Emily May's Reviews > Blood Meridian
Blood Meridian
by
by

Blood Meridian has been on my to read list for well over a decade because, quite honestly, I sensed it was not my cup of tea.
I’m not sure why exactly� maybe it’s that I’ve suffered my way through Faulkner and Hemingway already and had this gut feeling that they and McCarthy would sit at the same super deep literary dudes lunch table, y’know?
But it is one of those books that has wormed its way onto lists of "must read before you die" and "greatest American literature" so I just had to know. And now I do.
Blood Meridian was pretty much ignored by critics when it was first released and it wasn't until later that a bunch of them-- Harold Bloom, David Foster Wallace, etc. etc. --decided it was a super deep and clever book about human nature and violence. I understand completely why it was ignored initially and not so much why it was rediscovered as a masterpiece.
What happens in this book is that a group of murderers called the Glanton gang go from town to town brutally killing and scalping indigenous Americans, as well as others. There is an unnamed protagonist, the "kid", and a dispassionate narration of this happened and then this happened and they all lay in pools of blood.
Lots of people die gruesome deaths, but they were just 2D, just words on a page, because Mccarthy made no effort to warm us to any of them. I was told the book was disturbing but I found it far too cold and unmoving to be disturbing. I would have been more disturbed if a single one of the characters felt real.
McCarthy describes the mountains and weather in exceptional run-on detail. It would go like� the cymballic thunder crashed and reflected against the shimmering water lightning cleaved the sky asunder behind the precipitous mountain shadows� and then he ripped the scalps off all the Indians and left a town full of corpses� before plundering on into the blood-red sunset through rolling grasslands and flower-carpeted meadows shrouded in post-storm haze.
Looong descriptions of rocks and grass and then PHWACK! there goes someone’s scalp...
I could not understand what we were supposed to care about in this book. Certainly not this band of murderers, but equally unlikely all the nameless, faceless "savages" and n-words dropping left and right.
I've been genuinely trying to understand the appeal of Blood Meridian to its fans. I read some reviews, and also some of the furious comments left on negative reviews, and it seems like there are people for whom this type of writing is truly the epitome of beauty. That's fair. McCarthy does spend a long time on description. But it is just not for me.
I read passages like this and I get Nevernight vibes:
It's an eye roll from me.
Also, I’m getting tired of authors who are just too intellectual and literary for punctuation. Great, you know how to not use speech marks and commas. I’m happy for you.
I’m not sure why exactly� maybe it’s that I’ve suffered my way through Faulkner and Hemingway already and had this gut feeling that they and McCarthy would sit at the same super deep literary dudes lunch table, y’know?
But it is one of those books that has wormed its way onto lists of "must read before you die" and "greatest American literature" so I just had to know. And now I do.
Blood Meridian was pretty much ignored by critics when it was first released and it wasn't until later that a bunch of them-- Harold Bloom, David Foster Wallace, etc. etc. --decided it was a super deep and clever book about human nature and violence. I understand completely why it was ignored initially and not so much why it was rediscovered as a masterpiece.
What happens in this book is that a group of murderers called the Glanton gang go from town to town brutally killing and scalping indigenous Americans, as well as others. There is an unnamed protagonist, the "kid", and a dispassionate narration of this happened and then this happened and they all lay in pools of blood.
Lots of people die gruesome deaths, but they were just 2D, just words on a page, because Mccarthy made no effort to warm us to any of them. I was told the book was disturbing but I found it far too cold and unmoving to be disturbing. I would have been more disturbed if a single one of the characters felt real.
McCarthy describes the mountains and weather in exceptional run-on detail. It would go like� the cymballic thunder crashed and reflected against the shimmering water lightning cleaved the sky asunder behind the precipitous mountain shadows� and then he ripped the scalps off all the Indians and left a town full of corpses� before plundering on into the blood-red sunset through rolling grasslands and flower-carpeted meadows shrouded in post-storm haze.
Looong descriptions of rocks and grass and then PHWACK! there goes someone’s scalp...
I could not understand what we were supposed to care about in this book. Certainly not this band of murderers, but equally unlikely all the nameless, faceless "savages" and n-words dropping left and right.
I've been genuinely trying to understand the appeal of Blood Meridian to its fans. I read some reviews, and also some of the furious comments left on negative reviews, and it seems like there are people for whom this type of writing is truly the epitome of beauty. That's fair. McCarthy does spend a long time on description. But it is just not for me.
I read passages like this and I get Nevernight vibes:
“The colt stood against the horse with its head down and the horse was watching, out there past men’s knowing, where the stars are drowning and whales ferry their vast souls through the black and seamless sea.�
It's an eye roll from me.
Also, I’m getting tired of authors who are just too intellectual and literary for punctuation. Great, you know how to not use speech marks and commas. I’m happy for you.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Blood Meridian.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 15, 2012
– Shelved
June 22, 2023
–
Started Reading
June 28, 2023
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-39 of 39 (39 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Zohal
(new)
Jun 29, 2023 02:43AM

reply
|
flag

I do recommend All The Pretty Horses by this author. It puts his beautiful writing on display without subjecting readers to pornographic levels of violence. And if you listen on audiobook the lack of punctuation disappears.


Exactly. Some people said the book was hard to get through because it was so violent and disturbing, but I felt completely detached from the violence. McCarthy could have been describing steam-cleaning a sofa.

I ..."
I actually read All the Pretty Horses many years ago and can't remember it at all. I was probably too young for it, to be honest. I'll have to try it again.

I agree. I tolerate it, but I've never felt it added anything but frustration and confusion.

I did consider it.


😂 it's too true



It's another one I've had on my list forever. I feel like I should read it, but I don't know if McCarthy's style is just one I should stay away from.


Yeah, I suspect it is just incompatibility with his style. I will have to try one more to see, but I've always had a problem with those rambling (to me, anyway) stream of consciousness narratives. I do enjoy an Austen but I like the darker feel of the Brontes most.




I believe I've seen McCarthy saying he didn't want to dirty up the pages of his books with the "messy" punctuation or something like that, as if all letters and symbols aren't the exact same damn thing. Like, what makes a period "messier" than a quotation mark or a question mark?!





Ive never experienced a more gut wrenching, jaw dropping scene of pure awe than the first Apache attack of the unexpecting first mounted troop anywhere...And the description of the first encounter with The Judge in the middle of the desert by Captain Glanton's troop? Fogedaboudit!
UH!
MAY!
ZING!!!
Great review Emily!

Freddy, are you talking about a Zen sutra, or a grimdark Faulkner knockoff?




