Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

mark monday's Reviews > Dr. Adder

Dr. Adder by K.W. Jeter
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
131922
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: new-dimensions, z-kw-jeter, scifi-60s-70s-80s

Dr. Adder is a brilliant surgeon in the horrible wreck of future Los Angeles, a messianic figure who earns his keep by re-sculpting the various teenage runaways of Orange County into the whores of Los Angeles - amputating and reconfiguring various body parts, wiping away their minds if necessary. This sickeningly sick character is an unrepentant woman-hater and homophobe; he is also the wildly popular and beloved symbol of freedom for both L.A. and the O.C. John Mox is a brillant corporate strategist and voice of moral authority in the drug-addled suburban sprawl of future Orange County, a messianic figure who keeps his power by out-maneuvering his fellow corporate shareholders and by addressing the denizens of Southern California during his daily televised hour of folksy, grandfatherly sermons. This sickeningly sick character is an unrepentant hater of all things associated with the body's desires; he is also the commander of a legion of bloodthirsty stormtroopers called The Moral Force. E Allen Limmit is a disaffected young man, fresh off the giant-mutated-chicken farm, once a soldier and later the manager of the farm's mutated-chicken-whore brothel. A somewhat bland and often irritable lad with vague ambitions to be somebody, do something, whatever, just getting the hell off of the farm. Limmit travels to The Interface - a terminally seedy street that functions as a meeting place for the degraded, drugged-up, fuck-happy denizens of L.A. & O.C. And he has brought a terrifyingly effective death-weapon with him - an instant-massacre machine. Woot! Guess who gets caught between a rock and a hard place.

The novel "Dr. Adder" is perhaps the first cyberpunk novel, being completed in 1972 (although not published until 1984). It certainly has that grim, tarnished, dirty urban feeling that is key to the subgenre. It has the nonchalant violence and misanthropy, the cynicism, the snark; its narrative includes violent corporate interests, casual murder & slaughter, bad-trip imagery, and a strange kind of psychic pre-internet that exists somewhere in between the mind and the electromagnetic static of radio waves & television transmissions. It is certainly a distinctive book: angrily snappy, grimly jokey, gleefully vindictive. An adventure and an excoriation.

I didn't particularly care for it. I do admire how forward-looking it turned out to be. As a person who lived for many years in So-Cal, I appreciated and shared the equal-opportunity contempt for both Los Angeles and Orange County. (Have there ever been such radically different neighbors?) The novel also has admirable chutzpah when it comes to the sheer imagintion on display - the seedy 'Rattown' of L.A., the sewers beneath it, the mind-numbing & hypocritical lifestyle of O.C., the casually bizarre chicken farm, various vividly characterized cast members, a tremendous dream-battle, gruesome & revolting sexuality, a bloodbath on the Interface, even an extraterrestrial Visitor... all quite strikingly stylized, all of these things practically popping off of the page. Jeter has a way with words. Although often lamentably sloppy (particularly in terms of plotline), the man is still a creative and often surprising wordsmith, with ideas that are well ahead of their time and are often fairly sophisticated. He knows how to write a great sentence and he knows how to create savage alternates to our reality. But the constant misanthropy - and, most obnoxiously, the constant misogyny - really began to annoy me. It seemed facile. Like an angry teenager from a cushy middle class background. All of the posturing felt shallow and unearned.

I am not a moral relativist. Sorry. I don't care what the fookin' era is all about or if this is just how a particular culture operates... if a specific demographic is demeaned over and over again, in a work of fiction or elsewhere, I am not going to make excuses for it. I may not completely dismiss the piece in question, but I'm not going to overlook bullshit or come up with reasons why it's not so bad. And so it is with the novel Dr. Adder: fearless, clever, boldly imaginative; the first cyberpunk novel; a sardonic encapsulation of the moral battles & culture wars between counties Orange & Los Angeles; concepts from Burroughs moving about in a world of Sadean cruelty; a deranged & violent sci fi farce; a gushing blood-fountain of excessive, crypto-techno-organic deviance... all that, yes, great... but also constantly WOMAN-HATING. Ugh. You may be ingenious... but still: Fuck Off, novel! Your attitude sucks.
34 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Dr. Adder.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 14, 2012 – Started Reading
May 14, 2012 – Shelved
Finished Reading
May 26, 2012 – Shelved as: new-dimensions
April 15, 2013 – Shelved as: z-kw-jeter
December 4, 2018 – Shelved as: scifi-60s-70s-80s

Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Invadozer Misothorax Circular-thallus Popewaffensquat hope you dont give up on this guy, Noir & Farewell Horizontal are pretty damn good. he moved out of L.A.! everything is ok now!!


mark monday definitely will not be giving up on him. the creative juice was there in spades. i'm still intrigued, despite getting extremely annoyed as well. a colleague lent me her entire collection of Jeter (including Farewell Horizontal) so i'll be going through as many as i can over the next few months.


Invadozer Misothorax Circular-thallus Popewaffensquat also if you have the Blade Runner 2 book by Jeter, read the first 3 pages. pretty damn good police grit-reel. the rest of the book is just ok though.
sorta thought Stars My Destination was the first cyberpunk novel. years later everyone caught up.


mark monday good point re Stars My Destination. i see it... but i don't see it as well. the hallucinatory mind-bending stuff, yeah. and some futuristic grit, well a lot of it. but i see that awesome novel as more of a pre-New Wave but still pretty New Wave take on the pulp scifi One Man's Incredible Adventure style. more of a revenge-filled picaresque through many different sorts of places, rather than a snapshot of a grim, gritty, cyber-urban landscape. the latter being how i see cyberpunk.


message 5: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus Glad you read it, wouldn't recommend it, eh?

Very much liked your review.


mark monday thank you! i just cut out a long paragraph of ranting that had nothing to do with the book, so i feel somehow... cleaner.

i WOULD actually recommend this one to anyone who likes cyberbunk. it is seminal. sort of a well-kept secret too. and who doesn't like secrets?


message 7: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus I'll stick to enjoying your review. I got the *feel* of the novel, you conveyed a sense of the atmosphere Jeter created, and that's what I'd want.

No one can say enough horrible things about LA/OC for me anyway. Dad grew up in Venice in the 1920s, his sisters are fascists Republican matrons in the OC, blahblahblah; nothing to learn there!

I shall accept your expertise with an appreciative pursing of the lips and pass on to my next read.


mark monday two such different places... and both so uniquely horrible. they are like evil siamese twins who hate each other. and who feed off each other as well.

that sounds like the premise of a horror novel by K.W. Jeter!


message 9: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus Heh. I knew it! You secretly *are* KW!


message 10: by mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday oopsy! my cocky self-loathing gave me away!


message 11: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus *speaking to mm's cock*

He doesn't mean it, dear boy, it's a figure of speech, there there


message 12: by Jeffrey (new)

Jeffrey Keeten sick character is an unrepentant woman-hater and homophobe

So that pretty much leaves just sex with himself?

I can see how the boy might want off the mutated-chicken-whore-brothel. It gives whole new meaning to wanting off the farm.

Great review Mark.


message 13: by mark (last edited May 25, 2012 12:04PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday thanks Jeffrey!

about the mutated-chicken farm... that brief sequence actually contains the one genuinely human moment, as Limmit responds forlornly to a one of the giant mutated chicken's slow death.

So that pretty much leaves just sex with himself?

misogynists love to have sex with women. and then hate them (and themselves) afterwards!

one of the many odd things about this novel is that - for a book that is so pumped up sexually - Dr. Adder's sexuality is not even discussed. at one point it is clear he is in love with a particular character (a woman), but that part is brief. it's surprising because the protagonist Limmit is a highly sexual character who has many sex scenes, but the title character - responsible for all of the deviant sexuality in & out of the Interface - is barely sexualized. he's basically asexual.


message 14: by Traveller (new)

Traveller Good lordy.. it sounds like it must have been a nightmare read - one of those that you don't want to read before bedtime in case it creeps into your dreams...


message 15: by Jeffrey (new)

Jeffrey Keeten I read Infernal Devicesand was underwhelmed although I do understand the significance of the book being an early steampunk novel. He was ahead of his time, but lacked the cool factor that Gibson had in spades.


message 16: by mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday Good lordy.. it sounds like it must have been a nightmare read - one of those that you don't want to read before bedtime in case it creeps into your dreams...

ha! well, i think that may speak to a great difference between the two of us, Traveller. i often like the disturbing stuff (except when it involves children, ugh). i love horror and i often 'enjoy' my nightmares. when i've had a particularly intense one - usually happens about once every week or two - i'll often wake up all agitated & sweaty & upset... and then i'll think to myself man, that was a good one! i must have mental issues to respond like that, but my nightmares are like slowly building & eventually terrifying horror-movie rollercoaster rides. fun!

the problem with Dr. Adder, for me at least, is its casual disregard and not-so-hidden loathing for women. it ran so deep that i was reminded of the KKK's views on blacks & jews. the anti-woman attitude was just so noxious.

if i could subtract that from the novel - impossible, because it is everywhere - this would actually be a 4 star book for me.


message 17: by Traveller (last edited May 25, 2012 12:28PM) (new)

Traveller mark wrote: "Good lordy.. it sounds like it must have been a nightmare read - one of those that you don't want to read before bedtime in case it creeps into your dreams...

ha! well, i think that may speak to a..."


LOL... are you sure you're not confusing nightmares with wet dreams, Mark?

Just asking, just asking..

(It almost sounds like you have 'em both at the same time, though.. LOL)


message 18: by mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday Jeffrey wrote: "I read Infernal Devicesand was underwhelmed although I do understand the significance of the book being an early steampunk novel. He was ahead of his time, but lacked the cool factor that Gibson h..."

i have that one on the shelf too. odd that Jeter was one of the original progenitors of both cyberpunk & steampunk - and yet he barely gets mentioned these days.


message 19: by Traveller (new)

Traveller Jeffrey wrote: "I read Infernal Devicesand was underwhelmed although I do understand the significance of the book being an early steampunk novel. He was ahead of his time, but lacked the cool factor that Gibson h..."

OMG, I didn't realize this is the same guy that wrote Infernal Devices ... I think I might have bought the latter, because I enjoy steampunk.


message 20: by mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday LOL... are you sure you're not confusing nightmares with wet dreams, Mark?

for me, those are synonyms!


message 21: by Jeffrey (last edited May 25, 2012 12:38PM) (new)

Jeffrey Keeten Traveller wrote: "Jeffrey wrote: "I read Infernal Devicesand was underwhelmed although I do understand the significance of the book being an early steampunk novel. He was ahead of his time, but lacked the cool fact..."

Yeah it took me a minute to put it all together too. William Gibson had rock star status in the book world, on par with China Mieville now, and nobody was talking about Jeter even though he wrote steampunk and cyberpunk novels before we knew what to call them. Maybe that was a problem, he wrote them before the genres were defined.


message 22: by Robert (new)

Robert Seems like there's heaps of "punk" but where's the "cyber"?


message 23: by mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday great question. i was thinking the same thing myself, for a little while. it certainly has the cyberpunk aesthetic, what with the degraded urban setting, cynical sensibilities, mutated sexuality, devious corporate interests, terrible weapons, terrible people, etc. but all that can be seen in Burroughs.

when you find out that (view spoiler), i thought Okay, this must be why it has been called the first cyberpunk novel. although that felt like a little bit of a reach.

but then you finally get to a character in the last third of the book who opens a door for Dr. Adder & Limmit to enter a kind of proto-cyberspace. there is a battle there. and the mental-electromagnetic battleground is indeed very Neuromancer etc.

so i think the combination of all of the above is why it is considered the first cyberpunk novel. or at least a novel that paved the way.


message 24: by Robert (new)

Robert Fairy Nuff.


message 25: by Spacewanderer (new)

Spacewanderer Of course, if you were to judge a book strictly by its cover, this one would have to be five stars; Dr. Adder looks like Steve Perry with a metal hand!


message 26: by mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday you don't get much more stylish than Dr. Adder. or deadly!


message 27: by Greg (new) - added it

Greg Love your review but I'm still interested in reading the book as an early cyberpunk work.

Mark said: ' But the constant misanthropy - and, most obnoxiously, the constant misogyny - really began to annoy me. It seemed facile. Like an angry teenager from a cushy middle class background. All of the posturing felt shallow and unearned.'

If the book was really written in 1972 then Jeter would've only been 22 at the time. This likely explains the 'angry teenager' element on the writing.


message 28: by mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

mark monday in general, I don't think anyone should take my critical reviews as a reason to not read a book! they are just my perspective.


back to top