Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

As someone who loves spiritual practices as well as reading spiritual books, I can 100% understand why you didn’t like it! I’ve read this book years ago and it didn’t resonate with me, plus, the structure of the book as a whole is something I vividly remember as a bit exhausting, not in the mind-bending, thought provoking kind of way. Ok, I’m ranting here! Haha. A fair review, Baba! :)

Debbie Y wrote: "As someone who loves spiritual practices as well as reading spiritual books, I can 100% understand why you didn’t like it! I’ve read this book years ago and it didn’t resonate with me, plus, the structure of the book as a whole is something I vividly remember as a bit exhausting, not in the mind-bending, thought provoking kind of way. Ok, I’m ranting here! Haha. A fair review, Baba! :)"

That's interesting to hear, thanks for rant... sharing :)
Maybe it's a book of its time, a time when I feel progressive thinking and art were at a place where they often included/needed a sense of being out-there, non-conformist etc. to a point where on face value they were sometimes just nonsensical?

You’re welcome, haha :) Perhaps that’s the case. A good book is timeless, one you can get back to read and enjoy even years after the first time you opened it. It’s like a good album! If art turn irrelevant because the time changes, it means something. You don’t look at a Goya painting and think, nah, this is outdated. :)