Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Betsy's Reviews > City of Girls

City of Girls by Elizabeth Gilbert
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
8637462
's review

liked it

3 stars--It's okay, but I had some issues with it.

The basic premise is that Vivian, the 89-year-old narrator, is telling her life story to someone named Angela in the form of a letter.

I did love the level of historical detail included in this (mostly) WWII-era novel. Although "The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel" took place a bit later, I vividly pictured the characters running around a New York that looked something like it did in that TV show.


I appreciated Vivian's sense of humor--you know she doesn't take herself too seriously when she claims, "The only two things I've ever been good at in this world are sex and sewing." No, I wasn't holding my sides or belly laughing, but I did chuckle a lot.

Through the bulk of the novel, Vivian didn't grow or change much, but I think that's what Gilbert intended. For the most part, we're supposed to take Vivian at face value. For this reason, the big leaps forward in time bothered me a bit. It's hard to tell how or why Vivian develops when big chunks of time are left out of her story.

The other really big thing that kept me from enjoying City of Girls as much as I could have is that the text itself was prepared sloppily. I was *not* reading an ARC or galley, so the English should have been nearly perfect. In my version, there were lots of stray commas that really broke up the flow of sentences. No one's perfect, but this problem was so prevalent that it had a negative impact on the reading experience.

In addition, the text was mostly written in American English, but there were UK spellings thrown in at random. Gilbert is American, and her narrator is American. I got a US edition from my US public library, so there's no logical explanation for the weird inconsistency in the text. Maybe Penguin was trying to cut corners in the editing department?

City of Girls gets a down-the-middle 3 from me because there are worse ways to spend a few hours. It's an okay beach read that won't make anyone think too hard.
81 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read City of Girls.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 5, 2019 – Started Reading
June 5, 2019 – Shelved
June 6, 2019 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jane (new)

Jane What, do you have, against, the poor, comma??


Betsy Hahaha!

Something like this: What I have against her other sentences: That have colons everywhere: Followed by unnecessary capital letters.


message 3: by Jane (new)

Jane At least there were no apostrophe catastrophes?


Betsy And abominable alliteration was also absent.


message 5: by Jane (new)

Jane I'm out. You win :p


Betsy Jane wrote: "I'm out. You win :p"

Aw, but I still had...

And she was averse
To writing in verse ;)


message 7: by Jane (new)

Jane There must be more! I just can't think of them.


Dorothy It was boring. I cared little about any of the characters


Betsy Dorothy wrote: "It was boring. I cared little about any of the characters"
Yeah, I agree that it wasn't really anything to write home about!


message 10: by Holly (new)

Holly  B (slower pace!) Thanks for the review Betsy! Seems like a honest take.


Betsy Thanks, Holly! It's tough to write about the books that I think are just "meh." Much easier to gush or rip apart, haha!


message 12: by Joanna (new) - added it

Joanna Elm I have this one on my TBR list, and love this review. It mentions some specific details that I haven't seen in any other reviews. Thanks Betsy.


Betsy Thanks, Joanna! I hope the library got an updated digital edition that fixed some of those problems!


message 14: by Maria (new)

Maria Thanks for the review. I am 5 chapters in and really can't get into it.


Betsy Maria wrote: "Thanks for the review. I am 5 chapters in and really can't get into it."
You're welcome! I was pretty ambivalent the whole way through. It didn't bug me enough to quit, but it didn't hook me, either.


Betsy Nicola wrote: "Terrific review Betsy! I agree with you it’s hard to write reviews for books that made little or no impact on you ! 😊"

Thanks, Nicola! When I have strong opinions about a book one way or another, the words usually pour right out. With books like this, I stare at a blinking cursor for quite a while :p


message 17: by Jane (new)

Jane description


Betsy Jane wrote: ""

Haha did my spammer friend disappear too soon?
(I'm still laughing at this GIF, btw :P And if I open up the one that I left for your latest Activist Mommy troll, I still end up giggling!)


message 19: by Jane (new)

Jane Aww, your spammer friend had answers. Answers to life. All the problems. Totally legit.

Lol! I was so grateful that you popped up on Activist Mommy, 'cause I saw that and just didn't have my head in the game enough to come up with anything good!


Betsy Aw, probably needed to Perfect (His) English (TM) too :P

The Jesus GIF was totally a happy coincidence--I was just looking for a "regular" missed the point GIF, and I couldn't resist when I found that one because it was too freaking perfect! If I didn't find it, someone else would've--we got yer back when you were off the grid ;)


message 21: by Jane (new)

Jane Oh! I just realized my <3 reply to your Jesus GIF doesn't look to have stuck. Know that it was there not long after you posted ;)


Lihsa I agree. It wasn’t not as well written as some of her earlier works.


back to top