Mark's Reviews > Ice
Ice
by
The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.
This is the opening line of William Gibson's first novel, Neuromancer. It also sums up how I felt as I read Anna Kavan's Ice. I felt like I was watching an old analog television tuned to snow.

If you look at it long enough it's kinda mesmerizing, isn't it? You begin to see patterns, things coalescing and breaking up. Kind of like the shades in this novel. I can't rightly call them characters as they never felt that way to me. They were empty vessels waiting for someone to bring life to them. Only in the final chapter did this happen. On its own, the final chapter would make a nice standalone short story. But everything that preceded it was a wash of -- nothing. My eyes scanned the pages, but there was nothing there. I felt nothing. Not cold, warm, horror, excitement. It was random scenes strung together by random events. Lots of "suddenly"s, like an old ghost story. Or Marsha Brady. "Something suddenly came up." But the something never led to anything, and in the end the something felt like -- nothing at all.
There were moments when, as I read, I could tell that I was supposed to feel horror. There were words like "blood" or "slap" or phrases like "stacked two feet high." But when these words are placed besides empty vessels, the vessel still remains -- empty.
I read this with my buddy Mary and about halfway through I asked how she was liking it. This is a short book and I knew that if by the halfway mark it wasn't clicking, it probably wasn't going to. Mary enlightened me. She told me how she saw the events arranged, and I gotta admit, if Mary wrote the story the way she described it to me, I think I would have enjoyed it. Not enough to be mind-blown, but at least 3-stars worth. On its own, the novel to me is worth a single star. It's that final chapter that raises it to two.
In the final chapter I finally saw a semblance of characterization. All of a sudden there was something worth paying attention to. The characters spoke, they spoke in a meaningful way. I found myself slowing down to take everything in. It was almost like enjoyment. Would the chapter itself stand toe to toe with the best short stories in the world? Heck no. Was it worth reading? Yeah, I think so. But by the same token, everything before it was worth skipping.
There were glimpses, in random words and scenes, that made it seem like Kavan was on to something. The book was published originally in 1967. Vietnam. The threat of the Cold War. Nuclear annihilation. For a sentence at a time, spread maybe fifteen to twenty pages apart, I had an inkling there was something going on. A comment on the state of the world at that time. In many ways, I feel that sixties and the present day are mirroring each other in a sadistic sort of way. That should have made this a very interesting read. But by the next sentence the scene was changed, some random happening was happening, an empty vessel moved from here to there. The new place was just as staticy and unclear as the previous one. And -- nothing.

by

The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.
This is the opening line of William Gibson's first novel, Neuromancer. It also sums up how I felt as I read Anna Kavan's Ice. I felt like I was watching an old analog television tuned to snow.

If you look at it long enough it's kinda mesmerizing, isn't it? You begin to see patterns, things coalescing and breaking up. Kind of like the shades in this novel. I can't rightly call them characters as they never felt that way to me. They were empty vessels waiting for someone to bring life to them. Only in the final chapter did this happen. On its own, the final chapter would make a nice standalone short story. But everything that preceded it was a wash of -- nothing. My eyes scanned the pages, but there was nothing there. I felt nothing. Not cold, warm, horror, excitement. It was random scenes strung together by random events. Lots of "suddenly"s, like an old ghost story. Or Marsha Brady. "Something suddenly came up." But the something never led to anything, and in the end the something felt like -- nothing at all.
There were moments when, as I read, I could tell that I was supposed to feel horror. There were words like "blood" or "slap" or phrases like "stacked two feet high." But when these words are placed besides empty vessels, the vessel still remains -- empty.
I read this with my buddy Mary and about halfway through I asked how she was liking it. This is a short book and I knew that if by the halfway mark it wasn't clicking, it probably wasn't going to. Mary enlightened me. She told me how she saw the events arranged, and I gotta admit, if Mary wrote the story the way she described it to me, I think I would have enjoyed it. Not enough to be mind-blown, but at least 3-stars worth. On its own, the novel to me is worth a single star. It's that final chapter that raises it to two.
In the final chapter I finally saw a semblance of characterization. All of a sudden there was something worth paying attention to. The characters spoke, they spoke in a meaningful way. I found myself slowing down to take everything in. It was almost like enjoyment. Would the chapter itself stand toe to toe with the best short stories in the world? Heck no. Was it worth reading? Yeah, I think so. But by the same token, everything before it was worth skipping.
There were glimpses, in random words and scenes, that made it seem like Kavan was on to something. The book was published originally in 1967. Vietnam. The threat of the Cold War. Nuclear annihilation. For a sentence at a time, spread maybe fifteen to twenty pages apart, I had an inkling there was something going on. A comment on the state of the world at that time. In many ways, I feel that sixties and the present day are mirroring each other in a sadistic sort of way. That should have made this a very interesting read. But by the next sentence the scene was changed, some random happening was happening, an empty vessel moved from here to there. The new place was just as staticy and unclear as the previous one. And -- nothing.

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Ice.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 28, 2012
– Shelved
February 19, 2013
– Shelved as:
bleak-ass-ice-box
June 10, 2013
–
Started Reading
June 11, 2013
–
13.0%
June 13, 2013
–
53.0%
June 18, 2013
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-29 of 29 (29 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mark
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Jun 11, 2013 09:09AM

reply
|
flag


Lots of folks liked Ice, but it just barely clicked with me. If you see it cheap, or in the library, you might thumb the short final chapter, see what cha think. Right now Jenn is reading another from Kavan and the lines she's quoted sound a heckuva lot more interesting than any I came across in Ice. Depending on her final assessment, that one might be worth trying :)
Always a lil peculiar when one that makes a big impression on most folks fails to make one on you.

I've had a few like that, too. If it weren't for the fact that our GR friends are above such things, I'd have suggested it was a case of them not pointing out that the emperor has no clothes. We should stick to our guns in any case, though it's natural to second-guess ourselves when we disagree strongly with the cool kid orthodoxy, isn't it?


In fact, I'm thinking I'm just going to stop awarding stars at all, but then that would have the opposite problem...catch 22?

Right now, I'm working through Proust's first volume. When I began, I really enjoyed the "comfy" scenes he projected. By page 100, I began to grow tired of his longwinded descriptions. I understood what he was going for, but like I felt with Infinite Jest, I found the result tedious. It's likely my personal taste that prevents me from loving-loving-loving either of these. To me, the perfect books are the ones in which the author of the book is nowhere to be found. They create characters and let them do the storytelling, scene-creating. With Jest, DFW could not help throw himself into nearly all the scenes. Not literally, of course, but figuratively the entire book screamed "I was written by DFW."
With Ice, it felt like Kavan had no story. It felt to me like she was making up every scene as she went. I like "haphazard," when I understand that's what the author is going for, but I like a character I can follow and understand. I never felt like there were any characters in this one. There were kinda-sorta events, but none of them seemed connected. By the end of the first chapter, I had a feeling Ice was not one I was going to like. I tried to be objective, but it seems impossible for humans not to bring their own idiosyncrasies to whatever they do.
That's a good idea re: stars. Way too much importance is put on a book's star rating I think. We're in such a hurry nowadays, the star can be (or is used?) as a shorthand way to know whether we ourselves will like a book or not. Since the beginning of this year, I've been using the stars the way GR labels them. Just as a way to note my own personal enjoyment. Like with Ice, I would say it was an "okay" read, to me, but nothing more.


Seems like there was a buncha buzz surrounding this around the time I read it so maybe I had high expectations, but man it was just blah


I think it was late 2012, I started to see several folks reading and enjoying Ice, and wanting a short read I had to give it a try. 5 years later, I can't say I remember much about it. Even the last chapter, that I apparently thought was good, no recollection

I really interpreted this as being at least partially some sort of dream or hallucination on the part of the narrator.

I really interpreted this as being at least partially some sort of dream or hallucination on th..."
This poor narrator didn't even have an interesting dream life


It's been a while, but some reads from around the same time still stand out as just a fantastic reading experience. I couldn't tell you a single thing that happened in Ice, though

