ŷ

K's Reviews > The Elegance of the Hedgehog

The Elegance of the Hedgehog by Muriel Barbery
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
F 50x66
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: maybe-it-s-me

My name is Renee, and I’m the first protagonist of this book � the hedgehog, as it were. I’m a 54-year-old concierge who works in a building populated by rich and powerful people who barely notice my existence. I’m also a closet intellectual and I frequently try to prove that to you by digressing into asides about philosophy, culture, and other topics. I alternate between sniping at the apartment owners for their snobbish indifference to my lowly concierge self (an image I strive to maintain at every opportunity while blaming the rich apartment owners for buying into it), and terror that they may find out that I read loftier books than they do (I’m as much of a snob as they are, if not worse, but I guess we won’t go there � let’s keep things simple, even though this book is ostensibly higher literature). Given the owners� apathy toward me, it’s not clear what I fear might actually happen if they learned that I was an intellectual. Probably nothing. But hey, this conflict keeps the book going and maybe makes some kind of a statement about French class differences. I guess you’d have to be French to understand. But you don’t have to be French to feel smug and superior about reading this pretentious novel. In fact, it probably helps if you’re not French because then you’re reading something foreign.

My name is Paloma, and I’m the other protagonist of this book. I’m a brilliant, precocious, underestimated and misunderstood 12-year-old who plans to burn down my apartment and commit suicide on my 13th birthday. I’m not sure exactly why I’m so unhappy. I mean, I can make all kinds of bitter and cynical observations about my parents and sister, but really, I’m not lacking for anything. I can tell you in lofty language about how life truly has no meaning, but for someone so bright, my thinking tends to be pretty two-dimensional as does my personality and my life in general. Although disliking your family is pretty normal in adolescence, it’s not clear why, in all 12 years of existence, I’ve never discovered a friend, teacher, neighbor, or relative who might complicate my unilaterally dark feelings about humanity by actually having some positive qualities. But maybe this is part of what helps me sound like a 50-year-old philosopher even though I’m supposed to be a 12-year-old girl, so I guess that’s something. In fact, I spend so much time sounding intellectual that, except for my melodramatic suicidality, there’s little hint of the fact that, emotionally, I’m really just an early adolescent. A bit more attention to my emotional side might have made my character more interesting, but c’est la vie. I get a little more three-dimensional at the end, but you have to hang in there and I'm not sure it's worth it.

My name is ___, and I’m a reviewer for a snooty periodical. I just finished Muriel Barbery’s The Elegance of the Hedgehog, and my editor is expecting a review from me this week. To be honest, all the pedantic asides left me cold. They took me out of the story and weren’t all that interesting. I kind of skimmed over them, but that’s not something I could ever reveal to my readers. I have to act like I read them, understood them, and appreciated them as only a brilliant reader could. I have to act like they enhanced the novel, rather than detracting from it. Similarly, if I poke holes in the characterization or plot, it might sound as if I didn’t understand or failed to appreciate the depth of this book. When a book comes out that tries to sound like it’s above my head, my job is to rave about it. This way, the snooty readers of my snooty periodical can feel even snootier as they read, even as they also feel alienated by this pretentious book.

***
I (Khaya, not one of the characters) wrote the above when I was about halfway through and feeling very negative. Now that I've finished the book, my opinion mostly stands. I will say, though, that the book had some better moments and was quite readable. It's really a 2-going-on-3-star book, as opposed to a solid 2 or a 2-rounded-up-from-1 book. Definitely didn't live up to its hype, though.
643 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read The Elegance of the Hedgehog.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
March 19, 2009 – Shelved
March 19, 2009 –
page 22
6.77%
March 21, 2009 –
page 156
48.0% "I already wrote my review, but the book is readable enough so I'll just finish it to make sure my opinions are credible."
May 2, 2011 – Shelved as: maybe-it-s-me

Comments Showing 1-50 of 104 (104 new)


Lisa I'm about half way through this and feeling much like you did in your review. I'm glad to hear it may be worth finishing because at this point, I'm just not getting it. If I wanted to read philosophy, I would. If I wanted to listen to people whine, I'd just talk to my children!


message 2: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Amen, Lisa! I can't guarantee that you'll find it worth finishing, though -- I think I may have been trying too hard to find some merit in the book.


Rebecca Though I actually liked the book, I really enjoyed your review!


message 4: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Rebecca! Glad you liked it.


Natasha I just finished and reviewed it and complete agree with yours!


message 6: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Natasha!


Rebecca I also liked your review, even though I loved the book. I wish Amazon would go to the "yes" only option for their reviews, because people tend not to rate the quality of the review, but whether or not they agree. And that's plain annoying.

I liked the pedantic asides to a point, but admit that they started to get tedious. But Ozu and Renee's relationship made up for it IMO, as did the ending (which I loved).


message 8: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks for your comment, Rebecca. I'm glad you enjoyed my review! Lots of people did like the book; I think I was just too cynical for it. Oh, well.


message 9: by Kim (new) - rated it 1 star

Kim The recommendation for snobs cracked me up! I just had to stop reading this, as I found the pretension to be entirely too much to bear.

Very accurate review of the book.


message 10: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Kim! Glad you agree.


Lauren I don't know you but I have to say your review cracked me up! You are dead on, sister. The snobbery and racial projections in the book (foreign stranger from the East) are too much!


message 12: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thank you! Glad it's not only me...


Daniela I'm halfway through this book and I have to say that I agree with what you wrote here, in fact I jotted down pretty much the same things you've said in the margin of my own copy of the book! This book lacks characters that evoke a sense of empathy in the reader ( not that this has to happen for a novel to be good) and it also lacks focus ( unless focusing on negativity somehow makes a novel). Basically its just these two unhappy people who are judgmental and bitter but because they are intellectual, I guess thats supposed to give them a right to be? They come off sounding as snobbish and pretentious as the people they criticize. While there are passages that are thought provoking they all to often dissolve into more drivel and cliched banality than anything of depth worth thinking about. I'm inclined to throw this into the "abandoned books" pile but I'm going to continue on and see if something gives... somehow I doubt it though, so far this book is a disappointment.


message 14: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K I completely agree, Daniela. Lots of people seem to have liked it, and I'm not sure what they saw in it. I guess it's easy enough to finish, even if it doesn't end up redeeming itself for you.


Allie I ended up liking the book a lot, but I love your review. At the halfway point, I felt exactly the same way about it, but I felt the book redeemed itself in the second half.


message 16: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Allie. I wrote my review when I was halfway through, and also saw a bit of improvement in the second half. I couldn't bear to discard my review, though! That's why I added the qualifying piece at the end.


Hannah Caitlin First time in my life I would be considered a snob! Thanks for recommending the book... there was so much more to it than you discerned, but I suspect you are not a snob... at least.. not on the face of it!


message 18: by Katie (new)

Katie Wonderful review! I love the way you've constructed it in three voices. I haven't read the book but gather that's how the book is done too. I like the reviewer's voice in particular.


message 19: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Katie! I no longer remember the book that well and am not sure whether I was deliberately parodying the book in that way (though I appreciate your generosity in assuming I was being clever), but I'm glad you enjoyed the review.


message 20: by Gwen (last edited Mar 22, 2010 04:29PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Gwen Haaland Loved your review Khaya: it had me laughing out loud. However I agreed with it more during the slow first part of the book. For me the "The Elegance of the Hedgehog" actually redeemed itself when I began reading the last third of the book.


message 21: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Gwen! I'm happy you liked it. I agree that the book improved at the end, but it wasn't quite enough for me to change my review (especially since I liked the review too much to do that!).


Sandy I plagiarized you (well, I cited you) in my review of this book, since what you wrote speaks to my reading of the book as well.


message 23: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K How flattering! Thanks!


Malisa I liked the book. The intellectual wearing the thorny shroud of ignorance to hide her sensitive underbelly worked for me. The way the characters affected and ultimately saved each other was such a genuine portrayal of the actual power of relationships. I loved it because it was unpredictable. But I liked your review too.


message 25: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks for your comment, Malisa. It's always interesting to me how one book can evoke a range of reactions, and I like hearing from people who saw the book differently. At this point I no longer remember the book that well. I hear what you're saying; at the same time, I think I've read other books with similar themes that I found more affecting. But that's what keeps life interesting! I'm happy you enjoyed the review.


Anne Hawn Smith I loved the book and I also loved your review. You are very clever and might do well to write your own book!


message 27: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Anne! I always appreciate people who can enjoy a book and, at the same time, enjoy other opinions of the book. I do have dreams of writing my own book someday (I suspect many of us goodreaders share that aspiration). Thanks for your encouragement!


message 28: by Mark (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mark Read your review and thoroughly enjoyed it though like Anne Hawn Smith I too really enoyed the book but thanks for a really clever review


message 29: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Mark. I always appreciate people who enjoy a snarky review even when they liked the book!


message 30: by Liesl (new)

Liesl Loved your review and agree with most of it. The French class differences really struck me as amazing--is it really so? This woman would have had a scholarship and have been a professor in the U.S. (maybe not a good one...). I will say, though, that I have not forgotten this book a year and a half later. I guess that says something good about it.


message 31: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Liesl. I have no idea whether the class differences described in the book are an accurate reflection of the way things are in France. In either case, it was hard for me to understand Renee's agenda in so effortfully concealing her intelligence. I'm not sure the people around her cared that much either way; if the class differences are so entrenched, I'm sure they wouldn't have noticed or cared what books she was reading.


❀ Hana LOL! Thanks for this review. I was wondering what's wrong with me for not liking this so famous book! I watched the movie a few days ago (before even finished the book) and found out it is so surprisingly good. However the foul feelings returned as I resume my reading.


message 33: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Hana! It seems there are a lot of us out there. I didn't know there was a movie -- I'm glad to hear it's better than the book.


Naomi Hah! Great review, a hit-the nail-on-the head one. Very funny, and for me captures the essence of this non-novel that to be fair I have not yet finished, am still waiting for its novel-ness to reveal itself.


message 35: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thank you so much, Naomi! I also didn't think it was much of novel, and although the plot did pick up a bit toward the end, I wasn't much impressed with the story. I hope you like it better than I did, but at least it probably won't take too long to read in either case.


Stephanie Jones I liked the book especially the further along I got in it, but I loved reading your review.


message 37: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Stephanie! Compliments on my review from people who disagree with my assessment of the book are my favorite kind.


message 38: by Riya (new) - rated it 4 stars

Riya I liked this book, but I enjoyed reading your review of it even more. This book IS pretentious, to the point where it does alienate the reader quite a bit. I don't remember now why I liked it so much when I first read it.


message 39: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Mariya! I felt that the book's intellectual pretensions came at the expense of plot and character development. I didn't find Renee or Paloma's struggles particularly believable or sympathetic, and felt that the romance ended up being Harlequinesque. But others liked it, so it could be me.


message 40: by Riya (new) - rated it 4 stars

Riya Completely agree with you on the romance being Harlequinesque, it was just too convenient for it to happen the way that it did.


message 41: by Hyacinth (new)

Hyacinth Yes, yes, yes. You totally captured my feelings about this book, but in a much more interesting and funny way than I could have done. I listened to the audio, which was very well done. I loved both narrators, particularly the one reading for Paloma. Still, I found it a struggle to connect with the story or to care very much about the characters.


message 42: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Anande! I appreciate your kind words and am glad you liked the review.


Venuskitten Your review sums up exactly how I feel about this book.

The first few pages struck me as pretentious and stilted, either because that is how it is in the original French or because I am reading a bad English translation. I decided to give the book a fair trial and to continue reading.

I am now on page 70 and still baffled by this book, with its pompous language, pretentious structure and obscure philosophical arguments. It has almost become a challenge to get past the halfway point to see whether it improves in the second half. If it doesn't, I can only attribute the author's success to spectacular marketing or an uncanny ability to fool readers into thinking that it is essential reading.


message 44: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks so much for your comment! It's been a while, but I remember feeling that the love story in the second half was pretty banal. I completely agree with your assessment - methinks the emperor has no clothes.


Heleen Thank you. I was the only member of my book club who hated Hedgehog. And I hated it for all the reasons you so brilliantly summed up in your review.


message 46: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Heleen! Even if you were alone in your opinion at your book club, you're definitely not alone here on goodreads. I think many people felt the way you and I did.


message 47: by Andrea (new)

Andrea This is a wonderful review, Khaya. I tried to read the book on a friend's recommendation several years ago and quit after the first few chapters. Then this spring it was on the list for my reading group, so I slogged through it. When I read fiction, I need to know that there is something *true* about it. In this novel there is nothing that persuades me of that. I have spent my career teaching and have known many very, very bright 12 year olds, but Paloma is simply not believable. I found her character laughable. As for Renee, a bitter, ingrown woman who has intentionally made herself unattractive physically and personally, who "suffers" with her hidden intelligence -- oh please....why should a reader care?? Furthermore, the "philopsohical" ramblings of this novel are vacuous waste. To call it philosophical gives philosophy a bad name.


message 48: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Thanks, Andrea! I completely agree with your views on the book. So pretentious, and the characters were not convincing.


message 49: by Anne Hawn (last edited Aug 05, 2013 07:23PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Anne Hawn Smith I think what I liked about the book was the new ideas it gave me. I found my mind spinning off following an idea that came from the book. For example, the problem of Renee: What does happen to someone, especially a woman, who has a brilliant mind but is born to a family who dismisses intelligence completely and whose lives are too impoverished to provide any stimulation whatsoever? Obviously, that has to happen. There have to be people like Renee. What if they can never find an outlet for their imagination and intelligence? I figured that some of them have to become brilliant criminals simply because the opportunity to take advantage of your fellow man is always present.

I remembered a story that someone told me about my father. (He was with me when this was told and admitted that it was true.) He was raised on farm in Mississippi during the depression. When they were about 12, Daddy's friend said that they would go to a little town down the road and my daddy got everyone, himself included, to go into the store and steal something, which they did. Then when they all were outside with the stolen goods, he said that they had to sneak back in and return what they took. (BTW, he grew up to work for the FBI.)

I remembered that story when I was thinking about someone like Renee. Unfortunately, the game of outwitting the people around you does provide a use for superior intelligence often to someone's detriment. That is just one of the things I thought of when I was puzzling over Renee and the way she carved out her life.

Paloma presents a similar problem. Her superior intelligence is just as warped. She is the product of superficial environment which gives her intelligence nothing to anchor it. She was a good example of life without red or yellow. She is not an attractive character, but she is the product of a life where no one has tried to connect with her. There is no passion or heart in her life. Her physical situation is different from Renee, but she is just as deprived.

To me, the point of the book is the problem of superior intelligence in an impoverished environment. Renee and Paloma are not meant to be attractive characters. We meet people like them every day and this book made me stop and think about some of them. We know when we don't like someone, but how often to we get a window into what made them that way?

The second part of the book begins to provide some of the things that are missing in both these characters. It's been ages since I read it, but I still remember the feeling I got when I realized how the critic was able to unobtrusively minister to each of them. I admit that I was thinking that these two characters were beyond redemption. In fact, I wasn't even thinking in terms of redemption. The critic connected with them because he actually saw them as people. He looked beyond the role of "child" or "concierge."

A librarian/friend recommended this book to me and we both loved it, but when my sister asked about it, we both told her that she would hate it:>) It isn't a plot driven book and to me, the philosophical "ramblings" are what brought me to the point of understanding a bigger picture. I felt like I was changed by reading it. The only author I can remember effecting me this way was Proust. It took me ages to read just one of his books because my mind would drift as I explored some of his ideas.


message 50: by K (new) - rated it 2 stars

K Anne, thanks for your thoughtful and intelligent comment. I always appreciate it when people who disagree with my reviews choose to respond by opening a stimulating discussion as opposed to simply posting an unsolicited snarky comment.

I agree that there are people like Renee. I've even known some. But the blue-collar intellectuals I've known never felt that they had to go through all sorts of elaborate contortions to hide their intellectual interests, while in the meantime despising and looking down on the people from whom they were hiding their intellectualism. Maybe it's something about French culture that I'm not getting, but I just didn't find that aspect of Renee believable or sympathetic.

I think I had similar feelings when it came to Paloma, although I probably had higher expectations, and therefore deeper disappointment, when it came to Renee who should have had more life experience and perspective. But I don't think I found Paloma particularly believable either.

I've read other books which depicted the struggle of being more intellectual than those around you (unfortunately none of them come to mind for me right now), and I'm not sure whether they did a better job but this account did not work for me. And I don't necessarily need a novel to be plot driven, but it's rare for me to truly enjoy what's sometimes labeled as a "novel of ideas." I think it's almost a contradiction in terms. If the author is using their book as a platform to teach ideas to the audience, then it's not really a novel in my view. A novel is here to tell a story. If something else comes through, so be it, but in my opinion this should never come at the expense of plot and characterization.

Everyone reads for different reasons and wants different things from their books, and I certainly respect the opinion of someone who appreciated this book's good points and felt that they compensated for the negative. For me I felt the opposite but to each his own. Thanks again for your comment.


« previous 1 3
back to top