Lit Bug's Reviews > To Kill a Mockingbird
To Kill a Mockingbird
by
by

In the course of 5 years, I’ve read this book nearly 17 times. That adds up to reading it once at least every 4 months, on an average. And I still return to this book like a bark seeking a lighthouse in the dark. When I first finished it, I was so overwhelmed by how much I related to it, I read it nearly 8 times before the year ended. By now I’ve memorized almost every scene and I still can’t shake off the feeling that I still have to learn a lot from it. Over the years, I realize that without knowing it, it has become my personal Bible � a beacon to keep me from straying from the path of kindness and compassion, no matter what.
With its baseless cruelty and what Coleridge poetically referred to as motiveless malignity, the world is in need of much motiveless kindness � a rugged determination to keep the world a quiet haven and not the callous, cruel place it constantly aspires to be.
To Kill A Mockingbird is one of those rare books that doesn’t give in to the belief that ”deep down, everybody’s actually good.� Not everybody is. And we must still persevere to see things from their perspective, and though we may not justify their ways, we must strive to understand them � though we might not follow them, we must try to be as kind to them as possible. And yet, there comes a time when some people need to be put down � we must follow the call of our conscience then, and yet be kind to them in the process, as much as we can.
Striving to follow this dictum, I have realized how difficult it is to be kind to others when I find I’m right. It is so easy to put down others bluntly, it is so easy to be critical and fair, but so difficult to consider for a moment what the other might be going through. How convenient it is to dismiss the hardships of others and say, “They had it coming!� and unburden our conscience of the probable guilt that perhaps we’ve been a bit too harsh.
How simple it is to stereotype people, classify them neatly into convenient square boxes and systematically deal with them based on those black-or-white prejudices! Robe a prejudice in the opaque, oppressive garment called Common Sense and display boldly the seal of Social Approval and you’ve solved the biggest difficulty of life � knowing how to treat people.
And yet, nothing could be farther than the truth. Rarely are people so simple as they seem. In Wilde’s words, “The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.� For you never know when a grumpy, rude, racist Mrs. Dubose might be fighting her own monsters or Ewell be, in fact trying to protect the last vestiges of honor he has, or Aunt Alexandra only trying to advocate the least painful way of life. And though we might not agree with any of them, like Atticus, we must see them for their peculiar situations and grant them a little leeway, make a little corner for them too, and yet, stand up for what is right in defiance of them.
It is this tricky rope-walking balance between prejudice and common sense, kindness and firmness, and justice and leeway that spurs me to revisit this little book every time I seem to falter. While I find it difficult to keep my cool in the midst of flagrant injustices and ensuing pain, I strive to strike a balance between giving in to despair and becoming too optimistic; between becoming indifferent, unkind, righteous and being compassionate, considerate. It is what keeps me from becoming paranoid or cynical with the unceasing drone of passivity, callousness, overwhelming prejudice and unyielding customs while still being alive to the pain of those very people I do not necessarily agree with.
In a country like India with its bizarre, incomprehensible equations and sequestrations of religion, class, caste, region, language, race, gender, sexuality and education, it takes a whole load of effort not to blow up one’s mind � people will kill each other over anything and everything. They’ll hate each other, isolate each other and cook up stories amongst themselves and leave it floating in the air. It takes every ounce of my energy not to hate my land and its majority people viciously. Yes, viciously.
But you see, I’ve got so much to learn to survive here � I have to stand up for myself when there will be hordes banging upon my door telling me to shut the hell up. And I’ll have to muster all the courage I have to tell them to go f*** themselves if they think I musn’t transcend the limits set for me. But I also have to learn not to hate them. Even if it sounds silly.
I know for one, Lee � I don’t care if you never wrote another work. I don’t care if Capote helped you write it, as many say. I’m glad somebody wrote this book, and somebody assigned this book as syllabus when I needed it the most. Five years ago, I hadn’t even heard of it. I read it in a single sitting. And then I read it several times over, taking my time, pondering over every page. I still do so. It is my favorite book ever.
With its baseless cruelty and what Coleridge poetically referred to as motiveless malignity, the world is in need of much motiveless kindness � a rugged determination to keep the world a quiet haven and not the callous, cruel place it constantly aspires to be.
To Kill A Mockingbird is one of those rare books that doesn’t give in to the belief that ”deep down, everybody’s actually good.� Not everybody is. And we must still persevere to see things from their perspective, and though we may not justify their ways, we must strive to understand them � though we might not follow them, we must try to be as kind to them as possible. And yet, there comes a time when some people need to be put down � we must follow the call of our conscience then, and yet be kind to them in the process, as much as we can.
Striving to follow this dictum, I have realized how difficult it is to be kind to others when I find I’m right. It is so easy to put down others bluntly, it is so easy to be critical and fair, but so difficult to consider for a moment what the other might be going through. How convenient it is to dismiss the hardships of others and say, “They had it coming!� and unburden our conscience of the probable guilt that perhaps we’ve been a bit too harsh.
How simple it is to stereotype people, classify them neatly into convenient square boxes and systematically deal with them based on those black-or-white prejudices! Robe a prejudice in the opaque, oppressive garment called Common Sense and display boldly the seal of Social Approval and you’ve solved the biggest difficulty of life � knowing how to treat people.
And yet, nothing could be farther than the truth. Rarely are people so simple as they seem. In Wilde’s words, “The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.� For you never know when a grumpy, rude, racist Mrs. Dubose might be fighting her own monsters or Ewell be, in fact trying to protect the last vestiges of honor he has, or Aunt Alexandra only trying to advocate the least painful way of life. And though we might not agree with any of them, like Atticus, we must see them for their peculiar situations and grant them a little leeway, make a little corner for them too, and yet, stand up for what is right in defiance of them.
It is this tricky rope-walking balance between prejudice and common sense, kindness and firmness, and justice and leeway that spurs me to revisit this little book every time I seem to falter. While I find it difficult to keep my cool in the midst of flagrant injustices and ensuing pain, I strive to strike a balance between giving in to despair and becoming too optimistic; between becoming indifferent, unkind, righteous and being compassionate, considerate. It is what keeps me from becoming paranoid or cynical with the unceasing drone of passivity, callousness, overwhelming prejudice and unyielding customs while still being alive to the pain of those very people I do not necessarily agree with.
In a country like India with its bizarre, incomprehensible equations and sequestrations of religion, class, caste, region, language, race, gender, sexuality and education, it takes a whole load of effort not to blow up one’s mind � people will kill each other over anything and everything. They’ll hate each other, isolate each other and cook up stories amongst themselves and leave it floating in the air. It takes every ounce of my energy not to hate my land and its majority people viciously. Yes, viciously.
But you see, I’ve got so much to learn to survive here � I have to stand up for myself when there will be hordes banging upon my door telling me to shut the hell up. And I’ll have to muster all the courage I have to tell them to go f*** themselves if they think I musn’t transcend the limits set for me. But I also have to learn not to hate them. Even if it sounds silly.
I know for one, Lee � I don’t care if you never wrote another work. I don’t care if Capote helped you write it, as many say. I’m glad somebody wrote this book, and somebody assigned this book as syllabus when I needed it the most. Five years ago, I hadn’t even heard of it. I read it in a single sitting. And then I read it several times over, taking my time, pondering over every page. I still do so. It is my favorite book ever.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
To Kill a Mockingbird.
Sign In »
Quotes Lit Bug Liked

“Until I feared I would lose it, I never loved to read. One does not love breathing.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view... Until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It's when you know you're licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and see it through no matter what.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“They're certainly entitled to think that, and they're entitled to full respect for their opinions... but before I can live with other folks I've got to live with myself. The one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule is a person's conscience.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“Atticus said to Jem one day, "I’d rather you shot at tin cans in the backyard, but I know you’ll go after birds. Shoot all the blue jays you want, if you can hit ‘em, but remember it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird." That was the only time I ever heard Atticus say it was a sin to do something, and I asked Miss Maudie about it. "Your father’s right," she said. "Mockingbirds don’t do one thing except make music for us to enjoy. They don’t eat up people’s gardens, don’t nest in corn cribs, they don’t do one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That’s why it’s a sin to kill a mockingbird.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“Atticus, he was real nice."
"Most people are, Scout, when you finally see them.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
"Most people are, Scout, when you finally see them.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)... There are just some kind of men who - who're so busy worrying about the next world they've never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“It was times like these when I thought my father, who hated guns and had never been to any wars, was the bravest man who ever lived.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“As you grow older, you’ll see white men cheat black men every day of your life, but let me tell you something and don’t you forget it—whenever a white man does that to a black man, no matter who he is, how rich he is, or how fine a family he comes from, that white man is trash”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“You just hold your head high and keep those fists down. No matter what anybody says to you, don't you let 'em get your goat. Try fightin' with your head for a change.
-Atticus Finch”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
-Atticus Finch”
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“When a child asks you something, answer him, for goodness sake. But don't make a production of it. Children are children, but they can spot an evasion faster than adults, and evasion simply muddles 'em.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“It’s never an insult to be called what somebody thinks is a bad name. It just shows you how poor that person is, it doesn’t hurt you.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“If there's just one kind of folks, why can't they get along with each other? If they're all alike, why do they go out of their way to despise each other? Scout, I think I'm beginning to understand something. I think I'm beginning to understand why Boo Radley's stayed shut up in the house all this time. It's because he wants to stay inside.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“There are just some kind of men who-who're so busy worrying about the next world they've never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird

“They've done it before and they'll do it again and when they do it -- seems that only the children weep. Good night.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird
Reading Progress
October 31, 2012
– Shelved
April 16, 2013
– Shelved as:
american
April 16, 2013
– Shelved as:
fiction
April 16, 2013
– Shelved as:
novels
April 16, 2013
– Shelved as:
owned
April 16, 2013
– Shelved as:
literary
October 25, 2013
– Shelved as:
favorites
November 5, 2013
–
Started Reading
November 5, 2013
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 64 (64 new)



My that's all I can say. You've read this book (nearly) seventeen times! I had a friend who watched the movie "Casablanca" 57 times and I thought he was nuts. However, I love the "Thomas Crown Affair" DVD with Pearce Brosnan and I could watch that for ever. I love the music. It mesmerizes me. It sets a spring in my stride.
I particularly liked : "Striving to follow this dictum, I have realized how difficult it is to be kind to others when I find I’m right." I'm a bit like that myself.
So, I already have this book and I must read it.
You are remarkable. You're getting close to Dolors but I still think that Dolors is in the lead...



I can't imagine a better tribute to an author!

To be honest, I have little hope of any book changing my attitude in a big way, but this review of yours just makes me want to try it.
Being kind is a difficult/tedious job,isn't it. Or am I the only one who feels this way.



There are a few great adjectives here preceding the word 'review' already, but I must say, stunning review.
You illustrate perfectly what Harper Lee was trying to promulgate with this classic book. Especially when you mention the certain characters who appear unpleasant and villainous at first glance (as well as the clever mention of one of Wilde's many vibrant and brilliant quotes). Indeed, everyone is the protagonist of their own story and everyone has goals, dreams, hopes and motivations. I don't know what more could have been said, I'm jealous I didn't write it myself!
You illustrate perfectly what Harper Lee was trying to promulgate with this classic book. Especially when you mention the certain characters who appear unpleasant and villainous at first glance (as well as the clever mention of one of Wilde's many vibrant and brilliant quotes). Indeed, everyone is the protagonist of their own story and everyone has goals, dreams, hopes and motivations. I don't know what more could have been said, I'm jealous I didn't write it myself!





Ah, Dolors, what a pleasure to receive such effusive praise from a new and much-valued friend - but you really hit the bull's eye when you said I transmute literature to a life-changing experience. Literature came to me as pleasure only by chance. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say literature is one of the major forces that shaped my life.
Going over to Tagore,
Not hammer-strokes, but the dance of water, sings pebbles into perfection.
That's what literature has done to me.

It's a pity I haven't watched the movie yet for fear of disappointment. But I'll do so now - everybody seems to love it. It's a pity this book has got numerous 1 star reviews too.
"It's a pity I haven't watched the movie yet for fear of disappointment. But I'll do so now - everybody seems to love it. It's a pity this book has got numerous 1 star reviews too."
Ahh yes, the film was great. A little bit of trivia, Harper Lee was brought to tears from Gregory Peck's performance as Atticus Finch, it was spot on to everyone but even more so to the woman who knew the man.
Ahh yes, the film was great. A little bit of trivia, Harper Lee was brought to tears from Gregory Peck's performance as Atticus Finch, it was spot on to everyone but even more so to the woman who knew the man.

Thanks! Yes, I'll really watch it now :)

Well, like you, most of them had it assigned in school. Unlike you, most of them were probably teenagers. The remarkable thing to me is that so many kids who were forced to read it didn't dislike it!
I somehow managed to not read the book until my 30s, when my wife practically forced it on me. No regrets :) Atticus Finch, even if he is purely fictional, is America's answer to Gandhi.
Lovely review!

Well, like you, most of them had it assigned in school. Unlike you, most of them were probably teenagers. The remarkable..."
Ah, I read in in my early 20s, for my Bachelors degree - I wish I had it in school.



@Jr - yeah, India's a terribly complicated people with its uncountable divisions and therefore unlikely but true alliances. Maybe its a good place to visit,, but a horrible place to stay. I don't see any significant social change coming for at least 50 years. Yeah, am pretty pessimistic, but since I've read quite a lot on India right from Ancient and Medieval history, more things have stayed the same than having changed. It's a messy, gloomy place with occasional glimmers of goodness and hope. I don't even know how it has managed to survive its implosions.
And gender is just a minor issue - there are a lot more worse issues raging here. It is a continent in its own right, rather than a country.


I haven't, but TBRing it. A lot many Indians bash other people for speaking up against the grim side of everyday India, but most of the criticism is true. It's a sick place, a country whose wounds are infected so deeply that it will never really heal. Someday, I'd really like to talk about it all, in massive detail. You'd be aghast then. It's like living in a stinky, festering flesh that you know will only worsen with time.

Would India today be a more stable society if the British had imposed a single culture on the sub-contintent, the way China has over its own sphere of control? India is actually populated about 3 times as densely as China, despite China's larger total population, so I wonder if any nation so large & densely populated can ever be stable.
[and let me assure you, even if such an Indian society was more stable, I'm not advocating it. I'm Canadian, and we still believe multi-culturalism can work, when European countries all call it a "failed experiment"]

It's tempting to blame French partisanship for the separatism in Canada, but I suspect there might be deeper issues than only that? The French haven't always been that separatist everywhere, although I guess they have a good track record of tending to keep themselves in a clique.
Talking of China, China's cultural, erm, the acculturation of especially North and South China through the centuries, wasn't exactly an easy affair...
I suppose one could look toward the Roman Empire as a model of multiculturalism working quite well?

You're quite right when you say the British can be blamed to "some" degree - the Brits could do it only because Indian society itself was a fractured, highly unequal, oppressive and exploitative, not to forget extremely selfish in nature. The Brits only took advantage of the internal rifts, and although everything the Brits did wasn't right, not everything they did was any worse than what we already were doing to each other under the approval of a different culture.
Honestly, given a chance to turn back history, I'd say I prefer the 400 year Brit rule to leaving India in charge of its own land. I am thoroughly convinced that India would have been only slightly better off than Middle East today had it not been for the Brits.
And this isn't my blind adoration/fixation with the mythical liberal West speaking, I've been thinking over this since at least 5 years, going over past and present events, wondering how it would have been if Brits hadn't come over. Already, we would have been slaughtered by the Portuguese, but suppose no one had discovered an alternate route to India after the fall of Constantinople, we would still have been mired in that exploitative culture.
Don't fall for the metanarratives, the Grand Narratives about Indians being so family-oriented, so generous, so kind and warm people - they might be that to foreigners (Indians have a massive crush on the Whites and Firangis), but you need to integrate here for a few years to see beyond that façade.
Multiculturalism can work, but like anything else, it needs goodwill. Currently, in India, even if people manage to develop goodwill among each other, political factions will step in deliberately to make a mess, incite hatred on some or other counts, and divide public opinion to gather votes from their targeted cultural/socio-economic/minority-majority group. Things here are too twisted, and nobody cares for the nuanced truth - they believe what they're told, until the representation replaces truth itself.



I would just like to make one correction about your movie comment. It was Gregory Peck that played the role of Atticus and not Gary Cooper. The reason I know this is because I am a HS teacher and have seen this movie many many times, I can't even count how many times I've showed it to students. I enjoyed it every time. It's a good movie and Gregory Peck gives a great performance as Atticus.

Good movie though and Gregory Peck gave a great performance.

And though we might not agree with any of them, like Atticus, we must see them for their peculiar situations and grant them a little leeway, make a little corner for them too, and yet, stand up for what is right in defiance of them.
Very interesting comment, considering in "Go Set a Watchman" it is Atticus himself who must be granted the leeway, & Scout stands up in defiance of him. The two books seem so much two halves of a whole than what I ever expected.
Very interesting comment, considering in "Go Set a Watchman" it is Atticus himself who must be granted the leeway, & Scout stands up in defiance of him. The two books seem so much two halves of a whole than what I ever expected.

Oh thanks! I will, for sure


I have to read this now. Now.