ŷ

s.penkevich's Reviews > The Dream of a Ridiculous Man

The Dream of a Ridiculous Man by Fyodor Dostoevsky
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
6431467
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: short-story, russia, empathy

I will not and cannot believe that evil is the normal condition of mankind.

I have always loved reading Dostoevsky. While I do have him inked on my right arm, that love for him goes further than just skin deep, and there are so many moments where his writing and ideas seem to fit into the grooves of my brain like a key into a lock, opening up trails of thought where I realize with pleasure “yes, this is exactly what I want to be thinking about and oh how my entire being seems to dance to his rhythm.� Trails of thought like the most lush forest path during blissful early-autumn weather. Because, sure, it can be rather dark, but it is always in a way that gives hope too and pleads for empathy. Such is the case in his 1877 short work The Dream of A Ridiculous Man, a tale of a self-declared ridiculous man (surprise) spiraling into a sense of nihilism. After a brief encounter with a suffering girl, his desire to commit suicide is thwarted by a dream (surprise!) as if it were a Christmas eve with Dickens. Plunging us into a surreal dreamscape of a paradise as it succumbs to corruption and fractures into waring entities valuing individuality over love, and that �the consciousness of life is higher than life, the knowledge of the laws of happiness is higher than happiness.� Described by Mikhail Bakhtin as �practically a complete encyclopedia of Dostoevsky’s most important themes,� this is a brief but intense story delving into many of Dostoevksy’s signature themes such as grappling with nihilism, questioning utopias, and the meaning of suffering.

I suddenly felt that it made no difference to me whether the world existed or whether nothing existed anywhere at all.

Our narrator begins in a state of �terrible anguish,� finding the world lacking in meaning and already preparing to commit suicide with a gun previously purchased for such an occassion. We can read him not unlike Dostoevsky’s Underground Man, who’s opening self analysis �"I am a sick man ... I am a wicked man� is mirrored by �I am a ridiculous person. Now they call me a madman.� (All quotes taken from my copy using the Constance Garnett translation). The opening spoke strongly to me, for who hasn’t been frustrated by the world and all its absurdities, finding oneself ridiculous for participating in trading our irreplaceable hours of our one wild and precious life to endless labor, or wondering if there is meaning to anything at all. Especially when considering how one’s own demise would be insignificant in the long scheme of things, unless we adopt a solipsistic notion that the world vanishes without us. When he says �the more I learned, the more thoroughly I understood that I was ridiculous,� I couldn’t help but think of this meme and how often learning not only makes you feel the world is absurd but also recognizing how little you know and understand about anything makes you indeed feel ridiculous.

Yet how can one go on in this state of mind, which, as we see here, tends to bend the mind towards suicide-- something he would like to do if he can even see any meaning in doing so:
I was so utterly indifferent to everything that I was anxious to wait for the moment when I would not be so indifferent and then kill myself.

His brief encounter with a girl, suffering from some issue he thinks must be related to her mother, he finds his conscience biting him for not aiding her. This is thematic in Dostoevsky’s works, which often are a resistance to ideas of nihilism influenced by his own rejection of the during his time. We see a similar issue in Crime and Punishment with Raskolnikov’s resolve towards nihilism shaken by his guilty conscience.
if I had really decided to do away with myself that night, everything in the world should have been more indifferent to me than ever…It was clear to me that so long as I was still a human being and not a meaningless zero, and till I became a zero, I was alive, and consequently able to suffer, be angry, and feel shame at my actions. Very well. But if, on the other hand, I were going to kill myself in, say, two hours, what did that little girl matter to me and what did I care for shame or anything else in the world?

Wrestling with his own conscience has him contemplating ideas that he is not as nihilistic as he thinks but how this is a waste if he is about to become nothingness, however the line of thought drags him to sleep.

Dreams apparently proceed not from reason but from desire, not from the head but from the heart.

I’m really hit or miss on dreams being used as essential to a plot, but Dostoevsky pulls it off quite effectively here. I appreciate the way he almost anticipates this, discussing how his mention of the dream brought ridicule (though this is also tied in with the idea that preaching religion—there is certainly a God element to this as in most of his works—is met with mockery) and that surely he couldn’t have dreamed such vivid details. Well played. The dream brings us to a world that is a sort of paradise or utopia, styled like the as in Greek mythology, particularly from Hesiod. But his presence corrupts them as he teaches them to lie and �they learned to lie and began to love the lie and knew the beauty of the lie.� The idea that deceit is a powerful impulse takes over and we see the history of humanity play out as the lie starts a chain reaction of corruption.
They began to struggle for separation, for isolation, for individuality, for mine and thine. They began to talk in different languages. They became acquainted with sorrow and loved sorrow; they thirsted for suffering, and said that truth could only be attained through suffering. Then science appeared. As they became wicked they began talking of brotherhood and humanitarianism, and understood those ideas. As they became criminal, they invented justice and drew up whole legal codes in order to observe it, and to ensure their being kept, set up a guillotine. They hardly remembered what they had lost, in fact refused to believe that they had ever been happy and innocent. They even laughed at the possibility of this happiness in the past, and called it a dream.

What stands out is the idea that in their downfall and loss of innocence, they believe knowledge of happiness is greater than happiness. They define existence against suffering, and ideas of humanitarianism or brotherhood exist in opposition to suffering instead of simply living at peace. The irony becomes that they percieve paradise as impossibility, yet the narrator has seen that it is indeed possible. There are some interesting observations here, such as creating different temples of worship for the sake of dividing into faction that deep down know their gods are fiction (which, knowing Dostoevsky, is less a rejection of religion and more a kind of rejection of any religion aside from his as “false gods� sort of deal), as well as the idea of desiring individual rights or a sense of individualism is a root cause of humanity’s downfall.


Yet this dream suddenly reverses his nihilism, and upon awakening, he has purpose again. �I made up my mind to preach from that very moment and, of course, to go on preaching all my life,� he says and sees this dream as proof paradise is possible and that the key is empathy, compassion, and unity not just as various groups but encompassing everyone everywhere all at once. We also see, however, that in a world of suffering we also have choice, and that we should choose wisely. The lesson of the shame he felt was that, no, we are not indifferent and should not attempt to be, but should lean into compassion. His final line lets us know he has tracked down the girl and we can see this as the start of his ministry, as it were.

Sorrow compressed my heart, and I felt I would die, and then... Well, then I woke up.

This tiny tale of a man’s transformation is such a succinct distillation of many of Dostoevsky’s primary themes and characterizations. As always, it is a rebuttal to nihilism, and the characters used to represent the idea are often shown as weak, naive, and hurting those around them due to their insistence on the belief. For a story that begins with suicide, it ends with hope and a call for love, one that is lovely to process regardless of its intended religious aims. Direct and beautifully emotive in its intensity, The Dream of a Ridiculous Man is pure Dostoevsky and a brief but lasting joy.



The consciousness of life is higher than life, the knowledge of the laws of happiness is higher than happiness--that is what one must contend against. And I shall. If only everyone wants it, it can be arranged at once.
310 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read The Dream of a Ridiculous Man.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
June 23, 2023 – Shelved
June 23, 2023 – Shelved as: short-story
June 23, 2023 – Shelved as: russia
June 23, 2023 – Shelved as: empathy

Comments Showing 1-50 of 56 (56 new)


message 1: by Danielle (new) - added it

Danielle Domoney Brilliant review, as always. I just know that i must read this story; thank you for the inspiration :))


s.penkevich Danielle wrote: "Brilliant review, as always. I just know that i must read this story; thank you for the inspiration :))"

Thank you so much! Ooo I hope you enjoy, it’s a really quick read but lots to ponder!


message 3: by Ava (new) - added it

Ava Cairns I love this personal review of yours 💜


message 4: by Amina (new)

Amina Such a thought-provoking and yet insightful review,S. 💟 As sensitive a subject this story touches upon, I appreciate how much of an oxymoron it actually is. That while the mind does contemplate suicide, it still takes into account about how much of life, one is still unaware of, that makes one rethink our own choices in order to better understand what is happening elsewhere in life. If that makes any sense. ☺️ I'm glad it was such a lovely read for you, eps. from an author that's very dear to you, as well. �


s.penkevich Ava wrote: "I love this personal review of yours 💜"

Thank you so much :)


message 6: by Zainab (new) - added it

Zainab How beautifully you portray a book or novel and its characters makes us want to read them and feel all the feelings you told us. Thank you for being there.


s.penkevich Amina wrote: "Such a thought-provoking and yet insightful review,S. 💟 As sensitive a subject this story touches upon, I appreciate how much of an oxymoron it actually is. That while the mind does contemplate sui..."

Thank you so much, and that is a really lovely way to put it. Yea, it’s like the more he wants to negate everything inside him the more he realizes he does still feel and wants to protect that because it’s worth retaining. It’s been so long since I revisited Dostoevsky and I’m glad I did, might have to do another deep dive into him again now haha


s.penkevich Zainab wrote: "How beautifully you portray a book or novel and its characters makes us want to read them and feel all the feelings you told us. Thank you for being there."

Thank you so much, Dostoevsky certainly inspires haha. And thanks, glad to be here!


message 9: by Zoe (new)

Zoe Artemis Spencer Reid Love you review. Dostoevsky's simply understood, he and Chekov make me fall madly in love with Russian literature


s.penkevich Zoe wrote: "Love you review. Dostoevsky's simply understood, he and Chekov make me fall madly in love with Russian literature"

Thank you so much! He’s just so good. Oooo great choices, Chekhov is great too and I really really need go read more of him. For me it was Dostoevsky and Gogol, which I feel like so many of my favorite books always a little vibe of one of them in it to this day haha


message 11: by Zoe (new)

Zoe Artemis Spencer Reid Gogol is on my list too. You mean darkness, and suffering and melancholy? XD My vibe too


s.penkevich Zoe wrote: "Gogol is on my list too. You mean darkness, and suffering and melancholy? XD My vibe too"

Exactly—my favorite vibes :)


message 13: by Kushagri (new)

Kushagri This is such a wonderful, impactful and evocative review, Steven! Thank you for sharing!


s.penkevich Kushagri wrote: "This is such a wonderful, impactful and evocative review, Steven! Thank you for sharing!"

Thank you so much! Really enjoyed returning to Dostoevsky, started up White Nights now this morning


message 15: by Kushagri (new)

Kushagri Amazing! Would be looking forward to your review of that story!


s.penkevich Kushagri wrote: "Amazing! Would be looking forward to your review of that story!"

Soon to come! I realized I have two different translations of it so I’m kind of going back and forth to compare them, especially after a phrase in one of them I was like “oh no NOT a good metaphor� haha


message 17: by Kushagri (new)

Kushagri Ohh yeah!! I too get confused in choosing which translation to pick with the Russian classics.


message 18: by Mark (new) - added it

Mark André Cool story. Cool review. Cool quotes! (especially the first) Cool artwork, too.


s.penkevich Kushagri wrote: "Ohh yeah!! I too get confused in choosing which translation to pick with the Russian classics."

Ha same. I always enjoy the Pevear/Volokhonsky when they are available and trust Garnett as a standby but beyond that…no clue haha


message 20: by s.penkevich (last edited Jun 27, 2023 11:28AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

s.penkevich Mark wrote: "Cool story. Cool review. Cool quotes! (especially the first) Cool artwork, too."

Thank you! Yea, this one was really fun, I like seeing Dostoevsky get all surreal


Nina (ninjasbooks) What an utterly beautiful review.


s.penkevich Nina wrote: "What an utterly beautiful review."

Thank you so much :)


message 23: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino All true, S. but Dostoevsky's rejection of nihilism led him to embrace religion and the far right in Russia. F.D. is a cautionary tale, just like Celine, of how an author, or any of us, can despise liberal capitalist civilization only to adopt something far worse.


s.penkevich Julio wrote: "All true, S. but Dostoevsky's rejection of nihilism led him to embrace religion and the far right in Russia. F.D. is a cautionary tale, just like Celine, of how an author, or any of us, can despise..."

Yeaaaaa that seemed the main point in this one, which is sort of a bummer because it gets super heavy handed at the end with the whole "preaching" stuff. I definitely prefer his earlier works for that reason. I had thought this was an earlier story and then all the religious imagery came strong and I was like oh yea I forgot he made that turn haha


Rana (This City That Book) This is why, Dostoevsky is one of my favorite authors! He is brilliant. I wish I can understand Russian just so I can really experience his raw works. Amazing review!


s.penkevich Rana (This City That Book) wrote: "This is why, Dostoevsky is one of my favorite authors! He is brilliant. I wish I can understand Russian just so I can really experience his raw works. Amazing review!"

He’s amazing, right? Agreed, I really wish I could read it in the original. And thank you so much :)


message 27: by Julio (new)

Julio Pino s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "All true, S. but Dostoevsky's rejection of nihilism led him to embrace religion and the far right in Russia. F.D. is a cautionary tale, just like Celine, of how an author, or any of u..."
Alas, no nation is immune from this disease. Back in 1980 plenty of liberal writers, such as the screenwriter William Goldman (HARPER, BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID, ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN) who out of disgust with Carter voted for Reagan. I would not have voted for Carter either, but embracing the far right because the libs repel you is dangerous and absurd, as proven earlier by the likes of John Steinbeck and John Dos Passos.


s.penkevich Julio wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Julio wrote: "All true, S. but Dostoevsky's rejection of nihilism led him to embrace religion and the far right in Russia. F.D. is a cautionary tale, just like Celine, of how an..."

Yeaaaaa and that seems to be a growing issue lately a lot of people are showing concern about for the upcoming election. Huh, thats amusing because in the present Reagan has the reputation of having been one of the worst presidents we've ever had and Carter has gone down as beloved.


message 29: by Julio (last edited Jul 02, 2023 07:57AM) (new)

Julio Pino Dear S.: Funny how Europeans chuck political parties at the drop of a dime while Americans treat their two-party system with divine reverence. I've often wondered if "the American intellectual" isn't an oxymoron.


s.penkevich Julio wrote: "Dear S.: Funny how Europeans chick political parties at the drop of a dime while Americans treat their two-party system with divine reverence. I've often wondered if "the American intellectual" isn..."

TRUE, which seems part of the system design to divide and avert from policy to “‘my team vs your team�


message 31: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I would very much like to begin my Dostoevsky journey. Is there any one or two in particular you would recommend to someone new to his work? I want to continue my delve into Russian literature this year.


message 32: by Joseph (new)

Joseph Anthony Great review. Even greater that you have him embedded in your skin. I’m actually getting Rimbaud on my left arm this Friday! Wondering� when it comes to Dostoevsky, do you prefer certain translators over others? I read TBK and The Idiot when I was in my early 20s and was thinking about revisiting� interesting to hear people’s ideas about fidelity in translations. Thoughts?


s.penkevich Sharon wrote: "I would very much like to begin my Dostoevsky journey. Is there any one or two in particular you would recommend to someone new to his work? I want to continue my delve into Russian literature this..."

Oooo yay I’m excited for you to check him out! Hmmm while I suppose there is no wrong way to enter his work I’d say Crime and Punishment is an excellent first read because it hits a lot of his biggest themes and has this rather feverish quality to the storytelling that makes it easy to really burn through big chunks rather quickly. Personally my first was The Idiot which I also really recommend though if you want a fairly short one to try him out you can’t go wrong with The Gambler. Hope that is helpful! Oh, White Nights is a short story that is rather charming and would give a taste of his style too (though also an early story that feels fairly different from his bigger works).

Hope your first read is enjoyable though! I look forward to hearing what you think.


message 34: by Tom LA (new)

Tom LA I also love Dostoevski, but for very different reasons. Your review is extremely well-written, but it’s exactly what one would write about Dostoevski if one disliked, hated or did not understand the truth of the christian faith, which is the main theme of all his work. There isn’t a “God element� in Dostoevski� “Karamazov� and “Crime and Punishment� are almost as powerful as the gospel, for those who are ready to listen, they don’t “have a God element�. I love your reviews so much, but I seriously cannot stand your anti-religious bias. I am 100% aware that, among US readers, I am in the minority, not you. US christianity is a muddy pot of last-minute heresies, so I completely understand my US friends who don’t like religion. But catholicism and eastern orthodox christianity have nothing to do with American ignorance.


message 35: by Sharon (new)

Sharon s.penkevich wrote: "Oooo yay I’m excited for you to check him out! Hmmm while I suppose there is no wrong way to enter his work I’d say Crime and Punishment is an excellent first read because it hits a lot of his biggest themes and has this rather feverish quality to the storytelling "

Oh, wonderful! I do own a copy of Crime and Punishment (inherited from my grandfather which makes it special). I've also heard good things about The Idiot, but I don't think I've seen much about The Gambler yet, so I will certainly check that one out!

Thanks! You'll definitely have a number of updates and reviews to read once I get to it 😊


s.penkevich Joseph wrote: "Great review. Even greater that you have him embedded in your skin. I’m actually getting Rimbaud on my left arm this Friday! Wondering� when it comes to Dostoevsky, do you prefer certain translator..."

Thank you so much! Oh that is amazing! What will the tattoo be, one of his face or something symbolic? That is so cool though.

Hmm I guess I’ve really only read either the Constance Garnett or the Pevear/Volokhonsky ones for most of his bigger works (some random ones on the short stories that I’ve never felt were bad but also nothing that really stood out?). I really enjoy the P/V duo for any Russian books I’ve read and they make the text feel very modern but after awhile I’ve felt they sort of have a signature style that flattens each individual author a bit? Not necessarily bad but you can tell it’s them if that makes sense, though maybe it’s just because on my reread of Master and Margarita I didn’t like their translation as much. Garnett definitely reads in a way that feels much older, though I found that charming in The Idiot. I kind of want to reread The Idiot with P/V and then reread Crime and Punishment with Garnett to see how switching translators from my first experiences with those books goes. Sorry that’s probably a kind of non-answer, but then again I couldn’t actually read the original Russian so I’m basing it all entirely on how it reads in the English over any knowledge of artistic accuracy.


message 37: by s.penkevich (last edited Feb 05, 2024 09:40PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

s.penkevich Tom LA wrote: "I also love Dostoevski, but for very different reasons. Your review is extremely well-written, but it’s exactly what one would write about Dostoevski if one disliked, hated or did not understand th..."

I guess I’m not sure what part of this comes across as anti-religious, my apologies if it does, I think I was just attempting to express that it is a rebuttal to nihilism from his specific take on Christianity as opposed to a more just generally religious stance. Or even a lot of US Catholicism which tends to be slightly different from Russian orthodox. I guess the line about the God aspect was more that he tends to get broadly talked about as philosophical but without acknowledging it is specifically about his devotion to God it’s missing the key element, though I think even those who read him without a religious faith themselves can get a lot out of what he is trying to say as well.


s.penkevich Sharon wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Oooo yay I’m excited for you to check him out! Hmmm while I suppose there is no wrong way to enter his work I’d say Crime and Punishment is an excellent first read because it hi..."

Oh that is perfect! Inherited copies are always the best copies. The Idiot is really cool and id even argue a bit underrated haha there’s some scenes in there up with the best of his. And excellent, can’t wait! Hope you enjoy!


message 39: by Sharon (new)

Sharon s.penkevich wrote: "Oh that is perfect! Inherited copies are always the best copies. The Idiot is really cool and id even argue a bit underrated haha there’s some scenes in there up with the best of his. And excellent, can’t wait! Hope you enjoy!"

Thank you! I'm sure I will!!
And I do love a good underrated classic. Sometimes the surprise gems are the best ones.

And yes! It's a super cool volume. My grandfather was a psychiatrist and it's this weird little copy that was sent out as marketing material gift from a pharmaceutical company.


message 40: by Joseph (new)

Joseph Anthony Mine will be of his face, the squiggly line drawing. It was the cover of the first poetry book I ever bought, way back when. Or a realism silhouette. We’ll see!

I think the books I’ve read are the P/V translations. I remember a big article that came out, can’t remember where, that carried the debate on both G and P/V. Looks like those are still the primary choices.

Since we are on the topic of Russian lit, and I know you love poetry, if you haven’t, I would recommend the complete palms of Anna Akhmatova. The translation is by Judith Hemschemyer and is stellar. Some of the most beautiful poetry one could ever hope to read.

Thanks for the tips!


s.penkevich Sharon wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Oh that is perfect! Inherited copies are always the best copies. The Idiot is really cool and id even argue a bit underrated haha there’s some scenes in there up with the best o..."

Woah that is amazing. I kind of love that a pharmaceutical company would pick Crime and Punishment too. I bet that is a super rare edition then!


message 42: by Sharon (new)

Sharon s.penkevich wrote: "Woah that is amazing. I kind of love that a pharmaceutical company would pick Crime and Punishment too. I bet that is a super rare edition then!"

I agree! It's such an interesting book to choose. I'm sure it is too! I haven't seen much online about it - ŷ certainly doesn't have the edition listed lol.


s.penkevich Joseph wrote: "Mine will be of his face, the squiggly line drawing. It was the cover of the first poetry book I ever bought, way back when. Or a realism silhouette. We’ll see!

I think the books I’ve read are th..."


Just looked it up and I think I found the art you mean and that will make such a great tattoo! Do you have any other author related ones? I need to get more haha Ive wanted a Jeanette Winterson one for awhile and I’m going to see her do a reading this summer so I should probably get it before then.

Yea they seem the big staples for sure. There was a new retranslation of Crime and Punishment like maybe 2 or three years ago by Michael Katz but I’ve only once run across a copy of it. Was just reading some reviews on it and people seem to really like that one so that might be a good alternative.

Ooo thank you. I’ve only read a few random poems from her in anthologies and always enjoyed but never knew a good place to really start so thanks I will definitely check that out. Did she do the big Complete Poems too? I’ve always really loved all the stories around Akhmatova and the secret poetry reading sessions. That whole group of writers are so fascinating.


s.penkevich Sharon wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Woah that is amazing. I kind of love that a pharmaceutical company would pick Crime and Punishment too. I bet that is a super rare edition then!"

I agree! It's such an interest..."


Haha you know it’s an awesome and rare one when even the seemingly endless goodreads editions don’t have it!


message 45: by Joseph (new)

Joseph Anthony She did the big complete poems. You can see the specific one I’m talking about if you browse down my little list of read books. Been off of ŷ for a long while, several years, just getting back in the swing. I’ve flirted with a few tattoo ideas of Bolaño, which I saw you had a SD graph. Cool! My favorite book of all time has been 2666� with Europe Central by WT Vollmann being a close runner up. Thought about a Nietzsche tattoo, something from an old edition of Beyond Good & Evil. That intense and quintessential image. Time will tell.

Tried to attach those Rimbaud images. Guess I’m showing my age. Can’t figure it out 🥳

I’m enjoying yer reviews. I’ve garnered a few recommendations from yer lists and am enjoying the spoils of yer library. And I loved Martyr! By the way. Nearly through w/ a first read of Calling a Wolf. a Wolf! Fella can write some lines. Totes! Happy reading.


message 46: by s.penkevich (last edited Feb 06, 2024 09:47AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

s.penkevich Joseph wrote: "She did the big complete poems. You can see the specific one I’m talking about if you browse down my little list of read books. Been off of ŷ for a long while, several years, just getting b..."

Oh awesome, Akbar has some great lines for sure. I feel bad I never read much of his second collection, I should figure out what I did with that haha.

2666 is such a masterpiece, fully agree. Saw a 6 hour play adaptation of that a few years ago in Chicago and it was pretty incredible. Oooo okay I need to finally read Europe Central then haha I’ve had it staring at me on my shelf for…probably a decade now I should just dive in.

Attaching pictures is SUCH a pain on here. Especially in the comments. For reviews I use the embed feature from Flickr but it doesn’t work in comments because it is technically a link. But for that you can use:
< img scr = (remove space between the end tag and img
And then in quotations put the image address the backslash and >
Sorry for the confusing way to write it out but it vanished from the text if you put the actual HTML. But even then half the time it shows up as a broken link for me.


message 47: by Joseph (new)

Joseph Anthony Vollmann can be hit or miss. Loved The Ice Shirt, You Bright and Risen Angels, the abridged version of Rising Up & Down, and Fathers & Crows� my copy of The Dying Grass is the one that’s been staring at me for nearly decade, haha.. Although I did get to see him read from it when came out in 2015. I’ve actually got to see him read several times, and even got to ask him some questions about the job of an artist. I had a black and white photo taken with him. It’s somewhere, I should probably get out and put in a frame 🤷🏻‍♂�. He is super engaging and probably too smart for his own good.


message 48: by Tom LA (new)

Tom LA Yes � I agree with you, S. ! Sorry if I didn’t articulate my comment well, or misunderstood your review.


message 49: by Sarah-Hope (new)

Sarah-Hope Lovely review!


message 50: by Shen (new) - added it

Shen Mao Wow, thanks a lot. Marvelous Review!


« previous 1
back to top