Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

rivka's Reviews > Enchantment

Enchantment by Orson Scott Card
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
171430
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: osc

** spoiler alert ** (2.5 stars)

I first read this shortly after it was published. Unlike most other OSC books, I had not reread it . . . until now.

The problem is, that even though it is a marvelously written book, and I usually enjoy retellings/retoolings of old fairy tales, I find Enchantment very disturbing.

I know perfectly well why Ivan is Jewish: in 1970s Russia, it was certainly the easiest way to end up a refusenik! And what other non-Christian would make any sense in pre-1000 Russia? I get all of that. It makes perfect sense in the book's context.

But it means that I am meant to root for Ivan's marriage to Katerina, and against poor Ruthie. To root for a marriage that makes all his children non-Jews, completely lost to the Jewish people. (Not to mention be ok with his conversion to Christianity.)

Somehow, I can't imagine OSC ever making a character Mormon as a plot point.

So on the one hand, I would give this book 4 stars; and on the other point, I would give it 1. My actual rating is a compromise.
7 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Enchantment.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
May 1, 2000 – Finished Reading
July 4, 2007 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Kressel Housman My feelings exactly!


rivka I had no idea you read OSC.


Kressel Housman Actually, it's the first of his I've ever read, but my husband read two of his short stories aloud to me years ago, and I enjoyed both at the time.


rivka That your husband reads OSC I did know. ;)


Lyd's Archive (7/'15 to 6/'18) What do you mean by "making a character Mormon as one of his plot points?" I'm pretty sure the people of Taina are Orthodox.


rivka That sentence of my review is in the , as are most things people imagine (or in this case, I said "I can't imagine"). That means it is not something that is actually true.


back to top