ŷ

JimZ's Reviews > Cloud Atlas

Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
99765491
's review

did not like it

I surrender. I throw in the towel. I was not going to rate this novel because I did not read all of it, and I ordinarily think it unfair to rate a book as "do not like" if you didn't read the entire book. But this book was 509 pages in length and I read 293 pages. I gave it my best shot. 1 star for me. �

I tried two separate times to read it. I returned it to the library the first time after reading the first three “chapters� � “The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing,� “Letters from Zedelghem,� and “Half Lives: The First Luisa Rey Mystery� � because I was having a hard time following it, and thought the writing was pretentious. But I returned to the novel knowing that so many GR folks liked it. I read the next chapter, “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish�, and it was sort of OK but again the writing, to me, was full of one-liners�. it seemed to me David Mitchell was saying “see what a clever writer I am!� with practically all sentences that were written in that chapter. Then I got to “An Orison of Sonmi-451� and that was torture. Language was used that were not real words (e.g., conurb, AdV, handsony). I did not even try to read the next chapter, “Shousha’s Crossin� An� Ev’rythin� After�, because the first paragraph contained gobble-dee-gook language and this chapter was 70 pages full of such language.

So then I was at that part of the novel where supposedly things were supposed to be tied in to prior chapters (supposedly what made the novel different and clever) and I thought maybe things would get clearer. Things only got worse. I had to bail early on in the second manifestation of “An Orison of Sonmi-451”…I just couldn’t take it anymore. Then I went to the second manifestation of “The Ghastly Ordeal of Timothy Cavendish� and after reading the first several pages just skipped to the last 3 pages to get its ending. Then I went to “Half Lives � The First Luisa Rey Mystery� and read that second manifestation in its entirety and I honestly do not know what Mitchell’s point was…there were so many twists and turns and unexpected events and killings that I just couldn’t understand why he was writing the way he was writing. Left unread were the last two second manifestations of “Letters from Zedelghem� and “The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing�.

I admit it � I could not understand what point or points David Mitchell was making in this very long novel. Well-respected authors including David Eggers and Michael Chabon loved it. It was a Man Booker Prize finalist…book reviews from newspapers and magazines abounded on the back cover and the first few pages of the book extolling its brilliance.

I feel bad because I bailed on this novel two separate times, and because other people got it and I did not. However, I think I would have felt even worse had I tried to read this entire novel.

Reviews (uniformly positive):




65 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Cloud Atlas.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 9, 2020 – Started Reading
July 9, 2020 – Shelved
July 9, 2020 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Elena (new)

Elena Sala How disappointing, Jim. Never read anything by this author so I have no idea what you're writing about, but your review sure made me laugh!


message 2: by Kim N (new)

Kim N Based on your review and those of other ŷ friends, I guess it's safe to push this one to the bottom of my TBR.


message 3: by Barbara (new)

Barbara Maybe I'll rethink this one. Love an honest review, Jim.


Mary JimZ, sorry it didn’t work for you! Also sorry I didn’t write more of a review. In retrospect, one interesting think about Mitchell is that he regularly reuses characters - I realized this when I later read Black Swan Green, and figured out that the old lady in the story was the young woman in Cloud Atlas, daughter or niece of the composer in the second story. Have you read Ghostwritten - a sort of series of short stories, and the second has a reference back to the first, and the third to the second, to the point that the second last story is almost fully references. I recommended to a friend for her book club and more than one person showed up with a large chart of references back and forth.


message 5: by Candi (new)

Candi Jim, I've tried Mitchell once and I just didn't find anything appealing there for me either. I think you gave it more than a fair shot!


message 6: by Cecily (last edited Jul 10, 2020 05:42AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Much as I love this book, and most of his others, you should NOT feel bad for not enjoying it. You gave it two good shots, which is more than I would with something I wasn't enjoying.

As for the "point", I took it as exploring his recurring themes of reincarnation/cycles, and especially of predacity: how and why people prey on others.

EDIT: I just noticed I omitted a crucial "not" in my first sentence. I'm very sorry!


message 7: by Gerhard (new)

Gerhard Shame JimZ, I feel your pain ... Not all books are liked or enjoyed by all readers, even if they're universally praised. I recently saw an article about 'The Top 40 Books of 2020 So Far' or suchlike on ŷ ... and realised I haven't read a single one.

Maybe check out The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, a straightforward historical novel that is one of my favourite books by Mitchell.


Cecily Gerhard wrote: "... The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, a straightforward historical novel that is one of my favourite books by Mitchell."

It's my favourite, and you can read it as a straightforward historical novel. But the middle section isn't really (as becomes especially obvious when you read The Bone Clocks).


message 9: by Gerhard (new)

Gerhard Cecily wrote: "Gerhard wrote: "... The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, a straightforward historical novel that is one of my favourite books by Mitchell."

It's my favourite, and you can read it as a straightfo..."


Oh yes. JimZ, do not go near The Bone Clocks.


message 10: by Paul (new)

Paul Well, Jim Z, I'm a fan of odd, innovative books that might be labelled "pretentious", but I'm with you on this one. I tried it and abandoned it. It just didn't appeal. Similarly, I'm aware of all the positivity around this author, so part of me wants to try again.

There should be a proverb, "beware of reading friends bearing recommendations." If you hated Cloud Atlas, I'm willing to bet you won't like his others. I ended up reading four Murakamis ("Pretentious? Lui?") Take courage, Jim Z - resist!


message 11: by Gerhard (new)

Gerhard Paul wrote: "Well, Jim Z, I'm a fan of odd, innovative books that might be labelled "pretentious", but I'm with you on this one. I tried it and abandoned it. It just didn't appeal. Similarly, I'm aware of all t..."

Paul, I'm with you on Murakami after Killing Commendatore.


message 12: by Paul (new)

Paul Gerhard wrote: "Paul, I'm with you on Murakami after Killing Commendatore."

There's only so much Mitchekami one can take.


message 13: by Hanneke (last edited Jul 10, 2020 10:04PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hanneke Gosh, Jim, you did not like Cloud Atlas! How did that happen! It is one of my favorite books ever! I feel that I have to defend David Mitchell. He is not pretentious. His boundless fantastical tales just pour out. He is just amusing himself and us!


message 14: by Fran (new)

Fran Jim...sorry this tome did not work for you. Onward to your next five star read!


Laysee Oh, Jim. Sorry, this Mitchell book didn't click with you. But you tried to read it twice and that alone is admirable. Your review conveyed why it was such a frustrating read. I've a much lower threshold for books or authors that disappoint. I do not re-read. I must say this is one Mitchell you either love or hate. Try Black Swan Green instead if you haven't read it. It's my favorite Mitchell.


message 16: by Gerhard (new)

Gerhard Paul wrote: "Gerhard wrote: "Paul, I'm with you on Murakami after Killing Commendatore."

There's only so much Mitchekami one can take."


Ha ha ... That's very droll, Paul!


message 17: by JimZ (new) - rated it 1 star

JimZ Cecily wrote: "Much as I love this book, and most of his others, you should NOT feel bad for not enjoying it. You gave it two good shots, which is more than I would with something I wasn't enjoying.

As for the ..."

No worries Cecily!


message 18: by JimZ (new) - rated it 1 star

JimZ Gerhard wrote: "Cecily wrote: "Gerhard wrote: "... The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, a straightforward historical novel that is one of my favourite books by Mitchell."

It's my favourite, and you can read it ..."

OK, I will make a note of that.


message 19: by JimZ (new) - rated it 1 star

JimZ Hanneke wrote: "Gosh, Jim, you did not like Cloud Atlas! How did that happen! It is one of my favorite books ever! I feel that I have to defend David Mitchell. He is not pretentious. His boundless fantasies just p..."
I am an outlier extraordinaire! :(


message 20: by Ingrid (new)

Ingrid I couldn't get through this book, so I didn't rate it.


message 21: by Kathryn in FL (new)

Kathryn in FL It sounds just ghastly. I am so glad I didn't make it a priority!


 Cookie M. Mitchell is hard to take. I don't think anyone understands him. Maybe if you are masochistic enough to read the book 2 or 3 times it will make sense.
Me? I just enjoyed the ride, took it for what it was and didn't read it chronologically. That helped.


PattyMacDotComma We're in good company, Jim. It has certainly divided readers. I can't pinpoint when it strikes me that an author is showing off instead of just writing well, but once I cross that line, I find it hard to go back.

For me, it's a completely arbitrary state of mind that I can't defend, as with art and fashion. Some you like, some you don't, and who knows why?


message 24: by T (new)

T Try Number9Dream or Ghostwritten. Number9 is a bit Murakami-like, a plus for me! I haven't tried Cloud because historical fiction is not always my favorite, although time travel is.


message 25: by Mary (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mary Jim, read Mitchell’s The Thousand Autumns of Jacob Dezoet. His most approachable work. Seeing the Cloud Atlas movie might help. Mitchell fans are sort of a cult group.


lethe Mary wrote: "Seeing the Cloud Atlas movie might help."

I fell in love with the film 5 minutes into watching it, but trying to read the book afterwards was a great disappointment. I dnf'ed it after Sloosha's Crossing.

But Jim, if you like watching films, I can heartily recommend Cloud Atlas :)


Cecily lethe wrote: I fell in love with the film 5 minutes into watching it, but trying to read the book afterwards was a great disappointment. I dnf'ed it..."

I confess, I'm surprised. I'd read the book a couple of times before watching the film, and assumed it wouldn't make much sense without having read the book. I stand corrected.


message 28: by Kris (new)

Kris Minne Same feeling here. Unreadable. 200+ pages read and I still feel sorry for the time spent on trying to get through.


lethe Cecily wrote: "I confess, I'm surprised. I'd read the book a couple of times before watching the film, and assumed it wouldn't make much sense without having read the book. I stand corrected."

I think they did a brilliant job. To have the main actors play in several of the story lines, some even in all six of them, helped hit home the "everything is connected" tagline.

It is not often that I prefer the film to the book, but this is one of those cases (the other one I can think of off the top of my head is Catch-22)


Cecily lethe wrote: "It is not often that I prefer the film to the book..."

It's rare for me (and this isn't an instance of it for me). I find it happens with books I disliked: something the film is better or less bad!


Bucky Buchanan (from Saratoga) I’m attempting to start this one but I can already tell from the beginning I will not enjoy it. It seems like one of those books that might not get better�


back to top