Luffy Sempai's Reviews > Dracula
Dracula
by
by

** spoiler alert **
Dracula, the book, struck a chord with me. In it was a fight between good and evil. Modern vampires have great seduction powers. I never liked that. I also didn't like vampires in many Urban Fantasy books. The Hollows series spring to mind. The greatest change in the villainous vampires arises in Anne Rice's books. It was a perfect case study of an idea done to the death.
In Dracula, several people record their impressions. I 'pretend' to know that the women in the books, Lucy and Mina, have the same voice. Maybe the men are slightly different. They possess greater vocabulary, such as Lord Godalming's, and Jonathan Harker's recollections. Van Helsing, being a foreigner has his mistakes in grammar, and therefore has the most unique voice.
Throughout the book, we don't see the vampire Dracula triumph much. Except maybe when he turns Lucy into an undead. But even then, through the guiding hands and the knowledge of van Helsing, she is freed from her shackles. But Jonathan escapes from his imprisonment. And the vampire cannot settle in London. He was found out by our 'A-team' and had to flee for his life. He expresses baffled malignity.
It is the testament to Bram Stoker's neatness that I could follow most of the story. And I'm in awe of his mind, which chronicles the entire story via journal entries (or phonograph recordings in the case of John Steward), all of which are dated. I don't mean outdated, but dated, day after day. And I mourned the death of Quincy Morris, gallant to the end, dying with a smile on his lips.
The entire book defies what happens in movies and series (of which latter I've watched only True Blood). Most people don't read books regularly. So their idea of the vampire comes from horror movies. And Boris Karloff and especially Bela Lugosi as vampires are etched in the minds of most people. I don't think cinephiles will get any influence from the 1992 movie directed by Francis Ford Coppola. That was a mess. The book still stands proud. As it should. Thus ends my review on 02 Sep 2018.
In Dracula, several people record their impressions. I 'pretend' to know that the women in the books, Lucy and Mina, have the same voice. Maybe the men are slightly different. They possess greater vocabulary, such as Lord Godalming's, and Jonathan Harker's recollections. Van Helsing, being a foreigner has his mistakes in grammar, and therefore has the most unique voice.
Throughout the book, we don't see the vampire Dracula triumph much. Except maybe when he turns Lucy into an undead. But even then, through the guiding hands and the knowledge of van Helsing, she is freed from her shackles. But Jonathan escapes from his imprisonment. And the vampire cannot settle in London. He was found out by our 'A-team' and had to flee for his life. He expresses baffled malignity.
It is the testament to Bram Stoker's neatness that I could follow most of the story. And I'm in awe of his mind, which chronicles the entire story via journal entries (or phonograph recordings in the case of John Steward), all of which are dated. I don't mean outdated, but dated, day after day. And I mourned the death of Quincy Morris, gallant to the end, dying with a smile on his lips.
The entire book defies what happens in movies and series (of which latter I've watched only True Blood). Most people don't read books regularly. So their idea of the vampire comes from horror movies. And Boris Karloff and especially Bela Lugosi as vampires are etched in the minds of most people. I don't think cinephiles will get any influence from the 1992 movie directed by Francis Ford Coppola. That was a mess. The book still stands proud. As it should. Thus ends my review on 02 Sep 2018.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Dracula.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 24, 2018
–
Started Reading
August 24, 2018
– Shelved
September 2, 2018
–
Finished Reading
August 11, 2020
– Shelved as:
5-star
Comments Showing 1-32 of 32 (32 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Bionic Jean
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Sep 02, 2018 01:44AM

reply
|
flag



Thanks Felicia. I too have never read this extended version. Most of the book was known to me a decade ago.

Thanks, Paula! It was formulated in a very modern way.


Thank you, Debra! I'm happy for you, and, whatever the book, happy reading to you.

Thank you, Rita! I suppose I should be fascinated by female vampires, but they never seem to be the big boss of their respected books, occasional book aside.


Thank you, Beverly! Glad that you see it that manner. You put it in a way of your own too. I think the quality of the book that inspired me to write this review.

Yes, it is a great book and I am glad you wrote your review, Luffy. I like new perspectives on books, especially ones I love.


Thanks, Tammy! I didn't know that! I'll look into this recommendation soon.



Thank you, Mackey! I can't write every review with the same level of quality but anyway, I appreciate your quasi recommendation.


Thank you, Gina! I read Dracula a lot when I had no computer and no internet. I still can read the book. The 1992 movie, forget it.

Glad to hear you enjoyed!

Glad to hear you enjoyed!"
This is a quaint insight of yours. Nobody else has seen it this way. I read this for a book club read recently. Thanks for the contribution to my review!

Thanks, Kimber, love to hear from you! The book is indeed praiseworthy.