Diana's Reviews > The Eight
The Eight (The Eight, #1)
by
by

I was told by several people whose books tastes I generally respect that I would love this book - sadly, that wasn't the case. I found it tiresome, hard to follow, and the writing was almost impossible to slog through in several places. The characters were never fully developed, I never got invested in any of the characters, and I found the book too plot-driven to an irritating degree - with too many historical elements "dropped in" (almost like name dropping) in order to tie the events to historical situations.
The only part of the book that I found remotely interesting and attention-holding was the very first chapter. It's a book that has reached something like cult status, but I found the plot hard to follow, lots of twists and turns that only confused me, and a very unsatisfying ending. I finished it only because I hate to leave a book unfinished if I've committed to reading it.
It just doesn't live up to its hype for me.
The only part of the book that I found remotely interesting and attention-holding was the very first chapter. It's a book that has reached something like cult status, but I found the plot hard to follow, lots of twists and turns that only confused me, and a very unsatisfying ending. I finished it only because I hate to leave a book unfinished if I've committed to reading it.
It just doesn't live up to its hype for me.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Eight.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
December 1, 2006
–
Finished Reading
December 31, 2008
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Tania
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Apr 14, 2010 07:49PM

reply
|
flag

The historical elements were actually quite interesting, especially since I have an extensive knowledge of history, including all the events Neville includes in this book. In comparing it to other historical novels/mysteries I've read, I just didn't find it as compelling.
"Well written" and "character development" are a matter of subjective opinion; this one just didn't grab me - and I read A LOT.

I am an educated reader (in fact, very widely read and very educated reader, with a PhD in medieval literature), so it's not that I did not "understand" the history or find it "above" my reading level and comprehension.
I am also a writer, and my quibbles with this book lie with the writing style - the premise of the book is actually quite interesting. I just found elements of the writing and elements of the plot amateurish.
Remember that what one considers "good" in any creative field - visual art, writing, music - is VERY subjective. You either like it or you don't. I can truthfully say that I would NOT find this book any more attractive if I re-read it.
Sorry if my review doesn't sit well with those who gave the book five stars - but telling me that I should re-read or that I need to be a better-educated reader is simply not going to make me like the book any better.



EXACTLY!


You are very welcome! :-)