Petra in Tokyo's Reviews > Scoop
Scoop
by
by

Evelyn Waugh was a snob, a racist, an anti-semite and a fascist sympathiser whose attitude was, in the words of his biographer David Wykes, "[Waugh's racism was] "an illogical extension of his views on the naturalness and rightness of hierarchy as the (main) principle of social organisation".
He was also jealous, personally nasty and malicious, had been a bully at school, and as James Lees-Milne said, "the nastiest-tempered man in England".
Waugh was, however, absolutely devoted to his adopted religion, Catholicism, and generally friendly, welcoming and generous to other Catholics. Nancy Mitford asked him how he reconciled his often objectionable conduct and attitude with being a Christian, said he replied that "were he not a Christian he would be even more horrible".
All of this is on display in this absolutely hilarious farce of a book, and right at the beginning the tone is set,
"That’s Mrs. Cohen,� said Effie. “You see how it is. They’re Yids.�
“Sure it isn’t the nigger downstairs you want?�
Scoop is a satire on journalism and the newspaper industry in general based on his own experiences or rather that of a fellow war correspondent for the Daily Mail covering the Abyssinian-Italian war. Although the characters are so utterly defined by the mythical racial characteristics assigned to them by an unkind world, it is still easy to laugh. The snobbery which the non-ethnic characters displayed was equally harsh and that is perhaps the key as to why such an ostensibly nasty book by such an unpleasant man is so funny, he must have seen himself in all of this, "He was gifted with the sly, sharp instinct for self-preservation that passes for wisdom among the rich," and so it's a bit of a send-up, and that's something we can all appreciate.
The writing is wonderful, just as it was in his opus magnum, Brideshead Revisited, the humour extravagant, the denoument ridiculous. All in all, recommended to everyone who likes period pieces that aren't quite. nor ever will be, classics.
He was also jealous, personally nasty and malicious, had been a bully at school, and as James Lees-Milne said, "the nastiest-tempered man in England".
Waugh was, however, absolutely devoted to his adopted religion, Catholicism, and generally friendly, welcoming and generous to other Catholics. Nancy Mitford asked him how he reconciled his often objectionable conduct and attitude with being a Christian, said he replied that "were he not a Christian he would be even more horrible".
All of this is on display in this absolutely hilarious farce of a book, and right at the beginning the tone is set,
"That’s Mrs. Cohen,� said Effie. “You see how it is. They’re Yids.�
“Sure it isn’t the nigger downstairs you want?�
Scoop is a satire on journalism and the newspaper industry in general based on his own experiences or rather that of a fellow war correspondent for the Daily Mail covering the Abyssinian-Italian war. Although the characters are so utterly defined by the mythical racial characteristics assigned to them by an unkind world, it is still easy to laugh. The snobbery which the non-ethnic characters displayed was equally harsh and that is perhaps the key as to why such an ostensibly nasty book by such an unpleasant man is so funny, he must have seen himself in all of this, "He was gifted with the sly, sharp instinct for self-preservation that passes for wisdom among the rich," and so it's a bit of a send-up, and that's something we can all appreciate.
The writing is wonderful, just as it was in his opus magnum, Brideshead Revisited, the humour extravagant, the denoument ridiculous. All in all, recommended to everyone who likes period pieces that aren't quite. nor ever will be, classics.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Scoop.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 1, 2013
–
Started Reading
May 1, 2013
– Shelved
May 2, 2013
– Shelved as:
fiction
May 2, 2013
– Shelved as:
2013-reviews
May 2, 2013
– Shelved as:
humour
May 2, 2013
–
Finished Reading
May 5, 2015
– Shelved as:
reviewed
Comments Showing 1-48 of 48 (48 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mikela
(new)
-
added it
May 01, 2013 08:56AM

reply
|
flag


This is an all time favorite of mine, Petra. I look forward to your review.


Great review.

Thank you. I put that statement in a spoiler because I didn't want to labour a point, and I made it because this is the sort of review that does get them grubby, drooling trolls from out under the bridge and maybe I could forstall them?









It is true for every time. But to kind of excuse it, if not condone it, wasn't any more true for that time than this one. His appalling attitudes made him plenty of enemies back then. I don't think the world has moved on one tiny whit, unless of course you are just talking about a percentage of liberal whites in the US and Europe.


Not being provocative or anything but if you aren't from the US, it is sometimes very annoying that Americans think the whole world revolves around them and that if they say some place or other, or politician, or tv show, or store, or whatever then the whole world would immediately recognise it. The thing about the liberal white, nominally Christian, community holding an attitude towards something is an extension of this. But the US is full of Asians, African-Americans, Mexicans, Arabs, Muslims, etc. who don't necessarily share this at all. It is a kind of prejudice to exclude them and their thoughts and insist that your group's are the 'American' ones and the only ones it is necessary to voice.
I am sorry if this doesn't come across well Gary. I count you as a friend so read it with a friendly tone of voice

You only sometimes find that annoying? Good grief you are a tolerant woman!


No one owes anyone any kind of apologies for putting their views politely in a thread.

Also (everyone), please note the caveats in my comment, including "plenty of room for improvement" and "much [i.e. not all] of the world has moved on"


In any case, the young people are much more accepting of everyone, of international friends, gay, lesbian and transgender , mentally handicapped and even of fatties. Of course, you hear about bullies. I don't think Americans own that trait.
There are so many great books to read. I've read many by authors who are, personally, pigs. It's just that I don't usually check out the authors first. Many times, especially before Good Reads, I didn't check out the author at all. That said, I won't knowingly read Waugh, even though he's funny and articulate.

+++++++++++++++++
Suzanne, as a fellow American (and former Peace Corps Volunteer), I wholeheartedly endorse your views here. Smile. But I will read Waugh (on the basis of his skill and talent as a writer of his era), though I detest him as a human being. (I have several of his books in my library.)


I had only read Brideshead Revisited before and hadn't realised it was written by a man as nasty as Waugh. I'd rather thought he was a sort of Christopher Hitchens (but more aristocratic) type. I couldn't have been further off base.

It needs to have a certain sense of humour - an ability to find sheer nastiness funny.


Thank you. It is recommended to all except special snowflakes, the woke and anyone who puts being PC first.


Waugh sounds, as a writer, as someone who would be great to have at a dinner party. But I wonder if his wit would be quite so harmless then?

Waugh sounds, as a writer, as someone who would be great to have at ..."
Hmmm...interesting thought! Greene, one of his best friends and closest peers, was once there with him in a party with his mistress and if reports are to be believed, there was a bit of an upset at the party with Waugh fuming with anger. I am not able to remember the exact incident but I remember Greene observing later that Waugh could be terribly bitter in his jokes but he was certainly funny in his own way. Regardless of that, he was indeed a brilliant writer. I need to read more of him.