Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

³¢³Üí²õ's Reviews > ±·Ã³²õ

±·Ã³²õ by Yevgeny Zamyatin
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
117399210
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: e-5, russian-literature, science-fiction, fantasy

It is a dystopia novel, one of the very first (1923), and which has not aged a bit, it would have inspired George Orwell for 1984. I read it in this new translation, which is undoubtedly more modern, lively, sometimes funny, and told in the present tense. The title is "We," whereas, in the old translation, it was "We others." Already, the title is more peremptory, direct, and, in my opinion, more accurate. The writing is beautiful, refined, sometimes abrupt, not always easy, but fitting perfectly with the main character's thought, lost in his contradictory reflections, writing full of images with a jerky rhythm, which follows the thread of the thought, a thought that gets lost. It is a great success, the description of a logical, cold, mathematical, unified reflection, without nuances, which had confronted with a more ethereal, poetic, fanciful thought inside the very mind of our character. , D-503. language is of paramount importance in this story. This novel criticizes Stalinist communism, the single thought, and capitalist Taylorism. The Science-fiction aspect is then only a pretext, a medium to bring its ideas. He did it with great subtlety. The author manages to put himself on the other side. The poetic soul, the dream, would only be a dangerous illness that one must treat.
This novel transported me and surprised me. But first, we'll have to make room for my desert island.
276 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read ±·Ã³²õ.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
February 4, 2021 – Shelved
December 24, 2021 – Shelved as: e-5
March 2, 2025 – Shelved as: russian-literature
March 2, 2025 – Shelved as: science-fiction
March 2, 2025 – Shelved as: fantasy

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Bob (new)

Bob Newman I read this back in 1963, so it was another me, but I remember being repelled. I didn't feel tenderness, I felt horrified at such a cold, mathematical world. It always stood as an example of an academic's idea of dystopia. Maybe I was wrong? Too young? But wow, that's the impression I've been carrying all these years.


³¢³Üí²õ Bob wrote: "I read this back in 1963, so it was another me, but I remember being repelled. I didn't feel tenderness, I felt horrified at such a cold, mathematical world. It always stood as an example of an aca..."

I think this one is better than Orwell's 1984...


message 3: by Bob (new)

Bob Newman You could be right there. It certainly hit me hard.


³¢³Üí²õ Bob wrote: "You could be right there. It certainly hit me hard."

;)


Patrick Peterson I liked 1984 by Orwell much better.
And also the novella "Anthem" by Ayn Rand was better too.

Some very funky stuff in this book - hard to decipher, at least listening to the AudioVox version, which did not have the best narrators.


³¢³Üí²õ Patrick wrote: "I liked 1984 by Orwell much better.
And also the novella "Anthem" by Ayn Rand was better too.

I'll add it as a recommendation by you. Thanks.

Some very funky stuff in this book - hard to decipher, at least listening to the AudioVox version, whi..."



Wreade1872 The Iron Heel (1908) by Jack London is also worth a look.


Julio Pino Luis, Orwell stole the plot of WE and turned it into "1984". He admits as much in his review of this novel. WE has not aged well because the pupil outdid his master.


³¢³Üí²õ Julio wrote: "Luis, Orwell stole the plot of WE and turned it into "1984". He admits as much in his review of this novel. WE has not aged well because the pupil outdid his master."

Interesting, Julio. Thank you.


³¢³Üí²õ Wreade1872 wrote: "The Iron Heel (1908) by Jack London is also worth a look."

Thank you.


Cecily Excellent review. I read a newish English translation, which also has the one-word title, as well as a very informative preface from the translator. The beauty of the language was a particular surprise, but everything about it was wonderful.


³¢³Üí²õ Cecily wrote: "Excellent review. I read a newish English translation, which also has the one-word title, as well as a very informative preface from the translator. The beauty of the language was a particular surp..."

Thank you, Cecily.


Celeste   Corrêa Obrigada, ³¢³Üí²õ, pela resenha. Nunca consegui entender este livro (nem entendo a razão de o ter classificado com 5 estrelas, lapso certamente!!). A tuas informações são valiosas e incentivam-me a voltar a pegar nele.


³¢³Üí²õ Celeste wrote: "Obrigada, ³¢³Üí²õ, pela resenha. Nunca consegui entender este livro (nem entendo a razão de o ter classificado com 5 estrelas, lapso certamente!!). A tuas informações são valiosas e incentivam-me a vo..."

De nada, Celeste. Peguei neste livro, depois de ter sido recomendado por um amigo e também depois da resenha de 1984 de Orwell.


back to top