Stacy's Reviews > The Fault in Our Stars
The Fault in Our Stars
by
by

I had never read a John Green novel prior to reading this one. I wanted very much to like it and felt certain after reading some of the overwhelmingly positive reviews here that it would be an awesome and heartbreaking experience. I was ready and excited. I guess I could sum the experience up best by stating that it is unlikely I will read another book by this author, and if I do it will be sometime in the future when I forget how utterly disappointing I found this book to be.Â
I had a lot of problems with this book. Overall, it felt very insincere and I was constantly distracted by how obviously everything was written with the goal of tugging on the reader's heart strings, rather than just letting things happen that were beautiful in spite of being sad. It felt like Mr. Green was screaming at me from the page 'ARE YOU SAD YET? YOU'RE SAD RIGHT? THIS IS SAD. YOU SHOULD FEEL ALL THE THINGS AND CRY ABOUT IT. I'M A GOOD WRITER. I WRITE FEELINGS. ARE YOU CRYING YET?' For a story about Human Beings, it doesn't feel very human at all. Instead everything feels very unnatural and self-conscious in the worst way.
The biggest and most impossible thing for me to get around was I simply didn't believe the character of Augustus or his relationship with main character Hazel. As these concepts  are basically what the entire story hinges upon, I didn't believe in or care about anything else that happened either. Augustus came off completely pretentious and obnoxious, particularly in the way he insisted on speaking in a Diablo Cody nerd hipster sort of dialect that no one would ever use in the real world. (Some commenters here have said it's the way Mr. Green himself talks which, a.) way to be self-congratulatory, and b.) how does he not get punched in the face, like, ALL THE TIME?) His entire character felt contrived and I never once felt a connection with him. Too often it seemed like he was walking around like I AM SO CLEVER LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME, constantly putting on a show so that nothing from him felt genuine or real. His whole fascination with ultimately meaningless metaphors felt condescending, like Mr. Green constantly squealing HEY GUYS, SEE WHAT I DID THERE? TAKE A SECOND, WRITE IT DOWN IF YOU NEED TO. YEAH, I'M DEEP. Augustus' one fault was sickness, but it was nothing that he could control. And that's just so... boring.
But it wasn't just Augustus. The character of Hazel was somewhat likable, (despite Mr. Green's insistance on making her 'sound like a teenager' by formating every other statement she makes like it's a question? and tacking distracting 'or whatever's onto the end of random bits of dialogue BECAUSE THIS IS HOW TEENAGERS TALK RIGHT? I CAN TALK LIKE A TEENAGER, SEE? BECAUSE THEY SAY 'WHATEVER'. I'M A GOOD WRITER. ARE YOU FEELING THINGS YET?) but her relationship with Augustus felt completely and totally forced. There was never any real reason for them to fall in love with one another, and that is crossing dangerously close into Twilight territory. He was so convienient, so effortless for Hazel. I had to wonder, was it him or was it because he was there and ready and willing? It all fell flat and left so many places to take the stories and facets of their characters completely unexplored. Any opportunities to delve into hard questions and real answers were left untaken and exchanged for large passages (mainly in the **SPOLIER ALERT**: Amsterdam trip scenes) that had very little purpose outside of screaming LOOK AT THIS HANDSOME CHARMING BOY ISN'T HE SWEET LADIES? HE WILL PULL YOUR CHAIR OUT FOR YOU AND HE TALKS LIKE I DO. IT'S CHARMING, RIGHT? YOU ARE FEELING CHARMED. I'M A GOOD WRITER.Â
Ultimately, it felt completely fake. I couldn't get lost in it, always fully aware of the fact that I was reading fiction and how irritating EVERYTHING about it was. I finished it, which is the only reason I gave it 2 stars, but it was a true task. Truthfully, it pissed me off. I would have loved to love this book as much as everyone else and have a new favorite to hold dear to my heart. Now I'm just confused. Was my copy broken?
I had a lot of problems with this book. Overall, it felt very insincere and I was constantly distracted by how obviously everything was written with the goal of tugging on the reader's heart strings, rather than just letting things happen that were beautiful in spite of being sad. It felt like Mr. Green was screaming at me from the page 'ARE YOU SAD YET? YOU'RE SAD RIGHT? THIS IS SAD. YOU SHOULD FEEL ALL THE THINGS AND CRY ABOUT IT. I'M A GOOD WRITER. I WRITE FEELINGS. ARE YOU CRYING YET?' For a story about Human Beings, it doesn't feel very human at all. Instead everything feels very unnatural and self-conscious in the worst way.
The biggest and most impossible thing for me to get around was I simply didn't believe the character of Augustus or his relationship with main character Hazel. As these concepts  are basically what the entire story hinges upon, I didn't believe in or care about anything else that happened either. Augustus came off completely pretentious and obnoxious, particularly in the way he insisted on speaking in a Diablo Cody nerd hipster sort of dialect that no one would ever use in the real world. (Some commenters here have said it's the way Mr. Green himself talks which, a.) way to be self-congratulatory, and b.) how does he not get punched in the face, like, ALL THE TIME?) His entire character felt contrived and I never once felt a connection with him. Too often it seemed like he was walking around like I AM SO CLEVER LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME, constantly putting on a show so that nothing from him felt genuine or real. His whole fascination with ultimately meaningless metaphors felt condescending, like Mr. Green constantly squealing HEY GUYS, SEE WHAT I DID THERE? TAKE A SECOND, WRITE IT DOWN IF YOU NEED TO. YEAH, I'M DEEP. Augustus' one fault was sickness, but it was nothing that he could control. And that's just so... boring.
But it wasn't just Augustus. The character of Hazel was somewhat likable, (despite Mr. Green's insistance on making her 'sound like a teenager' by formating every other statement she makes like it's a question? and tacking distracting 'or whatever's onto the end of random bits of dialogue BECAUSE THIS IS HOW TEENAGERS TALK RIGHT? I CAN TALK LIKE A TEENAGER, SEE? BECAUSE THEY SAY 'WHATEVER'. I'M A GOOD WRITER. ARE YOU FEELING THINGS YET?) but her relationship with Augustus felt completely and totally forced. There was never any real reason for them to fall in love with one another, and that is crossing dangerously close into Twilight territory. He was so convienient, so effortless for Hazel. I had to wonder, was it him or was it because he was there and ready and willing? It all fell flat and left so many places to take the stories and facets of their characters completely unexplored. Any opportunities to delve into hard questions and real answers were left untaken and exchanged for large passages (mainly in the **SPOLIER ALERT**: Amsterdam trip scenes) that had very little purpose outside of screaming LOOK AT THIS HANDSOME CHARMING BOY ISN'T HE SWEET LADIES? HE WILL PULL YOUR CHAIR OUT FOR YOU AND HE TALKS LIKE I DO. IT'S CHARMING, RIGHT? YOU ARE FEELING CHARMED. I'M A GOOD WRITER.Â
Ultimately, it felt completely fake. I couldn't get lost in it, always fully aware of the fact that I was reading fiction and how irritating EVERYTHING about it was. I finished it, which is the only reason I gave it 2 stars, but it was a true task. Truthfully, it pissed me off. I would have loved to love this book as much as everyone else and have a new favorite to hold dear to my heart. Now I'm just confused. Was my copy broken?
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Fault in Our Stars.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 8, 2012
–
Started Reading
May 8, 2012
– Shelved
May 14, 2012
– Shelved as:
read-in-2012
May 14, 2012
– Shelved as:
library-book
May 14, 2012
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 61 (61 new)
message 1:
by
kathryn
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jul 16, 2013 11:01AM

reply
|
flag

"The way the book really let me down was in the moments that are supposed to be the painful real moments like dealing with actual sickness. I didn't believe those. And that really hurt because you can have a story narrated by a sixteen year old girl, and I can maybe forgive that this is sort of a fantasy version of how they would talk or how she feels she would talk with her boyfriend or the way that they treat adults, I can maybe buy all of that, but the real opportunity to show realism was in the awfulness of facing death and even those scenes, I felt like I'd seen them in movies or in an episode of Dawson's Creek. Everything felt very romantic and those were the moments that I wanted to be really in it. I wanted her to be actually disgusted by his body and disgusted by her own body at times, and I didn't feel like that really came through enough for me to buy into the emotions of the book."


Kathryn, you're missing the point there. Gus's only "flaw" is having cancer. Obviously, cancer is not actually a flaw. Real people have flaws like having a short temper, being argumentative, being clingy, etc. Gus is not a real person, because his only flaw is "being sick," which is obviously not a flaw, but a terrible circumstance.
John Green is unable to create three-dimensional characters with real, relatable flaws. Instead he creates hyperactive talking heads and then slaps them into tragic circumstances so that we feel sorry for them, because tragic circumstances are tragic.
It's easy to make a reader feel sympathy by having the universe take a dump on a character. It's a lot harder to make a reader feel sympathy by creating a flawed, three-dimensional character that we root for.
John Green always takes the easy way out.
And people do get famous for dying from cancer:




You are free to disagree with me, but just because your opinion is different than mine doesn't make my opinion any less valid. If you're only here to make personal attacks and offer absolutely no intelligent conversation whatsoever, kindly fuck off and troll elsewhere.

And yes, if a douchey, possessive, pretentious, ridiculously ill-concieved CHARACTER I've loathed from the first time he made an appearance on the page dies, I'm absolutely going to cheer.


Also, Stacy, it wasn't very nice of you to bait him/her like that, even if it is true.

Couldn't agree more with your review. The sad part is that i feel i will be under much attack from my peers when I tell them it just wasn't my cup of tea. From his writing style to the lack of depth i felt this story should have contained. The characters were one dimensional in my opinion with pretentious dialogue that no teenager engages in and it just seemed like he tried way too hard to make something out of nothing. I didn't feel as connected with this story or the characters as I would have if it was written by better authors.

^ THIS.












In Real Life, if any shitty teen - wether they had cancer or not - would be so absorbed by their own perceived wisdom as to publicly spout page-long pompous 'metaphors' about Life, Death And Everything, someone would be sure to tell them to shut the f*ck up. But of course, this is narc-wank-land, so we are told by the author, the author's fans and every other character and situation in the book that Gussy and Hazy are Teh Deepest Teens Evah! The author even goes so far as to use the one character that does not pander to Gussy and Hazy as the patsy, the fall-guy we are all supposed to boo.
Ugh... I have no adequate words for this drivel. Your review is much more eloquent than I could ever be. Thumbs up from me!




P.S. My favorite line of yours: "There was never any real reason for them to fall in love with one another, and that is crossing dangerously close into Twilight territory." The reference to Twilight is golden :)

I completely failed to connect with the book. Gus died? Well whatever.
After being surrounded by JG fans treating the book like it's a classic, this review comes as a breath of fresh air!