Ashley's Reviews > 90s Bitch: Media, Culture, and the Failed Promise of Gender Equality
90s Bitch: Media, Culture, and the Failed Promise of Gender Equality
by
by

Ashley's review
bookshelves: read-for-book-club, audiobooks, americana, class-gender-race, mixed-media, feminism-and-sexuality, film, musical, non-fiction, television
Oct 23, 2021
bookshelves: read-for-book-club, audiobooks, americana, class-gender-race, mixed-media, feminism-and-sexuality, film, musical, non-fiction, television
This was a secondary optional pick for one of my IRL book clubs (I'm in two now and it is great; the next person I see making fun of book clubs gets a virtual punch in their sensitive bits—book clubs are friendship, books, and food, fuck you) and I'm glad I read it, although it was a far from a perfect read. When it was on, I really enjoyed it. When it was off, steam came out of my ears.
The perspective this book takes is to reexamine basically the entirety of mainstream pop culture and news from 1990 to 1999 through the lens of how GIRL POWER WAS A LIE. And she does mostly make a compelling case. From inside the 90s things seemed pretty progressive. Looking back, things were gross.
She takes a look at nearly everything in the scope she's set for herself (I think to the book's detriment): TV, movies, the music industry, politics, and big news stories. I thought she served the real-life stuff well (examination of real life figures like Lisa "Left-Eye" Lopes, Marcia Clark, Monica Lewinsky) and did a pretty poor job of talking about the fictional stuff. Those sections were more miss than hit for me, because she doesn't take the time to provide context for most of the things she's discussing. The exception to this is the Beverly Hills 90210 section. Lots of context there, and it's no accident that section goes so much better than when she tries to talk about anything else, when it feels like she's just cherry-picking examples to prove her points, and often picking bad examples. I lost it when she called Dana Scully a harpy, implying that the character was a shrew created by a man to make the male lead look better, and didn't come back to listening to the book for a while. It must also be noted that even though the 90s themselves were full of awful or non-existent queer or non-white pop culture, the book doesn't do super well by them either.
I actually really liked the sections on Marcia Clark, Monica Lewinsky, and Anita Hill the most. The news coverage of women in the 90s (and let's be honest, still today for the most part) was disgustingly misogynistic, but like in a sneaky way. We were so steeped in it most people didn't even realize. She does a good job showing the ways that various parts of culture collided to portray these women the way it did, and the feedback loop of people creating culture and then being fed and reinforced it.
To sum up, this book is worth a chance, but I wouldn't buy it. Get it from the library or listen to it on SCRIBD.
The perspective this book takes is to reexamine basically the entirety of mainstream pop culture and news from 1990 to 1999 through the lens of how GIRL POWER WAS A LIE. And she does mostly make a compelling case. From inside the 90s things seemed pretty progressive. Looking back, things were gross.
She takes a look at nearly everything in the scope she's set for herself (I think to the book's detriment): TV, movies, the music industry, politics, and big news stories. I thought she served the real-life stuff well (examination of real life figures like Lisa "Left-Eye" Lopes, Marcia Clark, Monica Lewinsky) and did a pretty poor job of talking about the fictional stuff. Those sections were more miss than hit for me, because she doesn't take the time to provide context for most of the things she's discussing. The exception to this is the Beverly Hills 90210 section. Lots of context there, and it's no accident that section goes so much better than when she tries to talk about anything else, when it feels like she's just cherry-picking examples to prove her points, and often picking bad examples. I lost it when she called Dana Scully a harpy, implying that the character was a shrew created by a man to make the male lead look better, and didn't come back to listening to the book for a while. It must also be noted that even though the 90s themselves were full of awful or non-existent queer or non-white pop culture, the book doesn't do super well by them either.
I actually really liked the sections on Marcia Clark, Monica Lewinsky, and Anita Hill the most. The news coverage of women in the 90s (and let's be honest, still today for the most part) was disgustingly misogynistic, but like in a sneaky way. We were so steeped in it most people didn't even realize. She does a good job showing the ways that various parts of culture collided to portray these women the way it did, and the feedback loop of people creating culture and then being fed and reinforced it.
To sum up, this book is worth a chance, but I wouldn't buy it. Get it from the library or listen to it on SCRIBD.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
90s Bitch.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 29, 2021
– Shelved
August 29, 2021
– Shelved as:
to-read
August 29, 2021
– Shelved as:
read-for-book-club
October 17, 2021
–
Started Reading
October 17, 2021
– Shelved as:
audiobooks
October 18, 2021
–
13.0%
"She is cherry-picking examples for her arguments and taking them out of context, re: pop culture. If you're going to use Buffy and X-Files as examples of negatives to feminism you best show your receipts. (Which she did not, if it wasn't clear.) You come at Scully, you'd best be ready for a fight. 'S all I'm saying."
October 22, 2021
–
15.0%
"Her calling Dana Scully a harpy in chapter one has made me cranky and thus hypercritical of this book. But also, while reading, I keep thinking that if this was first exposure to some of these ideas, it would not be very convincing."
October 22, 2021
–
23.0%
"This is much more tolerable in terms of the writing in the real world sections rather than the pop culture ones. She's using a lot more concrete examples. The content is much more infuriating, though."
October 22, 2021
–
Finished Reading
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
americana
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
class-gender-race
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
mixed-media
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
feminism-and-sexuality
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
film
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
musical
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
non-fiction
December 6, 2021
– Shelved as:
television
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Miriam
(new)
-
added it
Dec 06, 2021 12:48PM

reply
|
flag



We are pretty chill. Mostly that happens when we have multiple books we can't decide between.

Also everything women like is (derogatory), which explains so. much. If only we could find a way to harness the power of misogyny for good, we could have world peace�