Yules's Reviews > A Swim in a Pond in the Rain: In Which Four Russians Give a Master Class on Writing, Reading, and Life
A Swim in a Pond in the Rain: In Which Four Russians Give a Master Class on Writing, Reading, and Life
by
by

Yules's review
bookshelves: essays-criticism, writing-how-to, slavs, 19th-c, teaching-kiddos
Jul 31, 2024
bookshelves: essays-criticism, writing-how-to, slavs, 19th-c, teaching-kiddos
This book includes stories in translation by four nineteenth-century Russian authors � Gogol, Turgenev, Chekhov, and Tolstoy � along with Saunders� commentary. I found his interpretations interesting, despite vehemently disagreeing with some of them (which disagreement Saunders good-naturedly encourages). His critical style is far removed from the academic (despite teaching the course for 20 years, he has not bothered to learn Russian!), which is to say, he is not over-serious or intimidating. Instead, he speaks in a generally friendly, inviting, funny and slightly immature voice.
The full list of stories:
Chekhov In the Cart
Turgenev The Singers
Chekhov The Darling
Tolstoy Master and Man
Gogol The Nose
Chekhov Gooseberries
Tolstoy Alyosha the Pot
Saunders� dissections of the text are geared towards creative writing students, and I found his guidance particularly useful on the topics of pattern (immediately applying it to my own writing) and causality (which I’ve yet to fully master � my instinct is towards the epiphanic, but that’s something only writers of Chekhov’s caliber can pull off).
“there are two things that separate writers who go on to publish from those who don’t. First, a willingness to revise. Second, the extent to which the writer has learned to make causality. Making causality doesn’t seem sexy or particularly literary. It’s a workmanlike thing, to make A cause B [...] But it’s the hardest thing to learn. It doesn’t come naturally, not to most of us. But that’s really all a story is: a series of things that happen in sequence, in which we can discern a pattern of causality. For most of us, the problem is not in making things happen (“A dog barked�, “The house exploded�, “Darren kicked the tire of his car� are all easy enough to type) but in making one thing seem to cause the next. This is important, because causation is what creates the appearance of meaning.�
The full list of stories:
Chekhov In the Cart
Turgenev The Singers
Chekhov The Darling
Tolstoy Master and Man
Gogol The Nose
Chekhov Gooseberries
Tolstoy Alyosha the Pot
Saunders� dissections of the text are geared towards creative writing students, and I found his guidance particularly useful on the topics of pattern (immediately applying it to my own writing) and causality (which I’ve yet to fully master � my instinct is towards the epiphanic, but that’s something only writers of Chekhov’s caliber can pull off).
“there are two things that separate writers who go on to publish from those who don’t. First, a willingness to revise. Second, the extent to which the writer has learned to make causality. Making causality doesn’t seem sexy or particularly literary. It’s a workmanlike thing, to make A cause B [...] But it’s the hardest thing to learn. It doesn’t come naturally, not to most of us. But that’s really all a story is: a series of things that happen in sequence, in which we can discern a pattern of causality. For most of us, the problem is not in making things happen (“A dog barked�, “The house exploded�, “Darren kicked the tire of his car� are all easy enough to type) but in making one thing seem to cause the next. This is important, because causation is what creates the appearance of meaning.�
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
A Swim in a Pond in the Rain.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 9, 2021
– Shelved
April 9, 2021
– Shelved as:
to-read
April 9, 2021
– Shelved as:
essays-criticism
April 9, 2021
– Shelved as:
writing-how-to
March 1, 2022
– Shelved as:
slavs
March 4, 2024
– Shelved as:
teaching-kiddos
March 4, 2024
– Shelved as:
19th-c
Started Reading
July 30, 2024
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
path
(new)
-
added it
Jul 31, 2024 04:47PM

reply
|
flag

I admit I did not fully understand why Saunders used these particular authors to make his argument about causality. There are many points in Chekhov where causality is ambiguous, a missing piece for the reader to fill in (a technique probably more suitable to fiction than non-fiction). In Gogol, causality completely breaks down, that's why his fiction is called absurdist. So I am not sure Saunders' statement applies to every author and every story, but I still found it good advice for improving the mechanics of my own storytelling.
I'd be curious to hear what you think if you end up reading it!


Saunders sometimes tries to track down the meaning of a word, and writes out his investigations:
"A former student of mine, fluent in Russian, and his wife, a native speaker, and a Russian poet they consulted, and my former student's tutor in Russian, all agree..."
Whenever he goes down this road of asking his uncle's neighbor's cat about what a word means, it makes me feel a bit embarrassed!