Emily May's Reviews > The Madman's Daughter
The Madman's Daughter (The Madman's Daughter, #1)
by
I really feel like I gave this book a fair chance, I read it all the way to the end because I kept wanting to love it and get caught up in the atmosphere of this Victorian horror story - but it was not to be. Not everything I have to say about The Madman's Daughter is bad, so thankfully this will not be a wholly negative review, but there were a number of things I didn't like and those elements combined with long periods of slow, plotless boredom made me feel this was no more than a two-star read.
But let me offer you something good first because my initial impressions of this novel were entirely positive. Firstly, though this won't matter to many readers, I adore this cover. It's creepy, atmospheric and it caught my eye instantly. I actually prefer covers that are a bit different and edgy to the usual close-up of a girl pouting in a ballgown. Anyway, aesthetics aside, this book immediately introduces the reader to a strong, sassy protagonist who isn't afraid to kick ass or get her hands dirty. I felt sure that myself and Juliet Moreau were going to get along great - and we probably would have if I'd cared more for the story. I also thought the first couple of chapters set the scene well with a touch of the macabre to draw the reader in. So, I will happily admit that the first chapter or two elevated my hopes for this book a great deal.
Then, I don't even know what happened... it was like for seventy pages things just came screeching to a tremendous halt.
Basically, Juliet and Montgomery (possible beau number one) got on this boat and there were all these ships and sailing and sailors and...

Then, of course, there was a romance and - even worse - a love triangle. I don't even hate love triangles that much, I just can't stand it when that becomes the main focus of the story. This book is described as a "gothic thriller" but the truth is that everything either gothic or thrilling came second to the romance which was filled with the same old cliches and annoying gushy phrases like "I couldn't deny the way I floated inside when he touched me". The two candidates for Juliet's heart - Montgomery and Edward - were presented as complete opposites: the gentlemen vs the wild man... ooh, haven't heard that one before!
What astounded me most of all about this relationship was the way Juliet's mind jumped so quickly from one to the other and back again. One minute she was thinking about Montgomery's pretty eyes and the next she had moved onto Edward's sexy charms. This is one example from the book that had me snorting aloud in disbelief:
"Didn't Montgomery remember last night, during the storm, running his fingers down the bare skin of my back? I did. I could barely think about anything else."
directly - as in, the actual next sentence - followed by:
"Edward sat across from me, deep in his own thoughts. His hands still bore the scratches from our escape. I wondered if his ribs still hurt him. I absently touched my own, remembering the feel of his hands holding me there behind the waterfall."
Then we come to some more slow sections like the walking through the jungle scenes and the needlepoint explanations - I wanted monsters, not sewing...

One thought that I had through most of this was that so many parts of the book seemed like pointless filler to stretch out a weak plot. My theory is that Shepherd may have stretched the story too thin in order to make it into a series instead of a standalone - or perhaps she's just a fan of slower-moving plots - either way, large chunks were too uneventful for me and I had a hard time making myself finish it. Though the stories are not alike, the way I feel about The Madman's Daughter is similar to how I felt about Grave Mercy, they both started great but quickly became bogged down by slowness and romance. To give one final bit of credit where it's due, I will say that there was a pretty nifty twist near the end that I didn't see coming, unfortunately it was all just too little too late.
by

I really feel like I gave this book a fair chance, I read it all the way to the end because I kept wanting to love it and get caught up in the atmosphere of this Victorian horror story - but it was not to be. Not everything I have to say about The Madman's Daughter is bad, so thankfully this will not be a wholly negative review, but there were a number of things I didn't like and those elements combined with long periods of slow, plotless boredom made me feel this was no more than a two-star read.
But let me offer you something good first because my initial impressions of this novel were entirely positive. Firstly, though this won't matter to many readers, I adore this cover. It's creepy, atmospheric and it caught my eye instantly. I actually prefer covers that are a bit different and edgy to the usual close-up of a girl pouting in a ballgown. Anyway, aesthetics aside, this book immediately introduces the reader to a strong, sassy protagonist who isn't afraid to kick ass or get her hands dirty. I felt sure that myself and Juliet Moreau were going to get along great - and we probably would have if I'd cared more for the story. I also thought the first couple of chapters set the scene well with a touch of the macabre to draw the reader in. So, I will happily admit that the first chapter or two elevated my hopes for this book a great deal.
Then, I don't even know what happened... it was like for seventy pages things just came screeching to a tremendous halt.
Basically, Juliet and Montgomery (possible beau number one) got on this boat and there were all these ships and sailing and sailors and...

Then, of course, there was a romance and - even worse - a love triangle. I don't even hate love triangles that much, I just can't stand it when that becomes the main focus of the story. This book is described as a "gothic thriller" but the truth is that everything either gothic or thrilling came second to the romance which was filled with the same old cliches and annoying gushy phrases like "I couldn't deny the way I floated inside when he touched me". The two candidates for Juliet's heart - Montgomery and Edward - were presented as complete opposites: the gentlemen vs the wild man... ooh, haven't heard that one before!
What astounded me most of all about this relationship was the way Juliet's mind jumped so quickly from one to the other and back again. One minute she was thinking about Montgomery's pretty eyes and the next she had moved onto Edward's sexy charms. This is one example from the book that had me snorting aloud in disbelief:
"Didn't Montgomery remember last night, during the storm, running his fingers down the bare skin of my back? I did. I could barely think about anything else."
directly - as in, the actual next sentence - followed by:
"Edward sat across from me, deep in his own thoughts. His hands still bore the scratches from our escape. I wondered if his ribs still hurt him. I absently touched my own, remembering the feel of his hands holding me there behind the waterfall."
Then we come to some more slow sections like the walking through the jungle scenes and the needlepoint explanations - I wanted monsters, not sewing...

One thought that I had through most of this was that so many parts of the book seemed like pointless filler to stretch out a weak plot. My theory is that Shepherd may have stretched the story too thin in order to make it into a series instead of a standalone - or perhaps she's just a fan of slower-moving plots - either way, large chunks were too uneventful for me and I had a hard time making myself finish it. Though the stories are not alike, the way I feel about The Madman's Daughter is similar to how I felt about Grave Mercy, they both started great but quickly became bogged down by slowness and romance. To give one final bit of credit where it's due, I will say that there was a pretty nifty twist near the end that I didn't see coming, unfortunately it was all just too little too late.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Madman's Daughter.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 10, 2012
– Shelved
December 12, 2012
–
Started Reading
December 19, 2012
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 53 (53 new)
message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Dec 15, 2012 08:54AM
I'm starting this one next and absolutely can't wait! I hope you like it, Emily! It sounds amaaaaazing.
reply
|
flag
I'm going to second Steph's comment - the romance (and possible love triangle) perhaps?
Oh no! I'm only 30% in and am liking it, though I have some problems with the pacing and romance. Now I'm a bit worried. :(

1) There were many slow parts that I had to struggle through
2) Yeah - you guessed it - the romance and that whole love triangle thing wasn't doing it for me.
3) I feel like the plot has been deliberately stretched thin to make this into a series instead of a standalone.
@Blythe How far are you in the story? I started to lose interest when they began on the boat journey so if you're past that then hopefully this book is just more suited to you than me :)
They just got off the boat a few percentages ago. I'm starting to gradually lose interest, though.
BOO! And right in time for the re-release of Monsters Inc! (This is when my inner child gets excited - just mention Monsters Inc.) Sorry this one wasn't for you, Emily. I'm liking it - probably about 3.5 stars right now. Not a fan of the romance very much, but I do like the plot and am curious to see where it will lead. And I'm also really curious about this big twist at the end! I have an idea about what it could be (view spoiler)

Great review. Looks like I will not be reading this book.



@Brandi I can see the romance-y feel of the novel being the main problem for readers because it seemed pretty unrealistic - but if you can look past that, it'll probably please you much more.
@Mariya Haha, thanks :)
@Steph Don't give that comparison too much weight, I have this habit of comparing books based on my reading experience not on their actual similarities. For example, if I read a long and boring book, I tend to compare it to other books that were long and boring to me (but have nothing in common storywise). Have you read The Dark Unwinding? That was a book similar to this one but far better, IMO.
@Renu Thanks Renu and I agree, I really doubt I would have read this if I'd known how much of the book was taken up by the love triangle angsting :)


Thanks for the review ^^


I too don't mind love triangles, felt like they pretty consumed the plot, especially in the middle of the book. The last through brought back the action (especially the descriptions of the monster), but I had kind of lost interest by then.

Okay, knowing that, would you still have read this book? I am on the fence about it. However, your review about the down time is leaning me towards "no read". I cannot stand too much information that we readers really don't need to "read". (I think it is just wasted filler.)
Thank you for the reply(s). :)


Thank you. :)

My other pet peeve was how she would be disgusted with her father's work and mesmerized by it in the same sentence. She kept blaming it on her genes and being her father's daughter. Either be horrified by what he's doing or be proud of him for doing it but not both. At least not in the same breath.



ugh and it sounds so promising from the little summary. owell. ill shelf it for now.


i heard the ghost bride handled the whole love triangle romantic thing in a more delicate and simple manner. i hate when love is central to an otherwise good plot and concept
Hey Emily, what means your "coverly love" tag?



^This. I totally agree. Way more high school-style angst than psychological thriller.

Love triangles usually irritate me (and I definitely did find this out problematic), but the other elements in the novel saved it for me. I would have given the novel a lower rating due to the triangle/slow pacing, but then the last 50 pages came and I was blown away!
I'm currently reading the sequel and it's already better in terms of pacing.
I am curious about whether or not you've actually read The Island of Dr Moreau? It's one of my all-time favourite classics - I would definitely recommend it. While I do think it isn't necessary to read it before this series, it does add a lot.

"When I first read the synopsis, I got so excited to read about a heroine who was teetering on the edge of insanity (I have a thing for sociopaths)
^This. I totally agree. Way more high school-style angst than psychological thriller."
READ THE SECOND. That is all I'll say. :)xo
I didn't love the first one, it felt like another hunger games knock off, with a love triangle and everything. I must say the second one is loads better. It still has the love triangle but, it's more about a murder roaming through London.