jessica's Reviews > Artemis
Artemis
by
by

this book is a masterclass for how male authors should never write a female character. like, never ever ever. i honestly have never read such terrible characterisation before and i can only think of two reasons for why that is.
� 1.5 stars
1. andy weir just copied what he wrote for mark in ‘the martian� and pasted it into this book. or,i think AW was just rushing through to quickly put out a book while he could ride on the success of ‘the martian� (the film) and stay relevant. i mean, just because he could write a book, does that really mean he should? especially when its so poor quality? the writing is extremely lacking, the plot is not interesting and is lazily thrown together, and jazz is one of the worst characters in the history of ever. i just, i am still so shocked that someone could write such a terrible character. i really dont know what to say.
2. andy weir has somehow managed to never meet a woman in his entire life.
� 1.5 stars
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Artemis.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
June 28, 2019
– Shelved as:
to-read
June 28, 2019
– Shelved
June 28, 2019
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
ash |
(new)
Jun 29, 2019 06:09AM

reply
|
flag


that makes sense! i have this problem where i am unable to dnf a book -- it eats at me to leave things unfinished so i have to force myself to do it just to say it's completed. lol



paula - ah, im sorry it didnt work out for you either! :(




i am not saying that men should never have female characters in their novels. you are correct - that is sexist.
what i am saying is jazz is a perfect example of how men should never portray female characters. she is unrealistic and inaccurate. i feel like i have the right to call out terrible characterisation when i see it.
that being said, i can see how my vague statement could lead to your confusion.

I'm wondering whether it's possible that Rosario Dawson's narration makes this book. I've looked at the quotes that people find horrible and thought about how maybe I wouldn't have been as forgiving if Dawson hadn't made them sound inconsequential. It could possibly be that the audiobook might be slightly better just for that reason, since reading aloud is a type of interpretation and her interpretation might be better than whatever was in Weir's head.


