Emily May's Reviews > War and Peace
War and Peace
by
So... I did it. I finally convinced myself to read War and Peace, partly because it's just something everyone wants to say they've done, and partly because one always needs a good excuse to procrastinate during the exam period when I should have been studying. And, you know what, I really enjoyed most of it. The novel is far less taxing than I imagined, I don't know if that's because the English translation goes easy on us non-Russians or because Tolstoy wrote it in a quite light-hearted fashion. I suspect I shall never find that out for myself.
Personally, I think a much better title for this book would be War and People. Because, though an in-depth look at history during the time Napoleon had ambitions to take over Europe, this is first and foremost about humanity and Tolstoy observes humanity and all its weirdness with a sense of humour and occasionally sadness. I don't like to make too many predictions about the older authors, some people will tell you that Bram Stoker was a feminist and William Shakespeare was a humanist, I think these are quite melodramatic conclusions to make about authors who lived in societies where they would struggle to be that.
However, Tolstoy may or may not consider himself liberal, forward-thinking, a humanist, and I wouldn't state that he is any of those things. But I think his perception of the human condition in the nineteenth century shows he is somewhat before his time in his ability to see almost every character as flawed, confusing but ultimately human. He manages to construct a comphrehensive view of humanity and Russian culture at the time in question, complete with betrayals and scandals and affairs. But though the characters may place blame on one another - like calling Natasha a hussy - Tolstoy appears to remain impartial. Those who stray from the conservative path of the nineteenth century do not do so without reason.
Another reason that War and People is a much better title for this book is because there is very little peace going on in here. There are times when the battles aren't raging, of course, but there is always something equally dramatic happening within the social world of Russian high society. People falling in and out of love, people having affairs, wealthy aristocrats dying and leaving their fortune to illegitimate sons. It seems to me that there's a constant war going on in this book, just sometimes it isn't on the battlefield.
And oddly enough, it was the real wars in War and Peace that interested me least of all. They were probably the reason this book got four stars instead of five - and because goodreads rating system is about personal enjoyment rather than literary merit. I felt much more entertained by the soap opera that was the lives of the Russian nobles than by the tedious and repetitive battle scenes. There were guns and canons and horses - riveting. But thankfully, like I said, Tolstoy's masterpiece is more about people than anything else and this is the reason that I saw this book through and enjoyed the journey.
by

So... I did it. I finally convinced myself to read War and Peace, partly because it's just something everyone wants to say they've done, and partly because one always needs a good excuse to procrastinate during the exam period when I should have been studying. And, you know what, I really enjoyed most of it. The novel is far less taxing than I imagined, I don't know if that's because the English translation goes easy on us non-Russians or because Tolstoy wrote it in a quite light-hearted fashion. I suspect I shall never find that out for myself.
Personally, I think a much better title for this book would be War and People. Because, though an in-depth look at history during the time Napoleon had ambitions to take over Europe, this is first and foremost about humanity and Tolstoy observes humanity and all its weirdness with a sense of humour and occasionally sadness. I don't like to make too many predictions about the older authors, some people will tell you that Bram Stoker was a feminist and William Shakespeare was a humanist, I think these are quite melodramatic conclusions to make about authors who lived in societies where they would struggle to be that.
However, Tolstoy may or may not consider himself liberal, forward-thinking, a humanist, and I wouldn't state that he is any of those things. But I think his perception of the human condition in the nineteenth century shows he is somewhat before his time in his ability to see almost every character as flawed, confusing but ultimately human. He manages to construct a comphrehensive view of humanity and Russian culture at the time in question, complete with betrayals and scandals and affairs. But though the characters may place blame on one another - like calling Natasha a hussy - Tolstoy appears to remain impartial. Those who stray from the conservative path of the nineteenth century do not do so without reason.
Another reason that War and People is a much better title for this book is because there is very little peace going on in here. There are times when the battles aren't raging, of course, but there is always something equally dramatic happening within the social world of Russian high society. People falling in and out of love, people having affairs, wealthy aristocrats dying and leaving their fortune to illegitimate sons. It seems to me that there's a constant war going on in this book, just sometimes it isn't on the battlefield.
And oddly enough, it was the real wars in War and Peace that interested me least of all. They were probably the reason this book got four stars instead of five - and because goodreads rating system is about personal enjoyment rather than literary merit. I felt much more entertained by the soap opera that was the lives of the Russian nobles than by the tedious and repetitive battle scenes. There were guns and canons and horses - riveting. But thankfully, like I said, Tolstoy's masterpiece is more about people than anything else and this is the reason that I saw this book through and enjoyed the journey.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
War and Peace.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 50 (50 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Nilesh
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
May 03, 2012 04:56AM

reply
|
flag





That makes oh so much sense. I work graveyard, and it's best not to read here -- it makes me too cranky when work interrupts my book. Instead I Facebook, Pinterest, Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ... oy.

Since it's almost impossible to pin down what literary merit IS, personal enjoyment will always be the best rating scale for books.



True. And it's also possible to absolutely love a book and still admit that technically it has its flaws. And which would you recommend to a friend? Bet it's the flawed book you loved.


And that's a great review review with words about Tolstoy's comphrehensive view of humanity are really excellent point.
And comments on goodreads rating system is also good, I have been struggling with them a bit.
And... nothing, just great review!



I can understand that even though I found them quite fascinating and sometimes even surreal in tone (due to the ambiance described). What do you think about Tolstoy's own musings during the book?



I dunno. Definitely to each their own!! :)



put it on my to-read list after watching the new mini-series. In that portrayal of the story, Pierre, especially, but all the characters seem to be waging inner battles. Some seem to seek war and some peace. The peasant prisoner that Pierre befriends has found inner peace, despite his circumstances, and has learned to savor life. I think that is the epiphany Pierre needed and he finally learns to be at peace. I am looking forward to reading the book. Actually, I may be looking forward more to having read the book--it looks daunting! And I skimmed so much of Anna Karenina when they were hunting, etc. --I am afraid I will end up doing the same in the battle scenes. :)










This is it. It is very easy to read also in Russian.

This is it. It is very easy to read also in Russian."
Glad to hear this! I always worry how much tone is lost in translation.


If you've read other classics/literary fiction, chances are you'll find this way easier to read than you're expecting. It's not overly complex, just long. The trickiest part is remembering who all the characters are.


