Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Petra in Tokyo's Reviews > Scoop

Scoop by Evelyn Waugh
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1237196
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: fiction, 2013-reviews, humour, reviewed

Evelyn Waugh was a snob, a racist, an anti-semite and a fascist sympathiser whose attitude was, in the words of his biographer David Wykes, "[Waugh's racism was] "an illogical extension of his views on the naturalness and rightness of hierarchy as the (main) principle of social organisation".

He was also jealous, personally nasty and malicious, had been a bully at school, and as James Lees-Milne said, "the nastiest-tempered man in England".

Waugh was, however, absolutely devoted to his adopted religion, Catholicism, and generally friendly, welcoming and generous to other Catholics. Nancy Mitford asked him how he reconciled his often objectionable conduct and attitude with being a Christian, said he replied that "were he not a Christian he would be even more horrible".

All of this is on display in this absolutely hilarious farce of a book, and right at the beginning the tone is set,

"That’s Mrs. Cohen,� said Effie. “You see how it is. They’re Yids.�

“Sure it isn’t the nigger downstairs you want?�


Scoop is a satire on journalism and the newspaper industry in general based on his own experiences or rather that of a fellow war correspondent for the Daily Mail covering the Abyssinian-Italian war. Although the characters are so utterly defined by the mythical racial characteristics assigned to them by an unkind world, it is still easy to laugh. The snobbery which the non-ethnic characters displayed was equally harsh and that is perhaps the key as to why such an ostensibly nasty book by such an unpleasant man is so funny, he must have seen himself in all of this, "He was gifted with the sly, sharp instinct for self-preservation that passes for wisdom among the rich," and so it's a bit of a send-up, and that's something we can all appreciate.

The writing is wonderful, just as it was in his opus magnum, Brideshead Revisited, the humour extravagant, the denoument ridiculous. All in all, recommended to everyone who likes period pieces that aren't quite. nor ever will be, classics.
267 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Scoop.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 1, 2013 – Started Reading
May 1, 2013 – Shelved
May 2, 2013 – Shelved as: fiction
May 2, 2013 – Shelved as: 2013-reviews
May 2, 2013 – Shelved as: humour
May 2, 2013 – Finished Reading
May 5, 2015 – Shelved as: reviewed

Comments Showing 1-48 of 48 (48 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Mikela (new) - added it

Mikela I've wanted to read this forever but it somehow never gets to the top of the pile. Eager to hear how you like it.


Corto Loved this one. When you're finished, check out Wilfred Theiseger's homicidal ruminations on meeting Waugh. ("A Life of My Choice")


Andrew Schirmer "Feather-footed through the plashy fen passes the questing vole."

This is an all time favorite of mine, Petra. I look forward to your review.


Nigeyb A fab book Petra. I must re-read it soon. My overriding memory is the "cleft-stick" misunderstanding. It still makes me chuckle when I think about it.


message 5: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Have you decided to opt out of the star ratings?(view spoiler)


Petra in Tokyo No, an oversight on my part Gary. Thanks for letting me know.


message 7: by Dolors (new)

Dolors I love opening spoilers of books I haven't read, but I find that yours in this review was the most worth opening so far!
Great review.


message 8: by Sketchbook (new)

Sketchbook It's hard to satirize a self-satirizing biz like jlism...


Petra in Tokyo Dolors wrote: "I love opening spoilers of books I haven't read, but I find that yours in this review was the most worth opening so far!"

Thank you. I put that statement in a spoiler because I didn't want to labour a point, and I made it because this is the sort of review that does get them grubby, drooling trolls from out under the bridge and maybe I could forstall them?


message 10: by KOMET (new)

KOMET GORE VIDAL once said of Evelyn Waugh that he was "the most terrible human being I've ever met."


message 11: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm That's pretty low when you consider its source. Vidal wasn't known for his likability either.


Petra in Tokyo True, but he was also a great writer (most of the time).


message 13: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Also true. I liked his historical novels and his memoir:Palimpsest. I could never make sense out of Myra Breckinridge.


Petra in Tokyo I liked Myra Breckenridge a lot. I don't know what my favourite book of Vidal's is, maybe Hollywood.


message 15: by KOMET (new)

KOMET Lincoln, Burr, and Empire (there's a final scene in this novel which is LOL!) are also SUPERB. Though Gore Vidal didn't care for Waugh at all, he did also acknowledge Waugh's skill and talent as a writer.

The Last Empire Essays 1992-2000 by Gore Vidal


message 16: by Petra in Tokyo (last edited May 02, 2013 11:46AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Petra in Tokyo I think my view of Waugh mirrors Gore Vidal's precisely.


message 17: by Sketchbook (last edited May 02, 2013 12:17PM) (new)

Sketchbook C'mon : Wah was a nasty, but his talent far, far exceeded Goring whose best novel is surely Myra. Otherwise Goring is Mr Slick. On the other hand, his essays (The Second American Revolution) carry insight.


message 18: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne Your review is great, but I think I'll pass on this.


Corto Excellent review.


Petra in Tokyo Wow, that is a fantastic compliment. Thank you so much, Reese. *happy dance*


message 21: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm I never told you what I think about this review (view spoiler)


Andrew Schirmer Lovely review, Petra. I would also recommend to you Waugh's Black Mischief which is quite offensive in certain ways, but at least the Europeans certainly do not get off lightly...


Petra in Tokyo All these compliments, man it's enough to make a gurrrl blush, thanks guys :-)


message 24: by Kim (new)

Kim More compliments from me, Petra. Great review! I think I'll add this one. As for Vidal, I think my favourite is "Creation", although I haven't read the American-themed historical novels as yet.


message 25: by Florence (Lefty) (new)

Florence (Lefty) MacIntosh Adding to the compliment heap - fabulous review. Insightful, great quotes, and it made me chuckle:)


message 26: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Re "Evelyn Waugh was a snob, a racist, an anti-semite and a fascist sympathiser", distasteful (and true) as that is, it was not unusual for people of his class and time. That is not to condone such views, but rather to celebrate the fact that although there is plenty of room for improvement, much of the world has moved on from assuming such views are normal and acceptable.


Petra in Tokyo Cecily wrote: "Re "Evelyn Waugh was a snob, a racist, an anti-semite and a fascist sympathiser", distasteful (and true) as that is, it was not unusual for people of his class and time. That is not to condone such..."

It is true for every time. But to kind of excuse it, if not condone it, wasn't any more true for that time than this one. His appalling attitudes made him plenty of enemies back then. I don't think the world has moved on one tiny whit, unless of course you are just talking about a percentage of liberal whites in the US and Europe.


message 28: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm There may be more liberals, but in terms of political power, at least in the US, things are worse then ever. I agree with Cecily that is frowned upon to express overt racism or anti-semitism in public, but that hasn't done much to change the lives of those without economic opportunities.


Petra in Tokyo It is not frowned upon to be overtly racist or anti-semitic at all! Only in your liberal white nominally Christian communities. This doesn't apply to the ethnic communities who have no problem speaking loudly about the people they despise.

Not being provocative or anything but if you aren't from the US, it is sometimes very annoying that Americans think the whole world revolves around them and that if they say some place or other, or politician, or tv show, or store, or whatever then the whole world would immediately recognise it. The thing about the liberal white, nominally Christian, community holding an attitude towards something is an extension of this. But the US is full of Asians, African-Americans, Mexicans, Arabs, Muslims, etc. who don't necessarily share this at all. It is a kind of prejudice to exclude them and their thoughts and insist that your group's are the 'American' ones and the only ones it is necessary to voice.

I am sorry if this doesn't come across well Gary. I count you as a friend so read it with a friendly tone of voice


message 30: by Jan-Maat (new)

Jan-Maat Petra X wrote: "Not being provocative or anything but if you aren't from the US, it is sometimes very annoying that Americans think the whole world revolves around them and that if they say some place or other, or politician, or tv show, or store, or whatever then the whole world would immediately recognise it."

You only sometimes find that annoying? Good grief you are a tolerant woman!


message 31: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm @Petra That is a valid point about the limitations imposed upon us by our social circle, but I was thinking more in terms of public pronouncements of racism. Comedians and politicians (is that redundant?) have gotten themselves in trouble for making such statements, and in the age of cell phones, there are no private moments for them. I guess many people are as bigoted as before but they can only express if it is accepted by their peers. Another example of this would be that people tend to get fat if everyone around them is fat. I think America's cultural hegemony is beginning to erode but you are absolutely right that Americans view the rest of the world through the prism of their experience-or more often-inexperience. Even Henry James knew that! I am always happy to hear the opinions of my (virtual) friends.


message 32: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm Besides it's your thread. ;-)


Petra in Tokyo Reese did you do something I missed you might need to say sorry for?

No one owes anyone any kind of apologies for putting their views politely in a thread.


message 34: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Petra, I'm not in the US, either.

Also (everyone), please note the caveats in my comment, including "plenty of room for improvement" and "much [i.e. not all] of the world has moved on"


Petra in Tokyo Reese �


message 36: by Gary (new)

Gary  the Bookworm I'm just looking for someone to blame for my weight gain-it's all my fat friends and family. It would be even better if they weren't all fat Americans.


message 37: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne I'm one of those fat Americans who really enjoyed your review, but decided to pass on Waugh because of it. Yes, I'm a liberal white, but I've worked closely with "other" Americans for 30 years. Many schools in NYC have less than 20 percent white students born in the USA. Americans are changing. They have changed. For the first 20 years of my career, I was the only one in my class who didn't have a pass port. Then I got one.
In any case, the young people are much more accepting of everyone, of international friends, gay, lesbian and transgender , mentally handicapped and even of fatties. Of course, you hear about bullies. I don't think Americans own that trait.
There are so many great books to read. I've read many by authors who are, personally, pigs. It's just that I don't usually check out the authors first. Many times, especially before Good Reads, I didn't check out the author at all. That said, I won't knowingly read Waugh, even though he's funny and articulate.


message 38: by KOMET (last edited May 07, 2013 03:46PM) (new)

KOMET Suzanne wrote: "I'm one of those fat Americans who really enjoyed your review, but decided to pass on Waugh because of it. Yes, I'm a liberal white, but I've worked closely with "other" Americans for 30 years. M..."

+++++++++++++++++
Suzanne, as a fellow American (and former Peace Corps Volunteer), I wholeheartedly endorse your views here. Smile. But I will read Waugh (on the basis of his skill and talent as a writer of his era), though I detest him as a human being. (I have several of his books in my library.)


message 39: by Mark (new) - rated it 3 stars

Mark Great review, very fair. And I have always loved Waugh's defence that 'he would be so much more horrible' not because it justifies but just because it fleshes him out so wonderfully.


Petra in Tokyo Mark wrote: "Great review, very fair. And I have always loved Waugh's defence that 'he would be so much more horrible' not because it justifies but just because it fleshes him out so wonderfully."

I had only read Brideshead Revisited before and hadn't realised it was written by a man as nasty as Waugh. I'd rather thought he was a sort of Christopher Hitchens (but more aristocratic) type. I couldn't have been further off base.


message 41: by Morgan (new)

Morgan I love the sound of this. It is now on my To Read list!!!


Petra in Tokyo Morgan wrote: "I love the sound of this. It is now on my To Read list!!!"

It needs to have a certain sense of humour - an ability to find sheer nastiness funny.


message 43: by Kelli (new)

Kelli Wilson So this Waugh guy...he sounds just super!! You did a great job on this review, laying it out, some background, some quotes, and your thoughts at the end! Stellar review Petra!


Petra in Tokyo Kelli wrote: "So this Waugh guy...he sounds just super!! You did a great job on this review, laying it out,..."

Thank you. It is recommended to all except special snowflakes, the woke and anyone who puts being PC first.


message 45: by Zoeb (new) - rated it 5 stars

Zoeb Superb review, Petra! And indeed, the writing is wonderful indeed and I regard it as a classic satire nevertheless. And yes, Waugh's humour was indeed cruel but it was also hilarious and harmless in a way too.


Petra in Tokyo Zoeb wrote: "classic satire nevertheless. And yes, Waugh's humour was indeed cruel but it was also hilarious and harmless i..."

Waugh sounds, as a writer, as someone who would be great to have at a dinner party. But I wonder if his wit would be quite so harmless then?


message 47: by Zoeb (new) - rated it 5 stars

Zoeb Petra-X wrote: "Zoeb wrote: "classic satire nevertheless. And yes, Waugh's humour was indeed cruel but it was also hilarious and harmless i..."

Waugh sounds, as a writer, as someone who would be great to have at ..."


Hmmm...interesting thought! Greene, one of his best friends and closest peers, was once there with him in a party with his mistress and if reports are to be believed, there was a bit of an upset at the party with Waugh fuming with anger. I am not able to remember the exact incident but I remember Greene observing later that Waugh could be terribly bitter in his jokes but he was certainly funny in his own way. Regardless of that, he was indeed a brilliant writer. I need to read more of him.


Petra in Tokyo Zoeb wrote: "Greene, one of his best friends and closest peers..."

Only because he was Catholic.


back to top