switterbug (Betsey)'s Reviews > Wellness
Wellness
by
by

I’m gobsmacked, and have remained so from page one to the last word. An epic, sweeping, transformative, colossal (adverbs and adjectives are just not enough!) door-stopper of a book, a windswept and fiery, burning satire of a 1990s marriage between a modern couple in Chicago, Jack and Elizabeth. There’s a preoccupation with eternal love, health and well-being, the potent obsession with fitness and strength. How past years� discarded identities generate the self of today, afraid or unafraid of tomorrow.
Jack is a photographer, but his pictures arise from the chemicals and fixatives in the darkroom, not from the camera. Elizabeth is a scientist who peddles placebos to rejuvenate passion. WELLNESS spans twenty years forward, but reaches back, to their childhoods, shifting back and forth in time. Or should I say Time, since Time is essential here, it subverts the narrative and liquidates expectations. It’s about everything, sort of like Infinite Jest is about everything, and it’s a parabola, like Gravity's Rainbow is a parabola, but it’s neither the former or latter. The prose is gracefully placed on the page, despite the legion of info (critics would say info-dumping) that the text provides. Hill straddles the line between saying and pontificating, which may cause some readers to recoil.
Hill has created his own radical, non-starry-eyed romance, a 90s mosaic of Gen X ideology, as Jack and Elizabeth assemble and inhabit their identities via several and ongoing selves throughout the years, to someday evolve or diminish into what they are now. The stakes, at first, seem fairly mellow. I mean, the worst that I thought could happen is a break-up. Hooooold on, about those stakes. Hill drove them hard through my heart. It’s heavy, at times I felt my throat closing up. This isn’t a book I could read non-stop, I had to take breaks to release the tension, otherwise I would explode!
It's also about perception and paradox, connections and loneliness, greed and loss, manipulation and madness. The narrative winds through a buffet of subjects, and love is the polestar, and the threat. Love at first sight is endorsed and dismantled, but never abandoned. There’s so much breadth, from artists to investors, groupthink to prairie fires, children to ancestors, “forever homes,� the World Wide Web, health, sickness, and cures, social media, absence--and the faith in metaphysics, that our souls can travel at night.
Paradox: “…that was a pre-globalized world, a pre-9/11 world, a pre-housing bubble world…when they all sort of understood implicitly that however much they resented and resisted the mass economy, they would also have little trouble eventually finding a job and livelihood within it.�
Thematically rich in artful contradictions, as a new friend earnestly says to Elizabeth: “He practices the art of nothingness, while you practice the science of nothingness. You’re both obsessed with it: nothingness, emptiness, blankness, absence. Don’t you find that really meaningful?�
And this touched my heart, a poignant guidance from the scientist that mentored Elizabeth:
“Believe what you believe…but believe gently. Believe compassionately. Believe with curiosity. Believe with humility. And don’t trust the arrogance of certainty.�
This book is so deep, vast, mind-bending, and provocative, I just can’t do it justice. It’s written for all of us, all the Time, wherever you are, visible and manifest.
Jack is a photographer, but his pictures arise from the chemicals and fixatives in the darkroom, not from the camera. Elizabeth is a scientist who peddles placebos to rejuvenate passion. WELLNESS spans twenty years forward, but reaches back, to their childhoods, shifting back and forth in time. Or should I say Time, since Time is essential here, it subverts the narrative and liquidates expectations. It’s about everything, sort of like Infinite Jest is about everything, and it’s a parabola, like Gravity's Rainbow is a parabola, but it’s neither the former or latter. The prose is gracefully placed on the page, despite the legion of info (critics would say info-dumping) that the text provides. Hill straddles the line between saying and pontificating, which may cause some readers to recoil.
Hill has created his own radical, non-starry-eyed romance, a 90s mosaic of Gen X ideology, as Jack and Elizabeth assemble and inhabit their identities via several and ongoing selves throughout the years, to someday evolve or diminish into what they are now. The stakes, at first, seem fairly mellow. I mean, the worst that I thought could happen is a break-up. Hooooold on, about those stakes. Hill drove them hard through my heart. It’s heavy, at times I felt my throat closing up. This isn’t a book I could read non-stop, I had to take breaks to release the tension, otherwise I would explode!
It's also about perception and paradox, connections and loneliness, greed and loss, manipulation and madness. The narrative winds through a buffet of subjects, and love is the polestar, and the threat. Love at first sight is endorsed and dismantled, but never abandoned. There’s so much breadth, from artists to investors, groupthink to prairie fires, children to ancestors, “forever homes,� the World Wide Web, health, sickness, and cures, social media, absence--and the faith in metaphysics, that our souls can travel at night.
Paradox: “…that was a pre-globalized world, a pre-9/11 world, a pre-housing bubble world…when they all sort of understood implicitly that however much they resented and resisted the mass economy, they would also have little trouble eventually finding a job and livelihood within it.�
Thematically rich in artful contradictions, as a new friend earnestly says to Elizabeth: “He practices the art of nothingness, while you practice the science of nothingness. You’re both obsessed with it: nothingness, emptiness, blankness, absence. Don’t you find that really meaningful?�
And this touched my heart, a poignant guidance from the scientist that mentored Elizabeth:
“Believe what you believe…but believe gently. Believe compassionately. Believe with curiosity. Believe with humility. And don’t trust the arrogance of certainty.�
This book is so deep, vast, mind-bending, and provocative, I just can’t do it justice. It’s written for all of us, all the Time, wherever you are, visible and manifest.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Wellness.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 26, 2023
–
Started Reading
October 26, 2023
– Shelved
November 1, 2023
– Shelved as:
favorites
November 1, 2023
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 54 (54 new)
message 1:
by
Bruce
(new)
-
added it
Nov 01, 2023 05:11PM

reply
|
flag


Hi P'ma!! I think it kind of depends on whether you like a novel with this kind of vast subject matter. He does squeak into Foster Wallace territory at times. I can definitely see why this is divided in critique. Some people feel there's too much "telling" rather than showing, but I think it all depends on how you interpret this sort of third person limited, put I'm still trying to determine what "tense" it is. I do like these crazy trippy books, though. It's not stream of consciousness, per se, but it is filed with lyrical language. Gravitas, too. I had to take a few breaks. Especially on the Grand Prairie of Kansas occasionally



Bruce--I would love to know what you think of this book--you always have a prevailing cool head when you review!

I'm trying to think of something witty or winsome to say in response. Hold please.


I'm trying to think of something witty or winsome to say in response. Hold please."
: > )

That you, K, for your kind words. And you sound like me--collecting books by authors that still sit on the shelf. For instance, I have most of Sebastian Barry's books but didn't read any until this year, when I read Old God's Time! Now I can go back and read his oeuvre, mostly available on my shelf. !! I need to go back and read The Nix. I think I once started it and got disrupted.


Thank you, Theresa! So glad you liked my review--and the book is amazing!

Ann, thank you so much! Wellness is quite a magnum opus!


Cathy, you just gave my heart a big pump with your kind words. That really made my day and turned my week around! I can now say, "This week was extra special" when I look back on it. Namaste to you and your husband and your family. If my reviews give you even one millimeter of insight into a book I read, then I am so grateful to you and your husband and also happy to keep doing it. I am speechless!!! xo


I hope I didn't add to your confusion, Lisa! I hope you can enjoy this book for yourself.

I completely respect the validity of your perspective to put Hill’s masterpiece within the pantheon of Infinite Jest & Gravity’s Rainbow (full disclosure, Infinite Jest I’ve in a not bragging way read 6 times and is my favorite novel alongside Musil’s “Man Without Qualities�, Pynchon’s GR I’m on my second run).
I think Hill is indebted to David Foster Wallace, and he is I think also influenced heavily by Dave Eggers & Jonathan Franzen (27th City, earlier, better Franzen).
I loved Wellness, only Charlie Kaufman’s 2020 “Antkind� would for me rank higher as best novel in the past 15 years.
I wish Hill had doubled the length, made it the 1,000 page Gaddis-like epic.
I felt he ironically was only lacking in one area:
He needed to overwrite, give us more character depth and shift POV’s even more. Basically do more of what he did already.
I think if he writes another novel, it will be that William Gaddis-esque epic.
This is such a promising milestone, and it changes the reader, for the better.
It’s powerful.
“Don’t forget to subscribe�, Madagascar, Benjamin Quince’s scene-stealing hilarity, “hunger�, he is hilarious in his incision of a particular cluster of American pathologies in a way David Foster Wallace or say John Kennedy O� Toole (“Confederacy of Dunces�) would applaud!
I am glad you wrote this amazing review Betsey, honestly it was the clincher when I found a copy for 30% off at Target (your review!)

Yes, I agree he is indebted to DFW, Eggers, and I haven’t read 27th city but sounds like I should. I do see tendrils of Franzen. I own some Gaddis, i believe, and need to peek in.
In all ways, thank you so so so much, Alec!



Thx, Jillz! This book had a lasting effect on me, it was brilliant!

Oh, I'm so glad that you did! I almost didn't go for it, either. I thought it might be to "cute." Boy oh boy, it blew me away! Yes, the abuse really gutted me, too. It made me think about the many many many different kids of abuse, but that all add up to the worst kinds of PTSD.





Yes, Farnoosh. It swept me away!

Thank you, Anya! Now I need to go back and read The Nix.

Catherine, I love how your review includes the way you relate to it personally--I wonder what I would do if Jack's mother were my mother!


Yes, I think I fell in love with this book while reading this. And I really liked his sister, too. I just read your review, Lisa, and you nailed it!

It's hard to know who will and won't like it. Even for friends I've had for years. But I'll say this---one of my friends didn't think this would really be a book for her, and then ended up loving it.


A lesser author WOULD have been too precious. Nathan Hill really rocks!
