Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Oriana's Reviews > The Elegance of the Hedgehog

The Elegance of the Hedgehog by Muriel Barbery
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
30800
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: read-2009

The Elegance of the Hedgehog is an absolutely breathtaking book. Just stunning. Light and airy, yet penetrating, with bits of soft brilliance on every page. My goodness, what an astonishing book.

There are two narrators. The first is Renée Michel, a middle-aged concierge at an extremely opulent luxury apartment building in Paris. She has spent her twenty-five years there cultivating a careful persona of low-class idiocy � leaving the TV on at all times, maintaining an unkempt appearance, speaking in grumbly monosyllables when any of the elite tenants ask her to water the plants or polish the elevator buttons or sign for a package. Of course, this is all an act. She is actually highly cultured, a fervent devotée of philosophy and film and Art (caps intentional). The veneer of stupidity is only to allow the people who live in the building to maintain the class hierarchy that keeps their worlds sensibly organized.

The other is Paloma Josse. She is twelve, terribly smart and terribly sad, unable to bear the simpering silliness of everyone she knows, especially her family. She has decided on her thirteenth birthday to burn down her apartment (when no one is home, of course; she doesn't want to actually hurt anyone) and then to kill herself. Her sections are told through two journals: a journal of profound thoughts and meditations, and a journal of the movement of the world. In the latter, she catalogues actual movements, those which are jarring, peculiar, or beautiful. For example, her mother takes her shopping one day, and they go to a chic lingerie shop. Her mother tries on a garish purple-flowered bra, but when she reaches for the matching panties, she finds that another lady has also just grabbed them. They then do a complex dance, wherein they have a very aggressive passive-aggressive discussion about who deserves the panties, while each tugging, white-knuckled, at the garment, not so hard as to rip the flimsy lace thing, but hard enough to keep one another aware that no one is yielding ownership. Etc. Paloma is searching for movements that are so profound that they can elevate a life predictably lived, and profundity that can remove the taint of silliness from those around her.

There is, of course, so much more than this. The denizens of the apartment building are all catalogued, in all their snobbishness, bitchery, haughtiness, and rare moments of humanity. (In this way I was reminded of Perec's Life: A User's Manual, though of course on a very tiny scale.) Renée watches archly as they all reveal their nasty attitudes and dirty secrets, and then she retires to her loge to watch Japanese art films and read phenomenology (and thoroughly debunk many reigning theories) and meditate on camellias, cats, class, grammar, beauty, and on and on.

In many ways a very still book, The Elegance of the Hedgehog manages, in its quiet way, to be about everything. It is so very soft, very quiet, and very graceful. Not so very much really happens here, at least until the last fifty pages or so, when everything twists and changes. Until then it is just a series of beautiful or saddening meditations, through the eyes of either Paloma or Renée, either of whom I was happy to listen to for pages and pages.

Because I can't think how else to describe this, here is a sample from each narrator.

From Paloma: If you want to understand my family, all you have to do is look at the cats. Our two cats are fat windbags who eat designer kibble and have no interesting interaction with human beings. The only purpose of cats is that they constitute mobile decorative objects, a concept which I find intellectually interesting, but unfortunately our cats have such drooping bellies that this does not apply to them. My mother, who has read all of Balzac and quotes Flaubert at every dinner, is living proof every day of how education is a raving fraud. All you need to do is watch her with the cats. She's vaguely aware of their decorative potential, and yet she insists on talking to them as if they were people, which she would never do with a lamp or an Etruscan statue.

From Renée: And then, summer rain...
To start with, pure beauty striking the summer sky, awe-filled respect absconding with your heart, a feeling of insignificance at the very heart of the sublime, so fragile and swollen with the majesty of things, trapped, ravished, amazed by the bounty of the world.
And then, you pace up and down a corridor and suddenly enter a room full of light. Another dimension, a certainty just given birth. The body is no longer a prison, your spirit roams the clouds, you possess the power of water, happy days are in store, in this new birth.
Just as teardrops, when they are large and round and compassionate, can leave a long strand washed clean of discord, the summer rain as it washes away the motionless dust can bring to a person's soul something like endless breathing.




(Oh, but minus one star for the most flabbergasting, devastating ending I have ever turned a page to find.)

*

From a review by a clerk at Powell's:

The plot is light on what you might call "action." It's a novel of conversations and self-reflections, and takes place almost entirely within the confines of the apartment building. But it moves like a life, in the best possible way.

Um, yes please! That sounds like all my favorite kinds of movies too.
88 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Elegance of the Hedgehog.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 29, 2008 – Shelved
May 15, 2009 – Shelved as: read-2009
Started Reading
May 16, 2009 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-34 of 34 (34 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

t-rex That sounds awesome.


Oriana I know! I can't wait to get some money so's I can read it...


Hannah Garden I just got a proof of this! If you are dying to read it now, I'll give it to you--another always turns up. I am excited about it, too, GO HEDGEHOGS!


Oriana Hannah! You are very great. If you really want to be so amazingly generous, I'll totally take the proof. (I'll actually be right by the store tomorrow afternoon, & could come get it...) But if you want it, I'd be happy to wait for the next one.


trivialchemy Oh no. Anything but this. I might have to reconsider our friendship...


Oriana Ha, well, just because we both find cooking with semen fascinating doesn't mean we have to agree about everything, now does it?


trivialchemy That's true. And anyway, partially thanks to your generous vote, my review has more "likes" than yours. Democracy has spoken, and I am right and you are wrong.


Oriana Democracy is a fake! I just don't have the voodoo-magic vote-getting abilities the rest of you seem to be blessed with.


message 9: by Jessica (new)

Jessica omg, this review diverges sooo from Iasiah's!

what to think?

one can only turn to said book to make up one's own said mind...


message 10: by Jessica (new)

Jessica in terms of gathering votes, few reviews gather as many votes as ones that diss...

which is not to say the novel should not be dissed.
I've not read it, so won't weigh in here--


Oriana that's true, Jessica. by far my highest-"liked" review is the one where I tore the shit out of that abysmal piece of trash Eat When You Feel Sad . But what can I do? I mostly read things I love.


trivialchemy Precisely my strategy. Mostly read the things I love, mostly review the things I abhor.


Oriana oh so that's the secret.


message 14: by Jessica (new)

Jessica a real fall-in-love with the book and/or writer review will also net you a good number of votes.
perhaps not quite as many as the good diss, but still, a respectable number. We respect that laying-the-heart-bare mode--the unabashed truth & openness of it


message 15: by Alan (new)

Alan I voted for Isaiah's (I think) but I also want to vote for your's, but isn't that a bit daft? I'll have to read it now and decide which one of you is right. I very rarely trash a book cuz most of the books I read I love (like you), GR helps with the choosing, plus my mates and writer's group - of course I make the odd mistake, like David Mitchell.


message 16: by Jessica (new)

Jessica you didn't like Mitchell, Alan?

I've not read him yet--


Manny I'm with Alan. You're both way too convincing!


message 18: by Alan (new)

Alan nah Mitchell doesn't do it for me, good writer though he is..


Oriana Oh no, now it looks like I'm begging for pity votes! I was just kidding, I don't care about voodoo magic.

Alan & Manny, I don't think it's so strange that two people could disagree so sharply about this book, and argue so compellingly for different sides. It's a pretty nonstandard book, where very little happens, and much depends on whether you enjoy, as I did, spending time with the two main characters, and whether you believe, as Isaiah does not, that they are worth getting inside the skins of for 300 pages. Plus let's be honest, I think both he and I tend toward hyperbole, so I imagine the truth of this book is that it is neither as breathlessly wonderful as I have simpered or as insultingly horrible as he has grumbled.

Plus any-anyway, I don't think voting should only be based on what you agree with, content-wise. I've voted for tons of reviews that, though convincing or funny or warm or wise, argued for books I would never ever ever read even the back covers of.


message 20: by Alan (new)

Alan You're right Oriana I vote for the elegance of the review and both your's and Isaiah's have said quality, plus a bit of hyperbole. But I still can't decide whether to add this to my to-read list or not.


message 21: by Jessica (new)

Jessica whether or not you do add it Alan, please take the apostrophe off of yours, above!

thanks
;-)


message 22: by Jessica (new)

Jessica (just your friendly grammarian acting up here).


trivialchemy oriana wrote: "I think both he and I tend toward hyperbole, so I imagine the truth of this book is that it is neither as breathlessly wonderful as I have simpered or as insultingly horrible as he has grumbled."

I'll definitely have to agree with this. Books that are completely ho-hum I tend to remain fairly ambivalent about; but if I even slightly dislike something, I tend to keep thinking about it until I work myself into an unholy froth of loathing, and then hammer out my review in that frame of mind. It makes things more emotional, which is more interesting, but also more hyperbolic.

In any case, I have tried to emphasize in the thread under my review that lots of people do like this book, so I wouldn't advise categorically that you not read this book if you had been planning on it.

What I WOULD advise is that if you find the two main characters not just uninteresting, but actually lame and contemptible, in the first 50-100 pages or so, do not cling to hope that it is going to improve. Oriana is exactly right, this book is basically just about spending some time with two main characters, and how they change (unconvincingly) when their lives intersect the cardboard cut-out japanese caricature pseudo-male towards the end (sorry). Point being that if you're not interested in spending time with them, you will dislike this book.


message 24: by Jennifer (formerly Eccentric Muse) (last edited Sep 14, 2010 09:40AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jennifer (formerly Eccentric Muse) thank you, oriana. I would have been broken-hearted if Isaiah's review (no offense, Isaiah!) had been allowed to stand as the last word on this one.

:-)

Also, I agree with you that the ending was "flabbergasting [and] devastating" -- but I added rather than docked a star for it. A beautiful touch of the surreal, I thought.


message 25: by Robin (new)

Robin I have to thank you, oriana, for quoting a bit of the book. That decided me on whether to read it or not.

(And, as far as reviews go, I'd vote for Isaiah's. I innately distrust the 'breathlessly wonderful' type. JMO)


trivialchemy Oh, Robin you don't need to use the subjunctive amongst friends. You can vote for Isaiah's. Oh, you can!


Oriana Jennifer: thanks, and your review was quite lovely too.

Robin: you'd better not take any book advice from me, in that case. : )


message 28: by Alan (new)

Alan thanks for the correction Jessica - I'm not the greatest grammarian.


message 29: by Jessica (new)

Jessica sorry for bringing down the conversation to such a trite level!
;-)


Harriet Great review! Oftimes the book made me laugh with delight at the antics of kindred spirits.


Oriana Thanks, Harriet!


Jason Great review. This book was quiet, but intense, and of coarse heart breaking.


Oriana Thanks so much, Jason. This was a great one.


message 34: by Nightinkgale (new) - added it

Nightinkgale I'm stealing this shelve idea that's a very good idea read-2022 let's go


back to top