ŷ

s.penkevich's Reviews > Roadside Picnic

Roadside Picnic by Arkady Strugatsky
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
6431467
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: sci-fi, philosophy

Intelligence is the ability of a living creature to perform pointless or unnatural acts.

While the prospect of finding intelligent life elsewhere in the universe has long captivated the human mind, we must also wonder if, when we do find it, those other beings will even bother with us. What if, perhaps, we were so insignificant on a grand scale that an alien visit would be nothing more than a a roadside picnic where we are merely ants to their stop. Such is the case in Roadside Picnic by Russian brothers Boris and Arkady Strugatsky where in the aftermath of this very scenario the earth is left with deadly “Zones� full of discarded alien refuge that people risk their lives—often dying in horrific fashion—to obtain. But will these objects be used to improve the world or be weaponized because, knowing human desires for profit and power �it’s possible that by randomly pulling chestnuts out of this fire, we’ll eventually stumble on something that will make life on Earth completely unbearable.� The novel is also the basic for the 1979 cult-classic film, , which draws on the set-up and several themes of the novel while taking its own philosophical journey. A tense, page-turner of a sci-fi novel that navigates philosophical and social quandaries with the grit and caustic characters of a noir, Roadside Picnic goes down with all the burn and delight of a harsh whiskey that leaves you reeling and coming back for more.

Intelligence is the ability to harness the powers of the surrounding world without destroying the said world.

When I first came across this novel, I opened it intending to read just a page or two and the next thing I knew I was 40 pages deep and had barely taken a breath as the opening chapter was so intense. For as heady and ponderous the book is, the action with its blend of horror and complex noir-like underhanded dealings will keep you eagerly turning pages. A lot happens and there are many surprise twists and turns, yet at the heart it is a deeply philosophical investigation on human nature in a hellish landscape where truth and the search for a divide between good and evil is a stumble through a fog of ambiguity. All of which is playing out against a backdrop of humanity confronted with being cosmically insignificant after the most monumental moment in human history passed by without humans even being acknowledged.

That's the Zone for you: come back with swag, a miracle; come back alive, success; come back with a patrol bullet in your ass, good luck; and everything else - that's fate.

Written in the Soviet Union, there is a distinct Cold War vibe permeating the novel, particularly around the topics of arms buildups and the restricted Zones where the aliens had landed being walled off. There are the “Stalkers� who sneak in at night to recover objects and sell them for profit, a high-stakes profession with a high body count and other side-effects that they only learn about once it is too late. The novel is rather episodic, spanning nearly a decade in the life of Redrick “Red� Schuhart, who works for a scientific research lab by day but over the course of the book is repeatedly pulled back into the gangster-esque underworld of the Stalkers in order to survive financially. Redrick is as hard drinking as he is hard living, dealing with the side-effects of exposure to The Zone that caused his child to be born covered in fur for which they lovingly nickname her “Monkey�, but as time passes she is slowly losing her humanity and become more animalistic. Not to mention the visit woke the dead and a zombie-like version of his dad is living in their apartment. But money talks and there is rumor of a golden sphere in The Zone that can grant wishes, but those who have used it tend to make selfish wishes or kill themselves after. But is it possible someone could wish for something to help everyone?

Man is born in order to think... Except that I don't believe that. I've never believed it, and I still don't believe it, and what man is born for -I have no idea. He's born, that's all. Scrapes by as best he can.

I quite enjoy how there are so many entertaining and bizarre details to this speculative future that just pass as natural—such as the walking dead—and aren’t addressed beyond just being the way things are. The book is very much about ordinary people living in extreme times but just accepting this as the world.
Screw the years—we don’t notice things change. We know that things change, we’ve been told since childhood that things change, we’ve witnessed things change ourselves many a time, and yet we’re still utterly incapable of noticing the moment that change comes—or we search for change in all the wrong places.

We also see Redrick as a sort of anti-conformity hero, accepting the world around him but always wanting to live by his own rules and desires to get away from all the rigamarole of society. But he’s trapped by his own lack of mobility in a world ruled by power and profit, by �decaying capitalism and triumphant bourgeois ideology.� He is always considering the ironies of like such as how �you need money so you don’t have to think about money,� and asking himself �what the hell are we all running around for, anyway? To make money? But what the hell do we need money for if all we do is run around making it?� His options for money seem decidedly immoral, such as the request to recover something known as ‘hell slime,� an ooze that dissolved an entire lab killing most inside and will undoubtedly be used as a weapon. In such a world, he questions if there can truly be ethical living. �This is the way I figure it: if a man works with you, he is always working for one of you, he is a slave and nothing else,� he says during an attempt to recruit his services, adding �I always wanted to be myself, on my own, so that I could spit at you all, at your boredom and despair.� With a few escape scenes (including out a bar as well as carrying a man who’s leg has been dissolved in The Zone), a prison sentence, and plenty of moments drinking away the stress of the day while cursing at authorities, Redrick is practically a noir hero.

First serialized in Russia in 1972, this edition is a re-translation by Olena Bormashenko () returning all the text removed by censors and includes a fascinating introduction by Ursula K. Le Guin. There is plenty of discourse on the perspective of the novel, and its Cold War attributes, being rather strangely apolitical yet still managing to touch on a lot of issues the ordinary person would consider during these times. For one, the Zones and the wall around them calls to mind the Berlin Wall and one could interpret the alien artifacts to be symbolic of Western culture and goods that would be smuggled back into Soviet territory. Additionally, some have argued the representation of capitalism in the novel could represent Soviet sensibilities, though this seems shoehorning an interpretation since critiquing the evils of capitalism is hardly uniquely Soviet even at the time.

This did, however, aid in the novel avoiding censorship, as Boris Stugatsky has noted �it was quite ideologically appropriate and certainly not dangerous� to Soviet censors, and the bits that were removed were more about language and “immoral behaviors�. On the other hand, Roland Boer discusses in his book Knockin' on Heaven's Door that the brothers being blacklisted for an unauthorized East German publication of their novel The Ugly Swans led many in the West to embrace them as Soviet dissidents and brought them into wide translation, though Boer argues this is a misinterpretation of their politics as well. In the introduction, Le Guin argues they are, instead, �indifferent to ideology� and that looking for a Cold War political divide in their books or in glorifying them as smuggling Soviet critiques through science fiction is to miss the point:
Bureaucrats and politicians, who can’t afford to cultivate their imaginations, tend to assume it’s all ray-guns and nonsense, good for children. A writer may have to be as blatantly critical of utopia as Zamyatin in We to bring the censor down upon him. The Strugatsky brothers were not blatant, and never (to my limited knowledge) directly critical of their government’s policies. What they did, which I found most admirable then and still do now, was to write as if they were indifferent to ideology—something many of us writers in the Western democracies had a hard time doing. They wrote as free men write.

Perhaps this is what makes this book so effortlessly invigorating and engaging: it is a look at humanity at a struggle against abuse of power and cosmic indifference without needing to divide into political camps and instead hope for the success of people instead of our destruction by those who seek to divide. Which there is plenty of here, particularly when Redrick knows governments want to obtain the ‘hell slime� in order to weaponize it for war. � And it’s not because they are more clever and cunning than we are. The world is just like that,� the Strugatsky’s write, �Man is like that. If it wasn’t the Visit, it would have been something else. Pigs can always find mud.� Someone is always paying for power, and there will always be someone to accept the payments even at risk of their own life. It seems society has cornered people in poverty and harsh conditions to ensure the supply of these folks is unending. Just look at the quick flash of arguments against minor student loan repayment aid in the US whining that it will lower military enlistment.

We merely don’t understand a thing, but they at least understand how much they don’t understand.

A primary theme in Roadside Picnic is our limits of knowledge and how that also plays into the obfuscation between what is good or evil. We have teams of scientists trying to learn what the Zone objects do and how to use them, occasionally finding uses for power sources and occasionally realizing they could be a devastating weapon. An incredible centerpiece in the novel is a discussion between one character and the scientist who’s radio broadcast about the alien visit begins the novel, a discussion that covers the meaning of intelligence, our minimal purpose in a vast universe and the hate of humanity as a whole. There is hope, however, that humanity will weather any storm, but the tragedy that many often die in order to get there.

Which leads us to the incredible final section of the book where Redrick is seeking the wish-fulfilling object. It becomes a marvelous parable on ethics, particularly as to reach the orb and make a wish, a human sacrifice is required. In this case, it is a rather innocent youth who is seeking the orb to wish for the salvation of all humanity which becomes a pretty grim moment that reminds me of the ways society often looks down at young activists. Can one who is able to obtain the orb and have their deepest wish be read by it actually have a wish for mass goodness in their heart? It also reminds me how frequently human sacrifice to curry the favor of the gods (and what is a wish-granting machine if not godlike) occurs in the history of human literature, from the story of Abraham and Isaac to Agamemnon murdering Iphigenia to appease the gods for good sailing weather. Curiously, the Book of Revelations is alluded to frequently in the novel, such as the resurrection of the dead and other “demonic� miracles, and the character Gutalin is quick to mention the objects as satanic and warn �the pale horse has been saddled,� and that �thou, of human flesh, whom Satan has seduced, who play with his toys and covert his treasures,� referring to The Zone.

The end is abrupt, yet beautifully so as ambiguity and interpretability is one of Roadside Picnic’s greatest strengths. It also lends itself to the beauty of the film adaptation, Stalker, which is largely concerned with the wish-granting golden orb and what truly lurks in the hearts of people as their greatest wishes. The film is shot in Estonia and primarily outside an abandoned hydroelectric plant and has incredibly powerful imagery in long shots (this edition of the book even uses a still from the film as the cover). The film imagery frequently draws comparisons to the zone around Chernobyl, though the disaster would happen several years after the film. Interestingly enough, following the success of the film and book the term Stalker became a popular neologism in Russia for people who guide others into dangerous or restricted areas.

Stalker (1979)--Watch the

I cannot recommend Roadside Picnic enough. This book comes swinging and lands each blow with such power and philosophical impact that I can’t help but love it. Imaginative, gritty, thought provoking and even rather humorous at times, this is certainly a favorite sci fi and book overall. Enter the Zone if you dare, and keep your wits about you.

5/5

Look into my soul, I know - everything you need is in there. It has to be. Because I've never sold my soul to anyone! It's mine, it's human! Figure out yourself what I want - because I know it can't be bad! The hell with it all, I just can't think of a thing other than those words of his - HAPPINESS, FREE, FOR EVERYONE, AND LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN!
172 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Roadside Picnic.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
April 20, 2019 – Shelved
June 11, 2023 – Shelved as: sci-fi
June 11, 2023 – Shelved as: philosophy

Comments Showing 1-34 of 34 (34 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Mir (new) - added it

Mir I've been meaning to read this one for a long time.


Sofija Amazing review! I had no idea the movie was based on a book. I struggled to get through the movie, but I'd love to read this.


s.penkevich Sofija wrote: "Amazing review! I had no idea the movie was based on a book. I struggled to get through the movie, but I'd love to read this."

Thank you so much! Ha yea, that movie is quite slow paced which is amusing to me because this was basically a page turner so I was surprised when I watched the movie (I enjoyed it still). but the two are so different that it will still feel fresh when you read the book. The movie is like…”In the spirit of� with a lot of similarities and same setting but basically different characters and original plot. Hope you enjoy!


message 4: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we find amoeba. For that matter, some think we may be already living in an alien "human zoo". We just don't know it or want to accept it.


s.penkevich Julio wrote: "S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we find amoeba. For that matter, some think we may be already living in an alien "huma..."

Ah Yea, probably true. I mean any civilization that could locate us would almost certainly be far more advanced. There is a really good Octavia Butler story about that, where the aliens are studying humans and accidentally killing them then finally one informs them that humans…you know, feel feelings and that it’s bad (the Irony later is that when she returns the humans treat her worse than the aliens who at least were harming by accident and not malice). Ha I always loved the Zoo scenes in Slaughterhouse 5, and how they are like why aren’t they mating.


message 6: by Nocturnalux (last edited Jun 12, 2023 07:31AM) (new) - added it

Nocturnalux I have been meaning to read this one for ages now. More recently, it came to my attention thanks to the light novel- turned into anime, Otherside Picnic. In which a lesbian couple explores a world very much like the one in this novel, as it was directly inspired by it, as the title hints at. It also combined Japanese urban legends which is a world of fun.

I haven't read the light novel, the anime is fine (first episode is topnotch but it ends up lagging a bit, and it seems there was a mistake in the order in which episodes were aired, leading to continuity instability), you might want to check it out!


s.penkevich Nocturnalux wrote: "I have been meaning to read this one for ages now. More recently, it came to my attention thanks to the light novel- turned into anime, Otherside Picnic. In which a lesbian couple explores a world ..."

Woah that sounds awesome. Otherside Picnic haha I love the play on words there! I like the idea of it combining the urban legends too, it’s a perfect story to adapt that way. I actually started a graphic novel of Carmilla today that infuses the story with Chinese mythologies, and so far it works pretty well in a modern setting. It’s fascinating to see how many different books and movies this one inspired, I guess that Metro 2033 book that was everywhere like a decade ago is directly inspired by this as well.
Thank you though I’ll look for that!


message 8: by Julio (last edited Jun 12, 2023 09:13AM) (new)

Julio Pino s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we find amoeba. For that matter, some think we may be already living in ..."
S.: Any physical contact between us and an advanced ET would probably lead to our collective death since they would have developed immunities to earth diseases but we could not stand theirs. (THE WAR OF THE WORLD in reverse.) Re communication: To paraphrase Wittgenstein, "If we could talk to ETs I'd doubt we would have anything interesting to say to them".


message 9: by Nocturnalux (last edited Jun 12, 2023 09:26AM) (new) - added it

Nocturnalux Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we find amoeba. For that matter, some think we may b..."

Gundam 00 tries to tackle this: (view spoiler)


message 10: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino Thanks, Nocturnalux: The first part of the SPOILER is just like the plot of DUNE. The second half is a TWILIGHT ZONE episode. Even in science fiction or allegory, you can't cheat logic. A human raised to god-like status could possibly communicate with advanced ET, but then he would be one of them. In fact, this theme is debated in the book STRANGE BRAINS, which I have reviewed on GR. A human with a 1,000 I.Q. might make grans scientific discoveries or simply become bored with all other humans.


message 11: by Iluvatar (new) - added it

Iluvatar . The movie is great and I would love to read this book. An additional tragic fact is that as result of shooting in the “Zone� the director and the two main actors died from lung cancer few years later because all of the pollution


message 12: by Nocturnalux (new) - added it

Nocturnalux Julio wrote: "Thanks, Nocturnalux: The first part of the SPOILER is just like the plot of DUNE. The second half is a TWILIGHT ZONE episode. Even in science fiction or allegory, you can't cheat logic. A human rai..."

Gundam 00 was taking most of its clues from 2001, even down to the way it downplayed its women. It's the kind of development that strikes me as juvenile, at best. Dune understood the tragedy inherent in this, Gundam 00 is entirely oblivious.
As for Dune, (view spoiler)


Alexander Peterhans The Strugatskys were truly great sci-fi writers, actually, just great writers in general. I've only read a small part of their work, but it's wholly original.


s.penkevich Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we find amoeba. For that matter, some think we may b..."

Yea that’s a good point. It’d be the Europeans bringing pox to the indigenous all over again. I thought that was really clever in Le Guin’s Dispossessed where right in the first chapter there is a small scene about vaccinations and explaining that different planets would have different diseases. Becky Chambers makes sure to accommodate that as well, which I enjoy (I suspect they learned from Le Guin, i want to write a whole essay on Chambers placing themselves as an heir to Le Guin though).

Ha true, and I doubt they’d be very interested in our politics.


s.penkevich Iluvatar wrote: "The movie is great and I would love to read this book. An additional tragic fact is that as result of shooting in the “Zone� the director and the two main actors died from lung cancer few years lat..."

Yea I need to see it again because I was sort of just hanging on for the ride the first time and need to rewatch that whole amazing discussion at the end again (the (view spoiler)) but that entire River sequence was amazing. Oh wow that’s wild. I just looked up a bit about that, thanks for the tip, and saw that most of the crew died fairly young. Bummer. Learning it was filmed in Estonia makes me want to rewatch November as well, the only Estonian film I think I’ve seen and wow was that wild and good.

But I hope you enjoy the book if you get to it! It’s definitely different enough to sort of separate the two at least in my mind and both are quite good


s.penkevich Alexander wrote: "The Strugatskys were truly great sci-fi writers, actually, just great writers in general. I've only read a small part of their work, but it's wholly original."

Yea I really need to read more of them! I have one somewhere I should find that. Wholly original is a great way to put it, this book was bonkers in the best way and always surprising.


message 17: by Iluvatar (new) - added it

Iluvatar . Did you read Solaris and watch the Tarkovsky adaptation? If not then you should


s.penkevich Iluvatar wrote: "Did you read Solaris and watch the Tarkovsky adaptation? If not then you should"

Ooo not yet, and I keep saying I need to or I’ve failed at being Polish if I never read Solaris haha. Hmm maybe I’ll make that my next book club choice so then we can all have an excuse to watch the movie.


message 19: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we find amoeba. For that matter, some ..."
I recently came across a provocative essay, S. The author argued that just as humans began to lose interest in religion, or at least Christianity, after the 17th century, one-day humanity will simply cease to take politics seriously. That may be happening now. The political rows I the U.S. may be the last gasp of a dying type of thought. Thomas Mann once wrote, "In our time the fate of man can only be depicted in political terms". He cited Brecht as a shining example. Today, the opposite is coming true. After politics, what?


s.penkevich Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we find amoeba. Fo..."

Oh interesting. Which, yea, as it stands now in the US the big “political� discussions amongst the public is far less academic politics and more culture wars (like “is it or is it not politically acceptable to hate this specific group of people and cause them harm�) but yea true, then what. I mean there’s the whole Toni Morrison argument that all art is political and if it doesn’t seem it that in itself is a political stance…so what else indeed.


message 21: by Nocturnalux (new) - added it

Nocturnalux s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "S.: Most astronomers are of the opinion that an advanced ET civilization would find us about as interesting as we f..."

Long before Toni Morrison, plenty of post-WWII European thinkers claimed that everything is political. In fact, if you were raised in "intellectual" circles with a leftist bent, you would have encountered this as something of a given fact. The French, in particular, were very fond of it.

I know that growing up, this was taken as pretty much for granted, at least in my mother's family who was almost as left leaning as it gets.


message 22: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino S. and Nocturalux: I had a recent discussion on this very point on GR over the novels and essays of V.S. Naipaul. One fellow argued, "Politics---the art of governance---should be kept away from art,---including literature---which studies the human condition". Huh? Politics is the art of everything. Who you fuck is a political act. Who the state decides you have the right to fuck is a political act. What you eat, or if you eat, is a political act. I'm not in favor of politicizing everything. I am in favor of exposing the political undercurrents of everything, joined in this task by everyone from Freyre to Foucalt.


message 23: by Brendan (new) - added it

Brendan Stalker is one of my favorite films, and you have just seriously strengthened my determination to read Roadside Picnic.


s.penkevich Brendan wrote: "Stalker is one of my favorite films, and you have just seriously strengthened my determination to read Roadside Picnic."

It’s like one of the most visually amazing films I’ve ever seen for sure. Hope you enjoy the book, would definitely recommend!


message 25: by Nocturnalux (last edited Jun 15, 2023 08:06AM) (new) - added it

Nocturnalux Julio wrote: "S. and Nocturalux: I had a recent discussion on this very point on GR over the novels and essays of V.S. Naipaul. One fellow argued, "Politics---the art of governance---should be kept away from art..."

I find this notion of "keeping politics from art" to be nothing but an excuse for regressive, conservative thinking to propagate itself. Because the people who want to do this are also pushing for a political schema, one in which the haves remain so, and so do the have nots. Only that is not perceived as "political" to them, because they are upholding the status quo, an endeavor that blends- almost by definition, come to think of it- with said status quo. And standing still is already going backward.

A very good example of the dangers this presents in Thomas Mann, who defended that the intellectual should not interfere with politics...and then WWII happened. He fortunately lived and grew enough to see the error of his ways.


message 26: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino Nocturnalux wrote: "Julio wrote: "S. and Nocturalux: I had a recent discussion on this very point on GR over the novels and essays of V.S. Naipaul. One fellow argued, "Politics---the art of governance---should be kept..."
quite so, Nocturlux: Apolitical people by definition are upholding the unjust status quo. Mann actually wrote a book entitled THOUGHTS OF AN APOLITICAL MAN. Later, he made up for it by giving a radio broadcast on Hitler entitled "This Man is My Brother", meaning all Germans, including Mann himself, were responsible for Hitler. In the US during the McCarthyite period, writers were persecuted for what they had written of the Soviet Union during World War II when the USSR was an ally. Neutrality is not an option when your house is burning. "The hottest spots in Hell are reserved for those who, in a time of crisis, do nothing".---Dante.


message 27: by Nocturnalux (last edited Jun 15, 2023 10:43AM) (new) - added it

Nocturnalux Mann was lucky that he survived the horror long enough to recant. If things had gone even slightly different, he would have been one of the many victims of the Nazi regime.

Because that what happens when you take apolitical stances to their logical conclusion.


message 28: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino Nocturnalux: How significant that Mann, after the war, chose to live in Switzerland than either of the two Germanies. He did the world a favor by declaring "Anti-Communism is the basic foolishness of our time". Brecht came to regret having settled in East Germany and during the 1953 worker's uprising in East Berlin against the Ulbricht regime expounded, "If the government has lost the confidence of the people it can always elect another people".


message 29: by Nocturnalux (last edited Jun 17, 2023 09:12PM) (new) - added it

Nocturnalux When asked about how the Holocaust and its attending horrors were ever possible, Primo Levi said that one of the reasons was a very low political literary. Most people were simply entirely clueless and thus very easily swayed when things began to go very wrong.
He includes himself in this, too, despite having joined a Partisan group so as to fight Mussolini. Ironically, when he was arrested, he figured that saying he was a Jew would get him more lenient treatment- as opposed to being a political criminal- since he was not aware that Hitler's racial laws had taken hold in Italy as well (although they were not applied as comprehensively; it was still enough for virtually everyone in the ghetto of Rome to be exterminated).

Knowing how to weave politics into art and literature is, of course, not something everyone can do with the same degree of effectiveness and one runs the risk of becoming too programmatic. But from there to simply renouncing political engagement as the default- and most correct- approach, strikes me as naïve, at best.

But it is very interesting how at times the obvious political angle is mostly- if not entirely lost- on a vast swath of readers. Take The Shadow of the Wind, for example, where a library of banned and forbidden books during Franco's regime is very obviously a critique of Fascism. Not only does the English blurb not even mention Franco- or the Spanish Civil War, it merely alludes to WWII- as virtually every single review I've seen on gr does not mention the regime either.

Interestingly enough, the Portuguese blurb does allude to Franco. Not by name but as "post-war darkness".

At times, it seems that English language translators do not trust their readers in these matters.


message 30: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino Very perceptive, Nocturnalux: Political literacy is something rare in the West, and has definitely gone into decline since the 1980s, exactly as upholders of the status quo would have it. I've been to Span with groups of American tourists and they know nothing of Franco, nor is he ever mentioned in American history textbooks. As for Portugal the colonial wars and their savagery made news on occasion in the early 1970s but not US support for those wars. As Levi showed, even intellectuals can be political naifs.


message 31: by Nocturnalux (new) - added it

Nocturnalux I had not given it enough thought but I wonder how much damage this kind of thinking does, in the long run.

This is how people end up routinely voting against their best interests. It is also how a considerable number of Trump voters express their support for a woman's right to choose. I guess it is simply not important enough to keep them from voting for someone who made it one of his points of policy to ban abortion...? And went on to pretty much do just that?

On a much, much smaller scale, I was taking part in a challenge here on gr, one of the tasks including reading a book that "honors" queen Elizabeth II. Upon my voicing concerns about "honoring" someone whose unelected role is deeply connected with colonial rule, was told I was being overly "political".
Somehow, coming up with a task including a literal head of state, who doubles as leader of a national church, is not political. But finding issue with the person and the monarchy in general, that is a political stance.
It's such a small thing, it really does not matter, but it points to a wider problem and the way in which this dichotomy affects everything.


message 32: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino You are right on the spot, Nocturlaux: Traditionally, authoritarian regimes tried to politicize the public. In the modern world, the opposite is the case: Apathy, cynicism, boredom, and chastising those who look for political undercurrents in everyday life has become the norm.


message 33: by Khalid (new) - added it

Khalid Abdul-Mumin Another beautiful review, I'll try to read this soon.


s.penkevich Khalid wrote: "Another beautiful review, I'll try to read this soon."

Thank you so much! Hope you enjoy i really love this one. Just recommended and sold this book to someone at work earlier this week even haha


back to top