Dale's Reviews > Bag of Bones
Bag of Bones
by
by

I am a Stephen King junkie. I started reading him in high school and quickly tore through just about everything he'd ever written, and then started buying every new book he put out. Being a Stephen King fan is kind of like being a geek for Dragonlance or comic books - reviewing his work seems borderline pointless because non-fans will usually dismiss him out of hand and be hard to convince of any intrinsic value, and fans are already pretty hardcore about him.
Nevertheless, I wanted to add this specific Stephen King book to my "all time faves" shelf for three reasons:
1. It's amazing
2. Among King's books, this one is lesser known (hasn't been made into a movie or mini-series, isn't usually on people's Top 5 lists, etc.)
3. I think it's one of his more accessible and "mainstream" books.
Don't get me wrong, I love IT and The Stand and the Gunslinger septulogy, all the crazy outlandish horror and fantasy that is SK's bread and butter. But I adore Bag of Bones and think it is one of his absolute best. It's very intimate, very down to earth, with the supernatural downplayed. It's told from the first-person perspective of a widower writer with writer's block. I wouldn't want to give away much more than that. It's just a really solidly told story, where King writes about what he knows, doesn't try too hard or reach too far, and ends up with a perfectly polished gem.
This is not just a great Stephen King book, it's a great book.
Nevertheless, I wanted to add this specific Stephen King book to my "all time faves" shelf for three reasons:
1. It's amazing
2. Among King's books, this one is lesser known (hasn't been made into a movie or mini-series, isn't usually on people's Top 5 lists, etc.)
3. I think it's one of his more accessible and "mainstream" books.
Don't get me wrong, I love IT and The Stand and the Gunslinger septulogy, all the crazy outlandish horror and fantasy that is SK's bread and butter. But I adore Bag of Bones and think it is one of his absolute best. It's very intimate, very down to earth, with the supernatural downplayed. It's told from the first-person perspective of a widower writer with writer's block. I wouldn't want to give away much more than that. It's just a really solidly told story, where King writes about what he knows, doesn't try too hard or reach too far, and ends up with a perfectly polished gem.
This is not just a great Stephen King book, it's a great book.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Bag of Bones.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
March 1, 2000
–
Finished Reading
August 31, 2007
– Shelved
August 31, 2007
– Shelved as:
all-time-faves
August 19, 2008
– Shelved as:
stephen-king
Comments Showing 1-40 of 40 (40 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Melody
(new)
Feb 01, 2008 08:48PM

reply
|
flag


Aena/Manda - yeah, I'm looking forward to Bag of Bones on TV too! Should be interesting to see Pierce Brosnan as Mike. It's definitely made-for-TV as I believe it's going to be a four-hour miniseries.



I think I'm going to check out the novel beforehand! I'm kind of a SK newbie ... I've only read The Eyes of the Dragon and The Stand, and that was many years ago.

I saw what you said about getting into his stories and reading everything. Wanted to let you know it happened to me also









Generally I tend to point to Misery as a good starting point. It's extremely well-written, King at the top of his game. And it's fairly grounded, and doesn't require you to wrap your head around any crazy fantastical or science-fictiony concept or premise. It's tense, it's a thriller, not necessarily nightmare-fuel horror. If you prefer your horror as scary as possible, or if you really love getting into the weeds of cosmic entities or vampire mythology or psychic conspiracies or whatever, there's other recommendations I could make! But assuming "newbie" means "never read Stephen King, never read anything remotely like what I assume SK is like" then Misery has a very low barrier of entry, and is one of my personal faves.





