Brad's Reviews > Cunt: A Declaration of Independence
Cunt: A Declaration of Independence
by
by

This book is appallingly bad.
I bought it for a couple of reasons. First, I am about to teach Lady Chatterly's Lover for the first time, and I thought any book that makes the case for widespread use of "cunt" was an important bit of prep for D.H. Lawrence's infamous classic. Second, I was under the impression that the book delivered an overview of the etymology of "cunt." Third and last, I read Betty Dodson's introduction and was led to believe that Cunt A Declaration of Independence was the kind of book I could one day pass on to my daughters, a gift that would show them the existence of a community as comfortable and proud of their menstruation, sexuality and "cunts" as I hope my daughters will one day be.
Instead, there was nothing in Cunt that I could use in my class, an unreliable and disappointingly skeletal etymology, and little for my daughters that wasn't written by someone other than Inga Muscio.
In fact, most of the interesting bits of Inga Muscio's book were from much better writers and thinkers (Ursula K. LeGuin, Cristien Storm, Nina Hartley, Audre Lorde, etc., etc.). Muscio's own work was illogical, poorly argued, continuously fallacious, and often full of hate. She did offer a couple of inspired ideas -- such as her call for menarche parties to celebrate a woman's first menstruation and the need to remove shame from masturbation -- but these moments were too few to mitigate the overall shabbiness of her work.
And that shabbiness was heightened by Muscio's voice. She shifts from pirate to gangbanger to urban artist to pretentious author without any textually supported reason. It's obvious that she adopts this potluck style for effect; it's a voice used to make her cool and accessible, but she would have done better to spend her energy fully developing her ideas of how to make "cuntlove" universal and rid us all of "cunthate" than to waste time offering up piratical dialogue like, "We be powerful people when we bleed." Arrrrrr! Avast matey!
This book wasn't anywhere near good enough, and it could have been amazing in the hands of someone with the skills to propose an idea, sustain an argument, deliver the proofs, and avoid digressions. Hell...I wanted it to be amazing. But Cunt is pop drivel of the worst kind. I am going back to Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick to cleanse my feminist tastebuds.
As for Cunt A Declaration of Independence...I want my money back; instead, I suppose I will just have to use it as kindling come summertime.
I bought it for a couple of reasons. First, I am about to teach Lady Chatterly's Lover for the first time, and I thought any book that makes the case for widespread use of "cunt" was an important bit of prep for D.H. Lawrence's infamous classic. Second, I was under the impression that the book delivered an overview of the etymology of "cunt." Third and last, I read Betty Dodson's introduction and was led to believe that Cunt A Declaration of Independence was the kind of book I could one day pass on to my daughters, a gift that would show them the existence of a community as comfortable and proud of their menstruation, sexuality and "cunts" as I hope my daughters will one day be.
Instead, there was nothing in Cunt that I could use in my class, an unreliable and disappointingly skeletal etymology, and little for my daughters that wasn't written by someone other than Inga Muscio.
In fact, most of the interesting bits of Inga Muscio's book were from much better writers and thinkers (Ursula K. LeGuin, Cristien Storm, Nina Hartley, Audre Lorde, etc., etc.). Muscio's own work was illogical, poorly argued, continuously fallacious, and often full of hate. She did offer a couple of inspired ideas -- such as her call for menarche parties to celebrate a woman's first menstruation and the need to remove shame from masturbation -- but these moments were too few to mitigate the overall shabbiness of her work.
And that shabbiness was heightened by Muscio's voice. She shifts from pirate to gangbanger to urban artist to pretentious author without any textually supported reason. It's obvious that she adopts this potluck style for effect; it's a voice used to make her cool and accessible, but she would have done better to spend her energy fully developing her ideas of how to make "cuntlove" universal and rid us all of "cunthate" than to waste time offering up piratical dialogue like, "We be powerful people when we bleed." Arrrrrr! Avast matey!
This book wasn't anywhere near good enough, and it could have been amazing in the hands of someone with the skills to propose an idea, sustain an argument, deliver the proofs, and avoid digressions. Hell...I wanted it to be amazing. But Cunt is pop drivel of the worst kind. I am going back to Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick to cleanse my feminist tastebuds.
As for Cunt A Declaration of Independence...I want my money back; instead, I suppose I will just have to use it as kindling come summertime.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Cunt.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 15, 2009
– Shelved
Started Reading
January 15, 2010
– Shelved as:
feminist-lit
January 15, 2010
– Shelved as:
political
January 15, 2010
– Shelved as:
shabby
January 15, 2010
–
Finished Reading
May 2, 2010
– Shelved as:
matches-and-lighter-fluid
Comments Showing 1-38 of 38 (38 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jan 16, 2010 06:11AM
I've read several conflicting and suspect etymologies of the word over the years, but I really don't trust any of them. Disappointing that this sucks.
reply
|
flag

There's a PhD in there somewhere.
The idea of getting a PhD at this point in my life makes be break out in hives, but that actually sounds like fun. :)
The idea of getting a PhD at this point in my life makes be break out in hives, but that actually sounds like fun. :)


I'm pondering, though, what any feminist would write about "cunts" that would be akin to D. H. Lawrence's use of the word - poles apart, I think (no pun intended).


Yes, I figured that was your aim, but I was just struck by how differently Lawrence or Henry Miller et al would approach the term.
...I'm just bitter and gnashing my teeth at the moment, because the 1950s macho-dom of Revolutionary Road is making me INSANE, and I'm thinking I probably read a lot quite of similar texts many years ago and wasn't as bothered or cognizant...

I only have a couple of words that I feel I can't use. Off the top of my head, they are cunt, nigger, and retard. Right now I'm actually thinking of going back and re-typing these in some sort of code, but I think I'll probably let them lie. They upset me, because they are so terribly loaded with the vast power differences between one group of people and another, and they make my brain stop a little.
How about Atonement? I thought the use of the c-word was kind of perfect there - almost an allusion to the class stuff in Lawrence & then it made everyone's brains stop in the story.
How about Atonement? I thought the use of the c-word was kind of perfect there - almost an allusion to the class stuff in Lawrence & then it made everyone's brains stop in the story.

I'm glad you skipped the codes and were brave enough to offer the words up in full.

But if you read it, please note that I officially disapprove of the joke at the very end.
Cunt is a very primal word, historically and emotionally. For me it doesn’t have any of the endearing undertones that pussy sometimes does. In an intimate context, pussy is practically the only word that will do. What else are you going to call it? Vagina? Too clinical. Twat? Too belittling. Meat curtains? Too comical. Or is there a better and more acceptable term? Did I miss the newsletter?

I had to take a British coworker aside and explain that it isn't acceptable in the US to call people "cunt".

"Honeypot" made me laugh out loud. Yeah, I think I'd pass on having that term used in an intimate moment as well. Your very interesting research made me recall Mary Daly's Wickedary, or alternate feminist dictionary (and I think this was co-authored with Jane Caputi), which I'd read about, but not read. I just looked up some of her sample "subversive" words (and it's sad that she just died recently):
ACADEMENTIA n: normal state of persons
in academia, marked by varying and progressive
degrees; irreversible deterioration of faculties
of intellectuals
COCKALORUM n: a self-important little
cock. Examples: Napoleon, Andy Warhol, Fiorello
La Guardia, Mickey Mouse
And, on the operative word, cunt, Jane Caputi apparently coined the term "cuntspeak" and wrote a positive article on that topic. ...Just looked it up; the article is "Cuntspeak: words from the heart of darkness" in Not for Sale: Feminists Resisting Pornography and Prostitution (ed. Rebecca Whisnant and Christine Stark).

Cockalorum = also hilarious. Especially w/r/t Mickey Mouse.

Oh sure, I saw the snarky little entry on Milwaukee, and I've noted that, in movies, it is the city most frequently used for comedic effect. As a nearby resident, I need to set you straight. Despite Hooters, bratwurst, cheeseheads, and honeypots, Milwaukee is the cultural mecca of the world...




Burning books can be one of two things for me. Sometimes, as with Julius Caesar it is to honour a book that means a lot to me (I burned Caesar after finishing my second run of the play. I played Antony the first time and directed the second). The rest of the time it is to purge myself of a book that was particularly difficult to read or scarred me in some way, like my excruciating time spent with Anna Karenina. So the whole thing is a cathartic experience for me, personally devoid of any more sinister overtones. Hope that helps.
Miriam: Twice in my life I have taken my journal full of bad (and sometimes good) writing, mostly poetry, and purge my soul of them in a fire. One fire was in the mountains another on a beach. It's always a great way to ignite my creativity, both in the past and for the future. Much like your burning of homework, I think.


I haven't done that in front of anyone either. There is something chillingly personal about that isn't there?
My husband, after subjecting himself to the S-Word of Shannara (I may be misspelling, but I'm not going to bother to look) consigned it to a fiery grave in the backyard chimnea. I felt weird about it, but took great pleasure in watching it burn. My bestie Rachel recently told me about tearing up and recycling one of the later books by the woman who wrote The Other Boleyn Girl. As she said, no one else needs to read this. She thought it would be unfair to give away. Save the planet; recycle! Although I do like a good cleansing flame...

Have you burned any yourself, Ceridwen? Maybe that would have been a better fate for the P&P&Z sequel ;) I can burn it when I'm done and send you photos.
Have you burned any yourself, Ceridwen? Maybe that would have been a better fate for the P&P&Z sequel ;) I can burn it when I'm done and send you photos.
Now THAT would be a good fate for Dreadfuls - I actually feel pretty bad about mailing it to you. No, I haven't burned any myself, although I'm not really opposed to it on a non-institutional level. There are some I'd consider, but I tend only to buy books when I've already read them and love them, so I rarely own a copy of the things I hate.
Now THAT would be a good fate for Dreadfuls - I actually feel pretty bad about mailing it to you. No, I haven't burned any myself, although I'm not really opposed to it on a non-institutional level. There are some I'd consider, but I tend only to buy books when I've already read them and love them, so I rarely own a copy of the things I hate.

"Elizabeth wrote: "My favorite is "honeypot" because the image it calls up is of Winnie the Pooh with his hand or face stuck in the jar, not because it's a term I'd want anyone using in an intimate moment."
Dang! I was so excited to be like, "Um, hello . . . honey-oven?!" Did the 70's lesbians re-claim this from Ms. Small or something? It had to have been a romance-novel term first, right?
So in favor of burning Anna K. and the S-Word.
"Cunt" in Atonement is perfection. Love how Ceridwen described it.

I think there were some statistical problems with that study...I can't recall the exact findings, but it was discussed in Freakonomics.


And I'm worried that my children won't either.

JSTOR would be happy to discuss this .

Well, it was a honey oven, no?