ŷ

BlackOxford's Reviews > We Have Always Lived in the Castle

We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
17744555
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: american

High Gothic Art

Hawthorne, Poe, Lovecraft, and even James: Jackson is in their company when it comes to the Gothic genre. She writes in noir et blanc; every word is necessary; the context is revealed at just the right continuous pace; and there is plenty to reveal. No gimmicks, no spiritualist allusions, no unlikely situations: Jackson puts later writers like Stephen King to shame with her talent and wit.

Someone is a homicidal maniac, but which of the Blackwood sisters is it? The traumatized and agoraphobic Constance, or the obsessive-compulsive and more than slightly mad Mary Katherine? Or perhaps it’s the wheelchair-ridden Uncle Julian who fades in and out of dementia? The victims had their own problems, genetic as well as domestic; who knows but they did each other in. An accident is a possibility - perhaps the ancestors left some lethal material around. Then again, the ‘villagers� are not a very stable bunch; nor for that matter are the ladies of the local gentry who have more than a morbid curiosity in the family Blackwood. When the sinister cousin Charles come to visit, the question becomes more than academic.

The village itself is part of the mystery. How did it arise as what keeps it going economically? What is the cause of the animosity among the ‘leading families�? Why is the finest house in the village, which should be owned by the Blackwood’s, now a junkyard? There is no uncertainty that the village has some distinctive mores: “In this village the men stayed young and did the gossiping and the women aged with grey evil weariness and stood silently waiting for the men to get up and come home.� Jackson piles on the complexity at the same rate that she reveals the situation. For every question answered, two more are posed. The first person narrator might be either insane or acutely insightful. It’s a technique guaranteed to keep the reader’s interest.

It’s also a technique which creates a narrative world amazingly efficiently. The questions of the reader are the things the characters themselves are concerned about. The stance of each, his or her position in the puzzle, is who they are. Little further description is necessary. Strangely, how they fit with other is enough for the reader to imagine what they look like, how they dress, what the landscape is like. For example, Jackson characterises the entire village without specifying anything: “All of the village was of a piece, a time, and a style; it was as though the people needed the ugliness of the village, and fed on it.� She adds nothing but a terse negative formula: “whatever planned to be colorful lost its heart quickly in the village.� Nothing more is needed. She provokes participation by the reader who fills in the descriptive gaps like the eye automatically interprets perspective.

This is more than genre horror or fantasy. Jackson writes literary fiction. This is her masterpiece.
214 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read We Have Always Lived in the Castle.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 24, 2018 – Shelved as: to-read
August 24, 2018 – Shelved
Started Reading
August 28, 2018 – Shelved as: american
August 28, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Michael Wonderful and perceptive review of a fantastic novel. I agree wholeheartedly that this is Shirley Jackson at her brilliant best. You are right to point to the amazing economy of her prose. This is, I think, what distinguishes her two great novels (Castle and The Haunting of Hill House) from her earlier (and still very fine) work. There is not a single unnecessary word in these books. They're quite the literary concoctions. I continually marvel at how she manages to evoke so much with so little. And yet the prose isn't spare or stripped down; it's full of perfect evocative words.


BlackOxford Michael wrote: "Wonderful and perceptive review of a fantastic novel. I agree wholeheartedly that this is Shirley Jackson at her brilliant best. You are right to point to the amazing economy of her prose. This is,..."

Thanks Michael. I have yet to read Hill House so I shall get on it. By the way, the GR gnome in the machine is doing something strange to you in Compare Books. Our shared books show up, but any attempt to read your reviews generates only the one on Pynchon’s Mason & Dixon over and over. Tres strange.


Stephen I seem to be one of the few that missed the amazing in this book. Having re-read part of it, I still don't get it. You see quite enamored of the setting--the ruined village. The US is littered with places like this, once industrious towns with a few very wealthy manors all gone to ruin when the local industry (railroads, timber, steel, etc.) perished. To each his own. I remain disappointed.


Michael BlackOxford wrote: "Michael wrote: "Wonderful and perceptive review of a fantastic novel. I agree wholeheartedly that this is Shirley Jackson at her brilliant best. You are right to point to the amazing economy of her..."
BlackOxford, I think you'll very much enjoy The Haunting of Hill House, which has a similar quality of prose. I did an in-depth review of it here on GR, which I'd suggest only reading afterwards, as it does contain some spoilers. By the way, the same odd thing happens when I do the Compare Books with you. I keep getting your rating for Mason & Dixon. Why that novel? I have no idea. I mean it's a brilliant novel, to be sure, but...it's strange. Still I'm glad to see that we have so many books in common.


BlackOxford Michael wrote: "BlackOxford wrote: "Michael wrote: "Wonderful and perceptive review of a fantastic novel. I agree wholeheartedly that this is Shirley Jackson at her brilliant best. You are right to point to the am..."

Must be a temporary glitch. I’ll check back later.


BlackOxford Stephen wrote: "I seem to be one of the few that missed the amazing in this book. Having re-read part of it, I still don't get it. You see quite enamored of the setting--the ruined village. The US is littered with..."

You’re right of course - different criteria result in different judgments. But I can’t quite grasp the dominant significance of her describing the typical declining small town in America. Either she didn’t intend that, in which case it’s incidental; or she did, in which case it could well be an interesting allegory with some prescient interpretations. Charles as Trump for example.


Mizuki great review.


BlackOxford Mizuki wrote: "great review."

Thanks Mizuki.


H (no longer expecting notifications) Balikov I agree, BO. "Hawthorne, Poe, Lovecraft, and even James," Jackson is probably the most succinct at being able to achieve those deeply disturbing effects. Thanks for reminding me of this fine effort.


BlackOxford HBalikov wrote: "I agree, BO. "Hawthorne, Poe, Lovecraft, and even James," Jackson is probably the most succinct at being able to achieve those deeply disturbing effects. Thanks for reminding me of this fine effort."

And thank you for affirming my impression of her. It’s good not to be alone.


message 11: by Nichole (new)

Nichole I really liked this review, BO! This will be my Halloween read (I think).


Lorie How true, not one word is wasted! Love your review!


BlackOxford Lorie wrote: "How true, not one word is wasted! Love your review!"

Thank you Lorie.


Paltia It is her masterpiece. I first read it @12 years after being harassed by the librarian to keep out of the grown up section of the library. I’ve read it since then several times. Has never lost it’s wonder. Lovely review, as usual.🥀


BlackOxford Paltia wrote: "It is her masterpiece. I first read it @12 years after being harassed by the librarian to keep out of the grown up section of the library. I’ve read it since then several times. Has never lost it’s..."

Thanks, Paltia. I think so too. But I’ve only read it the once so far.🤷‍♂�


Caterina Yes. She was brilliant. And underrecognized for a long time. Insightful review, and thanks for bringing her to more readers' attention.


BlackOxford Caterina wrote: "Yes. She was brilliant. And underrecognized for a long time. Insightful review, and thanks for bringing her to more readers' attention."

You’re right of course. I hadn’t known her before last year. Classic writer.


message 18: by Mohammed (new)

Mohammed Jackson is fixated on old, majestic mansions. She's good at utilizing them, though.
Great Review!


message 19: by BlackOxford (last edited Mar 03, 2019 10:56PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

BlackOxford Mohammed wrote: "Jackson is fixated on old, majestic mansions. She's good at utilizing them, though.
Great Review!"


Like me. I suppose we gravitate toward our subliminal interests. She’s a strange attractor as they say in Chaos Theory.


message 20: by Sherril (new) - added it

Sherril I was about to buy this on BookBub for $1.99 and thought I’d look for reviews first, not knowing if it was one of Shirley Jackson’s better known books. You have called it her best and I clicked on buy. Thanks.


BlackOxford Sherril wrote: "I was about to buy this on BookBub for $1.99 and thought I’d look for reviews first, not knowing if it was one of Shirley Jackson’s better known books. You have called it her best and I clicked on ..."

I’m happy that my liability only extends to $1.99. Good luck with the book.


message 22: by Lars (new) - added it

Lars Jerlach Wonderful review once again BlackOxford. I'll move it up to the top of my list.


BlackOxford Lars wrote: "Wonderful review once again BlackOxford. I'll move it up to the top of my list."

A must read, Lars. The woman knew her trade.


message 24: by Mike (new) - added it

Mike I'm with Lars on this one. Have to make some time to track down a copy of this for myself. Terrific review and exposure on writing style.


BlackOxford Mike wrote: "I'm with Lars on this one. Have to make some time to track down a copy of this for myself. Terrific review and exposure on writing style."

I think she’s unique. Enjoy.


Tracy What a great review. I really enjoyed this, her writing is so clear and concise and quite frankly creepy.


BlackOxford Tracy wrote: "What a great review. I really enjoyed this, her writing is so clear and concise and quite frankly creepy."

Yes, creepiness can be delicious, can’t it?


message 28: by JimZ (new) - rated it 5 stars

JimZ How did I ever not read this until yesterday?! A sheltered life I must lead. :(


BlackOxford JimZ wrote: "How did I ever not read this until yesterday?! A sheltered life I must lead. :("

I often feel exactly like that as well. I suppose that only when we reach a certain age we understand the depths of ignorance.


Lesley R M Excellent review! This was my first Jackson’s book and I loved it! Merricat as main protagonist captured my heart!


BlackOxford Lesley wrote: "Excellent review! This was my first Jackson’s book and I loved it! Merricat as main protagonist captured my heart!"

Thanks, Lesley. A great writer who never fades.


back to top