Jay's Reviews > Austerlitz
Austerlitz
by
by

Jay's review
bookshelves: 5-star-prose, 21st-century, genre-war, region-german-sprachraum, author-sebald
Dec 14, 2023
bookshelves: 5-star-prose, 21st-century, genre-war, region-german-sprachraum, author-sebald
Because Sebald’s books are such artful puzzles, I couldn’t sleep after I finished this last night. My brain whirred and whirred, trying to make sense of what I’d just read. So much of his (Sebald’s) technique is about playing with the things he knows his readers would usually expect to be staring up at them from the page while he deliberately avoids placing them there on paper to be found. Consequently, Austerlitz, like The Rings of Saturn before it, is a work of minimalism which always skirts around the edges of its own dark heart, and because of this peculiar evasiveness, its emotions initially come over muted, with multiple layers of framing keeping the reader at a distance, rendering the narrative (for the most part) purposely cerebral rather than visceral. Ultimately, however, distance is the very thing that makes Austerlitz the moving and memorable book that it is, and its strange magnitude originates from the fact that what Sebald doesn’t write about is far more important than what he does.
As James Wood points out in his annoyingly brilliant introduction (which you’d better be sure not to read until you’ve finished), there is one word in particular that Sebald avoids throughout, even though it is the single word most central to what his book is trying to comprehend. This elusive word is very nearly the same word as the title of the book itself and it flickers up at the reader through the fog of almost every page. We should know what it is without being told. It’s a horror that Sebald’s writing orbits but purposely never enters: the black hole at the centre of history whose horizon conceals a void that defies contemplation. It is as though Sebald’s gaze has been determinedly angled slightly off to one side, away from the glaring eyes of the past, only daring to sense the magnitude of The Holocaust by the proximity of its gravity. And so, in this curiously askew way, Austerlitz becomes the most haunting expression I’ve yet come across of someone trying to process the anti-humanist bleakness of Nazi Germany. Here, in his last book, then, Sebald has finally moved beyond the cold and silent rubble of Saturn’s rings (mausoleums to long since disintegrated alien moons). He now navigates a deeper region of space, one more inhospitable and violent: the accretion disc of Sagittarius A*, perhaps. A white-hot outskirt encircling an immense abyss.
On a personal note, I felt connected to Austerlitz via two distinct channels. The first of which, rather trivially, comes from the fact that, so it turns out, my mum and her long-time bestie (who both studied languages at the University of East Anglia in the early 1980s) remember “Max Sebald� as one of their lecturers. They recall a “quiet and insular� man and were upset when they heard of his premature death 22 years ago. This is a tenuous link but it humanises him a little bit for me, and adds to his book’s strange mystique.
The second link, if you’ll permit me some indulgence, comes from my family’s own connection with the Kindertransport. My great-grandfather, who worked for the film industry in the cinemas of Birmingham in the 1930s, became (as I understand it) involved in the Kindertransport effort via his work colleagues. And so, in 1938, in the months before Kristallnacht, he and my great-grandmother agreed to look after a 9-year-old Jewish girl called Trudy, the daughter of another employee of the same industry � a man based in Vienna. When Tudy arrived in England, my grandfather, John, would have been 4 years old. “Johnpa� grew up with Trudy, living with her initially in Birmingham, then at the beach-side hotel (The Cary Arms, in Babbacombe, Torquay, Devon) that my great-grandparents ran from 1941 onwards, once they’d moved the family away from Birmingham soon after the outbreak of war � an attempt to find the family a place of greater safety clear of the city’s nightly bombardment.

Johnpa always, I think, thought of Trudy as his older sibling, and I picture them playing on the shingle of Babbacombe Beach amongst the American soldiers who frequently used the hotel during the war years, and who came to the area for training all through the run-up to the Normandy Landings. Eventually, word came that Trudy’s parents had escaped Vienna and made it to New York, and so, after five years in England, she took the boat across the Atlantic, arriving under the shadow of the Statue of Liberty at Ellis Island, before going on to live an archetypically 20th-century American life.

Trudy and Johnpa remained in contact until the very end (although, in their later years, when I asked, neither of them seemed entirely certain of the dates and details of their war stories). When she , age 92, in 2021, he was too ill to travel across the Atlantic for her stone setting, so my parents went in his place. At the ceremony, my mum was startled by the gratitude of Trudy’s extended family: “The only reason we’re here�, someone said to her, “is because of people like your grandparents�. Some eighty years after the fact, my mum felt a bit fraudulent accepting this praise, I think.
Johnpa, who, with my grandmother, returned to Babbacombe to live out his later years, passed away a few months ago, age 89, and with him went one more small, hazy link to the ever-receding past � history which year by year erodes into time’s ocean together with the crumbling Red Sandstone cliffs of Babbacombe Bay.

Indeed, the story I’ve just told isn’t really my story to tell, and many of the images I have of it are concoctions of my own mind, swimming in and out of focus depending on where the facts fit. Like I say, I’m convinced that Trudy and Johnpa spent a lot of time playing with American soldiers on Babbacombe beach in the months before D-Day � I’ve always imagined this to be so � but the dates don’t actually match: Trudy must have arrived in England in early 1938 and then stayed for no more than five years. The Normandy Landings didn’t take place until June 1944. She would have been gone, therefore, well before Johnpa was catering for the Americans at his father’s hotel. Sebald is always playing with this strange false recollection effect in his writing, showing us images which don’t quite add up, and reciting (supposedly from memory) a whole book’s-worth of dialogue he shared with someone many years ago. It would seem that, no matter how much we’d like it to, the glove doesn’t quite fit his story, just as it doesn’t quite fit mine. It is possible that our memories and our histories are mostly composed of lies, but what else do we have but the inventions of our minds and the fragments of a few faded photographs? � it is in this indistinct way that we find ourselves looking back at the past:
“Are we standing on a mountain of death? Is that our ultimate vantage point?� � these are questions the narrator asks the reader right in the middle of The Rings of Saturn. From what I’ve read, I think they’re probably the two questions most central to Sebald’s work (being a writer, as he was, mostly beaten into a sad listlessness by history’s unceasing insistence on the endlessly recurring cycle of man’s inhumanity to man). But, as with many of the things most fundamental to Austerlitz, this time around they are never posed to the reader directly. They, instead, float like ghosts beneath the text’s shrouded surfaces. As a result, this is a book you wish you could reach out and touch even though you know it will always elude your grasp � just like your memories.
As James Wood points out in his annoyingly brilliant introduction (which you’d better be sure not to read until you’ve finished), there is one word in particular that Sebald avoids throughout, even though it is the single word most central to what his book is trying to comprehend. This elusive word is very nearly the same word as the title of the book itself and it flickers up at the reader through the fog of almost every page. We should know what it is without being told. It’s a horror that Sebald’s writing orbits but purposely never enters: the black hole at the centre of history whose horizon conceals a void that defies contemplation. It is as though Sebald’s gaze has been determinedly angled slightly off to one side, away from the glaring eyes of the past, only daring to sense the magnitude of The Holocaust by the proximity of its gravity. And so, in this curiously askew way, Austerlitz becomes the most haunting expression I’ve yet come across of someone trying to process the anti-humanist bleakness of Nazi Germany. Here, in his last book, then, Sebald has finally moved beyond the cold and silent rubble of Saturn’s rings (mausoleums to long since disintegrated alien moons). He now navigates a deeper region of space, one more inhospitable and violent: the accretion disc of Sagittarius A*, perhaps. A white-hot outskirt encircling an immense abyss.
On a personal note, I felt connected to Austerlitz via two distinct channels. The first of which, rather trivially, comes from the fact that, so it turns out, my mum and her long-time bestie (who both studied languages at the University of East Anglia in the early 1980s) remember “Max Sebald� as one of their lecturers. They recall a “quiet and insular� man and were upset when they heard of his premature death 22 years ago. This is a tenuous link but it humanises him a little bit for me, and adds to his book’s strange mystique.
The second link, if you’ll permit me some indulgence, comes from my family’s own connection with the Kindertransport. My great-grandfather, who worked for the film industry in the cinemas of Birmingham in the 1930s, became (as I understand it) involved in the Kindertransport effort via his work colleagues. And so, in 1938, in the months before Kristallnacht, he and my great-grandmother agreed to look after a 9-year-old Jewish girl called Trudy, the daughter of another employee of the same industry � a man based in Vienna. When Tudy arrived in England, my grandfather, John, would have been 4 years old. “Johnpa� grew up with Trudy, living with her initially in Birmingham, then at the beach-side hotel (The Cary Arms, in Babbacombe, Torquay, Devon) that my great-grandparents ran from 1941 onwards, once they’d moved the family away from Birmingham soon after the outbreak of war � an attempt to find the family a place of greater safety clear of the city’s nightly bombardment.

Johnpa always, I think, thought of Trudy as his older sibling, and I picture them playing on the shingle of Babbacombe Beach amongst the American soldiers who frequently used the hotel during the war years, and who came to the area for training all through the run-up to the Normandy Landings. Eventually, word came that Trudy’s parents had escaped Vienna and made it to New York, and so, after five years in England, she took the boat across the Atlantic, arriving under the shadow of the Statue of Liberty at Ellis Island, before going on to live an archetypically 20th-century American life.

Trudy and Johnpa remained in contact until the very end (although, in their later years, when I asked, neither of them seemed entirely certain of the dates and details of their war stories). When she , age 92, in 2021, he was too ill to travel across the Atlantic for her stone setting, so my parents went in his place. At the ceremony, my mum was startled by the gratitude of Trudy’s extended family: “The only reason we’re here�, someone said to her, “is because of people like your grandparents�. Some eighty years after the fact, my mum felt a bit fraudulent accepting this praise, I think.
Johnpa, who, with my grandmother, returned to Babbacombe to live out his later years, passed away a few months ago, age 89, and with him went one more small, hazy link to the ever-receding past � history which year by year erodes into time’s ocean together with the crumbling Red Sandstone cliffs of Babbacombe Bay.

Indeed, the story I’ve just told isn’t really my story to tell, and many of the images I have of it are concoctions of my own mind, swimming in and out of focus depending on where the facts fit. Like I say, I’m convinced that Trudy and Johnpa spent a lot of time playing with American soldiers on Babbacombe beach in the months before D-Day � I’ve always imagined this to be so � but the dates don’t actually match: Trudy must have arrived in England in early 1938 and then stayed for no more than five years. The Normandy Landings didn’t take place until June 1944. She would have been gone, therefore, well before Johnpa was catering for the Americans at his father’s hotel. Sebald is always playing with this strange false recollection effect in his writing, showing us images which don’t quite add up, and reciting (supposedly from memory) a whole book’s-worth of dialogue he shared with someone many years ago. It would seem that, no matter how much we’d like it to, the glove doesn’t quite fit his story, just as it doesn’t quite fit mine. It is possible that our memories and our histories are mostly composed of lies, but what else do we have but the inventions of our minds and the fragments of a few faded photographs? � it is in this indistinct way that we find ourselves looking back at the past:
“All of us, even when we think we have noted every tiny detail, resort to set pieces which have already been staged often enough by others. We try to reproduce the reality, but the harder we try, the more we find the pictures that make up the stock-in-trade of the spectacle of history forcing themselves upon us: the fallen drummer boy, the infantryman shown in the act of stabbing another, the horse’s eye starting from its socket, the invulnerable Emperor surrounded by his generals, a moment frozen still amidst the turmoil of battle. Our concern with history, so Hilary’s thesis ran, is a concern with pre-formed images already imprinted on our brains, images at which we keep staring while the truth lies elsewhere, away from it all, somewhere as yet undiscovered.�
“Are we standing on a mountain of death? Is that our ultimate vantage point?� � these are questions the narrator asks the reader right in the middle of The Rings of Saturn. From what I’ve read, I think they’re probably the two questions most central to Sebald’s work (being a writer, as he was, mostly beaten into a sad listlessness by history’s unceasing insistence on the endlessly recurring cycle of man’s inhumanity to man). But, as with many of the things most fundamental to Austerlitz, this time around they are never posed to the reader directly. They, instead, float like ghosts beneath the text’s shrouded surfaces. As a result, this is a book you wish you could reach out and touch even though you know it will always elude your grasp � just like your memories.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Austerlitz.
Sign In »
Quotes Jay Liked

“It does not seem to me, Austerlitz added, that we understand the laws governing the return of the past, but I feel more and more as if time did not exist at all, only various spaces interlocking according to the rules of a higher form of stereometry, between which the living and the dead can move back and forth as they like, and the longer I think about it the more it seems to me that we who are still alive are unreal in the eyes of the dead, that only occasionally, in certain lights and atmospheric conditions, do we appear in their field of vision.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“Someone, he added, ought to draw up a catalogue of types of buildings listed in order of size, and it would be immediately obvious that domestic buildings of less then normal size â€� the little cottage in the fields, the hermitage, lockkeepers's lodge, the pavilion for viewing the landscape, the children's bothy in the garden â€� are those that offer us at least a semblance of peace, whereas no one in his right mind could truthfully say that he liked a vast edifice such as the Palace of Justice in the old Gallows Hill in Brussels. At the most we gaze at it in wonder, a kind of wonder which itself is a form of dawning horror, for somehow we know by instinct that outsize buildings cast the shadow of their own destruction before them, and are designed from the first with an eye to their later existence as ruins.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“We take almost all the decisive steps in our lives as a result of slight inner adjustments of which we are barely conscious.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“...the darkness does not lift but becomes yet heavier as I think how little we can hold in mind, how everything is constantly lapsing into oblivion with every extinguished life, how the world is, as it were, draining itself, in that the history of countless places and objects which themselves have no power or memory is never heard, never described or passed on.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“In my photographic work I was always especially entranced, said Austerlitz, by the moment when the shadows of reality, so to speak, emerge out of nothing on the exposed paper, as memories do in the middle of the night, darkening again if you try to cling to them, just like a photographic print left in the developing bath too long.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“Had I realized at the time that for Austerlitz certain moments had no beginning or end, while on the other hand his whole life had sometimes seemed to him a blank point without duration, I would probably have waited more patiently.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“The darkness does not lift but becomes yet heavier as I think how little we can hold in mind, how everything is constantly lapsing into oblivion with every extinguished life, how the world is, as it were, draining itself, in that the history of countless places and objects which themselves have no power of memory is never heard, never described or passed on.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“The trails of light which they [moths] seemed to leave behind them in all kinds of curlicues and streamers and spirals..., did not really exist, explained Alphonso, but were merely phantom tracks created by the sluggish reaction of the human eye ,appearing to see a certain afterglow in the place from which the insect itself, shining for only the fraction of a second in the lamplight, had already gone. It was such unreal phenomena, said Alphonso, the sudden incursion of unreality into the real world, certain effects of light in the landscape spread out before us, or in the eye of a beloved person, that kindled our deepest feelings, or at least what we took for them.”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“...and VÄ›ra said that every time we reached the page which described the snow falling through the branches of the trees, soon to shroud the entire forest floor, I would look up at her and ask: But if it's all white, how do the squirrels know where they've buried their hoard?... Those were your very words, the question which constantly troubled you. How indeed do the squirrels know, what do we know ourselves, how do we remember, and what it is we find in the end?”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz

“The ever-extended list of bans â€� before long it was forbidden for Jews to walk on the pavement on the side of the road next to the park, to go into a laundry or dry cleaner’s, or to make a call from a public telephone â€� all of this, I still hear VÄ•ra telling me, said Austerlitz, soon brought Agáta to the brink of despair. I can see her now pacing up and down this room, said VÄ•ra, I can see her striking her forehead with the flat of her hand, and crying out, chanting the syllables one by one: I do not un der stand it! I do not un der stand it! I shall ne ver un der stand it!!”
― Austerlitz
― Austerlitz
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Alan
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Dec 14, 2023 02:50PM

reply
|
flag

Ah, thanks a lot buddy. I was sat here, idly tweaking it and worrying it was a load of old shite. Haha. Needed to be written somewhere, though.

It really was. Can't wait to read more Sebald now. I've been thinking about this book all week. He was a quiet sort of genius, I think.

Very well done, güerito. I spent this afternoon reading it, and boy, I didn’t know you were incredibly connected to the author in so many ways. Him being a lecturer and your mother being one of the attendees is something that not everyone could boast about.
You just reminded me that I must go back and read the introduction; I somehow forgot about it. Of course you didn’t forget to add illustrations à la Sebald (you don’t hate me for skipping them while reading the book, do you?).
Well, thanks for giving us such a beautiful write-up. :)