Steve's Reviews > Still Life
Still Life (Chief Inspector Armand Gamache, #1)
by
by

This is a murder mystery in the category of police procedural. I like to throw in a few of these every once in a while for variety. After all, one does not wish to consider oneself effete for having dined on too rich a diet of purely literary fare, does one?
Now that we're in the star bestowal business I thought for a minute about what makes for a good book of this sort. Here’s the list I came up with along with how Still Life did with respect to it.
So with the exception of the last criterion, this one does well. Chief Inspector Armand Gamache qualifies as interesting in that wise and avuncular way that inspires confidence. It’s set in Quebec in a French and English speaking town south of Montreal. The local flavor was delicieux. As far as the forensics are concerned, there were some bits involving bowhunting that were out of the ordinary. This was Penny’s first book, but she seemed very polished in the way she set the stage and kept us guessing.
As you’ve no doubt already gathered from my list, I did have a problem with one of the characters on the investigative team. She seemed almost willfully obtuse. If the goal was to create conflict to foil the naturally unflappable Inspector Gamache, there had to have been more satisfying ways to do it than through her. Even so, the book has enough charm, intrigue and local color to recommend. 3.5 stars rounded up to 4.
Now that we're in the star bestowal business I thought for a minute about what makes for a good book of this sort. Here’s the list I came up with along with how Still Life did with respect to it.
�   Interesting characters
�   Plausible forensics
�   Sensible structure to the story
�   Skill in the uncovering of clues
�   Details of the setting for added flavor
x   Success in avoiding an annoying, witless junior officer who thinks she knows way more than she really does and is terrible at reading people
So with the exception of the last criterion, this one does well. Chief Inspector Armand Gamache qualifies as interesting in that wise and avuncular way that inspires confidence. It’s set in Quebec in a French and English speaking town south of Montreal. The local flavor was delicieux. As far as the forensics are concerned, there were some bits involving bowhunting that were out of the ordinary. This was Penny’s first book, but she seemed very polished in the way she set the stage and kept us guessing.
As you’ve no doubt already gathered from my list, I did have a problem with one of the characters on the investigative team. She seemed almost willfully obtuse. If the goal was to create conflict to foil the naturally unflappable Inspector Gamache, there had to have been more satisfying ways to do it than through her. Even so, the book has enough charm, intrigue and local color to recommend. 3.5 stars rounded up to 4.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Still Life.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
April 19, 2013
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-50 of 65 (65 new)
message 1:
by
Scribble
(new)
Apr 19, 2013 09:09PM

reply
|
flag


It was you and maybe Richard who were singing her praises earlier to put this book on my list to begin with. I figured I might as well try her first one first. Thanks for planting the seed (or cone) for the action in Three Pines, Megan!

I agree with Scribble on your "x". She always picks up on these nuances."
Thank you, Lynne. For future reference, do you prefer x or χ (the Greek chi)?

Oh and I vote for chi! I always loved writing it on the board in stats class, though do not ask me what the heck the chi-square distribution was all about.

He's a math guy Lynne, and they are full of trick questions.

@Lynne, you're right to expect trick questions, though this one is just a matter of preference. Both x and χ lay claim to a certain exoticism, don't they?
@Susan, I always liked your affinity for chi-square distributions. They're asymmetric, but never go negative.

And I was enough of a Grecophile to get a couple of answers quickly in the WSJ puzzle today...eta & omega? Not to mention the little pitchfork that you math types have likely put to some diabolical use in Econometrica. Three Greek letter clues in one Journal puzzle seems like a record.

Not at all! I was going to commend you on recommending a francophone Belgian to help solve the Louise Penney mystery.


Not at all! I was going to commend you on recommending a francophone Belgian to help solve the Louise P..."
Well I consider myself a francophony.

Hehe, I have outed you Steve! He is a maths guy indeed, Lynne.

I'm just glad you didn't say, "It's all Greek to me." The collective groan would not have been audible in NY.

It's about time the Greeks got a little recognition there. Usually the WSJ puzzle is partial to French.

@Lynne - As Susan said, I'm guilty as charged. Books are a wonderful palliative for maths syndrome, though, thankfully.


If you learned French from Julia, then you must have heard delicieux. Of course, that one you would have figured anyway.
As you know, Susan and I are both big Jess Walter fans. Susan is right there with you on Kate Atkinson, too. I haven't sampled her yet, but know I'll like her when I do given how good the TV version of Case Histories was.
So funny, Steve. i am currently reading and enjoying this book. But my crazy week has kept me from finishing it in a timely fashion, even though I gobbled up the first 130 pages in one day. I could not wait to read your review, even before I finished Still Life. So far, I too love the charm and local color, which I will probably re-emphasize in my own review. Glad you were pleased and that we are on the same wave length.

That's a pretty remarkable coincidence, Steve, since it's not all that common a book. I'll look forward to hearing your thoughts on it. Enjoy what you've got left!
Oh, and I'll give you one hint -- the butler did not do it.
Steve wrote: "Steve wrote: "So funny, Steve. i am currently reading and enjoying this book. But my crazy week has kept me from finishing it in a timely fashion, even though I gobbled up the first 130 pages in on..."
hah. at this point I don't care who did it because I just really enjoy the artsy characters so much.
hah. at this point I don't care who did it because I just really enjoy the artsy characters so much.
Scribble wrote: "Now what is the statistical likelihood that the butler actually would have done it, anyway?"
Apparently no more probable than two Steves on GR in high stress jobs reading the same mystery at the same time with no planning.
Apparently no more probable than two Steves on GR in high stress jobs reading the same mystery at the same time with no planning.

But then I'm a pure maths persona - when -metrics replaced -my as the suffix to econo I opted for the non-linear models :)

@Suzanne: Have you seen the TV adaptation of Kate Atkinson's mysteries? They've appeared occasionally on our PBS station throughout the past couple of years. I'm not sure if they're presented on Masterpiece Mystery but they are British productions. I don't usually like any film adaptation as much as the book and these are no exception, but they are well done and engaging.

I'll have to look the series up on PBS.Thank you.
Right now I'm studying Steve's rules and trying to apply them to a regular fiction book.


I've never gotten a signed anything, myself. Gary has. I've just stood behind or next to him. It's kind of awkward. How can it be anything but, with the people behind you, wishing you'd disappear.
Once, 30 years ago, when I was waddling in to the hospital to deliver my daughter, Katherine Hepburn held the door open for me and wished me luck. That was pretty impressive. Better luck, no I mean, better weather, next time.


I agree, Susan. You're showing remarkable self-restraint, though, foregoing the chance to one-up Suzanne by mentioning your own brush with fame after you were born. The one I'm talking about, of course, is when Ms. Hepburn's co-star in The African Queen saw you in the post-delivery room and said, "Here's looking at you, kid." (Sorry, I'm afraid I picked up a bad habit on April Fools' Day.)






Yeah, we live in their shadows-sort of at the nexus of high and low lives.

Haha, I guess I hope for better than dull, but I think I know what you mean. It's nice to have certain patterns we know should play out thereby freeing our brains to think less about the givens and more about the nuances. That is, if the writing is good enough to offer such subtlety. Fortunately, this one has a quirky charm that qualifies.

After reading the Dragon Tatoo books, I've sort of crossed off a trip to to Sweden from my bucket list.

There's definitely something to be said for genre writing that follows the prescribed patterns, but does it in a unique or better-than-usual manner. Some of my favorite reads have been books that tackled a well-trod path, but did so in a way that makes you see it in a different light

I like when that happens, too, Mark. Thinking of it from a writer's point of view, it seems like they might appreciate having certain genre conventions, structures, and rules set out in advance so as to highlight their creativity in the margins. It could be a curse having too much freedom -- paralysis being the risk when there are too many paths they could take.

Yes, yes!! In some of the writing books I've read, they suggest just that. They introduce you to different genres and their tropes, then suggest, "Now, how would you approach this in an original way?" It's a lot less pressure knowing you need to stay inside some kind of preordained path. Thinking anything is possible will lead to such head-scratching conundrums as Ivan soliloquizing
The Grand Inquisitor

Excellent point, Mark! It's a good rule of thumb to avoid any activity that could turn you into a Dostoyevsky character. :-)

Damn that Ivan! He's the reason I had to put down Bros. K. on my first read through! Errr, actually, being the Grand Inquisitor, damning him prolly wouldn't have that great an effect.
As fruitbasket as he was, I would like, for just a single day, to live the life of Golyadkin from The Double. He was such...a Golyadkin