ŷ

Dave Schaafsma's Reviews > Portnoy’s Complaint

Portnoy’s Complaint by Philip Roth
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
269235
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: fiction-20th-century, roth
Read 2 times. Last read September 2, 2018 to September 11, 2018.

'Enough being a nice Jewish boy. . . Let’s put the id back in yid”—Alex Portnoy

Portnoy's Complaint: "A disorder in which strongly felt ethical and altruistic impulses are perpetually warring with extreme sexual longings, often of a perverse nature."

I have had a couple intense years of reading Roth, rereading some, but mostly reading much I had not read. Recently Roth died, RIP, and then I read his last four short books, and decided to come full circle back to my (I think it was) first and possibly the most read of his books, Portnoy’s Complaint, which reads almost as if it were a joyous comic farce. As with many other of his books, it begins with a male boy character, Alex, who struggles mightily with his Jewish Newark working class identity, and since he is a teenager, specifically with his parents. Roth, as with most of his other books, does not hide his character’s sexual life; instead he celebrates (and then analyzes, and sometimes problematizes) it in all its Rabelaisian glory.

Portnoy’s Complaint is sort of known as the Great American Novel of Teenaged Masturbation. In this book, Alex Portnoy is not at 14 having sex, but he calls himself “the Raskolnikov of jerking off,� and this is how the book comically opens, focusing on this. There is, later, a lot of sex in the book, usually related humorously—and for the time, but probably still now, for many, shockingly—explicit and what people used to call “foul-mouthed,� but it is clear his more serious subject is what it means to be Jewish in America; while making fun of himself he also satirizes his fellow Jews, sometimes brutally. The sex-obsessed Portnoy is in this tale confessing to his analyst; he is trying to figure out how to be Jewish (or not) in America, exploring these issues through the various women—Jews, gentiles—he is with. The joy of sex, the joys and madness of Jewish life, and atheism, all three topics are persistent themes in Roth across most of his work, and are here from the very first.

It is 1969, and Portnoy’s Complaint emerges after 2-3 fairly tame books from Roth (in comparison, on the explicitness scale) that build his literary reputation, and then this famously “dirty book� explodes (pun intended, sorry) on to the literary scene getting him denounced by Jewish leaders and community, becomeing an instant bestseller and critical smash. The world, or at least America, is going through a sexual revolution: Freedom, man, stop getting hung up on all this religious repression and just Let Go. Love the one you’re with! Alex was a top student, and is, at the time is telling the tale to his therapist, 33, a good liberal, working for Mayor John Lindsay, but is still lost, personally. He struggles, especially in his relationships with women: How can such a (once) good Jewish boy like him get so screwed up?! Maybe it's the endless screwing?

The book tacks back and forth between Alex the masturbator at 14 and Alex the sadly, madly lost sexual libertine at 33, a case of arrested development, one of many many Roth books that would seem to take a look at sex and mortality and cultural identity. To be sexual is for Roth (or is it just many of his main male characters?) to be fully alive—while to have that denied is a form of living death. And yet it sometimes seems to be killing him, even as he obsesses about what it means to be Jewish, and an atheist, in America.

The book begins with a funny look at Alex’s upbringing by a set of neurotic Jewish parents—domineering mother Sophie, nebbish father—where the only thing he seems to have control over is his penis. Fast forward to age 33 where he is alone, childless, serial dating various goyish blond women. He seems to want to rid himself of his Jewish identity! But then, in Davenport, Iowa, he discovers his discomfort with Midwestern Christian America, too, as he visits his girlfriend’s family over the holidays. He doesn't want that life, either. Later in the book he pursues an Israeli Jew; will it be better in Israel, with a “real Jew�? Nope! It’s like a dialectical narrative, going back in forth between being anguished over his cultural background, not wanting to be a traditional Jew, and not wanting to be mistreated as a Jew. But remember, this is—like Salinger’s Catcher—a therapy session, so we are not supposed to see this solely as an affirmation of Alex. Alex is sex crazy, at 33, and all around pretty crazy.

Portnoy’s Complaint I thought was still very funny, in my second reading of it decades later, though it may have been knocked down a peg from my list of Roth’s absolute greats such as the American trilogy (though still I would say it is in the top seven or eight), but it is a manic, often hilarious, sometimes tiring series of rants (interspersed with comic Yiddishisms), a monologue, a confession from a seemingly arrogant, sometimes clearly self-deprecating, lost soul, creating one of the great literary characters of the twentieth century, still a source of shock and outrage and humor; still a “dirty book� and very much a literary accomplishment.
88 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Portnoy’s Complaint.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
August 29, 2012 – Shelved
September 18, 2012 – Shelved as: fiction-20th-century
July 12, 2017 – Shelved as: roth
September 2, 2018 – Started Reading
September 2, 2018 –
page 30
10.95% "I'm reading a lot of things now, but will re-read this too, my last Roth book in 2 years or so of reading a lot of his work, this the first one to gain him fame, a book I read once, in 1970. I just read the first 30 pages, and having read his last four novels (as an old man), the style here seems jarringly different, almost a comic romp. I loved it at 17; we'll see if I like it as much half a century (!!) later!"
September 4, 2018 –
page 70
25.55% "I find I am informally "buddy-reading" this book with a few people, so I read a bit more of it last night. A kind of rollicking romp of a book about a horny young man and his Jewish family that mortifed Roth's own family and all the middle-aged Jews (the young Jews and young people everywhere loved it) of the eastern seaboard when it came out in 1969. More a comedy than any other Roth I can recall."
September 6, 2018 –
page 120
43.8% "PC is sort of known jokingly as the Great American Novel of Teenaged Masturbation, and this is how it comically opens, but it is clear his more serious subject is what it means to be Jewish in America; he satirizes his fellow Jews sometimes brutally. The joy of sex, the joys and madness of Jewish life, and atheism, all three topics are persistent themes in Roth across most of his work, here from the very first."
September 11, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-20 of 20 (20 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Hanneke Great to read that you thought that Portnoy's Complaint is still funny. What a relief! It's one of those books I wondered if it stood the test of time. And, really, I am not surprised that it did! Very nice review, David, thanks!


Dave Schaafsma Hanneke wrote: "Great to read that you thought that Portnoy's Complaint is still funny. What a relief! It's one of those books I wondered if it stood the test of time. And, really, I am not surprised that it did! ..."Thanks, Hanneke. Well, I am always feeling a little defensive when I write reviews about Roth's (or his main characters's) perspectives on sexuality. But I'll admit I laughed, yes, sometimes aloud. Alex can be rude and crude and you don't always like him or agree with him, but he's witty. And self-deprecating, and clearly just a comical jerk sometimes. Great character even if you don't like him, I'd say.


message 3: by Hanneke (last edited Sep 11, 2018 11:36AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hanneke I did like him and probably still will! It would be interesting to read Portnoy's Complaint again after all those years. I think I would still feel the same about it, but you never know!


message 4: by Michael (new)

Michael Jandrok Fantastic review, as always, David! I'm not a Roth aficionado, but I'd now be tempted to pluck this out if I saw it at the used book store.


Dave Schaafsma There are other, more serious ones, like the ones with more politics in them, the American Pastoral trilogy, but this is usually the one people read if it is one they will try. I actually some of the later books are better writing, but this one is full of energy and is hilarious in places.


david David. This is just a fantastic review. One of your best. I forgot so much of this. I read it when I was quite young but knew it was great even then. I must read it again, and soon. Thank you for the reminiscence. I like the pun also.


Dave Schaafsma david wrote: "David. This is just a fantastic review. One of your best. I forgot so much of this. I read it when I was quite young but knew it was great even then. I must read it again, and soon. Thank you for t..." I put in the pun for you. :) I hope you do read it and tell me what your experience is with it.


message 8: by Joe (new) - rated it 5 stars

Joe Kraus Thanks for the vicarious re-read. Just a slight quibble in the midst of your usual terrific reading. You say, "it is clear his more serious subject is what it means to be Jewish in America..."

I'd say the subject is 'what it means to be American in America,' and I think Roth would have said the same. He's trying to imagine a way "in" from the "outside." In his case, as Philip Roth from Jewish Newark, NJ, that means a lot of Jewish references. And, of course, those references are the concrete details that provide almost all the humor and that make this as memorable as it is.

Still, I think Roth hoped that the Jewish elements of this could serve as analogues to other "out groups" grappling with how to understand themselves as legitimately American. In that context, I read Mario Puzo's contemporary (and much less good) The Godfather the same way, as an ethnic out-group's exploration of an America that, as they have reached for, has moved ever so slightly in their direction.

For what it's worth, I read Viet Thanh Nguyen's The Sympathizer -- a current novel set around the same moment as Portnoy (with a handful of fairly clear references to Portnoy) -- as making the same case for a later generation of Vietnamese-Americans.

In any case, thanks, as always, for your thoughts on this. Reading your pieces is a good way to get the intellectual juices flowing in the morning.


message 9: by robin (new)

robin friedman This book seems to me liberating in a time of feminism and renewed restriction of male female sexuality.


message 10: by Dave (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dave Schaafsma Joe wrote: "Thanks for the vicarious re-read. Just a slight quibble in the midst of your usual terrific reading. You say, "it is clear his more serious subject is what it means to be Jewish in America..."

I'd..."
You are right, that he would have seen this as not only about Jews. Anyone can read this and see themselves and their culture (or family identity: Sophie!), and that struggle.


message 11: by Dave (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dave Schaafsma Robin wrote: "This book seems to me liberating in a time of feminism and renewed restriction of male female sexuality."That was the time for it. Fear of Flying, oh, countless other books, but this one didn't hold back. And in there, too, is that Alex is 33 and still sex-crazed and lost, so it is not ONLY about liberation (though it is about the joys of sex, too, surely).


message 12: by Ilse (new) - added it

Ilse Manic, often hilarious, you laughed out loud - enough arguments for me to read this (and American trilogy), David - I hope it might give me a certain taste of American culture, having read few American authors so far...Superb review!


message 13: by Dave (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dave Schaafsma Well, Ilse. . .. There is a wide divide of opinions about Roth. He's in my opinion one of the great writers of the twentieth century, much deserving of awards, and yet some people find his (narrators's discussions/depictions of sex too "male" or graphic, to the point of being sexist, even (some say) misogynist. The Nobel Prize might have been given to him, there were yearly battles over him on this topic. So you can decide for yourself. This book comes right out of the late sixties with it's focus on freedom, and maybe especially sexual freedom. I guess this directness you get in other problematic writers, too, such as (Americans) Mailer, Henry Miller and Bukowski. Would the same tone/approach happen today? I am writing this note to you after a week watching and hearing about sexual assault in the Kavanaugh hearings here, and am reading 2666 by Bolano about the murders of poor women in Sonoma State in Mexico, so my head is sort of swirling with these related issues at this moment. In Roth, I'll say, the sex is consensual (always?).


message 14: by Hanneke (last edited Sep 30, 2018 08:47AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hanneke David, I think the sex in the novels of Roth is always consensual. Can't remember ever reading that there was a protest by women in his novels.


message 15: by robin (new)

robin friedman Roth was writing at a time when American culture was viewed as sexually repressive. How quickly times have changed! He wrote about restrictions on sexuality -- male primarily but female as well -- because of cultural disapproval -- what we loosely call puritanism. With a new openness towards sex as reflected in Roth's books, especially premarital sex by young people pressed by the needs of the culture to stay in school longer and to restrain desires came an inevitable reaction -- also written about in Roth's latter books. Part of that reaction may have involved a religious resurgence. But more of it in my view and I think Roth's involved the rise of feminism with our without religious commitments and an anger about sexuality that went well beyond anything in the culture of the 1950s. In my opinion, that anger is with us today and dominates American life in many forms.


message 16: by Dave (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dave Schaafsma Hanneke wrote: "David, I think the sex in the novels of Roth is always consensual. Can't remember ever reading that there was a protest by women in his novels." Well, that's my memory of all the books I have read, and I initially wrote it as a fact that all sex was consensual, but I haven't read everything. . ..


message 17: by Dave (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dave Schaafsma Robin wrote: "Roth was writing at a time when American culture was viewed as sexually repressive. How quickly times have changed! He wrote about restrictions on sexuality -- male primarily but female as well -- ..." Thanks, Robin, a lot to think about there. Roth certainly felt strongly about what he felt was a new puritanism.


message 18: by Ilse (new) - added it

Ilse David wrote: "Well, Ilse. . .. There is a wide divide of opinions about Roth.
You have certainly piqued my interest, David, what comes across as sexist/misogynist for one doesn’t necessarily for another, and I think it is good to read it with certain notions of the zeitgeist in mind � some Flemish/Dutch literature (Wolkers, Claus, Geeraerts) from that time had a similar focus on freeing sexuality from the conservative grip (in Flanders) religion had on it, shocking was easy in those times :-) and I think it interesting to compare Roth’s voice to what they did � when young I disliked reading Miller as I found him terribly denigrating on women, maybe I could see through that more at the moment (although I presume Roth a more poignant writer than Miller?). A very good question, how to relate to such literature today now these topics rise so much discussion - the Kavanaugh hearings are widely discussed in the press here too, and I recall also the various responses in the controversy on the short story ‘Cat person� by Kristen Roupenian � and a certain worry that spoke from the open letter in France from women fearing a new puritanism from metoo might infringe on the sexual freedom they have fought for. Interesting, and confusing times�


message 19: by Hanneke (last edited Oct 02, 2018 08:30AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hanneke Yes, certainly interesting and confusing times. And I do hate to see a new puritanism arising as well, Ilse. It seems people all get so petrified about perceived wrong actions and words that it is getting stifling.


message 20: by Dave (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dave Schaafsma Whew, so much to think about and respond to, Ilse. The tensions between, on the one hand, making sure people are safe and on the other hand, preserving desire/freedom, though these issues are both about freedom. To not denigrate women has to be one goal, of course, but for men to write about women in disrespectful ways is not that different from people (men and women) seen as limiting women's sexual choices. It's all potentially about governing women's bodies, which is a continuing societal and governmental problem. Roth to my mind was not about limiting or governing or hating women. Yes, Roth is also to my mind a better writer and thinker than Henry Miller, though it has been a long time since I read him. And a lot of people now see him as misogynist,. An interesting writer to consider is Bukowski, who writes--in often amusing ways--about sex. I am also almost done with Bolano's 2666, which is about the femicides in the Juarez area in the nineties. This book kinda makes me want to encourage (most) men to stop having sex altogether! (Not really, guys, but the image of men as rapist/murderers in this book is horrific). I can see why women comics creators are creating these all girl communities (Bitch Planet, Lumberjanes, Monsters).


back to top