Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Declan Hickey's Reviews > Bach: Music in the Castle of Heaven

Bach by John Eliot Gardiner
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
120647565
's review

liked it

'Perhaps there was a fundamental reluctance in [Bach] to pull back the curtain and reveal himself; unlike most of his contemporaries, he turned down the opportunity to submit a written account of his life and career when the opportunity arose.' If only the same were true of John Eliot Gardiner. As charming and well-researched as this survey of the Bach’s choral music may be, I can't help but feel an underlying self-indulgence throughout—a sense that, behind the ostensible portrait of the Cantor of Leipzig, lies a self-portrait of Gardiner himself, ever eager to share with his readers the magnitude of his musical undertakings and the calibre of his professional credentials.

The intended audience is also something of a mystery to me: is this a book for the literate musician, who is starved almost entirely of musical dots throughout, or for those, in Bach's own words, 'not presentable in music', who will no doubt find the lengthy passages of musical description/analysis a tad off-putting.

That said, there are many redeeming features: the brilliant exploration of the John Passion as music-drama, the refreshing foray into the milieu of Leipzig's coffee houses, the biographical rigour worthy of any Bach scholar. And, yes, the writing style, which is occasionally verbose but always full of life—a good recipe for that slightly curious genre of popular musicology.
5 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Bach.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 1, 2020 – Started Reading
October 1, 2020 – Shelved
November 12, 2020 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Ollie So is that kind of criticism of 'close reading' he does for the Passions and the Cantatas BS?


Ollie P.s. you forgot to list every slightly well-known person you know in the acknowledgements to this review


Declan Hickey Nah I wouldn’t say BS, but its advantage lies more in its impressively broad scope than in the insight of the commentary imo. He focuses v heavily on music-text relationships which on the whole don’t seem that contentious, but much of the book is more description than analysis (i.e. he basically draws your attention to salient music-text relationships rather than offering, for example, a formalist analysis of meaning within the musical structure itself), which is where I think it loses interest (except, perhaps, for those with comprehensive familiarity with the rep or performers with an interest in the Gardiner’s practical interpretations).


Declan Hickey But the acknowledgments are kingly


Ollie Thank you, I was wanting to know that for a while


back to top