Cecily's Reviews > The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (Chronicles of Narnia, #1)
by
by

Cecily's review
bookshelves: childrens, fantasy-faeries-magic, god-religion-faith, overrated
Jun 15, 2008
bookshelves: childrens, fantasy-faeries-magic, god-religion-faith, overrated
Read 2 times. Last read 2002.
Although raised as a Christian, I've long been an atheist and perhaps that's partly why I'm uncomfortable with this retelling of the life of Jesus as Aslan the lion. I have no objection to Bible stories as part of our culture and heritage, but this is more underhand.
As a child, I loved this series, even when I learned the metaphor. That was probably partly a reflection of my mother's enthusiasm, and it insulated me from the guilt and horror that some of the commenters below felt about Aslan's sacrifice.
Then I read it to my own child. I was increasingly uncomfortable, and fortunately, kiddo wasn't interested in my reading the rest of the series to them. It is too preachy, and the way Mr Tumnus lures Lucy to his lair doesn't feel right, despite his upstanding character. Nevertheless, we did see the 2005 film. Mr Tumnus was SO human - and naked (except for a little scarf) - from the waist up, that his taking Lucy home seemed even worse than on the page. Way worse.

Image: James McAvoy as Mr Tumnus and Georgie Henley as Lucy Pevensie ()
There are plenty of better written and more engaging stories in this genre, most of them without Lewis' agenda. As Michael cites below:
�Any amount of theology can now be smuggled into people's minds under the cover of fiction without their knowing it.� � C.S. Lewis
Lewis also wrote:
�No book is really worth reading at the age of ten which is not equally (and often far more) worth reading at the age of fifty � except, of course, books of information. The only imaginative works we ought to grow out of are those which it would have been better not to have read at all.� � CS Lewis, Of Other Worlds: Essays and Stories
I agree - but only because, for me, it would have been better not to have read this at all.
EDITED eleven and thirteen years after original brief review to take account of comments.
As a child, I loved this series, even when I learned the metaphor. That was probably partly a reflection of my mother's enthusiasm, and it insulated me from the guilt and horror that some of the commenters below felt about Aslan's sacrifice.
Then I read it to my own child. I was increasingly uncomfortable, and fortunately, kiddo wasn't interested in my reading the rest of the series to them. It is too preachy, and the way Mr Tumnus lures Lucy to his lair doesn't feel right, despite his upstanding character. Nevertheless, we did see the 2005 film. Mr Tumnus was SO human - and naked (except for a little scarf) - from the waist up, that his taking Lucy home seemed even worse than on the page. Way worse.

Image: James McAvoy as Mr Tumnus and Georgie Henley as Lucy Pevensie ()
There are plenty of better written and more engaging stories in this genre, most of them without Lewis' agenda. As Michael cites below:
�Any amount of theology can now be smuggled into people's minds under the cover of fiction without their knowing it.� � C.S. Lewis
Lewis also wrote:
�No book is really worth reading at the age of ten which is not equally (and often far more) worth reading at the age of fifty � except, of course, books of information. The only imaginative works we ought to grow out of are those which it would have been better not to have read at all.� � CS Lewis, Of Other Worlds: Essays and Stories
I agree - but only because, for me, it would have been better not to have read this at all.
EDITED eleven and thirteen years after original brief review to take account of comments.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
1975
–
Started Reading
1975
–
Finished Reading
2002
–
Started Reading
2002
–
Finished Reading
June 15, 2008
– Shelved
June 15, 2008
– Shelved as:
childrens
April 28, 2015
– Shelved as:
fantasy-faeries-magic
February 23, 2016
– Shelved as:
god-religion-faith
November 11, 2021
– Shelved as:
overrated
Comments Showing 1-50 of 127 (127 new)
message 1:
by
Jr
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Jun 03, 2013 08:04AM

reply
|
flag

As for Tumnus luring Lucy to his lair, it's a shame that a tiny number of paedophiles make it impossible for a decent, god-fearing, goat-footed, altruist, to help out a lost little girl without somebody calling out the Law.

I truly wish I wasn't so tainted by the world I live in that, as an adult, I saw it that way, but I am.
"the way Mr Tumnus lures Lucy to his lair doesn't feel right - despite his upstanding character."
I can see where that thought stems, it's unfortunate that society's worst stigmas can make seemingly innocent sequences feel a lot more sinister.
I can see where that thought stems, it's unfortunate that society's worst stigmas can make seemingly innocent sequences feel a lot more sinister.

I don't think it was that Mr. Tumnus who seemed sinister, but rather the image of Mr. Tumnus luring a lost Lucy into his home paints a frightfully unsettling picture.

For me, it was both, though the impression of the former was exacerbated in the film because he was SO human from the waist up, but naked (except for a little scarf?).




Cecily wrote: "Hi Kimber. I completely agree with what you say. The problem for me is that it doesn’t feel right, and seeing it on screen, that discomfort was all the greater."


Oh, that's even worse - or maybe not. Either way, on screen, it looked way too icky, and that overrode the message, I think.


I'm no acolyte, but I didn't know that. Thanks.

I know it's been a while since since you've read the book or thought about this review, but your review made me think of this book.

Thanks. I should perhaps not have given any rating at all: as a child it would have been 5*, but as a parent, 1*, and neither is really fair or meaningful.
Philip wrote: "I know it's been a while since since you've read the book or thought about this review made me think of this book."
Thanks for the link, and for your review. I'm not going to return to Narnia itself and am unlikely to read Miller's book, but I was glad to read some of her ideas, filtered through your own thoughts. It redeems my childhood memories a little, and that is soothing.


That's good to know. I take no pleasure in disliking a much-loved book, but it has enough fans that my opinion and yours won't dent that. And it's good for alternative opinions to be shared and discussed.


We all need joy and pleasure, especially at the moment. I'm glad this is a source for you.
(As it's 20 years since I read it as an adult, and much longer ago that I read them all as a child, I don't remember exactly when Aslan appears.)

(To any little girls who may happen to be reading this: if a charming half-naked man accosts you in the middle of a strange wood and asks you whether you'd like to come back to his place for tea, DO NOT accept his offer).


Little girls: be very, very wary of half-naked old goats. It doesn't matter how many sardines they're offering you.

That sounds more fun!
(As long as there are no human sacrifices!)

And yet a fully naked old goat is less alarming. It would just be a goat. But one in human clothing and language is a hybrid creature of maybe magical origin and possibly malign intent.

These two paragraphs of the Wiki page summarise it well:
I'm sure Google will find you dozens of essays, articles, and polemics that explore that aspect in far more detail.

It's a shame when happy childhood memories are shattered, but it's an inevitable consequence of growing up.

It's a shame when happy childhood memories are shattered, but it's an inevitable consequence of growing up."
So true. Do you think any of the Narnia animals recognized any old friends as fur coats on the kids? "Look, honey, it's Great-Grandma Beaver and our old neighbor Mr. Silver Fox!"

LOL. I never thought of that!

Greg wrote: "Do you think any of the Narnia animals recognized any old friends as fur coats on the kids? "Look, honey, it's Great-Grandma Beaver and our old neighbor Mr. Silver Fox!""
Not the coats exactly, but when I reread the Narnia books a couple years back, I was startled at the throwaway mention of the Cair Paravel treasure chambers containing ivory 😱

I'd forgotten that, but doubt it made a big impression on me: I certainly don't approve, but I know it was commonly and legally traded for centuries, including when the book was written.
Cendaquenta wrote: "just stumbled across this, hope I'm not butting in..."
The more comments, the merrier.


I read The Hiding Place in my teens, but remember the gist. That's a thought-provoking way to look at her book and at Lewis. Thanks, Kevin.

/review/show...

Correct. If you try to post a comment containing a URL that isn't on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ, you get this error:
1 error prohibited this comment from being saved:
For the safety of our members, links to other sites are not allowed in comments. Please edit your comment and try again.
It's very annoying, and the wrong and lazy solution to spam comments. When I've reported accounts that post only spam, repeatedly, it's often more than 24 hours before they're removed, if at all.

That's quite a debate. Thanks for the link, Kevin.


Now wouldn't that have floored poor Lewis?


"As for any inner meaning or ‘message,� it has in the intention of the author none. It is neither allegorical nor topical�. I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence."
� J.R.R. Tolkien (Foreword to the second edition of The Lord of the Rings).

I have read some rather disparaging comments on at least one of your wonderful reviews (you know which one I’m talking about 🙂)..."
Kevin, I know the review you mean, and I’m glad it had open comments, but I guess I’m fortunate the comments all remained civil. The only review I’ve had offensive comments on (directed at another commenter, not me) was my Hunger Games one.

Nocturnalix, that certainly is a “fun fact�. Thanks for sharing it.