Kristine's Reviews > The Giver
The Giver (The Giver, #1)
by
by

I've taught this book to my 6th graders nine years in a row. Once I realized that the book is actually a mystery, and not the bland sci-fi adventure it seemed at first skim, I loved it more and more each time. Nine years, two classes most years... 17 TIMES. I've come to see that the book isn't the story of a depressing utopia. It's the story of the relationship between the main characters the Giver, Jonas, and... I won't say her name. And of course, the baby Gabe.
Every year, as we read the book out loud together, I am amazed at details the students notice (things I've missed the previous 15 times), or questions they raise that lead to further insights for not just the class but ME. My God, the things they come up with, that I as an English major, or even me if I'd read this with a book club, could never have gone that far in depth.
As I began to more fully understand the book over the years, I was better able to guide their discussions, which helped them think more deeply about the book, and made me appreciate the book even more. And by "guide," I don't mean calm, controlled, teachery, "I already know the answer" talk.
My discussion techniques, simple:
--I'd stop the tape (books on tape are AWESOME- the narrator is always so much better than I could ever be) and say something like, "So, what do you think? Doesn't this seem a little WEIRD?" and off they'd go, bouncing ideas off each other until finally someone said something incredible, something no kid had thought of in the past nine years. Once I myself knew how to be interested in this book, I knew what might keep them hooked.
--Or, I myself would suddenly realize something new, and I'd stop reading and say, "OH MY GOD DID YOU GUYS GET WHAT THAT MEANT??? WHAT IT MIGHT MEAN????"
I feel free to participate myself, since I myself still have so many questions about the book. I'm not spoiling the ending when I bring up my own questions, because I know this book is a mystery in which things don't much get answered- they're left to linger, and that's part of the beauty and hopefulness in this book.
There are still lines, moments, in the book that give me chills. I wait for them greedily, just to hear the words spoken.
I feel lucky to have been forced to read this book a dozen times. There are other books I've read a lot with my students, and this is the one that most stands up over time, the only one that keeps my interest. I truly am on the edge of my seat to see what we will realize next. Because I've seen that, even if I think I have it all figured out, some kid is going to say something to rock my world.
I can't believe Lowry was able to make a book this clever; part of me thinks a work this good is impossible, and that we are just reading too much into it. But no, it's all there, all the pieces, and she put them there. I just don't see how could she have written such a tightly woven mystery- how could she have know all of the questions the book would raise? And you know what, she probably didn't. A book isn't like drawing a map. You make the world, and things happen. And in this case, she did make a perfect world. (I SO did not mean that as a UTOPIA PUN!!!!!!! I hate puns so much!!!!!! I mean, she so fully created that world where everything that happens is plausible.)
Just read the damn book, then call me.
Or, call me after like, Chapter 13, then after 18 and 19.
he book. Lines that almost make me cry-
Every year, as we read the book out loud together, I am amazed at details the students notice (things I've missed the previous 15 times), or questions they raise that lead to further insights for not just the class but ME. My God, the things they come up with, that I as an English major, or even me if I'd read this with a book club, could never have gone that far in depth.
As I began to more fully understand the book over the years, I was better able to guide their discussions, which helped them think more deeply about the book, and made me appreciate the book even more. And by "guide," I don't mean calm, controlled, teachery, "I already know the answer" talk.
My discussion techniques, simple:
--I'd stop the tape (books on tape are AWESOME- the narrator is always so much better than I could ever be) and say something like, "So, what do you think? Doesn't this seem a little WEIRD?" and off they'd go, bouncing ideas off each other until finally someone said something incredible, something no kid had thought of in the past nine years. Once I myself knew how to be interested in this book, I knew what might keep them hooked.
--Or, I myself would suddenly realize something new, and I'd stop reading and say, "OH MY GOD DID YOU GUYS GET WHAT THAT MEANT??? WHAT IT MIGHT MEAN????"
I feel free to participate myself, since I myself still have so many questions about the book. I'm not spoiling the ending when I bring up my own questions, because I know this book is a mystery in which things don't much get answered- they're left to linger, and that's part of the beauty and hopefulness in this book.
There are still lines, moments, in the book that give me chills. I wait for them greedily, just to hear the words spoken.
I feel lucky to have been forced to read this book a dozen times. There are other books I've read a lot with my students, and this is the one that most stands up over time, the only one that keeps my interest. I truly am on the edge of my seat to see what we will realize next. Because I've seen that, even if I think I have it all figured out, some kid is going to say something to rock my world.
I can't believe Lowry was able to make a book this clever; part of me thinks a work this good is impossible, and that we are just reading too much into it. But no, it's all there, all the pieces, and she put them there. I just don't see how could she have written such a tightly woven mystery- how could she have know all of the questions the book would raise? And you know what, she probably didn't. A book isn't like drawing a map. You make the world, and things happen. And in this case, she did make a perfect world. (I SO did not mean that as a UTOPIA PUN!!!!!!! I hate puns so much!!!!!! I mean, she so fully created that world where everything that happens is plausible.)
Just read the damn book, then call me.
Or, call me after like, Chapter 13, then after 18 and 19.
he book. Lines that almost make me cry-
1451 likes · Like
鈭�
flag
Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read
The Giver.
Sign In 禄
Reading Progress
Started Reading
January 1, 1999
–
Finished Reading
July 11, 2007
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-50 of 145 (145 new)
message 1:
by
Megan
(last edited Aug 25, 2016 12:09PM)
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Aug 25, 2007 06:15PM

reply
|
flag

I'm lucky to have them for 90 minutes a day. I know them very, very well by May. By chapter 19, we've spent a lot of time with the book; some of them already suspect what release is. I often warn them that something sad is going to happen in the chapters, and then we sit and listen together. What usually happens is that one of reacts strongly: That is awful! or, That is so sad! I'll agree sympathetically and other kids add on. I think I said in my review that I regret the years I had them read the book alone at home, without the group experience.
I don't discuss with them too long at the end of 19 bc J's reaction in 20 says it all. Jonas screams and cries; the kids know that THAT is the normal reaction. They KNOW they've seen something terrible, so don't feel alone in their fear. The book picks up quickly after Ch 19- Jonas and the Giver hatch their plan so the kids don't have too much time to dwell on the sadness. It turns pretty quickly to Jonas' love for Gabe, so they feel something wonderful pretty soon, and I think they know that Jonas is correcting his father's wrong.
And, this is weird; I think adults feel more of the devastation of the baby's death. Now that I have nephews, the sight of a child suffering is too much for me. I don't think Ch 19 affected me back when I was 23 or 25 as it does now at age 32.
We discuss at the end if Jonas and Gabe die or not. They were freezing, but Jonas feels he's coming closer to Elsewhere. Does that mean death, or does it mean a different place that he only knows by the name of Elsewhere? When the moment of joy surges through him, is he hallucinating? I love that the end is so ambiguous. 鈥淏ut perhaps it was only an echo.鈥� Usually one of them wonders, is that his town getting the memories of music? And is the Giver dead? Did Jonas get the hint of music as the Giver died and his memory left?
Most of them believe the boys lived. I thought for a long time that they died. How could that normal town have been so close and not know about Jonas' community? But, and I'm kind of irritated at this, in an interview, Lois Lowry said, "I'm disappointed that people think Jonas and Gabe die." Meaning, she thinks they live. I still think the kids should interpret the end, bc they haven鈥檛 read that interview. But I鈥橫 disappointed that she said that. I still wonder if Jonas and Gabe are brothers. I think they are.

There's a book written by a Mom who was po'd that all the books the books her kids were reading were all depressing, and she questioned the school's motives and judgment. I cannot remember the name of the book- I suppose if I googled it maybe those keywords could help me find it. It looked good- but I only read a little of it. It seems like it's something you might be interested in.
(For goodness sake, the theme of our 8th graders is the HOLOCAUST. An important thing to learn about of course, but man that's heavy. Even 9th grade might be a better audience. Who knows!)

I'm a 7th grade teacher and will be teaching the Giver this year for the 1st time. Do you have any advice or activities that you do with the book that were really effective?
Thanks

I read the giver and I hated it and I am a student. Do not teach this book to your children. Everyone in my class detested this book and thought it was a waste of time.


I finally read the book last year and I liked it. But I think it is too heavy for kids younger than 6th or 7th grade.
Kristine - I want to go back and read it again after reading your review of the book. I probably missed so much in my first read.







I really enjoyed reading your initial review and your subsequent responses to other's critiques and thoughts. I, like your students, naturally gravitate towards the optimistic ending and hoping that they live, while the realist in me says that the imagery is too coincidental and correlates to their condition at the time a little too well (read: hypothermic symptoms).
I also agree that having a child seems to make an immeasurable difference in how you read/experience the pain or suffering of children.
Lastly, would you mind elaborating on the concept of the book as a mystery? I love the dystopic genre and am curious about that angle.
Thanks,
Ben Hobbs (high-school chemistry/env. sci. teacher)



but 99% don't
and anyone under 6th grade probably doesn't understand half of it"
I read the book whilst in the fourth grade, and not because I was assigned it, rather for the sheer pleasure of reading it. Granted, when I selected the book I had not formulated any thoughts about how the novel would entice, whether it would. Still, even being that young, it was a rare occurrence that I encountered something within Lowry's novel that I did not understand. To this day, it has remained my favorite book, though I will openly admit it is not the best book. Still, it was the first real book I read; the first book that didn't focus on some illusory plot to entertain the reader; it held substance. And for that, I will disagree with both your statements.



Loved this book. Read it in (guessing?) 5th grade and it made a real impression on me. Have read it again and again as an adult. Great review. Teachers like you give me hope. :)


I teach 6th grade and have loved using The Giver for shared inquiry. We have had wonderful discussions and the students really think and predict and then change their thinking and think some more. It is a book they definitely remember.
How the teacher arranges the reading and the discussion definitely will impact whether the students appreciate the book. Most important is that the teacher understands the book and structures discussions that the students can engage in.
Our team divided our students for our dystopian literature and two groups read The Giver and another Among the Hidden. It worked well.







I have read the book and am onto the next in the series. After reading your review and "kind of" figuring out how the series ties together, I am seriously considering purchasing the entire set to read again and again.






I also want to add that I agree that when I was younger I saw the book in a different light than I do now. As an adult or as a parent you have a protective instinct toward children and babies in the story, but as a child you see yourself on the same level as Jonas and the other kids. It is still disturbing and wrong to kids, which I think is a good reaction to have, but I don't see anything wrong with kids experiencing disgust toward something or a feeling of responsibility to fix it. It has been a long time since I read it but I remember feeling empowered and able to stand up for what I felt was wrong.
I think that this difference in response depending on the stage you are at in your life is apparent all the time if you stop to notice it. Some movies disturb or upset me much more now than they used to. I used to think it was silly how my mom cried when watching certain movies and now of course I am on the couch sniffling right next to her!




鈥� My son read it in school (7th grade) and recommended it to me (and FWIW, he said that 95% of his class either loved it or at least liked it)
鈥� Kids mature at different rates, of course, but in general, I have to agree with those who've written that it isn't appropriate for 11 & under (though I certainly know that we all have different standards there)
鈥� I thought the book was great, didn't want to put it down, and am very much looking forward to reading "Gathering Blue," "Messenger," and "Son"


