Bea's Reviews > No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference
No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference
by
by

Bea's review
bookshelves: 2-5-star-reads, 2019-releases, audiobook, non-fiction, read-in-2019, short-books
Dec 24, 2019
bookshelves: 2-5-star-reads, 2019-releases, audiobook, non-fiction, read-in-2019, short-books
Financial success has come with an unthinkable price tag.
There are no grey areas when it comes to survival.
This is quite a hard book to rate, especially as it's a collection of speeches and not something with a flowing consistent plot. There was a lot of repetition which makes sense in speeches but it really started to annoy me in book from making me think this was probably not the best way to put the message of the climate crisis across. The amount of times I heard 'our house is on fire' for example, did my head in a little.
My main issue with the book however is that it gave no solutions and just repeated the same message: 'stop releasing greenhouse gases.' There was nothing about what the average person can do to reduce their carbon emissions, something that would have been highly useful to read about instead of hearing over and over that it's the fault of large global companies and now future generations have to struggle with the damage they have left. The companies are not going to read this, so to me the speeches in book form seemed kind of pointless and boring at times if I'm honest, to get through. 'We must change almost everything in our current societies', and then she doesn't explain how. The why certainly comes across but she annoyingly explains no further. Instead of publishing speeches, an informative and practical book teaching people how to be more environmentally friendly would have been so much better. Do I see this book as a cash grab? Kind of, and it sucks.
At the beginning Greta states that her speeches are not political statements which they absolutely are. At around 30% she mentions the politics we need are currently non-existent and politicians don't care. Maybe don’t include politics if you said you wouldn’t..?
Don't you think that a 16 year old can speak for herself?
I think Greta is wonderful person including everyone who supports her. There were phrases like 'Aspergers is not a disease, it is a gift', that must be amazing for young people with disabilities to hear as it can inspire them to lead actual change with the many current issues we have in the world. The book triggers an emotional response as you read which I think is what Greta was aiming for, clearly shown with the action that has come from her public appearances and protests. Being only 16 she's got more guts than most figures in positions of power having a sincere want to do things for good. The format and pointlessness of this book just wasn't it.
Although this book isn't stating anything new about the issue of climate change, it is nonetheless a powerful and inspiring collection of speeches from someone with a big heart who aims to change the world. Big love for this girl. 2.5/5 stars.
There are no grey areas when it comes to survival.
This is quite a hard book to rate, especially as it's a collection of speeches and not something with a flowing consistent plot. There was a lot of repetition which makes sense in speeches but it really started to annoy me in book from making me think this was probably not the best way to put the message of the climate crisis across. The amount of times I heard 'our house is on fire' for example, did my head in a little.
My main issue with the book however is that it gave no solutions and just repeated the same message: 'stop releasing greenhouse gases.' There was nothing about what the average person can do to reduce their carbon emissions, something that would have been highly useful to read about instead of hearing over and over that it's the fault of large global companies and now future generations have to struggle with the damage they have left. The companies are not going to read this, so to me the speeches in book form seemed kind of pointless and boring at times if I'm honest, to get through. 'We must change almost everything in our current societies', and then she doesn't explain how. The why certainly comes across but she annoyingly explains no further. Instead of publishing speeches, an informative and practical book teaching people how to be more environmentally friendly would have been so much better. Do I see this book as a cash grab? Kind of, and it sucks.
At the beginning Greta states that her speeches are not political statements which they absolutely are. At around 30% she mentions the politics we need are currently non-existent and politicians don't care. Maybe don’t include politics if you said you wouldn’t..?
Don't you think that a 16 year old can speak for herself?
I think Greta is wonderful person including everyone who supports her. There were phrases like 'Aspergers is not a disease, it is a gift', that must be amazing for young people with disabilities to hear as it can inspire them to lead actual change with the many current issues we have in the world. The book triggers an emotional response as you read which I think is what Greta was aiming for, clearly shown with the action that has come from her public appearances and protests. Being only 16 she's got more guts than most figures in positions of power having a sincere want to do things for good. The format and pointlessness of this book just wasn't it.
Although this book isn't stating anything new about the issue of climate change, it is nonetheless a powerful and inspiring collection of speeches from someone with a big heart who aims to change the world. Big love for this girl. 2.5/5 stars.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 22, 2019
– Shelved
December 22, 2019
– Shelved as:
to-read
December 23, 2019
–
Started Reading
December 24, 2019
–
26.0%
December 24, 2019
– Shelved as:
2-5-star-reads
December 24, 2019
– Shelved as:
2019-releases
December 24, 2019
– Shelved as:
audiobook
December 24, 2019
– Shelved as:
non-fiction
December 24, 2019
– Shelved as:
read-in-2019
December 24, 2019
– Shelved as:
short-books
December 24, 2019
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-12 of 12 (12 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Michael
(new)
Dec 26, 2019 02:29AM

reply
|
flag


There isn't much factual data in the speeches which was one of my problems. The statistics Greta presented are correct as far as I know as they are presented by upheld scientists. And I don't think there is much science when denying climate change, I'd say it's more lack of belief due to ignorance on the topic.

There isn't much factual data in the speeches which was one of my ..."
Thanks!
As far as science goes, there seems to be a growing number of scientists shifting away from the crisis mode on the subject. In part because the data being viewed does not have that much history in view.
I think we need to be more responsible with the environment, don't get me wrong. But, I don't really see (in my limited understanding) that patterns are outside historic bounds for warming and cooling.
For that reason, I was wondering about the scientific content of the speeches.
Again, thanks!

There isn't much factual data in the speeches which wa..."
You're welcome. I agree with what you're saying. I'm no scientist so I can't know for sure whether our human impact is really endangering Earth to the extent people are saying, but we definitely have been affecting our atmosphere and we should be more careful about how we treat our planet.

There isn't much factual data in the spee..."
One of the problems with knowing our impact on the atmosphere is that there are no scientific studies of the atmosphere before we started testing atom and nuclear bombs. So, there's no benchmark for what "normal" was before those detonations. Problematic!

There isn't much factual data..."
There is no 'normal' carbon level anyway as there have always been natural periods of high level and vice versa. But we can easily tell human impact has affected carbon rates to rise at a much faster rate since the industrial revolution leading to other technological advancements e.g. atom bombs. So to avoid any possible unalterable danger that we could be causing, best try and reduce the greenhouse gases multi-million dollar companies are releasing for profit. And of course governments not releasing bombs for aims of power would be helpful, but that's pretty much unpreventable.

There isn't much..."
I'm much more concerned about nuclear power plants and nuclear waste than I am about nuclear weapons. I don't think any sane person would actually launch a nuke. But, I'd be in favor of a complete elimination of all things nuclear - both weapons and energy sources.

Ther..."
Ah say that to some current leaders in control of launch codes, would barely trust many of them with baby's toy. Completely agree with everything you've said.

We seem to agree on quite a bit in what we've said. I'm sure we disagree on parts of it too, but let's stick with the common ground!