Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Stacy's Reviews > The Fault in Our Stars

The Fault in Our Stars by John Green
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4852567
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: read-in-2012, library-book

I had never read a John Green novel prior to reading this one. I wanted very much to like it and felt certain after reading some of the overwhelmingly positive reviews here that it would be an awesome and heartbreaking experience. I was ready and excited. I guess I could sum the experience up best by stating that it is unlikely I will read another book by this author, and if I do it will be sometime in the future when I forget how utterly disappointing I found this book to be. 

I had a lot of problems with this book. Overall, it felt very insincere and I was constantly distracted by how obviously everything was written with the goal of tugging on the reader's heart strings, rather than just letting things happen that were beautiful in spite of being sad. It felt like Mr. Green was screaming at me from the page 'ARE YOU SAD YET? YOU'RE SAD RIGHT? THIS IS SAD. YOU SHOULD FEEL ALL THE THINGS AND CRY ABOUT IT. I'M A GOOD WRITER. I WRITE FEELINGS. ARE YOU CRYING YET?' For a story about Human Beings, it doesn't feel very human at all. Instead everything feels very unnatural and self-conscious in the worst way.

The biggest and most impossible thing for me to get around was I simply didn't believe the character of Augustus or his relationship with main character Hazel. As these concepts  are basically what the entire story hinges upon, I didn't believe in or care about anything else that happened either. Augustus came off completely pretentious and obnoxious, particularly in the way he insisted on speaking in a Diablo Cody nerd hipster sort of dialect that no one would ever use in the real world. (Some commenters here have said it's the way Mr. Green himself talks which, a.) way to be self-congratulatory, and b.) how does he not get punched in the face, like, ALL THE TIME?) His entire character felt contrived and I never once felt a connection with him. Too often it seemed like he was walking around like I AM SO CLEVER LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME, constantly putting on a show so that nothing from him felt genuine or real. His whole fascination with ultimately meaningless metaphors felt condescending, like Mr. Green constantly squealing HEY GUYS, SEE WHAT I DID THERE? TAKE A SECOND, WRITE IT DOWN IF YOU NEED TO. YEAH, I'M DEEP. Augustus' one fault was sickness, but it was nothing that he could control. And that's just so... boring.

But it wasn't just Augustus. The character of Hazel was somewhat likable, (despite Mr. Green's insistance on making her 'sound like a teenager' by formating every other statement she makes like it's a question? and tacking distracting 'or whatever's onto the end of random bits of dialogue BECAUSE THIS IS HOW TEENAGERS TALK RIGHT? I CAN TALK LIKE A TEENAGER, SEE? BECAUSE THEY SAY 'WHATEVER'. I'M A GOOD WRITER. ARE YOU FEELING THINGS YET?) but her relationship with Augustus felt completely and totally forced. There was never any real reason for them to fall in love with one another, and that is crossing dangerously close into Twilight territory. He was so convienient, so effortless for Hazel. I had to wonder, was it him or was it because he was there and ready and willing? It all fell flat and left so many places to take the stories and facets of their characters completely unexplored. Any opportunities to delve into hard questions and real answers were left untaken and exchanged for large passages (mainly in the **SPOLIER ALERT**: Amsterdam trip scenes) that had very little purpose outside of screaming LOOK AT THIS HANDSOME CHARMING BOY ISN'T HE SWEET LADIES? HE WILL PULL YOUR CHAIR OUT FOR YOU AND HE TALKS LIKE I DO. IT'S CHARMING, RIGHT? YOU ARE FEELING CHARMED. I'M A GOOD WRITER. 

Ultimately, it felt completely fake. I couldn't get lost in it, always fully aware of the fact that I was reading fiction and how irritating EVERYTHING about it was. I finished it, which is the only reason I gave it 2 stars, but it was a true task. Truthfully, it pissed me off. I would have loved to love this book as much as everyone else and have a new favorite to hold dear to my heart. Now I'm just confused. Was my copy broken?
399 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Fault in Our Stars.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 8, 2012 – Started Reading
May 8, 2012 – Shelved
May 14, 2012 – Shelved as: read-in-2012
May 14, 2012 – Shelved as: library-book
May 14, 2012 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 61 (61 new)


kathryn I love this book. It's like, my life. I'm not going to yell at you though because it's your I only have one thing to say about this review. You said Augustus' fault was sickness and it was out of his control and boring. Well duh. That's sort of the point of everything Gus stands for. He can't control his cancer. It's not his fault. No one ever gets famous for dying of cancer because it's not interesting and he wants to leave a mark.


Stacy Kathryn, allow me to quote Rider Strong's review to best explain exactly why this aspect of the book doesn't work for me:

"The way the book really let me down was in the moments that are supposed to be the painful real moments like dealing with actual sickness. I didn't believe those. And that really hurt because you can have a story narrated by a sixteen year old girl, and I can maybe forgive that this is sort of a fantasy version of how they would talk or how she feels she would talk with her boyfriend or the way that they treat adults, I can maybe buy all of that, but the real opportunity to show realism was in the awfulness of facing death and even those scenes, I felt like I'd seen them in movies or in an episode of Dawson's Creek. Everything felt very romantic and those were the moments that I wanted to be really in it. I wanted her to be actually disgusted by his body and disgusted by her own body at times, and I didn't feel like that really came through enough for me to buy into the emotions of the book."


message 3: by Melissa (new) - added it

Melissa So true! This is my first YA since being a YA.. I am thinking I shall never, ever, return to YA. Especially on the heels of an epic as "The Interestings." Picked this up because wonderful J. Franzen so suggested in NYT mag... Oh well. However, will power through and finish. Putting a smile (or apparently tears?) on my face. Understated emotion=true feat.


message 4: by S (new)

S Kathryn wrote: "I love this book. It's like, my life. I'm not going to yell at you though because it's your I only have one thing to say about this review. You said Augustus' fault was sickness and it was out of h..."

Kathryn, you're missing the point there. Gus's only "flaw" is having cancer. Obviously, cancer is not actually a flaw. Real people have flaws like having a short temper, being argumentative, being clingy, etc. Gus is not a real person, because his only flaw is "being sick," which is obviously not a flaw, but a terrible circumstance.

John Green is unable to create three-dimensional characters with real, relatable flaws. Instead he creates hyperactive talking heads and then slaps them into tragic circumstances so that we feel sorry for them, because tragic circumstances are tragic.

It's easy to make a reader feel sympathy by having the universe take a dump on a character. It's a lot harder to make a reader feel sympathy by creating a flawed, three-dimensional character that we root for.

John Green always takes the easy way out.

And people do get famous for dying from cancer:




Stacy Thank you for that S, very well said.


message 6: by Mary (new) - added it

Mary Michael this book is horrendous. the dialogue is terrible.


Maggie Krajewski OK, these reviews are making me feel a bit better. I am reading this book now and HATE it. ESPECIALLY Augustus... who sounds like the most god awful pretentious douche bag on the planet. I also think that trying to read a Young Adult novel may have been an error on my part given I am 30... I may try to muscle through the rest but really want to give up!


Emma Cave I think you would like my review


Ryan Mccormick I personally enjoyed this book incredibly as yes, it is very much so a YA book=a cheesy romance. However, under that, Green worked in a brilliant philosophical dialogue exploring existential nihilism. i don't know the reasons why other people liked this book so much, but I enjoyed it largely due to it's juxtaposition. Complete YA romance right next to some serious philosophy. Blatant "you should be crying because the character is dying" right up against him questioning the purpose of what life and death are and if it all really means anything. If you found the book to smacking you in the face with it's plot and got distracted there, you really are missing it.


Jackson Chiara If you can't grasp the true feelings of this book then maybe your just not mature enough to read such a book. The feelings in this book are what actual cancer patients feel, I would know, I've been there. And if you can't realize that I'm sorry. Okay? Okay.


message 11: by Stacy (new) - rated it 1 star

Stacy Jackson wrote: "If you can't grasp the true feelings of this book then maybe your just not mature enough to read such a book. The feelings in this book are what actual cancer patients feel, I would know, I've been..."

You are free to disagree with me, but just because your opinion is different than mine doesn't make my opinion any less valid. If you're only here to make personal attacks and offer absolutely no intelligent conversation whatsoever, kindly fuck off and troll elsewhere.


Jackson Chiara Idiot


message 13: by Stacy (new) - rated it 1 star

Stacy I cheered when Augustus died, and there's nothing you can do about it :)


Yasmin Agree


Jackson Chiara So now when someone dies of cancer your going to cheer


message 16: by Stacy (new) - rated it 1 star

Stacy HE IS A FICTIONAL CHARACTER IN A WORK OF FICTION. HE IS NOT REAL. HE'S NEVER BEEN REAL. HE CAN'T ACTUALLY DIE BECAUSE HE NEVER ACTUALLY LIVED, JUST LIKE JAY GATSBY AND THE CAT IN THE HAT.

And yes, if a douchey, possessive, pretentious, ridiculously ill-concieved CHARACTER I've loathed from the first time he made an appearance on the page dies, I'm absolutely going to cheer.


message 17: by Lucy (new) - rated it 1 star

Lucy Jackson you're being awfully rude. Just because "you've been there" does not give you the excuse to be mean and call people names. We understand you like this book, and would respect your opinion, but now,we don't. I, too, have been through truly awful things (see my review of this book), but that doesn't mean I act so rude.


message 18: by Lucy (new) - rated it 1 star

Lucy And by the way, one of my friends did die of cancer. Even now I tear up thinking about her. So,all of us are "mature"enough for this book-if anything, it is you who isn't mature for attacking us personally (and not using the correct firm of "you're".)
Also, Stacy, it wasn't very nice of you to bait him/her like that, even if it is true.


message 19: by Katie (new) - rated it 1 star

Katie Zhao PRAISE! This review says it all. Also, since our thoughts are so similar on this book, I'd advise you to definitely not read any other John Green books. I tried two more and couldn't get past the first chapter of either of them. I guess his popularity will just be another one of those things I'll never understand...like Twilight.


message 20: by [deleted user] (new)

Couldn't agree more with your review. The sad part is that i feel i will be under much attack from my peers when I tell them it just wasn't my cup of tea. From his writing style to the lack of depth i felt this story should have contained. The characters were one dimensional in my opinion with pretentious dialogue that no teenager engages in and it just seemed like he tried way too hard to make something out of nothing. I didn't feel as connected with this story or the characters as I would have if it was written by better authors.


message 21: by Natalie (new)

Natalie ARE YOU SAD YET? YOU'RE SAD RIGHT? THIS IS SAD. YOU SHOULD FEEL ALL THE THINGS AND CRY ABOUT IT. I'M A GOOD WRITER. I WRITE FEELINGS. ARE YOU CRYING YET?
^ THIS.


Christine Great review! Just finished the book and looking at all the 5 star reviews and im thinking: Did they read a completely different book?? Way way way over-hyped.


Xanaro I laughed so hard at your review. Specially the capitalized parts... so damn true. "ARE YOU SAD YET? I'M SMART I'M A GOOD WRTITER." I blame Mr JG's youth.


Xanaro This is exactly how I feel about this book.


Milica Carter Is it just me, or did anyone else think Augustus was a weird cancer-girl fetish creeper?


message 26: by Kim (new) - rated it 2 stars

Kim Yeah Gus is super creepy, more like Edward from Twilight than a real person. I got a creepy "cancer chaser" vibe from him, considering he dated a girl who died from it previously. It's just not a phenomenal book.


message 27: by Laura (new) - rated it 1 star

Laura Bravo on this review. "I WRITE FEELINGS! ARE YOU CRYING YET?" This is exactly how I felt reading this book...and while one part did make me cry, I was angry at myself for having let it happen in the first place.


Priscilla Reyes Can we hug? I TOTALLY agree!!!!


message 29: by Amin (new) - rated it 2 stars

Amin That's all i say!


Potentialauthor People like this reviewer make me lose faith in humanity...


Alicia I definitely agree with you! To an extent, anyway.


Maddie’s Book Corner This is the best thing.


Ariana This was the most on-point review of this book I have seen thus far. I completely and entirely agree with you. Great job!!! It's appreciated to see a review like this, honestly.


Lindsey The animosity from some of the fans of this novel is disgusting. Learn to accept the fact that not everyone thinks this is the absolute most wonderful thing ever written, and that some of us downright hated this book. We're not wrong, you're not wrong. We're just different.


Ellena YES!!! I agree with you totally. Felt pretentious and over the top. I'm not sure I want to read anymore John Green books.


message 36: by Stef (new) - rated it 2 stars

Stef Rozitis I have to agree about the pretentiousness and the convenience. Which if people said "this is just basically a teenage romance book" I probably would have been more ok with but in a supposedly amazing and life-changing story it was very grating @


Mairéad (is roaming the Undying Lands) *applauds this review* This really illustrated the reasons why I'm so asdfghjkl about John Green books. and I have tried, repeatedly. >.<;


Leesia I agree wholehearted with every. single. word. of your review. Thank you!


Elmer LOVE this review. Spot on.


message 40: by Kia (new) - rated it 1 star

Kia I really disliked the book but I feel the movie was ok.


Dallin James Dang. Spot on review. The unbelievably large hype from this book intrigued me, so I read it. I dont care how sad or emotional a book is. That doesn't make it a good book. It takes more than just giving us sad circumstances that most of us can picture on our own. Nothing new is learned here, and nothing unique has been illustrated by this book. The characters and their relation seem to have been pulled straight from a fan fiction site. I could go on, but you've already summed it up for me perfectly.


Zepphia Gonzales Yes. Oh my gosh they fell in love too fast the romance was rushed. The characters were flat and John's attempts to sound like a teen is so freaking cringy. I didn't even cry when Augustus died and yet everyone is saying how they cried buckets.


Marion This is indeed one of the worst books I've ever read. It's about two narcissists who fall in love because they are literally mirror images of each other. More than that, this entire book is utter narcissistic wank fantasy material; it's the author's opinion that these two obnoxious teens are the Bestest and Greatest and Deepest character evah! and so every other character in this turd of a book and every thing that happens around them panders to these two little monsters. In real life, if anyone would dare to be so disrespectful in the Anne Frank House, they would've been forcibly evicted, but since the setting of the novel has but one purpose - to show how Totally Awesome Gussy and Hazy are - they get not only not evicted but APPLAUDED.
In Real Life, if any shitty teen - wether they had cancer or not - would be so absorbed by their own perceived wisdom as to publicly spout page-long pompous 'metaphors' about Life, Death And Everything, someone would be sure to tell them to shut the f*ck up. But of course, this is narc-wank-land, so we are told by the author, the author's fans and every other character and situation in the book that Gussy and Hazy are Teh Deepest Teens Evah! The author even goes so far as to use the one character that does not pander to Gussy and Hazy as the patsy, the fall-guy we are all supposed to boo.
Ugh... I have no adequate words for this drivel. Your review is much more eloquent than I could ever be. Thumbs up from me!


Pratiti Majumder This was my first John Green novel too and well even after reading it twice i didnot understand its so called life changing metaphors and also I didn't like its conclusion, it was so -ve.


Gabby Refreshingly honest review! I can completely relate to this. I felt like I had to like the book when I was reading it due to all the hype but, it just isn't a good piece of literature.


Pratiti Majumder Exactly because you can't expect everyone to like something just because a majority of people do. I did not like it and thats that


Melissa Ha! Rachel I actually only made it a third of the way through this book for the SAME reasons


Jennifair I have yet to agree with a review more than I do with yours! SPOT. ON. Was my copy broken too?

P.S. My favorite line of yours: "There was never any real reason for them to fall in love with one another, and that is crossing dangerously close into Twilight territory." The reference to Twilight is golden :)


Melissa Ann Goodman THANK YOU!! This book sucks.


message 50: by Marut (new) - rated it 1 star

Marut I read the book last year and I joined Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ this year after finally giving in to the insistence of my friend ( the same one who made me read this "book"). I cannot explain how much your review resonates with my opinion of the book. It was my first JG book too, and yup, I'm pretty sure I'm not gonna read anymore of his works. The fact that Augustus used an obnoxious no. of metaphors and most of them didn't even make any sense! Shadows of branches? Metaphor! Unlit cigarette? Metaphor!
I completely failed to connect with the book. Gus died? Well whatever.
After being surrounded by JG fans treating the book like it's a classic, this review comes as a breath of fresh air!


« previous 1
back to top