Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

David Eppenstein's Reviews > Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest

Band of Brothers by Stephen E. Ambrose
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
15165917
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: american-history, history, 4-or-5-star-history

I come to this book somewhat late and totally by accident. Yes, my first knowledge of this book and its subject was the outstanding HBO mini-series. I did want to read it then but I was still working and, well you know how that goes. I just didn't get around to it and then forgot about it completely. Lately my TBR shelf has been almost entirely drained and I was looking for something to read. I was scrounging around all of our bookshelves and found this paperback copy that belonged to my wife. My wife rarely ever reads anything of a historical nature so I was surprised to find this. She told me that yes she did read it and enjoyed it as much as she enjoyed the mini-series that we watched together. I now had a new book to read and I learned something new about my wife, a double win.

I guess I should start by mentioning that as an author and writer Ambrose doesn't get a lot of high marks. After reading this book I can understand the criticisms and can't disagree with a lot of them while some are a bit more like nitpicking. I enjoyed the book a great deal but not so much for the writing but for what the book contains. In large part the book reads like and actually is a collection of diary entries in the words of the men depicted in the book. After reflection I believe my 4 star rating is more for the effort Ambrose made to preserve these words and the stories of these men that actually fought the fight that made the history that we all enjoy reading and learning about. The book could have been written better and provided more of an entertainment for the reader but this is a history. Is history supposed to be entertaining? Should history conform to the tastes of the reading public or should it simply place the facts before the public to be regarded according to intellectual abilities of the individual? An interesting topic for a discussion that will not be had here. To me this book provided a glimpse of history that is made at the frontline by the unknown participants that do the fighting and dying. I read this book and couldn't help but wonder what these men would have thought of those people that stormed the Capital on January 6? What would they have thought of our 45th president? What would they have thought of us? This is definitely a book worth reading even if you think the author could have done better. I think what he did was enough. Enjoy.
14 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Band of Brothers.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 22, 2023 – Shelved
November 24, 2023 – Started Reading
November 24, 2023 –
33.0%
November 25, 2023 –
55.0%
November 26, 2023 –
75.0%
November 27, 2023 –
88.0%
November 28, 2023 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by CoachJim (new)

CoachJim David, I am one of those giving Ambrose low marks. He does write history and I wish more people would read history even if it’s written for entertainment. That and your question about “Should history conform to the tastes of the reading public or should it simply place the facts before the public to be regarded according to intellectual abilities of the individual?� will be fun to discuss someday, hopefully. I have mentioned before that people, especially young people, could get a good historical education from reading authors like Ambrose (and H. W. Brands, another author I consider similar to Ambrose). If that were to happen events like January 6th and our 45th president might not have happened.

I will try to read this book again someday.


David Eppenstein CoachJim wrote: "David, I am one of those giving Ambrose low marks. He does write history and I wish more people would read history even if it’s written for entertainment. That and your question about “Should histo..."

Jim, if sugarcoating the facts gets people and especially kids to read more history then I favor the flavor (LOL). I think my passion for history started with Disney and Davy Crockett back in the early �50’s. Yes, I and every other boy in my 1st grade class had coonskin hats but Davy sparked a curiosity that lead to learning what was true and what was fiction and I never looked back or tired of discovery. Unfortunately, most history is taught without any sort of coating and that has lead to most students hating history. Haven’t we all read histories that have bored us to tears and attended lectures that instantly put us to sleep? All kids know about history is that it’s all about remembering names, places, and dates for the test and nothing else. I use my fascination with Benedict Arnold as an illustration of how history should be taught and how it isn’t. All the vast majority of American know about Arnold is his treason. When you read about his life and what he did during the Revolution you learn so much more and the lessons his life and struggles illustrate are enormously valuable on so many levels. Arnold’s treason was partially if not entirely motivated out of the his fear that if the Revolution was won then the government would be in the hands of the self-dealers that had so badly and unfairly treated him. He turned his coat to protect the American people and himself from what expected would be a corruption of democracy by the greedy but he failed and today we have the GOP. Another history lesson not learned because we were all distracted by Arnold’s treason. Names, places, and dates have their value but they are more a distraction from the real value of history and that is the lessons it offers.


back to top