Kemper's Reviews > Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
by
by

Treasure of the Rubbermaids 20: Failing the Voight-Kampff Test
The on-going discoveries of priceless books and comics found in a stack of Rubbermaid containers previously stored and forgotten at my parent’s house and untouched for almost 20 years. Thanks to my father dumping them back on me, I now spend my spare time unearthing lost treasures from their plastic depths.
In the spirit of Phillip K. Dick‘s questioning of reality and identity, it’s fitting that there are two versions of this story. One is the novel he wrote in which a police bounty hunter tracks down and destroys androids while he tries to earn enough money to buy a real animal to snap his wife out of a depression. The other is a film version in which a disillusioned ‘blade runner� is forced to track down and kill dangerous replicants despite his growing sympathy for them. I also like to think that PKD would probably get a laugh because of the approximately one thousand different director’s cuts of the movie available to further confuse us as to which is the ‘real� story.
The world is pretty much a wasteland after a nuclear war, and the smart people are getting off the planet. Human-like androids have been developed to help with colonizing other worlds, but they have a habit of returning to Earth illegally and trying to hide. Police bounty hunters use an empathy test to identify them and then kill them on the spot. Rick Deckard is called in after the senior bounty hunter was nearly killed while hunting a group of a new type of android. Deckard is anxious for the big payday that he’d get because he’s embarrassed at not being able to afford a new animal to replace the fake sheep he bought after his real one died. He hopes that being able to get a real animal again will snap his wife out of the depression she’s in that even their mood organ device can’t fix.
If you’re hoping for futuristic tech in this, you’re going to be disappointed. PKD’s strength wasn’t in envisioning what the future would look like, and the idea that Deckard’s electric sheep has actual audio tape in it to simulate noises seems laughable now. Flying cars and laser tubes seem like the kind of sci-fi you’d get from any pulp writer of the era.
But that wasn’t the point, and PKD’s tech was always just an excuse to get at the more interesting issues of questioning reality and identity. In this one, the question is what it means to be human, and the hunt for the androids is used to explore the idea of empathy. It’s also a nice touch that with most of the animals killed by the nuclear fall-out, that owning a real one is the ultimate status symbol and any type of mistreatment is a shocking taboo. Deckard longs for an animal to care for while killing things with human faces. Are they too deserving of sympathy or is their humanity a mask over an overwhelming desire for self-preservation that essentially makes them all sociopaths? That’s the interesting stuff in this book.
Even though the Blade Runner movies adopts the basic story as well as several other elements, it’s not really a faithful adaptation of the book. It’s a sci-fi classic that became the template for the look of dystopian futures in film, but while the two share DNA, they feel like different beings in a lot of ways. (I think that Richard Linklater’s Rotoscoped verson of A Scanner Darkly is probably the best adaption of PKD’s work in capturing it’s tone and theme.)
The on-going discoveries of priceless books and comics found in a stack of Rubbermaid containers previously stored and forgotten at my parent’s house and untouched for almost 20 years. Thanks to my father dumping them back on me, I now spend my spare time unearthing lost treasures from their plastic depths.
In the spirit of Phillip K. Dick‘s questioning of reality and identity, it’s fitting that there are two versions of this story. One is the novel he wrote in which a police bounty hunter tracks down and destroys androids while he tries to earn enough money to buy a real animal to snap his wife out of a depression. The other is a film version in which a disillusioned ‘blade runner� is forced to track down and kill dangerous replicants despite his growing sympathy for them. I also like to think that PKD would probably get a laugh because of the approximately one thousand different director’s cuts of the movie available to further confuse us as to which is the ‘real� story.
The world is pretty much a wasteland after a nuclear war, and the smart people are getting off the planet. Human-like androids have been developed to help with colonizing other worlds, but they have a habit of returning to Earth illegally and trying to hide. Police bounty hunters use an empathy test to identify them and then kill them on the spot. Rick Deckard is called in after the senior bounty hunter was nearly killed while hunting a group of a new type of android. Deckard is anxious for the big payday that he’d get because he’s embarrassed at not being able to afford a new animal to replace the fake sheep he bought after his real one died. He hopes that being able to get a real animal again will snap his wife out of the depression she’s in that even their mood organ device can’t fix.
If you’re hoping for futuristic tech in this, you’re going to be disappointed. PKD’s strength wasn’t in envisioning what the future would look like, and the idea that Deckard’s electric sheep has actual audio tape in it to simulate noises seems laughable now. Flying cars and laser tubes seem like the kind of sci-fi you’d get from any pulp writer of the era.
But that wasn’t the point, and PKD’s tech was always just an excuse to get at the more interesting issues of questioning reality and identity. In this one, the question is what it means to be human, and the hunt for the androids is used to explore the idea of empathy. It’s also a nice touch that with most of the animals killed by the nuclear fall-out, that owning a real one is the ultimate status symbol and any type of mistreatment is a shocking taboo. Deckard longs for an animal to care for while killing things with human faces. Are they too deserving of sympathy or is their humanity a mask over an overwhelming desire for self-preservation that essentially makes them all sociopaths? That’s the interesting stuff in this book.
Even though the Blade Runner movies adopts the basic story as well as several other elements, it’s not really a faithful adaptation of the book. It’s a sci-fi classic that became the template for the look of dystopian futures in film, but while the two share DNA, they feel like different beings in a lot of ways. (I think that Richard Linklater’s Rotoscoped verson of A Scanner Darkly is probably the best adaption of PKD’s work in capturing it’s tone and theme.)
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 13, 2008
– Shelved
May 7, 2013
–
Started Reading
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-39 of 39 (39 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Trudi
(new)
May 14, 2013 08:43PM

reply
|
flag

No.

Your comment about what was a faithful movie adaption promted me to look and to learn that 11 movies based on his writing have been prodiced and a few more are in the works. I appreciated the Carrère biography, I Am Alive and You Are Dead: A Journey into the Mind of Philip K. Dick.

I saw a really good short bio on PKD a year or so back on one of the documentary channels as part of a series looking at sci-fi authors.

(great review)"
Movie. The atmosphere and noir-ish style made it one of the rare ones where the film is better than the source material.
Kemper wrote: "I saw a really good short bio on PKD a year or so back on one of the documentary channels as part of a series looking at sci-fi authors. "
I saw that one, too. It's a series that Ridley Scott produced called "Prophets of Science Fiction".
Great review, by the way. I enjoyed the novel, but I also prefer the movie.
I saw that one, too. It's a series that Ridley Scott produced called "Prophets of Science Fiction".
Great review, by the way. I enjoyed the novel, but I also prefer the movie.

Me either Brandon! What a relief to have someone to share the burden of this cinema sin with. I guess we should get on that though.

I saw that one, too. It's a series that R..."
Thanks! And thanks for coming up with the title of that series. I couldn't remember and it as making me crazy.

I liked the story but agree that the movie is better. As you suggest, I only wish I knew which of the gazillion director's cuts was the definitive version.
Like you, I stand aghast at Trudi and Brandon who doubtless deserve to be on the List of Shame for this one...
Might want to delete that admission Brandon and Trudi. Before too many people see.

Hey, Trudi stepped up to the plate and admitted her failings in a righteous manner. Brandon, on the other hand, not so much...
What's with you Canadians and not having seen Blade Runner?

Hey, hey, hey...slow down there, cowboy! Most Canadians, like me, are right-thinking people and have seen Blade Runner. Usually multiple times!

Hey, hey, hey...slow down there, cowboy! Most Canadians, like me, are right-thinking people and have seen Blade Runner...."
Count me as one Canadian who owns 3 versions of the movie and has read the book numerous times.
So Trudi and Brandon really have no excuse then. Glad to hear it.

This is beginning to feel like character assassination!
There is no excuse. I have none to offer. Show some mercy!


Hey, hey, hey...slow down there, cowboy! Most Canadians, like me, are right-thinking people and have seen Blade Runner...."
hey!

As a non-Canadian, I plan on just watching from the bleachers in New York or Montana as you all fight each other for our amusement.




Yeah, but it's like a dated idea of what future tech would be. Like the robots have tape in them or things like that. Kinda like if you watch an episode of old Star Trek and their communicators couldn't do what a smart phone today could. It's not a terrible thing and can actually seem kind of fun and quaint.

You also forgot to mention MERCERISM, Kemper, the religion that Dick cooked up for this novel. That's the biggest omission most people make in their reviews but Mercerism was actually key to the world that Dick built. So I'm knocking a star off your review for that :)
