Mark Porton's Reviews > Lolita
Lolita
by
by

You know, we quite happily � or more correctly, are prepared to, put ourselves inside the mind, or wear the skin of a murderer or a psychopath when reading a first-person narrative. How else can we get to understand the way these beings think and feel? But there is a real reluctance, aversion and repulsion to enter the wicked depths of a paedophile’s mind. For me, this is the hurdle I had to overcome to read Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov. I am so glad I did. I have just read the crescendo ending of this piece of art - and I need to write.
A small snippet of Nabokov’s ability to paint a picture.
Mr Beardsley was a flabby, dough-faced, melancholy bachelor tapering upward to a pair of narrow, not quite level shoulders and a conical pear-head which had sleek black hair on one side and only a few plastered wisps on the other. But the lower part of his body was enormous, and he ambulated with a curious elephantine stealth by means of phenomenally stout legs
Terribly tragic, absurd and funny.
So, the writing is superb, it’s a classic for a reason. Nabokov goes into intricate detail when describing Humbert Humbert’s conniving, manipulative and controlling ways when trying to ensnare the unsuspecting, pubescent Dolores. But he doesn’t provide the same intricate, and in this case pornographic detail, when our villain is satisfying his own carnal compulsions. He goes very close, but to my mind, he does one of two things, he either (1) goes right up to the moment the poor girl is violated or (2) uses metaphor, double-entendre to indicate what happened. He doesn’t need to do more than that.
Make no mistake, HH is a horrible beast of a man. How’s that for a colossal slice of judgement of a man who may be born that way? But to examine that further � this reader arrived at this conclusion by assessing the consequences of HH's dark obsession. To be sure, he essentially turned Delores into a sex-slave. He also behaved in a deplorable way to Delores� Mother � poor woman. Putting it bluntly. his every waking moment was devoted to how to get her and then how to have his way with her.
What a way to ruin a childhood. Destroy a life.
Nabokov’s depiction of Delores is spot-on, she’s flighty, moody, and has nasty turns, the usual stuff you may see with teenage girls (I had 4 of them). However, her occasional flirty behaviour � must be a consequence of her being sexualised so early. Why would a young girl turn that tap (faucet) on to a man in his thirties? I know young girls can mimic dance moves to music videos on TV, which are unashamedly sexual, and try and wear some of the revealing clothes of their favourite popstars, but that seems different to a 12-year-old girl being flirty � to a grown man.
Nabokov had me chuckling at some of the ways he describes some of HH’s thinking � for example when he wondered if, when talking to an amazingly annoying teacher, he should Marry Pratt and strangle her. I wouldn’t normally chuckle at that � but it was the way he wrote it and the way it ‘popped up�. I didn’t expect this slice of dark humour � that is often when funny is at it’s funniest.
There was also a laugh out loud moment (really) when HH was talking to, or being talked AT, by Pratt again � this annoying teacher managed to get Humbert’s name wrong at every turn. Her monologue to him contained the following variations of “Humbert� - ”Mr Humbird, Dr Humburg, Mr Humberson, Dr Hummer, Mr Hummerson� I howled. Humbert didn’t even flinch. I can truly identify with that as my surname is often misspelled as “Porter, Ponton or Poston� but once, hilariously, I received a letter at work addressed to a Mr Morj Porrydon. How the heck can that happen? I am now numb to punters getting my name wrong. HH was too � it didn’t even raise a mention when Pratt was babbling on.
So, it wasn’t all gruelling, the writing is outstanding and deserves to be appreciated, re-read and/or read slowly. I will DEFINITELY re-read this one, as there is more to be taken from this book for sure. There must also be a study guide I can get my sweaty hands on somewhere. What a privilege to have now recently read Gogol and Nabokov with a wicked splash of Highsmith in between � a very, very lucky bloke indeed.
I am happy to leave the world of Humbert Humbert for the moment � Lolita is an amazing story.
5-Stars
A small snippet of Nabokov’s ability to paint a picture.
Mr Beardsley was a flabby, dough-faced, melancholy bachelor tapering upward to a pair of narrow, not quite level shoulders and a conical pear-head which had sleek black hair on one side and only a few plastered wisps on the other. But the lower part of his body was enormous, and he ambulated with a curious elephantine stealth by means of phenomenally stout legs
Terribly tragic, absurd and funny.
So, the writing is superb, it’s a classic for a reason. Nabokov goes into intricate detail when describing Humbert Humbert’s conniving, manipulative and controlling ways when trying to ensnare the unsuspecting, pubescent Dolores. But he doesn’t provide the same intricate, and in this case pornographic detail, when our villain is satisfying his own carnal compulsions. He goes very close, but to my mind, he does one of two things, he either (1) goes right up to the moment the poor girl is violated or (2) uses metaphor, double-entendre to indicate what happened. He doesn’t need to do more than that.
Make no mistake, HH is a horrible beast of a man. How’s that for a colossal slice of judgement of a man who may be born that way? But to examine that further � this reader arrived at this conclusion by assessing the consequences of HH's dark obsession. To be sure, he essentially turned Delores into a sex-slave. He also behaved in a deplorable way to Delores� Mother � poor woman. Putting it bluntly. his every waking moment was devoted to how to get her and then how to have his way with her.
What a way to ruin a childhood. Destroy a life.
Nabokov’s depiction of Delores is spot-on, she’s flighty, moody, and has nasty turns, the usual stuff you may see with teenage girls (I had 4 of them). However, her occasional flirty behaviour � must be a consequence of her being sexualised so early. Why would a young girl turn that tap (faucet) on to a man in his thirties? I know young girls can mimic dance moves to music videos on TV, which are unashamedly sexual, and try and wear some of the revealing clothes of their favourite popstars, but that seems different to a 12-year-old girl being flirty � to a grown man.
Nabokov had me chuckling at some of the ways he describes some of HH’s thinking � for example when he wondered if, when talking to an amazingly annoying teacher, he should Marry Pratt and strangle her. I wouldn’t normally chuckle at that � but it was the way he wrote it and the way it ‘popped up�. I didn’t expect this slice of dark humour � that is often when funny is at it’s funniest.
There was also a laugh out loud moment (really) when HH was talking to, or being talked AT, by Pratt again � this annoying teacher managed to get Humbert’s name wrong at every turn. Her monologue to him contained the following variations of “Humbert� - ”Mr Humbird, Dr Humburg, Mr Humberson, Dr Hummer, Mr Hummerson� I howled. Humbert didn’t even flinch. I can truly identify with that as my surname is often misspelled as “Porter, Ponton or Poston� but once, hilariously, I received a letter at work addressed to a Mr Morj Porrydon. How the heck can that happen? I am now numb to punters getting my name wrong. HH was too � it didn’t even raise a mention when Pratt was babbling on.
So, it wasn’t all gruelling, the writing is outstanding and deserves to be appreciated, re-read and/or read slowly. I will DEFINITELY re-read this one, as there is more to be taken from this book for sure. There must also be a study guide I can get my sweaty hands on somewhere. What a privilege to have now recently read Gogol and Nabokov with a wicked splash of Highsmith in between � a very, very lucky bloke indeed.
I am happy to leave the world of Humbert Humbert for the moment � Lolita is an amazing story.
5-Stars
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Lolita.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
March 10, 2021
– Shelved
March 10, 2021
– Shelved as:
to-read
September 24, 2021
–
Started Reading
September 24, 2021
–
0.28%
"Well here goes, a wee bit anxious about this one - but everyone reckons it's wonderfully written, so here goes!!"
page
1
September 25, 2021
–
27.7%
"Well I'd better do things to stay alive - put this thing down and eat, wash and brush my teeth!!"
page
100
September 27, 2021
–
60.94%
"I'm not exaggerating - the writing here is brilliant. Even the way Nabokov describes the scenery of the road trip is totally immersive"
page
220
October 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
5-stars
October 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
classics
October 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
russian-authors
October 1, 2021
–
Finished Reading
February 5, 2022
– Shelved as:
nabokov
Comments Showing 1-50 of 57 (57 new)
message 1:
by
Jonathan
(new)
Oct 01, 2021 05:19PM

reply
|
flag


Looking forward to your "Highsmith Diaries" review!


That thing about the ‘flirty� Delores is it may all be in Humboldt’s head. Having had to study pedophiles for work once - they see and act on signs only they see. “She was flirting� was a constant justification for their actions. So I realised how well Nabokov got the characterisation. I must read it again - I’ve forgotten so much - but I also baulk at the idea of reading it while knowing it’s subject matter. I need to come to terms with it.
Powerful stuff literature - makes us think.
Btw, good thing you didn’t read it before you had girls.

I hope you do read it Jonathan and I hope my review snookers you into reading it - yes, it is so, so good my friend - looking forward to your review when you do!! Thanks for your kind words - Cheers Pornot ;-)

Hahahaha "Pontoon"!! FFS! - brilliant stuff Gary - I just saw your add and I'll be looking forward to your review mate. Thanks again :))


Looking..."
Totally understand Nattington, this obviously isn't for everyone - I'm kind of glad it's not a 'genre' - well I dont think it is!! Certainly a classic though - it really is one of my top 5. On Patty Highsmith, I will read it soon - but a friend at work gave me a New Yorker article on her - A Portrait of the Writer as a Young Woman - written by her 27th September 2021!!
Good look tomorrow my friend in the Grand Final - I want South Sydney to win too - GO THE RABBITOHS!! ;-)

Your review is very impressive and your enthusiasm is contagious. Well done!

Fabliss! Thank you for the link, I will investigate that soon.
And yes Marko, one more sleep!
GO THE RABBITOHS!!! ❤💚�
BUNNY POWER!!! 🐰🐰🐰

I just checked out review Bianca and thought it was great! Thanks so much for your kind comment too. You know, you're probably right about there being no cure for paedophilia - a very thought provoking book indeed - thanks again!

That thing about the ‘flirty� Delores is it may all be in Humboldt’s head. Having had to study pedophiles for work once - they see and act on signs only th..."
Thanks very much Nick, i enjoyed your perspectives on this one particularly That thing about the ‘flirty� Delores is it may all be in Humboldt’s head......yes of course!! Humbert probably misinterpreted, knowingly or unknowingly, playfulness for flirting. I agree it would have been really hard to read with my little girls around me - it's better now, because as they're in the late twenties/thirty - I can discuss it with them. Thanks again mate - Cheers Morj ;-)

Thanks so much Candi, high praise indeed from you means heaps - I just nipped over to re-read your review and of course it means so much more to me now I've read it. Your point about HH (and Nabokov?) being unreliable narrators is something that kind of slipped by me - referring also to Nick's comment above - of course, HH's version of events would be dodgy, anything that comes out of Humbert's mouth would be unreliable. The thought of you reading it with your daughter nearby would be massively uncomfortable for sure. This would be a great book to read in a study group over a period of time - plenty to discuss, debate and examine. Thanks again!!

Thanks very much for your comments Nilton. Indeed it will be interesting to read what you think about it - I'll have to look out for your review!!

Thanks very much for checking out my review Sue and your kind comments - yes, I know! I had to overcome the subject matter, pretty much like most of us no doubt - but for me, it was very much worth it in the end. Having said that, one could understand someone not taking this one on!





Yes, it would be interesting to see what you think of it now Jasmine, I could imagine being really uncomfortable reading this if you were a teenage girl - thanks for your kind comment!

Thanks heaps Laysee - much appreciated!! "Porrydon" can you imagine it? But worse still, how can you stuff-up "Mark" and turn it into "Morj"? I can still remember my colleague bringing the envelope into the lab - she was literally wetting herself!! Hahahaha. That description of Beardsley is a crack-up isn't it? But yes - on a serious note it is very heavy subject matter and obviously not for everyone!


Thanks Vishakha, 5-stars from us both hey - what a classic. I reckon you're right about the otherwordly prose - wasn't it brilliant? I couldn't put the thing down. You know I do remember the 'conspiracy of trees' phrase - it was a small touch but so memorable hey? I will follow your lead and go back to this one and enjoy it again (I hope!). I really appreciate your kind comments and 'lyrical' is a really nice thing to say thank you :))

Hahaha - 'made it through' well it wasn't as tough as you might think and it's a bit more complicated than that - all up 4 girls, 1 boy and 2 marriages Antoinette. Plus they're all great kids!! Thanks for the nice comments - I reckon (but who am I to say) you just may enjoy the writing here, if you can get over the subject matter. If you do read it, I'd love to know what you think :))

Well thing is mate, I haven't seen Greta on here for a while - so I'd be guessing - but, you're right Pedro it certainly is a highly thought provoking (to say the least) and well written book!





And so glad you quoted the book. It's all about the writing, the manipulation of language: the sounds, the wordplay, you capture that.
I love the quote you chose! (I haven't read Lolita in years and it's a pleasure reading that bit.)
You were true to your word and didn't return to my piece on Dolores. There's another comment waiting there for you. Read it and whatever or not-whatever :)
On to Pale Fire? Lolita was Nabokov's favorite of his works; most consider Pale Fire his masterpiece. It's my favorite too :)
And Speak Memory, his memoir of life in Russia and Europe which --for those who won't touch his fiction -- doesn't discuss the books. He was a terrific raconteur and led a truly extraordinary life.
Well done. And if that comes across as condescending, since we're fairly new to one another, it's not meant that way at all -- he's my favorite writer and I have never reviewed a single work of his, being humbled by them and too intimidated to take them on. Can't stop grinning from this.
But what inspired you to dub Lolita’s aging inamorato with such engaging redundancy? That, too, was easy. The double rumble is, I think, very nasty, very suggestive. It is a hateful name for a hateful person....Lends itself also to a number of puns."

No, I shall never regret Lolita. She was like the composition of a beautiful puzzle -- its composition and its solution at the same time, since one is a mirror view of the other, depending on the way you look...

.

Oh wow Lori, that is massive praise - thanks so, so much. It's all about the writing, the manipulation of language: the sounds, the wordplay,.......you got that in one!!! I checked out your review and thought it was terrific and I saw your notes about "Dolor" - seems Nabokov, does nothing by accident (of course he doesn't!) - I've just added Pale Fire, I need to read a couple of lighter reads first - but I did enjoy the work one has to put into his work. I will be honest, my stamina waned a little at about the 3/4 mark - that's due to fatigue rather than lack of interest. A re-read is essential as you know, having read it 10 times!!!! I would imagine, the more one reads this - the more one gets from it. You don't come across as condescending at all Lori - thanks again :))

That is just way too kind Annie!! My Dad would turn in his grave if he read that, he'd say "You can't say that to Mark!!!!" - but your kind words, are really appreciated friend - great to see you gave this one a solid 4-stars! :))

Yes for sure Lori, the ultimate dodgy Narrator - when I read this the 2nd time, I will be much more aware of this and will view his narrative in forensic detail - I'll look forward to that. What does "fwiw" mean? :))

Bahahahahahahaha .........breath........Bahahahahahaha.....that is friggin' hilarious Mr Mark, I particularly liked Mr Pots and Portorn, classic work my friend. You need to be careful with funny pieces like that, as I have a very, very fragile urinary tract (too much information I know, but some health warnings are important). Very kind comments mate, I can't wait to read what you think of it. One thing, it's really bugging me because I've tried to work it out - why the no "e's" with the "the's" - you must tell me, otherwise it will spoil my Sunday, as I'll be trying to figure it out all day and all night!! Cheers Morj ;-)

Also, Nabokov’s dark humour is appreciative, no doubt about it.

Oh what th hell � can’t leave a mate snookered all Sunday:
( “th� is just a habit from one-finger or thumb typing. Been doing it for years � rarely asked about it.
TECHNICALLY moving from tee-to-aitch-to-spacebar is smooth [like th end of that word] ; th missing e does not take away from comprehension.
In one of my classes I present a sentence showing only th horizontal bottom-half of th words, next I present only th top half of th sentence � they read it aloud perfectly.
PHILOSOPHICALLY it represents my take on casual writing� like texts. Just like in casual conversation with mates one wouldn’t harshly correct grammar or vocabulary � we kindly forgive each other those things. My wish is that a comprehensible misspelling lends to th casual/forgiving nature of an exchange between mates � possibly new ones.
So, there’s a long answer to a two-letter question. Now you can have a restful and satisfied Sunday afternoon mate!)
.

For what it's worth, the text abbreviation. Textspeaking on your remarkable review. Unfriend me! 🏃♀� :changes subject: Cannot understand how anyone could listen to Nabokov on audio since they'd miss every anagram and much of the rest of the wordplay. what do you think, Nat Korromp?*
*wonder if thatwould reach you at work? ;)

Also, Nabokov’s dark humour is appreciative, no doubt about it."
Thanks so much Adan, very kind - he certainly does have an eye for dark humour, I need to read more of his work :))

Thanks for saving my Sunday Mark, (Pothorn hahaha) - as stated in my reply on the other thread, I reckon you can drop the 'aitch' too - just think how much more efficient you'd be!!!! Cheers Morj ;-)

Hahahaha - believe it or not, I had to spend some time figuring that one out Lori!! Hey it's a long weekend here - so this is my Monday off and you have me performing mental gymnastics, I eventually got it though (genius hey) - I eventually got to "Park Morton" - once there, I was 'home and hosed'!! I'm not so sure that would reach me at work hahahaha - particularly if I couldn't figure it out. Great stuff Lorry :))


