s.penkevich's Reviews > The Dream of a Ridiculous Man
The Dream of a Ridiculous Man
by
by

�I will not and cannot believe that evil is the normal condition of mankind.�
I have always loved reading Dostoevsky. While I do have him inked on my right arm, that love for him goes further than just skin deep, and there are so many moments where his writing and ideas seem to fit into the grooves of my brain like a key into a lock, opening up trails of thought where I realize with pleasure “yes, this is exactly what I want to be thinking about and oh how my entire being seems to dance to his rhythm.� Trails of thought like the most lush forest path during blissful early-autumn weather. Because, sure, it can be rather dark, but it is always in a way that gives hope too and pleads for empathy. Such is the case in his 1877 short work The Dream of A Ridiculous Man, a tale of a self-declared ridiculous man (surprise) spiraling into a sense of nihilism. After a brief encounter with a suffering girl, his desire to commit suicide is thwarted by a dream (surprise!) as if it were a Christmas eve with Dickens. Plunging us into a surreal dreamscape of a paradise as it succumbs to corruption and fractures into waring entities valuing individuality over love, and that �the consciousness of life is higher than life, the knowledge of the laws of happiness is higher than happiness.� Described by Mikhail Bakhtin as �practically a complete encyclopedia of Dostoevsky’s most important themes,� this is a brief but intense story delving into many of Dostoevksy’s signature themes such as grappling with nihilism, questioning utopias, and the meaning of suffering.
�I suddenly felt that it made no difference to me whether the world existed or whether nothing existed anywhere at all.�
Our narrator begins in a state of �terrible anguish,� finding the world lacking in meaning and already preparing to commit suicide with a gun previously purchased for such an occassion. We can read him not unlike Dostoevsky’s Underground Man, who’s opening self analysis �"I am a sick man ... I am a wicked man� is mirrored by �I am a ridiculous person. Now they call me a madman.� (All quotes taken from my copy using the Constance Garnett translation). The opening spoke strongly to me, for who hasn’t been frustrated by the world and all its absurdities, finding oneself ridiculous for participating in trading our irreplaceable hours of our one wild and precious life to endless labor, or wondering if there is meaning to anything at all. Especially when considering how one’s own demise would be insignificant in the long scheme of things, unless we adopt a solipsistic notion that the world vanishes without us. When he says �the more I learned, the more thoroughly I understood that I was ridiculous,� I couldn’t help but think of this meme and how often learning not only makes you feel the world is absurd but also recognizing how little you know and understand about anything makes you indeed feel ridiculous.
Yet how can one go on in this state of mind, which, as we see here, tends to bend the mind towards suicide-- something he would like to do if he can even see any meaning in doing so:
His brief encounter with a girl, suffering from some issue he thinks must be related to her mother, he finds his conscience biting him for not aiding her. This is thematic in Dostoevsky’s works, which often are a resistance to ideas of nihilism influenced by his own rejection of the during his time. We see a similar issue in Crime and Punishment with Raskolnikov’s resolve towards nihilism shaken by his guilty conscience.
Wrestling with his own conscience has him contemplating ideas that he is not as nihilistic as he thinks but how this is a waste if he is about to become nothingness, however the line of thought drags him to sleep.
�Dreams apparently proceed not from reason but from desire, not from the head but from the heart.�
I’m really hit or miss on dreams being used as essential to a plot, but Dostoevsky pulls it off quite effectively here. I appreciate the way he almost anticipates this, discussing how his mention of the dream brought ridicule (though this is also tied in with the idea that preaching religion—there is certainly a God element to this as in most of his works—is met with mockery) and that surely he couldn’t have dreamed such vivid details. Well played. The dream brings us to a world that is a sort of paradise or utopia, styled like the as in Greek mythology, particularly from Hesiod. But his presence corrupts them as he teaches them to lie and �they learned to lie and began to love the lie and knew the beauty of the lie.� The idea that deceit is a powerful impulse takes over and we see the history of humanity play out as the lie starts a chain reaction of corruption.
What stands out is the idea that in their downfall and loss of innocence, they believe knowledge of happiness is greater than happiness. They define existence against suffering, and ideas of humanitarianism or brotherhood exist in opposition to suffering instead of simply living at peace. The irony becomes that they percieve paradise as impossibility, yet the narrator has seen that it is indeed possible. There are some interesting observations here, such as creating different temples of worship for the sake of dividing into faction that deep down know their gods are fiction (which, knowing Dostoevsky, is less a rejection of religion and more a kind of rejection of any religion aside from his as “false gods� sort of deal), as well as the idea of desiring individual rights or a sense of individualism is a root cause of humanity’s downfall.
Yet this dream suddenly reverses his nihilism, and upon awakening, he has purpose again. �I made up my mind to preach from that very moment and, of course, to go on preaching all my life,� he says and sees this dream as proof paradise is possible and that the key is empathy, compassion, and unity not just as various groups but encompassing everyone everywhere all at once. We also see, however, that in a world of suffering we also have choice, and that we should choose wisely. The lesson of the shame he felt was that, no, we are not indifferent and should not attempt to be, but should lean into compassion. His final line lets us know he has tracked down the girl and we can see this as the start of his ministry, as it were.
�Sorrow compressed my heart, and I felt I would die, and then... Well, then I woke up.�
This tiny tale of a man’s transformation is such a succinct distillation of many of Dostoevsky’s primary themes and characterizations. As always, it is a rebuttal to nihilism, and the characters used to represent the idea are often shown as weak, naive, and hurting those around them due to their insistence on the belief. For a story that begins with suicide, it ends with hope and a call for love, one that is lovely to process regardless of its intended religious aims. Direct and beautifully emotive in its intensity, The Dream of a Ridiculous Man is pure Dostoevsky and a brief but lasting joy.
�
�The consciousness of life is higher than life, the knowledge of the laws of happiness is higher than happiness--that is what one must contend against. And I shall. If only everyone wants it, it can be arranged at once.�
I have always loved reading Dostoevsky. While I do have him inked on my right arm, that love for him goes further than just skin deep, and there are so many moments where his writing and ideas seem to fit into the grooves of my brain like a key into a lock, opening up trails of thought where I realize with pleasure “yes, this is exactly what I want to be thinking about and oh how my entire being seems to dance to his rhythm.� Trails of thought like the most lush forest path during blissful early-autumn weather. Because, sure, it can be rather dark, but it is always in a way that gives hope too and pleads for empathy. Such is the case in his 1877 short work The Dream of A Ridiculous Man, a tale of a self-declared ridiculous man (surprise) spiraling into a sense of nihilism. After a brief encounter with a suffering girl, his desire to commit suicide is thwarted by a dream (surprise!) as if it were a Christmas eve with Dickens. Plunging us into a surreal dreamscape of a paradise as it succumbs to corruption and fractures into waring entities valuing individuality over love, and that �the consciousness of life is higher than life, the knowledge of the laws of happiness is higher than happiness.� Described by Mikhail Bakhtin as �practically a complete encyclopedia of Dostoevsky’s most important themes,� this is a brief but intense story delving into many of Dostoevksy’s signature themes such as grappling with nihilism, questioning utopias, and the meaning of suffering.
�I suddenly felt that it made no difference to me whether the world existed or whether nothing existed anywhere at all.�
Our narrator begins in a state of �terrible anguish,� finding the world lacking in meaning and already preparing to commit suicide with a gun previously purchased for such an occassion. We can read him not unlike Dostoevsky’s Underground Man, who’s opening self analysis �"I am a sick man ... I am a wicked man� is mirrored by �I am a ridiculous person. Now they call me a madman.� (All quotes taken from my copy using the Constance Garnett translation). The opening spoke strongly to me, for who hasn’t been frustrated by the world and all its absurdities, finding oneself ridiculous for participating in trading our irreplaceable hours of our one wild and precious life to endless labor, or wondering if there is meaning to anything at all. Especially when considering how one’s own demise would be insignificant in the long scheme of things, unless we adopt a solipsistic notion that the world vanishes without us. When he says �the more I learned, the more thoroughly I understood that I was ridiculous,� I couldn’t help but think of this meme and how often learning not only makes you feel the world is absurd but also recognizing how little you know and understand about anything makes you indeed feel ridiculous.
Yet how can one go on in this state of mind, which, as we see here, tends to bend the mind towards suicide-- something he would like to do if he can even see any meaning in doing so:
�I was so utterly indifferent to everything that I was anxious to wait for the moment when I would not be so indifferent and then kill myself.�
His brief encounter with a girl, suffering from some issue he thinks must be related to her mother, he finds his conscience biting him for not aiding her. This is thematic in Dostoevsky’s works, which often are a resistance to ideas of nihilism influenced by his own rejection of the during his time. We see a similar issue in Crime and Punishment with Raskolnikov’s resolve towards nihilism shaken by his guilty conscience.
�if I had really decided to do away with myself that night, everything in the world should have been more indifferent to me than ever…It was clear to me that so long as I was still a human being and not a meaningless zero, and till I became a zero, I was alive, and consequently able to suffer, be angry, and feel shame at my actions. Very well. But if, on the other hand, I were going to kill myself in, say, two hours, what did that little girl matter to me and what did I care for shame or anything else in the world?�
Wrestling with his own conscience has him contemplating ideas that he is not as nihilistic as he thinks but how this is a waste if he is about to become nothingness, however the line of thought drags him to sleep.
�Dreams apparently proceed not from reason but from desire, not from the head but from the heart.�
I’m really hit or miss on dreams being used as essential to a plot, but Dostoevsky pulls it off quite effectively here. I appreciate the way he almost anticipates this, discussing how his mention of the dream brought ridicule (though this is also tied in with the idea that preaching religion—there is certainly a God element to this as in most of his works—is met with mockery) and that surely he couldn’t have dreamed such vivid details. Well played. The dream brings us to a world that is a sort of paradise or utopia, styled like the as in Greek mythology, particularly from Hesiod. But his presence corrupts them as he teaches them to lie and �they learned to lie and began to love the lie and knew the beauty of the lie.� The idea that deceit is a powerful impulse takes over and we see the history of humanity play out as the lie starts a chain reaction of corruption.
�They began to struggle for separation, for isolation, for individuality, for mine and thine. They began to talk in different languages. They became acquainted with sorrow and loved sorrow; they thirsted for suffering, and said that truth could only be attained through suffering. Then science appeared. As they became wicked they began talking of brotherhood and humanitarianism, and understood those ideas. As they became criminal, they invented justice and drew up whole legal codes in order to observe it, and to ensure their being kept, set up a guillotine. They hardly remembered what they had lost, in fact refused to believe that they had ever been happy and innocent. They even laughed at the possibility of this happiness in the past, and called it a dream.�
What stands out is the idea that in their downfall and loss of innocence, they believe knowledge of happiness is greater than happiness. They define existence against suffering, and ideas of humanitarianism or brotherhood exist in opposition to suffering instead of simply living at peace. The irony becomes that they percieve paradise as impossibility, yet the narrator has seen that it is indeed possible. There are some interesting observations here, such as creating different temples of worship for the sake of dividing into faction that deep down know their gods are fiction (which, knowing Dostoevsky, is less a rejection of religion and more a kind of rejection of any religion aside from his as “false gods� sort of deal), as well as the idea of desiring individual rights or a sense of individualism is a root cause of humanity’s downfall.
Yet this dream suddenly reverses his nihilism, and upon awakening, he has purpose again. �I made up my mind to preach from that very moment and, of course, to go on preaching all my life,� he says and sees this dream as proof paradise is possible and that the key is empathy, compassion, and unity not just as various groups but encompassing everyone everywhere all at once. We also see, however, that in a world of suffering we also have choice, and that we should choose wisely. The lesson of the shame he felt was that, no, we are not indifferent and should not attempt to be, but should lean into compassion. His final line lets us know he has tracked down the girl and we can see this as the start of his ministry, as it were.
�Sorrow compressed my heart, and I felt I would die, and then... Well, then I woke up.�
This tiny tale of a man’s transformation is such a succinct distillation of many of Dostoevsky’s primary themes and characterizations. As always, it is a rebuttal to nihilism, and the characters used to represent the idea are often shown as weak, naive, and hurting those around them due to their insistence on the belief. For a story that begins with suicide, it ends with hope and a call for love, one that is lovely to process regardless of its intended religious aims. Direct and beautifully emotive in its intensity, The Dream of a Ridiculous Man is pure Dostoevsky and a brief but lasting joy.
�
�The consciousness of life is higher than life, the knowledge of the laws of happiness is higher than happiness--that is what one must contend against. And I shall. If only everyone wants it, it can be arranged at once.�
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
The Dream of a Ridiculous Man.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
June 23, 2023
– Shelved
June 23, 2023
– Shelved as:
short-story
June 23, 2023
– Shelved as:
russia
June 23, 2023
– Shelved as:
empathy
Comments Showing 1-50 of 56 (56 new)
message 1:
by
Danielle
(new)
-
added it
Jun 23, 2023 06:12PM

reply
|
flag

Thank you so much! Ooo I hope you enjoy, it’s a really quick read but lots to ponder!



Thank you so much, and that is a really lovely way to put it. Yea, it’s like the more he wants to negate everything inside him the more he realizes he does still feel and wants to protect that because it’s worth retaining. It’s been so long since I revisited Dostoevsky and I’m glad I did, might have to do another deep dive into him again now haha

Thank you so much, Dostoevsky certainly inspires haha. And thanks, glad to be here!


Thank you so much! He’s just so good. Oooo great choices, Chekhov is great too and I really really need go read more of him. For me it was Dostoevsky and Gogol, which I feel like so many of my favorite books always a little vibe of one of them in it to this day haha

Exactly—my favorite vibes :)

Thank you so much! Really enjoyed returning to Dostoevsky, started up White Nights now this morning

Soon to come! I realized I have two different translations of it so I’m kind of going back and forth to compare them, especially after a phrase in one of them I was like “oh no NOT a good metaphor� haha

Ha same. I always enjoy the Pevear/Volokhonsky when they are available and trust Garnett as a standby but beyond that…no clue haha

Thank you! Yea, this one was really fun, I like seeing Dostoevsky get all surreal


Yeaaaaa that seemed the main point in this one, which is sort of a bummer because it gets super heavy handed at the end with the whole "preaching" stuff. I definitely prefer his earlier works for that reason. I had thought this was an earlier story and then all the religious imagery came strong and I was like oh yea I forgot he made that turn haha


He’s amazing, right? Agreed, I really wish I could read it in the original. And thank you so much :)

Alas, no nation is immune from this disease. Back in 1980 plenty of liberal writers, such as the screenwriter William Goldman (HARPER, BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID, ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN) who out of disgust with Carter voted for Reagan. I would not have voted for Carter either, but embracing the far right because the libs repel you is dangerous and absurd, as proven earlier by the likes of John Steinbeck and John Dos Passos.

Yeaaaaa and that seems to be a growing issue lately a lot of people are showing concern about for the upcoming election. Huh, thats amusing because in the present Reagan has the reputation of having been one of the worst presidents we've ever had and Carter has gone down as beloved.


TRUE, which seems part of the system design to divide and avert from policy to “‘my team vs your team�



Oooo yay I’m excited for you to check him out! Hmmm while I suppose there is no wrong way to enter his work I’d say Crime and Punishment is an excellent first read because it hits a lot of his biggest themes and has this rather feverish quality to the storytelling that makes it easy to really burn through big chunks rather quickly. Personally my first was The Idiot which I also really recommend though if you want a fairly short one to try him out you can’t go wrong with The Gambler. Hope that is helpful! Oh, White Nights is a short story that is rather charming and would give a taste of his style too (though also an early story that feels fairly different from his bigger works).
Hope your first read is enjoyable though! I look forward to hearing what you think.


Oh, wonderful! I do own a copy of Crime and Punishment (inherited from my grandfather which makes it special). I've also heard good things about The Idiot, but I don't think I've seen much about The Gambler yet, so I will certainly check that one out!
Thanks! You'll definitely have a number of updates and reviews to read once I get to it 😊

Thank you so much! Oh that is amazing! What will the tattoo be, one of his face or something symbolic? That is so cool though.
Hmm I guess I’ve really only read either the Constance Garnett or the Pevear/Volokhonsky ones for most of his bigger works (some random ones on the short stories that I’ve never felt were bad but also nothing that really stood out?). I really enjoy the P/V duo for any Russian books I’ve read and they make the text feel very modern but after awhile I’ve felt they sort of have a signature style that flattens each individual author a bit? Not necessarily bad but you can tell it’s them if that makes sense, though maybe it’s just because on my reread of Master and Margarita I didn’t like their translation as much. Garnett definitely reads in a way that feels much older, though I found that charming in The Idiot. I kind of want to reread The Idiot with P/V and then reread Crime and Punishment with Garnett to see how switching translators from my first experiences with those books goes. Sorry that’s probably a kind of non-answer, but then again I couldn’t actually read the original Russian so I’m basing it all entirely on how it reads in the English over any knowledge of artistic accuracy.

I guess I’m not sure what part of this comes across as anti-religious, my apologies if it does, I think I was just attempting to express that it is a rebuttal to nihilism from his specific take on Christianity as opposed to a more just generally religious stance. Or even a lot of US Catholicism which tends to be slightly different from Russian orthodox. I guess the line about the God aspect was more that he tends to get broadly talked about as philosophical but without acknowledging it is specifically about his devotion to God it’s missing the key element, though I think even those who read him without a religious faith themselves can get a lot out of what he is trying to say as well.

Oh that is perfect! Inherited copies are always the best copies. The Idiot is really cool and id even argue a bit underrated haha there’s some scenes in there up with the best of his. And excellent, can’t wait! Hope you enjoy!

Thank you! I'm sure I will!!
And I do love a good underrated classic. Sometimes the surprise gems are the best ones.
And yes! It's a super cool volume. My grandfather was a psychiatrist and it's this weird little copy that was sent out as marketing material gift from a pharmaceutical company.

I think the books I’ve read are the P/V translations. I remember a big article that came out, can’t remember where, that carried the debate on both G and P/V. Looks like those are still the primary choices.
Since we are on the topic of Russian lit, and I know you love poetry, if you haven’t, I would recommend the complete palms of Anna Akhmatova. The translation is by Judith Hemschemyer and is stellar. Some of the most beautiful poetry one could ever hope to read.
Thanks for the tips!

Woah that is amazing. I kind of love that a pharmaceutical company would pick Crime and Punishment too. I bet that is a super rare edition then!

I agree! It's such an interesting book to choose. I'm sure it is too! I haven't seen much online about it - ŷ certainly doesn't have the edition listed lol.

I think the books I’ve read are th..."
Just looked it up and I think I found the art you mean and that will make such a great tattoo! Do you have any other author related ones? I need to get more haha Ive wanted a Jeanette Winterson one for awhile and I’m going to see her do a reading this summer so I should probably get it before then.
Yea they seem the big staples for sure. There was a new retranslation of Crime and Punishment like maybe 2 or three years ago by Michael Katz but I’ve only once run across a copy of it. Was just reading some reviews on it and people seem to really like that one so that might be a good alternative.
Ooo thank you. I’ve only read a few random poems from her in anthologies and always enjoyed but never knew a good place to really start so thanks I will definitely check that out. Did she do the big Complete Poems too? I’ve always really loved all the stories around Akhmatova and the secret poetry reading sessions. That whole group of writers are so fascinating.

I agree! It's such an interest..."
Haha you know it’s an awesome and rare one when even the seemingly endless goodreads editions don’t have it!

Tried to attach those Rimbaud images. Guess I’m showing my age. Can’t figure it out 🥳
I’m enjoying yer reviews. I’ve garnered a few recommendations from yer lists and am enjoying the spoils of yer library. And I loved Martyr! By the way. Nearly through w/ a first read of Calling a Wolf. a Wolf! Fella can write some lines. Totes! Happy reading.

Oh awesome, Akbar has some great lines for sure. I feel bad I never read much of his second collection, I should figure out what I did with that haha.
2666 is such a masterpiece, fully agree. Saw a 6 hour play adaptation of that a few years ago in Chicago and it was pretty incredible. Oooo okay I need to finally read Europe Central then haha I’ve had it staring at me on my shelf for…probably a decade now I should just dive in.
Attaching pictures is SUCH a pain on here. Especially in the comments. For reviews I use the embed feature from Flickr but it doesn’t work in comments because it is technically a link. But for that you can use:
< img scr = (remove space between the end tag and img
And then in quotations put the image address the backslash and >
Sorry for the confusing way to write it out but it vanished from the text if you put the actual HTML. But even then half the time it shows up as a broken link for me.

