Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Steve's Reviews > Still Life

Still Life by Louise Penny
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
236411
's review

really liked it

This is a murder mystery in the category of police procedural. I like to throw in a few of these every once in a while for variety. After all, one does not wish to consider oneself effete for having dined on too rich a diet of purely literary fare, does one?

Now that we're in the star bestowal business I thought for a minute about what makes for a good book of this sort. Here’s the list I came up with along with how Still Life did with respect to it.

�     Interesting characters
�     Plausible forensics
�     Sensible structure to the story
�     Skill in the uncovering of clues
�     Details of the setting for added flavor
x     Success in avoiding an annoying, witless junior officer who thinks she knows way more than she really does and is terrible at reading people


So with the exception of the last criterion, this one does well. Chief Inspector Armand Gamache qualifies as interesting in that wise and avuncular way that inspires confidence. It’s set in Quebec in a French and English speaking town south of Montreal. The local flavor was delicieux. As far as the forensics are concerned, there were some bits involving bowhunting that were out of the ordinary. This was Penny’s first book, but she seemed very polished in the way she set the stage and kept us guessing.

As you’ve no doubt already gathered from my list, I did have a problem with one of the characters on the investigative team. She seemed almost willfully obtuse. If the goal was to create conflict to foil the naturally unflappable Inspector Gamache, there had to have been more satisfying ways to do it than through her. Even so, the book has enough charm, intrigue and local color to recommend. 3.5 stars rounded up to 4.
64 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Still Life.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
April 19, 2013 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-50 of 65 (65 new)


message 1: by Scribble (new)

Scribble Orca I love your x.


Steve Thanks Scribble. It is one of my better letters.


message 3: by Scribble (new)

Scribble Orca Oh no...I disagree there. Others are even more evocative.


Steve Knowing you, you're probably thinking of Greek or Cyrillic characters.


message 5: by Scribble (last edited Apr 19, 2013 09:46PM) (new)

Scribble Orca Well, those of your letters featuring a euro flavour are always welcome, of course.


message 6: by Megan (new)

Megan Baxter I love this author, although strangely, I may not have read this particular book. The later books are also set in Three Pines, which leads to not only following Gamache and his team, but also knowing most of the suspects and the locale extremely well. It's a very interesting innovation, and Penny does it very well.


message 7: by Lynne (new) - added it

Lynne King Very nice review Steve.

I agree with Scribble on your "x". She always picks up on these nuances.


Steve Megan wrote: "I love this author, although strangely, I may not have read this particular book. The later books are also set in Three Pines, which leads to not only following Gamache and his team, but also knowi..."

It was you and maybe Richard who were singing her praises earlier to put this book on my list to begin with. I figured I might as well try her first one first. Thanks for planting the seed (or cone) for the action in Three Pines, Megan!


Steve Lynne wrote: "Very nice review Steve.

I agree with Scribble on your "x". She always picks up on these nuances."


Thank you, Lynne. For future reference, do you prefer x or χ (the Greek chi)?


message 10: by Lynne (new) - added it

Lynne King Well I really don't know. Now I know this is a trick question.


Susan Thanks for the heads-up re manufactured conflict, Steve. We share the same intolerance of that plot device. Given my Francophile leanings, it's obvious that I need to give Louise Penny a read. ( I guess that should be Quebecophile or Francophile-once-removed).

Oh and I vote for chi! I always loved writing it on the board in stats class, though do not ask me what the heck the chi-square distribution was all about.


Susan Lynne wrote: "Well I really don't know. Now I know this is a trick question."

He's a math guy Lynne, and they are full of trick questions.


message 13: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Sounds like a case for Hercule Poirot.


Steve If Susan were less of a Francophile-once-removed and more of a Grecophile instead, she might have stumbled across the book Gary is undoubtedly referencing: Hercule Poirot and the αβγ Murders.

@Lynne, you're right to expect trick questions, though this one is just a matter of preference. Both x and χ lay claim to a certain exoticism, don't they?

@Susan, I always liked your affinity for chi-square distributions. They're asymmetric, but never go negative.


message 15: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm This discussion is way out of my league.(I'm just happy I could spell Poirot)


message 16: by Susan (last edited Apr 20, 2013 11:27AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Susan I did remember the asymmetry, if nothing else. A cookbook statistician like me remembers only what's necessary to get the right answer...the why doesn't enter into it.

And I was enough of a Grecophile to get a couple of answers quickly in the WSJ puzzle today...eta & omega? Not to mention the little pitchfork that you math types have likely put to some diabolical use in Econometrica. Three Greek letter clues in one Journal puzzle seems like a record.


Susan Gary wrote: "This discussion is way out of my league.(I'm just happy I could spell Poirot)"

Not at all! I was going to commend you on recommending a francophone Belgian to help solve the Louise Penney mystery.


message 18: by Lynne (new) - added it

Lynne King Steve, What can I say. In x it's always good however it comes. Are you really a maths guy as Susan stated?


message 19: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Susan wrote: "Gary wrote: "This discussion is way out of my league.(I'm just happy I could spell Poirot)"

Not at all! I was going to commend you on recommending a francophone Belgian to help solve the Louise P..."


Well I consider myself a francophony.


Susan Lynne wrote: "Steve, What can I say. In x it's always good however it comes. Are you really a maths guy as Susan stated?"

Hehe, I have outed you Steve! He is a maths guy indeed, Lynne.


Steve Gary wrote: "This discussion is way out of my league.(I'm just happy I could spell Poirot)"

I'm just glad you didn't say, "It's all Greek to me." The collective groan would not have been audible in NY.


Steve Susan wrote: "And I was enough of a Grecophile to get a couple of answers quickly in the WSJ puzzle today...eta & omega? Not to mention the little pitchfork that you math types have likely put to some diabolical use in Econometrica. Three Greek letter clues in one Journal puzzle seems like a record."

It's about time the Greeks got a little recognition there. Usually the WSJ puzzle is partial to French.


Steve @Gary - Francophony -- I love it!

@Lynne - As Susan said, I'm guilty as charged. Books are a wonderful palliative for maths syndrome, though, thankfully.


message 24: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne I don't know any French that I didn't learn from Julia Childs. My math skill are also negligible. But I agree that good characters and an evocative setting are big pluses. I usually don't read detective stories or mysteries unless Jess Walter or Kate Atkinson wrote them. I prefer not to be disappointed or annoyed .


Steve Suzanne wrote: "I don't know any French that I didn't learn from Julia Childs. My math skill are also negligible. But I agree that good characters and an evocative setting are big pluses. I usually don't read d..."

If you learned French from Julia, then you must have heard delicieux. Of course, that one you would have figured anyway.

As you know, Susan and I are both big Jess Walter fans. Susan is right there with you on Kate Atkinson, too. I haven't sampled her yet, but know I'll like her when I do given how good the TV version of Case Histories was.


message 26: by [deleted user] (new)

So funny, Steve. i am currently reading and enjoying this book. But my crazy week has kept me from finishing it in a timely fashion, even though I gobbled up the first 130 pages in one day. I could not wait to read your review, even before I finished Still Life. So far, I too love the charm and local color, which I will probably re-emphasize in my own review. Glad you were pleased and that we are on the same wave length.


Steve Steve wrote: "So funny, Steve. i am currently reading and enjoying this book. But my crazy week has kept me from finishing it in a timely fashion, even though I gobbled up the first 130 pages in one day. I could..."

That's a pretty remarkable coincidence, Steve, since it's not all that common a book. I'll look forward to hearing your thoughts on it. Enjoy what you've got left!

Oh, and I'll give you one hint -- the butler did not do it.


message 28: by Scribble (new)

Scribble Orca Now what is the statistical likelihood that the butler actually would have done it, anyway?


message 29: by [deleted user] (new)

Steve wrote: "Steve wrote: "So funny, Steve. i am currently reading and enjoying this book. But my crazy week has kept me from finishing it in a timely fashion, even though I gobbled up the first 130 pages in on..."

hah. at this point I don't care who did it because I just really enjoy the artsy characters so much.


message 30: by [deleted user] (new)

Scribble wrote: "Now what is the statistical likelihood that the butler actually would have done it, anyway?"

Apparently no more probable than two Steves on GR in high stress jobs reading the same mystery at the same time with no planning.


message 31: by Scribble (last edited Apr 20, 2013 10:25PM) (new)

Scribble Orca Well....hmmm....a website of 16 million users, the commonality of the name, high stress jobs, and shared reading tastes and preferences....

But then I'm a pure maths persona - when -metrics replaced -my as the suffix to econo I opted for the non-linear models :)


Susan @Gary: Francophony, ooh-la-la c'est super!

@Suzanne: Have you seen the TV adaptation of Kate Atkinson's mysteries? They've appeared occasionally on our PBS station throughout the past couple of years. I'm not sure if they're presented on Masterpiece Mystery but they are British productions. I don't usually like any film adaptation as much as the book and these are no exception, but they are well done and engaging.


message 33: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne No, I never heard of until Atkinson until I joined Twitter. There were about a thousand, well maybe 100 or 50 (English majors don't tend to count) tweets about her new book. It wasn't out yet, so I randomly picked one, then another. I've just started Life After Life.
I'll have to look the series up on PBS.Thank you.
Right now I'm studying Steve's rules and trying to apply them to a regular fiction book.


Susan We had hoped to see Atkinson Thursday night at a local independent bookstore to get a signed copy of Life After Life, but crummy Chicago weather got in the way. We had floods in our town that morning and couldn't bear the thought of going out that night in case the waters were still high. So we're going to get a copy today without getting a glimpse of Kate. I would have mumbled incoherently in her presence anyway!


message 35: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne The weather has sucked, big time this year.
I've never gotten a signed anything, myself. Gary has. I've just stood behind or next to him. It's kind of awkward. How can it be anything but, with the people behind you, wishing you'd disappear.
Once, 30 years ago, when I was waddling in to the hospital to deliver my daughter, Katherine Hepburn held the door open for me and wished me luck. That was pretty impressive. Better luck, no I mean, better weather, next time.


Susan Kate Hepburn trumps Kate Atkinson any day in my book, as do her good luck wishes over a signed copy! That's quite a story, all right!


Steve Susan wrote: "Kate Hepburn trumps Kate Atkinson any day in my book, as do her good luck wishes over a signed copy! That's quite a story, all right!"

I agree, Susan. You're showing remarkable self-restraint, though, foregoing the chance to one-up Suzanne by mentioning your own brush with fame after you were born. The one I'm talking about, of course, is when Ms. Hepburn's co-star in The African Queen saw you in the post-delivery room and said, "Here's looking at you, kid." (Sorry, I'm afraid I picked up a bad habit on April Fools' Day.)


Susan What am I going to do with you, Steve?! I think you need the entire month of April to indulge that habit of yours!


message 39: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Bravo Steve! (Susan, you have enormous reserves of patience.) I once sat behind Walter Cronkite in a theater. When he started to speak during the intermission, I thought someone had switched on the TV.


Steve @Susan, @Gary -- Even with the whole month of April I can't compete with Walter Cronkite. Well done, Gary!


Susan @Gary & Suzanne: you guys have crossed paths with some truly impressive 20th century icons! I guess that's one of the perks of living in NY.


message 42: by Mark (new)

Mark Thanks for this review! I used to wonder why anyone would wanna read a police procedural. They sounded kinda dull. Then I read a couple of the Scandinavian crime novels that have been so popular lately and found that's just what they are. And damn if they're not some fine reading!


message 43: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Susan wrote: "@Gary & Suzanne: you guys have crossed paths with some truly impressive 20th century icons! I guess that's one of the perks of living in NY."

Yeah, we live in their shadows-sort of at the nexus of high and low lives.


Steve Mark wrote: "Thanks for this review! I used to wonder why anyone would wanna read a police procedural. They sounded kinda dull. Then I read a couple of the Scandinavian crime novels that have been so popular la..."

Haha, I guess I hope for better than dull, but I think I know what you mean. It's nice to have certain patterns we know should play out thereby freeing our brains to think less about the givens and more about the nuances. That is, if the writing is good enough to offer such subtlety. Fortunately, this one has a quirky charm that qualifies.


message 45: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne Susan, we ate dinner with Harvey Fierstein twice. Once in an Italian restaurant and once in a Thai restaurant . I don't think he noticed us and he certainly did not ask for our autographs.
After reading the Dragon Tatoo books, I've sort of crossed off a trip to to Sweden from my bucket list.


message 46: by Mark (new)

Mark Steve wrote: "Haha, I guess I hope for better than dull, but I think I know what you mean. It's nice to have certain patterns we know should play out thereby freeing our brains to think less about the givens and more about the nuances. That is, if the writing is good enough to offer such subtlety. Fortunately, this one has a quirky charm that qualifies. "

There's definitely something to be said for genre writing that follows the prescribed patterns, but does it in a unique or better-than-usual manner. Some of my favorite reads have been books that tackled a well-trod path, but did so in a way that makes you see it in a different light


Steve Mark wrote: "There's definitely something to be said for genre writing that follows the prescribed patterns, but does it in a unique or better-than-usual manner. Some of my favorite reads have been books that tackled a well-trod path, but did so in a way that makes you see it in a different light"

I like when that happens, too, Mark. Thinking of it from a writer's point of view, it seems like they might appreciate having certain genre conventions, structures, and rules set out in advance so as to highlight their creativity in the margins. It could be a curse having too much freedom -- paralysis being the risk when there are too many paths they could take.


message 48: by Mark (new)

Mark Steve wrote: "I like when that happens, too, Mark. Thinking of it from a writer's point of view, it seems like they might appreciate having certain genre conventions, structures, and rules set out in advance so as to highlight their creativity in the margins. It could be a curse having too much freedom -- paralysis being the risk when there are too many paths they could take."

Yes, yes!! In some of the writing books I've read, they suggest just that. They introduce you to different genres and their tropes, then suggest, "Now, how would you approach this in an original way?" It's a lot less pressure knowing you need to stay inside some kind of preordained path. Thinking anything is possible will lead to such head-scratching conundrums as Ivan soliloquizing
The Grand Inquisitor


Steve Mark wrote: "Thinking anything is possible will lead to such head-scratching conundrums as Ivan soliloquizing The Grand Inquisitor"

Excellent point, Mark! It's a good rule of thumb to avoid any activity that could turn you into a Dostoyevsky character. :-)


message 50: by Mark (new)

Mark Steve wrote: "Excellent point, Mark! It's a good rule of thumb to avoid any a..."

Damn that Ivan! He's the reason I had to put down Bros. K. on my first read through! Errr, actually, being the Grand Inquisitor, damning him prolly wouldn't have that great an effect.

As fruitbasket as he was, I would like, for just a single day, to live the life of Golyadkin from The Double. He was such...a Golyadkin


« previous 1
back to top