Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Bradley's Reviews > Blue Mars

Blue Mars by Kim Stanley Robinson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4213258
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: sci-fi, 2018-shelf, worldbuilding-sf
Read 2 times. Last read May 23, 2018 to May 26, 2018.

The first two novels in the Mars trilogy were pretty much a tight mix of colonization, politics, SO MUCH GREAT SCIENCE, and fairly interesting characterizations pretty much designed to carry the sprawling expanse of what MARS is more than anything else.

Let's put it this way, and careful, because here comes a spoiler, but...

Mars is the main character. :)

The third novel has relatively little action in it, but that's okay.

There's a new constitution being hammered out for the fascinating experimental political parts, new customs as both time and the planet changes radically with the terraforming, and the influence Mars has on a massively overpopulated Earth being driven crazy by the new life-prolonging treatments. (Designed and exported from Mars.)

I squealed like a little fanboy with the endless wordcount of the science, from the physics of brain chemistry at the quantum level to the terraforming of Mercury and Venus and some of the bigger moons out by the gassy ones. :)

What COULD be considered a negative to the novel was actually its biggest strength. Let me explain...

This is about old people. Senescence. You could take it as a metaphor if you like, Old Blue Earth vs New Mars, memories versus living in the present, or even White versus Red thinking (It's a Thing).

It's also about synthesis. As in alchemy. Mars is both its pristine red past and its new living, ocean-filled, green, boat laden glory. So are we. We're our memories, our hopes for the future, be it science, children, or ourselves, AND we are our present. Live your life, quick, the promise of immortality is an illusion. :)

I will never call this novel a great one in terms of plot or characters, though I really grew to love Sax and Ann, our embodiments of White and Red thinking, by the end. Everyone else, nascent gods supplanting their titan parents, were amusing and fascinating, but in the end, unnecessary... EXCEPT for the character of world-building, science, the collective unconscious, the zeitgeist, the evolving thought, and the evolving planet.

It's a sprawling jazz-filled explosion of life and erosion of time, water, and memory.

At least, that's how I see it. :)

If this novel had been presented today as a Hugo winner, I probably would have declined to nominate it, but for the time this won in '97, as well as the other two Mars novels, it was a revelation.

Most other SF is weaksauce compared to the science and exploration of science in these novels. Truth is truth. All this glorious science doesn't always make for a good STORY, but the story was good enough to showcase a polymath brilliance spanning ethics, psychology, politics, terraforming, biology, quantum physics, and even the meaning of life.

Come on. CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE. :) :) :)
57 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Blue Mars.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
March 26, 2013 – Shelved
March 27, 2013 – Shelved as: sci-fi
May 23, 2018 – Started Reading
May 26, 2018 – Shelved as: 2018-shelf
May 26, 2018 – Shelved as: worldbuilding-sf
May 26, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Trish I know you mean me *lol* but I can only give credit IF it's due. I agree that (so far, I'm not done with it yet), this books is better than the two previous ones because there is more science. However, the weird bits are still here, more pronounced than ever, and the characters are bloody awful.
So feel free to squeal, but that doesn't mean I have to jump on the band wagon. We'll see.


Cathy I just checked, I read this 15 years ago. Blimey... I can‘t face a reread, but it would sure be interesting to see how I like it now.


Bradley It was kinda a mixed bag for me. The characters were sometimes kinda rocky, but the science is still brilliant and blinding. :)


message 5: by Trish (last edited May 30, 2018 03:54AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Trish "sometimes", "kinda rocky", ... understatement of the century!


message 6: by Seadrift (new)

Seadrift hahaha, would you say the characters were geologically hard to digest? ;) Yeah, I've heard good things about this trilogy for a long time now. I haven't picked it up yet but I know I will eventually do it.


Bradley It is definitely worth reading at least once. This was my second time and I don't regret it.

I might have been ANXIOUS about it, but I don't regret either read. :)


Nick Murphy The plot is simple but I don't know that qualifying it "not great" or "great" is something that even makes sense in this case. I found myself pretty engrossed in the story, even if it isn't presented in the most gripping manner. The skeleton of the plot could be turned into something exciting in another medium, but that doesnt seem to the point with the Mars trilogy. I think you're on point with Mars being the primary protagonist, and its evolution with that of the first 100 (and Art and Nirghal) is the point. Seeing the fate of each character was climactic itself just because we have some we hope will live and some who we were indifferent. Idk, I think you're pretty accurate in what you say.. I just wouldn't say the plot is "not-great" either.


Bradley By any definition, the overarching plot of this book was weak. Some mystery elements remained, of course, but there was nothing to tie everything together except the ongoing memory issues and how the characters finally come together at the last.

I am not saying that the plot is the end-all of any novel, however. Character-driven novels are often fantastic and we don't even realize the plot is trash since we're invested in something completely different. My original point that Mars is a character still stands in this light. We want to see the progression of the people and the place more than we want something BIG happening, like, say, in Bear's Moving Mars where Mars moves. :)

Comparing THOSE two novels will put a heavy line on the difference between plots. :)

Just because we love a thing and the evolution to which it has undergone doesn't mean that it is perfect in every way. KSR's characters were RATHER bent in their ideologies in a way that almost or did caricature themselves.

Effective? Perhaps, but not flawlessly. And I know some people who would jump all over them as horrible pieces of s***. :)


Brandon Lee I couldn't finish it. It rambled on toward the end and I literally fell asleep page after page, night after night. And I can go days without sleep reading book after book.


Bradley Wow, sorry. Or rather, it sounds like you have a perfect solution for any possible future issue with sleep. :)


Bradley I still recommend it. :) Lots of Mars terraforming and social experimentations there. :)


Grant Excellent review, Bradley! I also found the book a little slower than the previous ones but didn't mind since it gave Robinson time to get all his characters over the finish line and really give us in-depth glimpses into the scope of his universe.


back to top