ŷ

Nataliya Yaneva's Reviews > The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
9539140
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: in-english

Bulgarian review below/Ревюто на български е по-долу
“If he be Mr. Hyde�, he had thought, “I shall be Mr. Seek�.
If “Jekyll and Hyde� was a painting, it would’ve been Edvard Munch’s “The Scream�. If it was a mental illness, it would’ve been dissociative identity disorder, not schizophrenia, as is the popular guess if there’s more than one of you inside your head. I would say that the story can also be likened to a long dark tea-time of the soul, because it would take you just that much to read it. Beware however, for you will ponder it for a long time afterwards and it’ll make your flesh creep.

I suppose it can be argued that in each of us there’s something we cannot fully explain. It happens to be seen “in a bad light�, we “jump out of our skin� or we “are out of our senses�. Thinking about it, we have a slight obsession for others to perceive us in our good half, or third, or however many sides we imagine that we have. This is probably also related to the prehistoric fear of banishment from the community, which meant certain death due to the lack of mammoth meat for dinner, or the roar of a predatory saber-toothed cat instead of “good morning�. The strain to appear more normal than we actually are is one of the curses of mankind. Sometimes the exertion of this exhausts us completely, and we even begin to wonder if there is such a thing as “normality�. The answer, of course, is always “no�.

In his Gothic novel, Robert Louis Stevenson carries to excess the good Dr. Jekyll’s struggle with his inner demons, and thus the blood-chilling Hyde appears. What better metaphor for the guileful human nature than being both the protagonist and the antagonist of one’s own life. One would have thought that if you cut off the sprout of evil in yourself and throw it away like a weed, it would be some sort of an ending. However, weeds have the annoying propensity to grow under all types of unfavorable conditions, unlike goodness, which, alas, requires quite special care and everlasting nourishment. Mr. Hyde, uprooted and then sprouting, left alone to his own devilish devices, slowly begins to choke his creator. The natural course of everything is towards chaos. Many efforts are needed to harness the chaos in one’s soul. Denial though only aggravates the situation.

Mr. Hyde is an allegory of the evil which smoulders in each of us. The scientific exorcism practiced by Jekyll eloquently shows the catastrophic consequences when one isn’t reconciled with all pieces of their own nature and is trying to be something they are not. It also shows that if you try to trick the much needed equilibrium in nature, nothing good is in store for you. I don’t entirely agree with Sartre, who thinks “hell is other people�. Hell is always in our own consciousness. And everything that it shows us is just an illusion.
~~~~~~~~~~~~

“If he be Mr. Hyde�, he had thought, “I shall be Mr. Seek�,
Ако „Джеки� и Хайд� беше картина, щеше да е „Викът� на Едвард Мунк. Ако беше заболяване, щеше да е дисоциативно разстройство на личността, не шизофрения, както е популярно да се смята, ако сте повече от един там някъде вътре. Бих казала, че историята може да се оприличи и на дълъг, мрачен следобеден чай на душата, защото толкова би ви отнело да я прочетете. Колко време след това ще си мислите за нея и ще настръхвате, е съвсем друг въпрос.

Предполагам може да се поспори, че във всеки от нас пребивава по нещо, което не можем напълно да обясним. Случва се да ни видят „� лоша светлина�, „излизам� извън кожата си� или „н� сме на себе си�. Като се замисля, имаме лека обсебеност другите да ни възприемат откъм добрата ни половина, третина или колкото там страни си въобразява всеки, че има. Вероятно това е свързано с праисторическия страх от отлъчване от общността, който означавал сигурна смърт поради липса на мамутско месо за вечеря или рев на кръвожаден саблезъб вместо „добро утро�. Напрежението да се покажем по-нормални, отколкото всъщност сме, е едно от проклятията на човечеството. Понякога усилието от това ни изцежда напълно и като цяло започваме да се питаме има ли такова нещо като „нормалност�. Отговорът, разбира се, винаги е „не�.

В своята готическа новела Робърт Луис Стивънсън довежда до крайност схватката на добрия доктор Джекил с вътрешните му бесове и така се появява смразяващият кръвта Хайд. Каква по-добра метафора на лукавата човешка природа от това да си едновременно протагонистът и антагонистът на собствения си живот. Човек би помислил, че ако откъснеш издънката на злото у себе си и я захвърлиш като плевел, това ще е нещо като край. Плевелите обаче имат досадното свойство да растат при всякакви неблагоприятни условия, за разлика от доброто, на което, уви, му трябват доста специални грижи и непрекъснато подхранване. Господин Хайд, изтръгнат и после покълнал, оставен сам на себе си и собствените си дяволски развлечения, бавно започва да задушава създателя си. Естественият ход на всичко е към хаос. Много усилия трябват, за да се овладее хаосът в нечия душа. Отричането обаче само влошава положението.

Господин Хайд е алегория на злото, което тлее по малко във всеки. Научният екзорсизъм, който практикува Джекил, красноречиво показва катастрофалните последици, когато някой не се е помирил с всички части на собствената си същност и се опитва да бъде нещо, което не е. Показва също и че ако се опитате да изиграете равновесието, което е необходимо в природата, не ви чака нищо добро. Не съм напълно съгласна със Сартр, който смята, че „адъ� � това са другите�. Адът винаги е в собственото ни съзнание. А всичко, което то ни показва, е просто илюзия.
106 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 15, 2012 – Shelved
November 30, 2017 – Started Reading
November 30, 2017 – Shelved as: to-read
November 30, 2017 – Shelved as: in-english
December 1, 2017 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Kat valentine ( Katsbookcornerreads) Fabulous review!💖😉


Nataliya Yaneva Thank you, Kat :~)


Dirk Hello Natalia,
great review. Jekyll and Hide was always one of my favorite. Did you know the history. Stevenson based his book on a carpenter from Edinburgh. He where gambling and lost a lot of money. Therefore he made double keys for the houses he worked during the day. And went into these in the night. Stealing all he could get. As Edinburgh is full of these stories, I liked a visit very much.


Nataliya Yaneva Didn't know that! Quite interesting. Thanks for sharing Dirk :)


Dirk My favorite is about two brothers stealing dead Bodys for the university of medicine in 1600.
When I visited the town and made a guided tour in the night in the catacombes under the city they told us, that on the main cemetery they had towers looking not to the outside, than to the center of the cemetery.
The reason where, people stealing dead Bodys for the university of medicine. With these towers the grieving where able to watch and guard the dead.
The two brothers needed money and so they where stealing the fresh buried and sold the dead to the university. The students where always in need for fresh bodies to train there skills. Once they where captured, found guilty, got brought to death and where delivered to the university as new material.
From one of the brothers the skin of his back was used to make leather for a book of medicine. Which you can see in the library of the University.


Nataliya Yaneva You've had a really nice goose bumpy tour there :) R. L. Stevenson has a story about that in a book I just finished, "Scottish Ghosts". The story is called "The Body Snatchers" and it's almost exactly the same as what you've been told :)


Dirk Goose bumps are good. Like these when it goes to history. My son made a presentation in school about the wimen chirch in Munich. There is a so called devils step short behind the entrance door. It is a imprint of a foot dated back to the time when the church was build.
The legend goes that the builder of the church had not enough time to finish his work. So he decided to do a deal with the devil. He should help him with the work and the devil forced him to leave all windows out of the building. If would not do what the devil wanted he had to give his soul.
When the church was finished with all the windows the devil came to the church. He went to the entrance and saw now windows. Therefore he was so angry that he stomped on the ground and left the footstep. The builder had managed to build the church such that there is just on spot on the entrance where you could not see any of the windows.


The Esoteric Jungle In Hinduism (to use western nomenclature) the “Super Ego� (Manas) and Id (wild untamed dehin essence or hidden hide to something quite more in us) have to unite and man the every day outer happy faced social persona/personality which is lower ego. They seem to do so as lets say a savage but conscientious gentleman (as a real guru always is, with wolf and lamb in balance). If this doesn’t happen in time wild untame essence can become a monster that gets stuck and dissasociated, such male virility especially is lost or reacts, as is happening in children today more and more in their hatred of schools teaching the super ego is “imaginary only� and such teachings which they are not allowed to confute but must swallow and compute - so their essence or dehin or Hyde goes awry, goes MGTOW and etc. etc.

The id must not be suppressed then it seems, as Dionysianism teaches and Nietzsche. Freud got Psychological evolution backwards for us (and nicked Nietzsche’s one time love Salome btw). So many in the west now try to manically gain semblence of social normality in them by making their super ego a smaller and imagined part of their whole lower ego like Dr Jeckyll tries and it doesn’t work, like Freud wrongly suggested as the path to wholeness and integration. Second rate Freudian BS as Cobain called it. This produces bad inversed results. This repressing as imaginary, drinking the skepticism elixer, doesn’t work also as Stevenson seems to be showing here (who, per Rodney Collin was part of an esoteric school in the west affiliated with Nietzsche and Hans Christian Anderson for a time in Vienna - quite unlike Freud who admitted he was on the outskirts of Shamanic groups and nicked their ideas, Jung should have parted with him long before).

The lower ego or outer personality should become rather a smaller and mostly imaginary part of the wholeness of our great divine subconscious and super ego or spiritual Manas. The lower outer ego is Jeckyll, is almost irrelevant, but a useful zonal aspect of one’s fuller self - as self mastery is most important.

This upward progression to wholeness into one’s higher self is considered taboo in the west, dissasociation and a sin in the west and yet is called detachment and non-identification and waking up in the East and the path to salvation. You decide which is right but Stevenson seemed to know a thing or two, great re view.

Anyways it annoyed me to no end for weeks once when the actor who played Golem said in interview it is not really Smeagol the dictator who is bad but gollum. And gollum does, he said, the actual attempted killing, not semingly evil Smeagol bossing in himself. What the crap? But the more I thought about that the more it makes sense.

I think also back to the mystery keyrgma box and key behind the monster man out in the trash bin that leads to the stars in Mulholland Drive and it seems all a mystery play between persona and essence. The blond is outer shiny persona going mad cause she can’t make sense of her dark essential nature self. Notice the final scene is of these happy smiling old people (grandparents) chasing her in their empty looks into madness with her screaming like Munch’s painting and she goes mad seeing this nice side is actually the more fake side in her world, the world, that she let happen, accrue to her.

Darker Essence “seems� more evil and to be repressed but is the silent wanderer in us and more innocent and more good and powerful, and more good than mere power, in a way of conscience beyond rules, and our real self, and that which perhaps sees us rather than is seen and the scene, and it makes us whole.

Anyways great review


back to top