K's Reviews > The Elegance of the Hedgehog
The Elegance of the Hedgehog
by
by

My name is Renee, and I’m the first protagonist of this book � the hedgehog, as it were. I’m a 54-year-old concierge who works in a building populated by rich and powerful people who barely notice my existence. I’m also a closet intellectual and I frequently try to prove that to you by digressing into asides about philosophy, culture, and other topics. I alternate between sniping at the apartment owners for their snobbish indifference to my lowly concierge self (an image I strive to maintain at every opportunity while blaming the rich apartment owners for buying into it), and terror that they may find out that I read loftier books than they do (I’m as much of a snob as they are, if not worse, but I guess we won’t go there � let’s keep things simple, even though this book is ostensibly higher literature). Given the owners� apathy toward me, it’s not clear what I fear might actually happen if they learned that I was an intellectual. Probably nothing. But hey, this conflict keeps the book going and maybe makes some kind of a statement about French class differences. I guess you’d have to be French to understand. But you don’t have to be French to feel smug and superior about reading this pretentious novel. In fact, it probably helps if you’re not French because then you’re reading something foreign.
My name is Paloma, and I’m the other protagonist of this book. I’m a brilliant, precocious, underestimated and misunderstood 12-year-old who plans to burn down my apartment and commit suicide on my 13th birthday. I’m not sure exactly why I’m so unhappy. I mean, I can make all kinds of bitter and cynical observations about my parents and sister, but really, I’m not lacking for anything. I can tell you in lofty language about how life truly has no meaning, but for someone so bright, my thinking tends to be pretty two-dimensional as does my personality and my life in general. Although disliking your family is pretty normal in adolescence, it’s not clear why, in all 12 years of existence, I’ve never discovered a friend, teacher, neighbor, or relative who might complicate my unilaterally dark feelings about humanity by actually having some positive qualities. But maybe this is part of what helps me sound like a 50-year-old philosopher even though I’m supposed to be a 12-year-old girl, so I guess that’s something. In fact, I spend so much time sounding intellectual that, except for my melodramatic suicidality, there’s little hint of the fact that, emotionally, I’m really just an early adolescent. A bit more attention to my emotional side might have made my character more interesting, but c’est la vie. I get a little more three-dimensional at the end, but you have to hang in there and I'm not sure it's worth it.
My name is ___, and I’m a reviewer for a snooty periodical. I just finished Muriel Barbery’s The Elegance of the Hedgehog, and my editor is expecting a review from me this week. To be honest, all the pedantic asides left me cold. They took me out of the story and weren’t all that interesting. I kind of skimmed over them, but that’s not something I could ever reveal to my readers. I have to act like I read them, understood them, and appreciated them as only a brilliant reader could. I have to act like they enhanced the novel, rather than detracting from it. Similarly, if I poke holes in the characterization or plot, it might sound as if I didn’t understand or failed to appreciate the depth of this book. When a book comes out that tries to sound like it’s above my head, my job is to rave about it. This way, the snooty readers of my snooty periodical can feel even snootier as they read, even as they also feel alienated by this pretentious book.
***
I (Khaya, not one of the characters) wrote the above when I was about halfway through and feeling very negative. Now that I've finished the book, my opinion mostly stands. I will say, though, that the book had some better moments and was quite readable. It's really a 2-going-on-3-star book, as opposed to a solid 2 or a 2-rounded-up-from-1 book. Definitely didn't live up to its hype, though.
My name is Paloma, and I’m the other protagonist of this book. I’m a brilliant, precocious, underestimated and misunderstood 12-year-old who plans to burn down my apartment and commit suicide on my 13th birthday. I’m not sure exactly why I’m so unhappy. I mean, I can make all kinds of bitter and cynical observations about my parents and sister, but really, I’m not lacking for anything. I can tell you in lofty language about how life truly has no meaning, but for someone so bright, my thinking tends to be pretty two-dimensional as does my personality and my life in general. Although disliking your family is pretty normal in adolescence, it’s not clear why, in all 12 years of existence, I’ve never discovered a friend, teacher, neighbor, or relative who might complicate my unilaterally dark feelings about humanity by actually having some positive qualities. But maybe this is part of what helps me sound like a 50-year-old philosopher even though I’m supposed to be a 12-year-old girl, so I guess that’s something. In fact, I spend so much time sounding intellectual that, except for my melodramatic suicidality, there’s little hint of the fact that, emotionally, I’m really just an early adolescent. A bit more attention to my emotional side might have made my character more interesting, but c’est la vie. I get a little more three-dimensional at the end, but you have to hang in there and I'm not sure it's worth it.
My name is ___, and I’m a reviewer for a snooty periodical. I just finished Muriel Barbery’s The Elegance of the Hedgehog, and my editor is expecting a review from me this week. To be honest, all the pedantic asides left me cold. They took me out of the story and weren’t all that interesting. I kind of skimmed over them, but that’s not something I could ever reveal to my readers. I have to act like I read them, understood them, and appreciated them as only a brilliant reader could. I have to act like they enhanced the novel, rather than detracting from it. Similarly, if I poke holes in the characterization or plot, it might sound as if I didn’t understand or failed to appreciate the depth of this book. When a book comes out that tries to sound like it’s above my head, my job is to rave about it. This way, the snooty readers of my snooty periodical can feel even snootier as they read, even as they also feel alienated by this pretentious book.
***
I (Khaya, not one of the characters) wrote the above when I was about halfway through and feeling very negative. Now that I've finished the book, my opinion mostly stands. I will say, though, that the book had some better moments and was quite readable. It's really a 2-going-on-3-star book, as opposed to a solid 2 or a 2-rounded-up-from-1 book. Definitely didn't live up to its hype, though.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
The Elegance of the Hedgehog.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
March 19, 2009
– Shelved
March 21, 2009
–
48.0%
"I already wrote my review, but the book is readable enough so I'll just finish it to make sure my opinions are credible."
page
156
May 2, 2011
– Shelved as:
maybe-it-s-me
Comments Showing 1-50 of 104 (104 new)
message 1:
by
Lisa
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jun 09, 2009 08:33AM

reply
|
flag


I liked the pedantic asides to a point, but admit that they started to get tedious. But Ozu and Renee's relationship made up for it IMO, as did the ending (which I loved).


Very accurate review of the book.




























The first few pages struck me as pretentious and stilted, either because that is how it is in the original French or because I am reading a bad English translation. I decided to give the book a fair trial and to continue reading.
I am now on page 70 and still baffled by this book, with its pompous language, pretentious structure and obscure philosophical arguments. It has almost become a challenge to get past the halfway point to see whether it improves in the second half. If it doesn't, I can only attribute the author's success to spectacular marketing or an uncanny ability to fool readers into thinking that it is essential reading.






I remembered a story that someone told me about my father. (He was with me when this was told and admitted that it was true.) He was raised on farm in Mississippi during the depression. When they were about 12, Daddy's friend said that they would go to a little town down the road and my daddy got everyone, himself included, to go into the store and steal something, which they did. Then when they all were outside with the stolen goods, he said that they had to sneak back in and return what they took. (BTW, he grew up to work for the FBI.)
I remembered that story when I was thinking about someone like Renee. Unfortunately, the game of outwitting the people around you does provide a use for superior intelligence often to someone's detriment. That is just one of the things I thought of when I was puzzling over Renee and the way she carved out her life.
Paloma presents a similar problem. Her superior intelligence is just as warped. She is the product of superficial environment which gives her intelligence nothing to anchor it. She was a good example of life without red or yellow. She is not an attractive character, but she is the product of a life where no one has tried to connect with her. There is no passion or heart in her life. Her physical situation is different from Renee, but she is just as deprived.
To me, the point of the book is the problem of superior intelligence in an impoverished environment. Renee and Paloma are not meant to be attractive characters. We meet people like them every day and this book made me stop and think about some of them. We know when we don't like someone, but how often to we get a window into what made them that way?
The second part of the book begins to provide some of the things that are missing in both these characters. It's been ages since I read it, but I still remember the feeling I got when I realized how the critic was able to unobtrusively minister to each of them. I admit that I was thinking that these two characters were beyond redemption. In fact, I wasn't even thinking in terms of redemption. The critic connected with them because he actually saw them as people. He looked beyond the role of "child" or "concierge."
A librarian/friend recommended this book to me and we both loved it, but when my sister asked about it, we both told her that she would hate it:>) It isn't a plot driven book and to me, the philosophical "ramblings" are what brought me to the point of understanding a bigger picture. I felt like I was changed by reading it. The only author I can remember effecting me this way was Proust. It took me ages to read just one of his books because my mind would drift as I explored some of his ideas.

I agree that there are people like Renee. I've even known some. But the blue-collar intellectuals I've known never felt that they had to go through all sorts of elaborate contortions to hide their intellectual interests, while in the meantime despising and looking down on the people from whom they were hiding their intellectualism. Maybe it's something about French culture that I'm not getting, but I just didn't find that aspect of Renee believable or sympathetic.
I think I had similar feelings when it came to Paloma, although I probably had higher expectations, and therefore deeper disappointment, when it came to Renee who should have had more life experience and perspective. But I don't think I found Paloma particularly believable either.
I've read other books which depicted the struggle of being more intellectual than those around you (unfortunately none of them come to mind for me right now), and I'm not sure whether they did a better job but this account did not work for me. And I don't necessarily need a novel to be plot driven, but it's rare for me to truly enjoy what's sometimes labeled as a "novel of ideas." I think it's almost a contradiction in terms. If the author is using their book as a platform to teach ideas to the audience, then it's not really a novel in my view. A novel is here to tell a story. If something else comes through, so be it, but in my opinion this should never come at the expense of plot and characterization.
Everyone reads for different reasons and wants different things from their books, and I certainly respect the opinion of someone who appreciated this book's good points and felt that they compensated for the negative. For me I felt the opposite but to each his own. Thanks again for your comment.