Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Trevor's Reviews > Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? by Edward Albee
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
175635
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: literature

** spoiler alert ** This is, quite simply, one of my all time favourite plays. There is a film version, with Burton and Taylor as the two main characters, and while this isn’t a bad version (and it is in glorious black and white) I think that film struggles with words and this is a wordy play. And then there is that bizarre scene when they leave the house which makes no sense at all

I first read this play in high school and had to do a reading of the play in front of the class. Naturally, I was Nick, as the teacher was George. There is a nice fact that Albee is supposed to have said he had no idea of the significance of calling his major characters George and Martha � and definitely did not mean any reference to the first President of the United States and his missus. I find this a little hard to believe � either way, fate has stepped in and this fact remains, intentional or otherwise. I've always thought it adds something interesting to the play.

This might as well be two plays. On the surface there is a couple who look like they are about to tear each other apart. This reads like a ‘moments before the divorce� play � and you would be stretched to find a play in which there are deeper feelings of hostility or more savage attacks between a married couple. But this is only on a surface level. The depth of affection and love between George and Martha is really the point of the play � the games they play are quite literally played so as to keep each other sane.

And this is not the only contradiction between our initial impressions and ‘reality�. Honey (has there ever been a more perfect name?) comes across at the start of the play as a mousey little moron of a wife, who puffs up with child to get her hands on a husband only to deflate again once the ring is on her finger. To look at her you might think she was completely incapable of sustaining a pregnancy and that this is the point � but actually, her life is spent having to drink brandy (never mix, never worry) to end a constant string of pregnancies.

This, of course, stands in stunning contrast to Martha, who comes across as the earth mother - but in reality is incapable of having children.

George comes across as a pathetic creature at the start of the play, unable to satisfy his wife who considers him so ineffectual that she doesn't even pretend to hide her flirtations with other men � but by the end we realise that he has completely controlled all of the action in the entire play and everything that has happened has happened due to his choices and his decisions. There are possibly few modern plays with a more God like character. More than this, everything that happens, happens due to his great love of Martha � something that seems incomprehensible at the start of the play as they are tearing strips off each other.

I went to see this play a year or so ago and was almost reduced to tears towards the end. The older I get the more I find that the sorts of things that are most likely to make me want to cry are not the sorts of things that might have had that affect on me when I was young. Then I would have been just as likely to have become upset over unrequited love or such - something I find a little dull now. Today I find what is almost too painful to handle is love that is based on a deep acceptance of who we are � if someone can love us for our scars, for ourselves � warts and all - I am almost invariably reduced to tears. At the end of Therapy when the main character kisses the mastectomy scar of what had been his childhood sweetheart I was virtually a blubbering mess. But of course, such love only exists in fiction - and that is, perhaps, its main role.

Fortunately, I’m too much of a boy to be caught crying in theatres � particularly over plays I know quite so well as I know this one (I must have read it a dozen times over the years). All the same, watching Gary McDonald recite the requiem mass at the end of the play as Martha realises that her son is truly dead and must remain so for them to continue to have any access to him at all was as close as I would like to be to tears in a grossly public place.

This is a truly devastating play, a play that shines and shines, a work of sheer power and genius. It is also one of the funniest plays I’ve ever seen. I don’t think it is possible to love this play any more than I do.
190 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
June 28, 2009 – Shelved
June 25, 2010 – Shelved as: literature

Comments Showing 1-25 of 25 (25 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Paul (new)

Paul Bryant What, no one sought to comment on this splendid review? Well, for my money, the movie's the thing, I don't like the stage unless there are musicians on it. The movie is the apotheosis of Elizabeth taylor who was already the apotheosis of all film stars, so that's something right there. So i love the movie but I feel that if i think too much about the actual plot & characters it'll all fall apart, because it's too much of the two-people-insanely-manipulating-each-other thing, which we see many many many times in such disparate places as Sleuth (another play) and The Prisoner (a cool tv series). Not to mention Hamlet, another play, or The Servant, another play.

"But of course, such love only exists in fiction - and that is, perhaps, its main role. "

An interesting comment...! Perhaps in another review you could expand on that!



Trevor Thanks Paul, I've found I can never guess which reviews people will like or which they won't. Before I left Ireland as a child we watched Prisoner on TV and my mother says it was the first time we were able, as a family, to watch a television program and all get something out of it. Another spoiler - apparently we all cheered when he got away at the end.

The love comment is just me being a sad old fart - pay no attention.


David Thanks, Paul, for alerting me to this, another one of Trevor's masterpiece reviews. There are so many hidden gems here on goodreads. just the two of you alone are responsible for many of them. One could be forgiven for just hanging out on this site 24 hours a day. Had I but world enough, and time ....

But then there is life to be lived, in all its glorious messiness. (And my current episode, here in Santiago, Chile, has all the messiness I can handle, what between would-be camera thieves, and attack dogs roaming the streets, not to mention the menacing heating arrangements here in my rented apartment).

Trevor? You spent your childhood in Ireland? where? until when? Maybe this explains why your reviews resonate so much with me!


Trevor Thanks David - high praise from one of my favourite reviewers here too. God, I love this site, but it is all too tempting.

We left Belfast, where I was born, in 68 when I was five. All this just a month or two before the Troubles started (I don't believe there is any connection between those two events - we were never asked to come back in an attempt to end the Troubles, anyway). We came out here on a working holiday which was going to last for 2 years and seems to have gone on for a while longer than anticipated.

When I was growing up Chile was always one of the great sadnesses of the world. It always struck me as one of the most breathtaking injustices.


message 5: by Meredith (last edited Aug 04, 2009 02:32PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Meredith Holley Oh, I could not agree more with everything you said about this play. I think the really tragic (but also beautiful) thing about the movie is that Martha is made into more of a villain, where I think the play is more balanced about the where hostility of the marriage comes from. Neither George nor Martha is really in the wrong. A few of my friends did a university production of this in a small arena theater, and I was absolutely devastated by it. It was so beautiful and tragic. Did I mention the tragedy and beauty yet?

I think I basically agree with what you are saying about the "only in fiction" thing with love. Fiction is able to show the greatness of the human spirit in loving despite horrible injustices and disappointments, but that point is not so resonant if they show how annoying it is when someone leaves their dishes in the sink for one day too long, or clears their throat in an annoying way while you're watching a movie. In real life even when you have great love those things are still annoying, but fiction can focus on one moment enough to evaporate the petty things.


Trevor Love was easier to understand when I was young: it was just the stuff that was in the songs, it was something in the way she moved or singing a street sussed serenade. It was something that happened to you, I guess. Now it is not so nearly easy to understand. And they don't write songs about the sort of love that really moves me. The perfect example is at the end of Cinema Paradiso (Christ, this is becoming a review of spoilers, better not) where he goes back to see his young love and blah, blah, blah - and I was bored stiff for twenty minutes or so. Then that last scene with the film sent to him, that was the hardest scene to watch that I can remember in any film. Fortunately, I watched this alone on DVD.

I think perhaps when we are young our expectation is that love is going to be more about us - but fiction, like this play, shows us that real love is about what we do for others. That sort of love is much harder to find in the world. It is even hard to find in the world of fiction - but you can find it in this play if you go looking for it.

I've really got to go to work... Good Reads gets me again.


message 7: by Paul (last edited Aug 04, 2009 02:49PM) (new)

Paul Bryant Fiction is responsible for telling some whoppers, and then telling them again and again, because they have a resonating loveliness, because everyone wants them to be true so much, and if you screw your eyes up and look sideways at the human race, maybe they are kind of slightly true sometimes. There should be a great critical work somewhere which could expose the lies of fictionmakers, whether on the page or the screen.

"Realism" - I spoke that word as if a wedding vow
Ah, but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now


message 8: by Paul (new)

Paul Bryant


Meredith Holley Hmmm. I have to disagree, Paul. I think realism tells some way bigger lies than fiction. And it wants, with a more patronizing attitude, for me to believe them. I think exaggeration often gets more at the heart of the truth than attempts to be realistic, and it seems very difficult if not impossible for art succeed at being very realistic.


message 10: by Paul (new)

Paul Bryant Oh yes, I agree, I was being a little tongue in cheek about "realism" which i always think should be put into handcuffs and led away for interrogation. I think in many ways fiction is doomed to tell lies, but it should struggle against its fate.


Meredith Holley Ha! My mistake! I got a little shaky when I was taking you seriously. Lesson for self: never take people seriously. I should know that already. Agreed about fiction. The eternal struggle of all art and literature (said in dramatic voice).


Meredith Holley Ha! again. Doubly funny because of the cynicism of "wedding vow". Sorry, it's been a big wedding vow summer for me, so I've lost all of the humor that marriage can inspire.


message 13: by John (new)

John Da capo: Trevor, an excellent reading of a great favorite of mine. AFRAID OF V. WOOLF stands as a fascinating balance of harsh yet hilarious intimacies & a sweeping American nightmare (not for nothing is this bareen couple named George & Martha). All this, & a well-made play, to boot.


Trevor This is a funny old site, you know. I wrote this a couple of weeks ago and thought, 'oh well, no interest there' and now look!


message 15: by Paul (new)

Paul Bryant I don't mind taking credit for that!


Trevor Yes, it is true. You deserve the credit.


message 17: by Omar (new) - rated it 5 stars

Omar Hayat This is one of the best reviews I have read on GR Trevor. I have just finished reading this masterpiece, and I honestly cant think of a book which is capable of being both as extraordinarily funny and as deeply sad as this one...


Trevor Thanks Omar - there are plays and poems and books that have followed me through life, that I'm reminded of at the strangest times - this is definitely one of those.


message 19: by Jan-Maat (new)

Jan-Maat At the end of Therapy when the main character kisses the mastectomy scar of what had been his childhood sweetheart I was virtually a blubbering mess. But of course, such love only exists in fiction - and that is, perhaps, its main role.
it is a great moment though, I wonder what led David Lodge to it


Trevor It has that direct literalness that can fall flat on its face, but did the opposite here. I barely remember anything else about that book, other than not liking it at all until the end - all the stuff about Kierkegaard seemed overwrought. I often have that trouble with Lodge - I think I think I ought to like him more than I do.


message 21: by Yael (new) - rated it 5 stars

Yael great review!


message 22: by Deborah (new)

Deborah Love your review.


Trevor Thanks Deborah. I’ve stopped waiting to be notified by goodreads now and just check in when someone likes a review. I’m sorry for the delay. I hadn’t realised how deep this problem has gone.


message 24: by Nick (new) - rated it 3 stars

Nick Katenkamp I really like this review. I honestly didn’t glean anything like this but reading this i can get a better understanding of why the play is held in the regard it is.


Trevor Thanks Nick. It’s a lovely play.


back to top