ŷ

MischaS_'s Reviews > Romanov

Romanov by Nadine Brandes
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
12772859
***Advance Review Copy generously provided through NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.


The Romanov family fascinates people for a century. Well, mainly their end does.
And I was curious what Nadine Brandes would do with the story. And mainly how she's going to end the story, that's what I'm always curious to see.

I believe that the book had great potential. However, it seems a bit like a miss. Like the story is always the one note away for me to really enjoy. But it's still an enjoyable read, and I think that you won't be disappointed reading this.

Roughly the first 60% follow the Romanov family from Tobolsk to Ekateringburg. Here, it seems very precise. The author then said that she did a lot of research. However, it seemed like she mainly used the Wikipedia article about the Execution of the Romanov family. There are some sentences that seem very similar. Or they might have the same source. (No judgement, only stating my subjective feeling).
However, the result is that it seems a bit textbook said from the POV of a teen girl. And I'm not sure this is the desired result.

Then the last 40% is a fiction. Following the myth that Anastasia and fully developing the fantasy element of this book.

Strangely enough, I prefer the textbook beginning. Why? Because it at least makes sense. Unfortunately, the author seems to be lost when she suddenly does not have a history to follow. What to do now? And suddenly there are so many problems for me to unsee.

I have several things I need/want to point out.

- There is a lot of Russian words used to describe things. Budenovka, fortochka, droshky. I understand all of them. But, I really doubt that someone who does not speak a Slavic language will know all of them. And unfortunately, it is not a good thing to be forced to google things, especially in fantasy. Also, I saw that several times the Russian was done wrong as well. In a basic sentences. If I remember correctly the "Good morning" was wrong.

- The Romanov family was shown as the nicest people ever. And while I understand that of course, Anastasia would love her parents... It does not work. The author claims extensive research, but here I believe she fails. Nikolai was very much a family man who loved his wife and children. But, he was a very bad tsar. Meek. Under the influence of his wife who was HATED by the Russian people. But here Nikolai is suddenly the perfect leader who leads his family and supposedly was a devoted leader to his people. It seems fake. Romanticised. (But I have to say that I loved the relationship in the family! Well written).

- The book should have started at a different point; not everyone is familiar with the Revolution and the Romanov family. If the book started maybe with the abdication, it would make more sense. Explain why Nikolai was forced to abdicate. Why people hated him and his wife. Explain Bolsheviks, Mensheviks. Why the revolution started, how badly the Russian people were affected by the First World War.
And I wish Grand Duke Michael was at least mentioned in the book.

-This is one of the problems. People need knowledge. One time Nicholai talks about his cousin King George V of the United Kingdom. But he does not say his name and people are left guessing. Or confused. (view spoiler)

- There is a lot of talk about the White Army, but once again I felt like it was very confusing unless you know the history. And by the way, correct me if I'm mistaken. But wasn't it the Czechoslovak legion that was reaching Ekaterinburg? They were going East so that they could go back to Czechoslovakia if I remember correctly.

- Also, Maria went with her parents first and once they left her sisters sewed the jewels in their dress. So, how is it possible that Maria wore jewellery in her dress as well in the end? The jewels had to be put there before leaving Tobolsk but they started to do it once Maria left.

- Do I have any Russian friends here? If yes, please, help me here. Zash. I'm really confused by the name. I know the name Zasha exists, but I never saw Zash. I know that защитник (zashchitnik) means defender. But is there Zash as a name?

- Also, Zash is supposed to be from an aboriginal tribe from Siberia, but his description makes him sound more Scandinavian than Siberian.

- Talking about Zash. (view spoiler)

(view spoiler)

- And the ending: (view spoiler)

- Also, Anastasia is injured if only cracked ribs, but she was starved for months with a minimum of exercise. She's wearing a skirt, corset and heavy coat. But suddenly she's able to walk for a day while carrying her brother. Then she manages to jump out of the train on a horse and then from horse to the train... Oh, I almost forgot, MOVING train. I'm saying no. Making her a superhero is stupid and I hated this part.

- The problem with this book is simple. It tries very hard to be historically correct but always fails in small things which matter. And it does not work with the fantasy element. I want to believe that if it was fantasy all along, different names, different family, setting it might have worked. This book needs to be more fantasy, or more historically correct, the mix right now is very in between and seems artificial.
407 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Romanov.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

January 7, 2019 – Shelved
February 22, 2019 – Started Reading
February 27, 2019 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 66 (66 new)


message 1: by Maryam (new) - added it

Maryam Rz. hmmmmm, okay I've been wanting to read this, but I have a HUGE problem with books trying to be historically accurate and failing... research is one of the things I tale very seriously and now I'm not syre about this??
Great review though, love :))


MischaS_ @Mary, I think it's accurate in most times and failing only in little things. But for me the mix of historically accurate and fantasy was off. I think if the book started with Nicholai's abdications instead it would have worked way better.
Or there should have been way less accuracy and more fantasy. One or the other. (You can actually see that the author did a research and she relied heavily on it which I think it showed in the fictional part.)

But what I probably disliked the most was the portrait of the Romanovs. They almost seemed as a family of Mary Sues and Gary Stues. You know, the loving, selfless people who are just the best.

I don't know... Just did not work in this sense for me and it's hard for me to explain. I don't want to discourage anyone from reading this book. The balance of the book between "being historically accurate" and writing fiction was off for me. It should have been more one or the other. But it was a pleasurable read.


message 3: by Maryam (new) - added it

Maryam Rz. MischaS_ wrote: "@Mary, I think it's accurate in most times and failing only in little things. But for me the mix of historically accurate and fantasy was off. I think if the book started with Nicholai's abdication..."

I know what you mean, and OK then, I guess I'll read it to see what I think of it. I always love seeing how different my experience with a book might be! Thanks Mischa! Perfect analysis, loved reading it!


MischaS_ Mary wrote: "MischaS_ wrote: "@Mary, I think it's accurate in most times and failing only in little things. But for me the mix of historically accurate and fantasy was off. I think if the book started with Nich..."

Great to hear that. :)

Btw, I guess you do not speak any Slavic language. Can you understand these words without googling them? Budenovka, fortochka, droshky.

And I'm looking forward to your review. Excited to see what you'll think and what you'll think about the historical part. 🤗


message 5: by Maryam (new) - added it

Maryam Rz. MischaS_ wrote: "Btw, I guess you do not speak any Slavic language. Can you understand these words without googling them? Budenovka, fortochka, droshky."

Nope, that I don't. However, I've got no problem with googling stuff. I would literally LIVE in Google if I could. my Google Assistant and all my Google apps are in 24/7 use. Yes, I'm a weird Google-stan...

And thanks! I'll see when I manage to defeat the unstoppable onslaught of my crushing ruthless tbr and get to this!


MischaS_ @Mary, thank you for the answer. :D I was just wondering if people would understand to them. I was really surprised to see them there. :D

Haha, Google the saviour. 😂 I call myself the Google Generation.😂

Hahha, you tell me about it. My tbr pile is endless!


message 7: by Maryam (new) - added it

Maryam Rz. MischaS_ wrote: "@Mary, thank you for the answer. :D I was just wondering if people would understand to them. I was really surprised to see them there. :D

Haha, Google the saviour. 😂 I call myself the Google Gene..."


😂😂😂 that we all are!


message 8: by Monique (new)

Monique Great review, Mischa! I often have a problem with historical novels because of romanticized or inaccurate events.


MischaS_ @Monique, great to hear that I'm not the only one. I think if it was more "inspired by the end of the Romanovs" it would have been way better.


message 10: by Holly (new)

Holly I really can't do historic based fantasy retellings of major historical figures as characters - because I just get annoyed by every part that isn't accurate to the real history. Or I end up wishing the book was more fantasy/fiction and not held to the lines of the real life event at all. It's just a bad combination - either write a non-fiction book about the real historical events, or take historical events to inspire a completely fictional story with all new characters/names. Maybe that's just me.


MischaS_ @Holly, yes! YES! I so much agree! If it was inspired by the end of the Romanov family, the characters were named differently and it did not claim to be historically correct with the very much Russian setting with the Bolsheviks I would be okay with it!
This really needs more fiction.


Viburnum (hiatus) Wonderful review, Mischa! Totally agree with you about this book and about how the fantasy elements didn't really work out. Interesting to read, but overall, the execution wasn't very good :/


MischaS_ Vibur wrote: "Wonderful review, Mischa! Totally agree with you about this book and about how the fantasy elements didn't really work out. Interesting to read, but overall, the execution wasn't very good :/"

Thank you so much. 🤗 Great to hear that you agree about the fantasy elements... I was not sure if I managed to write it coherently enough.
And I'm so sad because it could have been so much better. If the author really talked/Showed the revolution, integrated the fantasy more into the story... This almost feels like the first draft of the story.


message 14: by noa (new) - rated it 2 stars

noa You make a LOT of very good points and I agree with most if not all of them. This book really wasn't my cup of tea and I'm so disappointed. I studied Russian History last semester which is why I had a "basic" understanding of the events taking place but I would've been 100% confused otherwise. Great review ! x


MischaS_ Noa ☁️ wrote: "You make a LOT of very good points and I agree with most if not all of them. This book really wasn't my cup of tea, and I'm so disappointed. I studied Russian History last semester which is why I ha..."

🌺 Thank you so much. Yeah, I got the feeling... I know quite a bit about Russian history, and the Bolshevik revolution is taught even during some time in Primary school or maybe High School... not sure right now. But I had the knowledge (plus a basic understanding of Russian language), and I felt like without the knowledge I would be lost.
I felt like the author did not really explain why and how the revolution happened, who the Bolsheviks were and what they wanted. Except for being the bad guys and the Tsar being picture perfect which he was very far from.


message 16: by noa (new) - rated it 2 stars

noa MischaS_ wrote: "Noa ☁️ wrote: "You make a LOT of very good points and I agree with most if not all of them. This book really wasn't my cup of tea, and I'm so disappointed. I studied Russian History last semester w..."

Yesss ! I thought that it was a very black and white story with the good vs. the bad guys. I didn't like that portrayal because imo it obliterated a lot of very important facts from that time (like you said, Nikolai WAS NOT a good tsar or how miserable the Russian people were).


MischaS_ Noa ☁️ wrote: "MischaS_ wrote: "Noa ☁️ wrote: "You make a LOT of very good points and I agree with most if not all of them. This book really wasn't my cup of tea, and I'm so disappointed. I studied Russian Histor..."

"very black and white story " very well said! And it actually hurt the story with the "We are sooooo good and they still want to hurt us because they are misguided."

It was just so strange, the author tried to be historically correct on very stupid things which caused that during 60% of the book almost nothing happened and then she failed with the portrait of the Romanov family and mainly with the tsar. I get it, it was said from the point of view of a daughter who loved her father. But still the "oh, he cared so much about the people! He loved them so much. He was sooo great" was tedious and resulted in many eye-rolls.


message 18: by noa (new) - rated it 2 stars

noa MischaS_ wrote: "Noa ☁️ wrote: "MischaS_ wrote: "Noa ☁️ wrote: "You make a LOT of very good points and I agree with most if not all of them. This book really wasn't my cup of tea, and I'm so disappointed. I studied..."

YES YES YES !!! Overall really disappointed because in theory, the whole Anastasia story could've been really amazing :-( Also what you said about Zash, I 100% agree with. That love story came out of nowhere ?


MischaS_ Noa ☁️ wrote: "MischaS_ wrote: "Noa ☁️ wrote: "MischaS_ wrote: "Noa ☁️ wrote: "You make a LOT of very good points and I agree with most if not all of them. This book really wasn't my cup of tea, and I'm so disapp..."

It could have been amazing! If the author actually covered the revolution. If 60% of the book were not spend in a house with a seemingly perfect family who did nothing wrong. This needed to be more historical or less historical. Because the mix does not work.
And I would actually love to read historical fiction with fantasy elements how the Romanovs were forced to abdicate. How the tsar wanted to pass the throne to Grand Duke Michael. Why all the books focus on them being locked up in a house?

I'm always curious how authors will work with the "did Anastasia survive?" element and I'm sorry to say here it was hardly original. (😳 The more I talk about this book the more I think it was worse than I previously thought).

And YES! The romance was strange, I can get a friendship. But romance? What? How? When?
I'm also unsure about Zash's character... He feels strange in the story, out of place, I'm not sure about how the author described him. Not certain about the name.


message 20: by Shannon (new) - added it

Shannon This is a great review! I prefer reading this than the book 😁 but seriously, I have high expectation for this one but I kept hearing similar things. Thank goodness I can use my time to read other books


MischaS_ Shannon (discoverelysian) wrote: "This is a great review! I prefer reading this than the book 😁 but seriously, I have high expectation for this one but I kept hearing similar things. Thank goodness I can use my time to read other b..."

Thank you so much. And yes, I was very much excited about this book. But the disappointment is real. I cannot with good conscience recommend it. There better Anastasia retellings and there are better factual books about the Romanovs. This tried to be both and of course, it had to fail on both as well.

I'm actually looking for a good review of this book from a Russian reader, I bet they will have much more to say about this book.


➦Paulette & Her Sexy Alphas❥ 📖A great review L💕ve- sorry it was a miss for you


MischaS_ ❤️ Paulette wrote: "📖A great review L💕ve- sorry it was a miss for you"

Thank you, love. 🌺 It unfortunately was. Anastasia is a fascination for so many people but authors do not really know what to do with her story. They have troubles deciding if they want to go more fiction or more historical route and usually they got lost. As it happened here.


message 24: by Virginia Ronan (new)

Virginia Ronan ♥ Herondale ♥ Great review, Mischa! I love that you wrote a little bit about the historical details too. 😊


➦Paulette & Her Sexy Alphas❥ MischaS_ wrote: "❤️ Paulette wrote: "📖A great review L💕ve- sorry it was a miss for you"

Thank you, love. 🌺 It unfortunately was. Anastasia is a fascination for so many people but authors do not really know what to..."


Always Pleasure L💕ve � I kinda seen that in your review...Hopefully next read is better


message 26: by Dianne (new)

Dianne That really is a perfect review and now I won't waste my time getting an ARC and reading it or *gasp* paying for it and reading it!!!


MischaS_ @Dianne, in all honesty, I cannot recommend this book to anyone. 😔 Which I'm really sad about, expected greatness.


ℓуηη_σƒνєℳűяιѕ Love this review! It's so thorough and gives everyone a good forewarning about its flaws. I've been interested in the Romanovs since I was a kid & was looking forward to this book, but all I've seen are low rating reviews 😞 I may still give it a try, but keep my expectations low. Thanks for the heads up!


MischaS_ ℓуη�, ℓσкιѕℓутнєя¢ℓα� wrote: "Love this review! It's so thorough and gives everyone a good forewarning about its flaws. I've been interested in the Romanovs since I was a kid & was looking forward to this book, but all I've see..."

Thank you so much. I really tried with this one cause some things were a bit hard to voice. Glad to hear that I managed. 🤗
And yes, the Romanovs are a fascination... but for me, it was a bit confusing at first cause I learned about the history first and then I saw all those fairytales where Anastasia survived. It was confusing at first... but then I quite started to enjoy seeing what different people would do with the story. How original they would be. (Here? Not so much)
And yes, I was excited for this retelling (okay, not as much as for Blood Heir but we all know how that ended 😔) but I was disappointed.
But I don't definitely want to discourage you from reading it! You may enjoy it. :) And maybe the low expectations will help? :) Anyway, if you'll read it, please, let me know, I would be excited to read your thoughts!


message 30: by MiniMario (new)

MiniMario HAIIIIII


MischaS_ MiniMario wrote: "HAIIIIII"

MiniMario wrote: "hihihihihihihihihhhihihihi"

Hello. :) 🤗


message 32: by Queen Cronut (new) - added it

Queen Cronut I'm sorry this book wasn't very good :( I hope you read better books this year. I've been looking forward to reading this book but it's been getting lots of negative feedback


ℓуηη_σƒνєℳűяιѕ Don't worry, you haven't discouraged me from picking it up. I just might put it off for a time. But I'll definitely let you know what I think when I do read it ^_^


MischaS_ Queen Cronut wrote: "I'm sorry this book wasn't very good :( I hope you read better books this year. I've been looking forward to reading this book but it's been getting lots of negative feedback"

Thank you so much. 😍 And yes, this book was a disappointment I did not expect but so far my reading-year looks way better than I expected.
And actually, I was a bit surprised that I'm not the only one disappointed by this book.


MischaS_ ℓуη�, ℓσкιѕℓутнєя¢ℓα� wrote: "Don't worry, you haven't discouraged me from picking it up. I just might put it off for a time. But I'll definitely let you know what I think when I do read it ^_^"

Great to hear that!


Sunny Exactly what I thought!


MischaS_ @Sunny, yeah, it seems like a lot of people were let down by this book. However, I'm sorry to hear that you were one of them. :( (I sort of wait for someone to write me that they loved the book!)


Teodora Lipciuc Yes yes yes! Finally somebody who had the same issues with this book as I did! Everyone seems to love it and I'm just like??? No???


message 39: by Elise (new)

Elise Really great review. Will proceed with caution. I too wondered....what's gonna happen at the end? Thanks!!


MischaS_ Teodora wrote: "Yes yes yes! Finally somebody who had the same issues with this book as I did! Everyone seems to love it and I'm just like??? No???"

Hi, sorry for the late response, I missed your comment.

The more I think about it, I want to lower my rating. It was not a good book, I have more issues with it and I agree with you. However, the majority of reviews I saw (from my GR friends) seem to be a 3* where they think the book was just blah.


MischaS_ Elise wrote: "Really great review. Will proceed with caution. I too wondered....what's gonna happen at the end? Thanks!!"

I hope you'll like it more than I did! Please write to me what you're thoughts will be, I'm interested to see. 🤗


MischaS_ Elise wrote: "Really great review. Will proceed with caution. I too wondered....what's gonna happen at the end? Thanks!!"

Btw, not sure if that was a question in general or directed to me... but do you want to know what will happen at the end? Like a spoiler? 😉


Kat valentine ( Katsbookcornerreads) Excellent review!!💋👍💗😉


message 44: by [deleted user] (new)

It is an excellent review profound and all and very thought-provolking about fiction and facts . Besidesm there is a secret all along about the tragic event of an unfortunate rozal family Beautiful and sad at the same time and narrrations move on touching fliteenglz on parts of truth Thanks for liking A simple and honest woman


Christina Zash is probably just shortened from Zasha. My sister, Alexandra is called Sasha. But we often just say Sash.


MischaS_ Kat wrote: "Excellent review!!💋👍💗😉"

Thank you so much. 💕


MischaS_ Christina wrote: "Zash is probably just shortened from Zasha. My sister, Alexandra is called Sasha. But we often just say Sash."

... I feel stupid that I did not think about Zash being a short form or a diminutive for Zasha. 🤦‍♀�


lucia meets books What an incredible review Mischa! 😍
Honestly you review made me want to learn more about Romanov's history than the book itself lol. Since I didn't know much about it I got lost sometimes with the references (ex. The White Army) like you mentioned but I didn't pay much attention to it because I was expecting it to be explained later, it's so sad it didn't happen :/
I had no idea everyone hated the tsar's wife!


MischaS_ Luupi wrote: "What an incredible review Mischa! 😍
Honestly you review made me want to learn more about Romanov's history than the book itself lol. Since I didn't know much about it I got lost sometimes with the ..."


Thank you so much!

I'm not sure if I'm the best source, I do have some knowledge but mostly superficial.
But we talked about the White vs Red army back in high-school, so, I still remember some things. But then, I did think while reading it that it would be very confusing to those who knew nothing about it.
And yes she was not liked in Russia. She was German, did not knew the people or the country. Plus her devotion to Rasputin did not help at all.


Nataliya Spot-on review. To answer your question: Zash is not a name, at least not a Russian name. Sasha is (a diminutive of Alexander) but Zash is not.


« previous 1
back to top