Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Stephen's Reviews > The Princess Bride

The Princess Bride by William Goldman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1413439
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: 1970-1979, fantasy, humor-and-satire, swashbucklers

5.0 stars. HOW AMAZINGLY GOOD IS THIS BOOK YOU ASK?....so good it is almost


This is a literary treasure and one that I can not recommend more highly. Let me start by saying that prior to reading this book I had probably seen the movie version a dozen times or so and ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT!! I only mention this so that you know where I'm coming from in case you are not a fan of the movie as I think if you like one you will like the other and, conversely, if you didn¡¯t like the movie, the book may not appeal to you as much.

As for the book, I was AMAZED at what a superb adaptation of the novel the movie was. Along with the Lord of the Rings trilogy and No Country for Old Men, this may be the best adaptation of a classic novel that I have ever come across. This may lead you to ask whether it is even worth it to read the book given that much of what is in the book is on the screen. My answer to that would be a resounding YES!!

First of all, the book is as much fun as the movie and the tone of the writing is unique, playful and very funny. Despite knowing the plot of the book intimately, I found the reading experience to be fresh and new.

I am going to assume that people reading this have seen the movie, read the book or at least have an understanding of the basic plot. If not, the book description and other reviews do a very good job of explaining it. Instead, I thought it might be helpful to mention those parts of the book that were not included in the movie or that I thought the book¡¯s treatment was superior (i.e. Book is Better) and those aspects of the movie that I thought were superior to the source material (i.e. Movie is Better).

BOOK IS BETTER:

1. Prince Humperdinck¡¯s Zoo of Death (not mentioned in the movie and I thought it was interesting and gave great insight into the character).

2. The Book does a much better job than the movie in describing Prince Humperdinck as a truly evil person and thus a top notch villain.

3. The book contains a whole Chapter on Inigo Montoya that provides details of his childhood and his Father¡¯s original encounter with the Six Fingered Man (this is dealt with in a very brief conversation in the movie). I really enjoyed the expanded version.

4. The book also contains a whole chapter on Fezzik and shows his childhood and early years. This was excellent and I really liked learning about his trouble in adapting to deal with his enormous size.

5. The beginning of the book describes how Buttercup becomes the ¡°most beautiful woman in the world¡± and the fate of the women in front of her. This is absolutely HYSTERICAL. I wish they would have found a way to incorporate this into the movie because it was very enjoyable.

6. All of the interruptions in the Narrative where the author is explaining why he cut out whole sections of the original Morgenstern novel (the fictional novel of which this novel was supposedly the abridged ¡°good parts¡±) were very funny and made the book a unique experience.

MOVIE IS BETTER:

1. I must begin with Miracle Max. The book is really good, but Billy Crystal was absolutely AMAZING (as was Carol Kane who played Miracle Max's wife). Crystal¡¯s dialogue in the movie was better than the book and is a great example of making the original even better without messing with the feel of the story.

2. Wallace Shawn as Vizzini (pictured above) gives a truly great comic performance and made the Movie version of the character even more fun then the book version. All I kept hearing in my head whenever he was on stage in the book was him shouting INCONCEIVABLE!!

3. Similarly, Mandy Patinkin as Inigo Montoya is another example of amazing casting that made the on screen version of the character even more fun than the book version.

4. The final scene between Westley and Prince Humperdinck was more fun in the movie than in the book.

Bottom-line, if you have enjoyed the movie but have not read the book, I strongly recommend it. Similarly, if you have read the book and have not seen the movie, I strongly recommend that as well. Both are terrific.

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Princess Bride.
Sign In ?

Reading Progress

November 15, 2008 – Shelved
January 17, 2011 – Started Reading
January 19, 2011 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-33 of 33 (33 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Joel i also think the movie's framing device with the grandpa and the sick boy is better than the book's overlong satire on the publishing world and the fictional William Goldman's failing marriage, etc.


Stephen Joel wrote: "i also think the movie's framing device with the grandpa and the sick boy is better than the book's overlong satire on the publishing world and the fictional William Goldman's failing marriage, etc."

I completely agree...I should have included that.


Brenda This is one of my favorite movies, and I didn't think I had read the book, but reading your review, some parts sounded very familiar. So I wonder if I read it before I started keeping track of what I'd read. In any case, it's one I need to read (or re-read).


Jackie One of my favs


Joel this review popped up in my feed and i was going to comment on how i hate the book's framing device, when i saw that i already said that three months ago. but i wanted to point out that i agree with me, and think i make an excellent point.


Stephen Joel wrote: "this review popped up in my feed and i was going to comment on how i hate the book's framing device, when i saw that i already said that three months ago. but i wanted to point out that i agree wit..."

And I would like to say that I agree with me agreeing with you both before you agreed with you and after you agreed with you that the movie's framing device was much better than the book. Previous me said I should include that in the review but now me obviously didn't listen.


Milo I wish the original version was still available. I haven't been able to find it anywhere.


message 8: by Kat (last edited Apr 05, 2011 12:11PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kat The introduction to the book (not the persona's intro, the real author's) is also a lot of fun, and it's proof yet again that when the author adapts his own work into movie format, the results are always WAY better than if some Hollywood writer does it.


Joel Milo wrote: "I wish the original version was still available. I haven't been able to find it anywhere."

what is different? is it just the updated introduction? i think i only read the 25th anniversary edition.


message 10: by Milo (last edited Apr 05, 2011 02:47PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Milo Goldman cut out huge parts of the book, parts he thought were boring. While I'm sure that he was right to minimize it some I would've like to read the original. S. Morgenstern would undoubtedly be outraged with how his book has been tampered with.


message 11: by Joel (new) - rated it 3 stars

Joel oh. uh, you know that's a joke right? the "original" version doesn't actually exist. he's just being funny with all the "good parts" stuff.


Eh?Eh! Did you see the "Buttercup's Baby" addition to the 25th anniversary edition! He's a tease!!!!


message 13: by Joel (new) - rated it 3 stars

Joel Eh?Eh! wrote: "Did you see the "Buttercup's Baby" addition to the 25th anniversary edition! He's a tease!!!!"

i did. it's like literature's most tortuously prolonged joke.


Kat Kennedy Yes, there is no actual original. This book was written by William Goldman. There is no Morgenstern. Just as there aren't really any fire swamps, etc.

Stephen, fantastic review! I love it! This is one of my all-time favourite books so I'm glad you managed to write one of your uniquely eloquent and awesome reviews to do it justice!


kwesi ÕÂӢʨ I have this book hiding behind my bookshelf. I don't know when I'll start reading after measuring the thickness of the book. Haha.


Stephen Joel wrote: "oh. uh, you know that's a joke right? the "original" version doesn't actually exist. he's just being funny with all the "good parts" stuff."

Yeah right...I suppose next you are going to say that Lovecraft was lying about The "Mad" Arab Abdul Alhazred writing the Necronomicon.


Stephen Kat wrote: "Stephen, fantastic review! I love it! This is one of my all-time favourite books so I'm glad you managed to write one of your uniquely eloquent and awesome reviews to do it justice!"

Thanks, Kat. This is certainly on my list of "most fun" reads. As I said in my review, I really wish they could have found a way to include the whole "Buttercup becomes the most beautiful woman in the world" segment because I thought that was terrific.


Kat Kennedy They couldn't because the year they made the movie, I was born and they could no longer claim Buttercup was the most beautiful woman in the world. Sad really. But I did love that part of the book!


Stephen Kat wrote: "They couldn't because the year they made the movie, I was born and they could no longer claim Buttercup was the most beautiful woman in the world. Sad really. But I did love that part of the book!"

Enjoy the title while you can, I think my 11 year old daughter has designs on the crown.


Kat Kennedy I'm happy to hand it over. I'm sure she more than deserves it!


Stephen Kat wrote: "I'm happy to hand it over. I'm sure she more than deserves it!"

Not according to my 6 year old daughter who believes that an "accident" may be her future if she ever gets the title...I think I need to go do some serious parenting.


Kat Kennedy For once I'm kind of relieved that I have two boys...


message 23: by Milo (new) - rated it 5 stars

Milo Joel wrote: "oh. uh, you know that's a joke right? the "original" version doesn't actually exist. he's just being funny with all the "good parts" stuff."

Oh. Haha of course I was joking...of course. *sigh* I'm not fooling anyone am I?


Jonathan Terrington I just stumbled upon your review of this and fully agree with all you said!


Stephen Thanks, Jonathan. This is a wonderful story.


Jonathan Terrington I fully agree, my mum introduced me to it through the movie first and so naturally I had to read the book such a brilliant film was based on.


message 27: by Neelam (new) - added it

Neelam inconceivable!!


message 28: by Krystal (new) - added it

Krystal Givens I AGREE!! INCONCEIVEABLE!!!!!!!!


Catherine I have seen the movie well parts of it and it is hilarious iocane kills I thought Buttercup was dead


Catherine Inconceivably good


Catherine I agree with Neelan


Catherine Neelam


message 33: by Lily (new)

Lily Valley Thank you so much for this review! That was exactly what I was looking for. I'll buy the book!


back to top