Mario the lone bookwolf's Reviews > Cujo
Cujo
by
by

That´s what is happening when a year long mixed substance abuse drug alcohol trip doesn´t go ingenious with the works It, Different Seasons, Pet Sematary, Misery, etc., but turns to a literary horror trip for the readers.
At least King admits not remembering writing this one, but liking it for whatever reasons, probably typical parent´s ostrichism, although he should have noticed with under 2 permille blood alcohol, and years later after rehab, that something is going terribly wrong, that he forgot to give his characters the credible motivations and introspections to construct a satisfying plotline and premise.
He said in an interview that he got the inspiration when he met a strange guy in his cottage, home, maybe in the woods, not sure anymore, who had a huge beast of a pretty terrifying dog. Well, that was it already, in other creative enlightenment moments he wrote timeless masterpieces with a real dark force manipulating humans that is culminated into a main antagonist, side characters, sometimes even some meta, and the characterization he is so famous for, but this is just facepalm.
I knew this was average or bad because I am totally into swarm intelligence ratings, so was at least well prepared and truly, letting characters tell the story hardly ever went so wrong in his career, maybe his novel Cell as the only example I remember at the moment, but there might be the, especially subjective, one or other too. A logical, and often seen consequence of the creative writing approach without plotting and just letting creativity flow completely unleashed, are weak and illogical endings and general not really clean and believable plotlines, but there is nothing in here that makes King´s work great.
What shows that King is one of the greatest authors of all time is that even this one can´t be given less than 3 stars, because even completely wasted, not caring about complex storyboarding and creating an interwoven premise, etc. he produces an average novel. Not that it´s a good paragon for the kids, aspiring writers, or something, but one has to acknowledge and honor to write better than most humans would be able to do when high as hell. Drink and do drugs to find your muse, or even more than just one if you overachievingly overdose and see two of them, sexy monozygotic twins, if you want to be successful, doesn´t seem to be the best writing advice. Except beer, that´s just for recreation and harmless.
I guess dog lovers and people not caring about the unusual, superficial, soap opera style characters and their uninteresting lives that are just added to let the dog take a better bite and have more to chew away at, might even see it as a solid 4 star, but I´ve read too much King, some bad ones too, to not protect readers by keeping the rating low.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
At least King admits not remembering writing this one, but liking it for whatever reasons, probably typical parent´s ostrichism, although he should have noticed with under 2 permille blood alcohol, and years later after rehab, that something is going terribly wrong, that he forgot to give his characters the credible motivations and introspections to construct a satisfying plotline and premise.
He said in an interview that he got the inspiration when he met a strange guy in his cottage, home, maybe in the woods, not sure anymore, who had a huge beast of a pretty terrifying dog. Well, that was it already, in other creative enlightenment moments he wrote timeless masterpieces with a real dark force manipulating humans that is culminated into a main antagonist, side characters, sometimes even some meta, and the characterization he is so famous for, but this is just facepalm.
I knew this was average or bad because I am totally into swarm intelligence ratings, so was at least well prepared and truly, letting characters tell the story hardly ever went so wrong in his career, maybe his novel Cell as the only example I remember at the moment, but there might be the, especially subjective, one or other too. A logical, and often seen consequence of the creative writing approach without plotting and just letting creativity flow completely unleashed, are weak and illogical endings and general not really clean and believable plotlines, but there is nothing in here that makes King´s work great.
What shows that King is one of the greatest authors of all time is that even this one can´t be given less than 3 stars, because even completely wasted, not caring about complex storyboarding and creating an interwoven premise, etc. he produces an average novel. Not that it´s a good paragon for the kids, aspiring writers, or something, but one has to acknowledge and honor to write better than most humans would be able to do when high as hell. Drink and do drugs to find your muse, or even more than just one if you overachievingly overdose and see two of them, sexy monozygotic twins, if you want to be successful, doesn´t seem to be the best writing advice. Except beer, that´s just for recreation and harmless.
I guess dog lovers and people not caring about the unusual, superficial, soap opera style characters and their uninteresting lives that are just added to let the dog take a better bite and have more to chew away at, might even see it as a solid 4 star, but I´ve read too much King, some bad ones too, to not protect readers by keeping the rating low.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Cujo.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
October 22, 2020
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Joe
(new)
Oct 23, 2020 09:32AM

reply
|
flag

Holy heck, I have already enough with watching rabid animals on youtube, wouldn´t need that in real life, although your example is just a sober monster of a behemoth dog.

I guess I´ll restart my movie watching career when 8k or full immersive VR and AR are there in decades or something. And then maybe not with movies that have average ratings on rottentomatoes, imdb, and metacritics. Hm, I fear I am as picky with watching movies as with reading, if the meta ratings aren´t clean, no consumption. Except for genres I adore.

Like Arrival (2016), RT give them 98% (like the most perfect movie ever, the hell?), and IMDB give them 7.9, its fair enough bcoz I watched it and only rate it 7/10. Its a sci-fi movie with serious vibe, not everyone will love it.
Imdb is trusted for normal audience.

I am just believing in the user ratings of rottentomatoes, professional critics are just ridiculous, giving the joker bad ratings and praising the garbage Once upon a time in Hollywood. Same with metacritic, even the same constellation, forget the left professional critics and just listen to the right, meta, audience scores.
That´s why, as you say and I agree, the imdb is the best, basic democratic concept without pseudointellectual ivory tower egomaniacs promoting fringe philosophical Eurotrash culture noble prize dirt boredom s***. Wow, I really seem to have an anger management problem.

And I just watched Barbarian, a quite good german series on netflix. The second german thing I ever watched I guess after boring Das Boot.

And I just watched Barbarian, a quite good german series on netflix. The second german thing I ever..."
I am not really watching TV that much, close to never, and especially nothing from Europe, it´s similar to my reading preferences. There is no industry, no real professional creative writing or directing college education, no money for good actors or animations, just the desperate need to compensate having nothing substantial with the mentioned "pseudointellectual ivory tower egomaniacs promoting fringe philosophical Eurotrash culture noble prize dirt boredom s***
But I´ve heard that this
is quite a mind penetration.