欧宝娱乐

Craig's Reviews > Starry Messenger: Cosmic Perspectives on Civilization

Starry Messenger by Neil deGrasse Tyson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
83180
's review

it was amazing

I was very pleased to win an advance copy of this book from the 欧宝娱乐 giveaway program. I was a little afraid that some of the science or math portions would be hard to follow but found that my fears were groundless; it's written in a very clear and straightforward, easy to follow manner. I used to love reading Asimov's books of science essays, and I was a big fan of Cosmos. In fact, it's much more of a philosophical work than a science book, a guide on how to approach questions or situations from a scientific and factual viewpoint rather than relying on often incorrect "common knowledge" and preconceived notions. It's subtitled "Cosmic Perspectives on Civilization," and Tyson illustrates points about government, politics, race, gender, culture, and all manner of other weighty ideas and subjects with remarkable insight, clarity, and refreshing humor. I found myself trying to apply some of his examples of factual thinking as I read and began to look at his topics from a different perspective; for example, on page 19 he states that when a comet hit Jupiter in July of 1994, nothing died, but it would have been an extinction-level catastrophe on Earth. It struck me that he really didn't have any way of knowing for sure whether anything had been killed on Jupiter or not. He addresses subjects without bias and presents facts as an illustration of how the scientific method can help make better decisions. It reminded me of my favorite quote from Harlan Ellison: 鈥淵ou are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your -informed- opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.鈥� Another random observation that he made that impressed me was on page 176, and he is recounting his experience of being in a pool for jury selection. The defendant is charged with the possession of 1,700 milligrams of cocaine, and he points out that the charge is phrased that way rather than as the more accurate 1.7 grams simply to make it sound like a larger quantity and a more heinous offense. There were many such points he makes in the book that gave me a different way of looking at a situation. It's a very intelligent and thought-provoking book, full of historical and scientific facts presented in sometimes alternate ways. I recommend it highly.
57 likes ·  鈭� flag

Sign into 欧宝娱乐 to see if any of your friends have read Starry Messenger.
Sign In 禄

Reading Progress

June 24, 2022 – Shelved as: to-read
June 24, 2022 – Shelved
Started Reading
July, 2022 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lauren (new) - added it

Lauren Henderson That story from the jury selection is fantastic and has made me put this book on my TBR. Thanks for the great review.


Craig Thank you!


message 3: by C (new) - rated it 3 stars

C The jury duty story was originally told in his Space Chronicles in 2012, and appears to be a fabricated story which he recycled again and again, unable to keep the details straight:

欧宝娱乐 doesn't allow links, but search for the article, "Did Neil deGrasse Tyson Just Try To Justify Blatant Quote Fabrication?" which discusses his inconsistent versions of this story which he's told many times, as well as other times he was caught fabricating stories and quotes, and refused to own up to it.

I'm unimpressed with how he continues to trash his own reliability and apparently has had nothing new to write in 10+ years. I used to be a fan, read several of his books, but on top of the fabrications which he uses to try to appear clever, they also just feel like increasingly lazy, unscientific, and uncritical rehashes.


Carmen Hartono C wrote: "The jury duty story was originally told in his Space Chronicles in 2012, and appears to be a fabricated story which he recycled again and again, unable to keep the details straight:"

I felt the same way about the jury story story. I've decided to read his 'Astrophysics for People in a Hurry' book before giving an opinion on 'Starry Messenger.' It seems the author is feeling pressure to be relevant to current political affairs. But I realized the problem back in college days when I switched from a science to a philosophy major. Simply put, there are big questions in the humanities that science and engineering can never answer.


Sean Wait a minute, C Jury. It appears the article you鈥檙e referencing comes from a conservative news site. That鈥檚 not a convincing argument, especially if you鈥檙e trying to remain unbiased.


back to top