JimZ's Reviews > Cloud Atlas
Cloud Atlas
by
by

I surrender. I throw in the towel. I was not going to rate this novel because I did not read all of it, and I ordinarily think it unfair to rate a book as "do not like" if you didn't read the entire book. But this book was 509 pages in length and I read 293 pages. I gave it my best shot. 1 star for me. �
I tried two separate times to read it. I returned it to the library the first time after reading the first three “chapters� � “The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing,� “Letters from Zedelghem,� and “Half Lives: The First Luisa Rey Mystery� � because I was having a hard time following it, and thought the writing was pretentious. But I returned to the novel knowing that so many GR folks liked it. I read the next chapter, “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish�, and it was sort of OK but again the writing, to me, was full of one-liners�. it seemed to me David Mitchell was saying “see what a clever writer I am!� with practically all sentences that were written in that chapter. Then I got to “An Orison of Sonmi-451� and that was torture. Language was used that were not real words (e.g., conurb, AdV, handsony). I did not even try to read the next chapter, “Shousha’s Crossin� An� Ev’rythin� After�, because the first paragraph contained gobble-dee-gook language and this chapter was 70 pages full of such language.
So then I was at that part of the novel where supposedly things were supposed to be tied in to prior chapters (supposedly what made the novel different and clever) and I thought maybe things would get clearer. Things only got worse. I had to bail early on in the second manifestation of “An Orison of Sonmi-451”…I just couldn’t take it anymore. Then I went to the second manifestation of “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish� and after reading the first several pages just skipped to the last 3 pages to get its ending. Then I went to “Half Lives � The First Luisa Rey Mystery� and read that second manifestation in its entirety and I honestly do not know what Mitchell’s point was…there were so many twists and turns and unexpected events and killings that I just couldn’t understand why he was writing the way he was writing. Left unread were the last two second manifestations of “Letters from Zedelghem� and “The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing�.
I admit it � I could not understand what point or points David Mitchell was making in this very long novel. Well-respected authors including David Eggers and Michael Chabon loved it. It was a Man Booker Prize finalist…book reviews from newspapers and magazines abounded on the back cover and the first few pages of the book extolling its brilliance.
I feel bad because I bailed on this novel two separate times, and because other people got it and I did not. However, I think I would have felt even worse had I tried to read this entire novel.
Reviews (uniformly positive):
I tried two separate times to read it. I returned it to the library the first time after reading the first three “chapters� � “The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing,� “Letters from Zedelghem,� and “Half Lives: The First Luisa Rey Mystery� � because I was having a hard time following it, and thought the writing was pretentious. But I returned to the novel knowing that so many GR folks liked it. I read the next chapter, “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish�, and it was sort of OK but again the writing, to me, was full of one-liners�. it seemed to me David Mitchell was saying “see what a clever writer I am!� with practically all sentences that were written in that chapter. Then I got to “An Orison of Sonmi-451� and that was torture. Language was used that were not real words (e.g., conurb, AdV, handsony). I did not even try to read the next chapter, “Shousha’s Crossin� An� Ev’rythin� After�, because the first paragraph contained gobble-dee-gook language and this chapter was 70 pages full of such language.
So then I was at that part of the novel where supposedly things were supposed to be tied in to prior chapters (supposedly what made the novel different and clever) and I thought maybe things would get clearer. Things only got worse. I had to bail early on in the second manifestation of “An Orison of Sonmi-451”…I just couldn’t take it anymore. Then I went to the second manifestation of “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish� and after reading the first several pages just skipped to the last 3 pages to get its ending. Then I went to “Half Lives � The First Luisa Rey Mystery� and read that second manifestation in its entirety and I honestly do not know what Mitchell’s point was…there were so many twists and turns and unexpected events and killings that I just couldn’t understand why he was writing the way he was writing. Left unread were the last two second manifestations of “Letters from Zedelghem� and “The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing�.
I admit it � I could not understand what point or points David Mitchell was making in this very long novel. Well-respected authors including David Eggers and Michael Chabon loved it. It was a Man Booker Prize finalist…book reviews from newspapers and magazines abounded on the back cover and the first few pages of the book extolling its brilliance.
I feel bad because I bailed on this novel two separate times, and because other people got it and I did not. However, I think I would have felt even worse had I tried to read this entire novel.
Reviews (uniformly positive):
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Cloud Atlas.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 9, 2020
–
Started Reading
July 9, 2020
– Shelved
July 9, 2020
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Elena
(new)
Jul 09, 2020 06:09PM

reply
|
flag




As for the "point", I took it as exploring his recurring themes of reincarnation/cycles, and especially of predacity: how and why people prey on others.
EDIT: I just noticed I omitted a crucial "not" in my first sentence. I'm very sorry!

Maybe check out The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, a straightforward historical novel that is one of my favourite books by Mitchell.

It's my favourite, and you can read it as a straightforward historical novel. But the middle section isn't really (as becomes especially obvious when you read The Bone Clocks).

It's my favourite, and you can read it as a straightfo..."
Oh yes. JimZ, do not go near The Bone Clocks.

There should be a proverb, "beware of reading friends bearing recommendations." If you hated Cloud Atlas, I'm willing to bet you won't like his others. I ended up reading four Murakamis ("Pretentious? Lui?") Take courage, Jim Z - resist!

Paul, I'm with you on Murakami after Killing Commendatore.

There's only so much Mitchekami one can take.



There's only so much Mitchekami one can take."
Ha ha ... That's very droll, Paul!

As for the ..."
No worries Cecily!

It's my favourite, and you can read it ..."
OK, I will make a note of that.

I am an outlier extraordinaire! :(

Me? I just enjoyed the ride, took it for what it was and didn't read it chronologically. That helped.

For me, it's a completely arbitrary state of mind that I can't defend, as with art and fashion. Some you like, some you don't, and who knows why?



I fell in love with the film 5 minutes into watching it, but trying to read the book afterwards was a great disappointment. I dnf'ed it after Sloosha's Crossing.
But Jim, if you like watching films, I can heartily recommend Cloud Atlas :)

I confess, I'm surprised. I'd read the book a couple of times before watching the film, and assumed it wouldn't make much sense without having read the book. I stand corrected.


I think they did a brilliant job. To have the main actors play in several of the story lines, some even in all six of them, helped hit home the "everything is connected" tagline.
It is not often that I prefer the film to the book, but this is one of those cases (the other one I can think of off the top of my head is Catch-22)

It's rare for me (and this isn't an instance of it for me). I find it happens with books I disliked: something the film is better or less bad!