Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Sasha's Reviews > Cascade Failure

Cascade Failure by L.M. Sagas
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3056563
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: netgalley-2024, science-fiction, debut

Jal hasn't had anything to eat in over a day. He is on the run under a false identity and is looking for anyone who could use a laborer in exchange for a meal. By sheer accident, Jal is picked up by Ambit, a special little spacecraft with two things on board that are of particular interest to him:

1. Fresh apples, and
2. A broody lad named Saint, with whom Jal shares a pretty complicated history.

Although the Ambit's crew puts Jal in handcuffs for the first few pages of his on-board presence, he integrates into the team remarkably quickly. When a distress call leads the crew to a remote planet, the unfamiliar world is eerily quiet. The barbed wire on a fence points the wrong way. The lock on a heavy door still has the key sticking out of it. What happened on the planet sends the characters on an adventure that might be more fit for television than a novel.

This is a strange blend of Annihilation and an ensemble sitcom, intermingled with some interpersonal baggage. Unfortunately, it didn't come together cohesively enough for my enjoyment. Largely, this comes down to poor character development. The novel makes the mistake of sending the characters on a big and scary mission without setting up what going on the mission means for any of them.

Cascade Failure is written in third-person point of view with the narration giving us insight into the thoughts of multiple different characters. The head-hopping feels unfocused and doesn't make for a very insightful look at any given character. I think the novel would benefit greatly from limiting the narration to the inner world of a single protagonist. But ensemble casts are trendy, and who am I to argue with trends.

The characters read like too-cute clichés rather than real people. Whenever the text over-explained their personalities, I felt patronized. There are too many declarations about things that are either obvious from the existing dialogue or should be written as dialogue or actions instead. Here's an example. I underline the extraneous declarations.

Saint was less forgiving.

"Don't go lumping us in with the likes of The Trust," he growled at them both - perennially composed, yes, but he could still be a grump when the mood struck.


Many reviews say that this is a 'found family' story. But I feel like if that term applies here, then it must have lost all meaning. Cascade Failure has an ensemble cast with sitcom vibes, but it lacks the emotional complexity, evolution, and impact that would earn the title "family" for a group of unrelated characters who are on an adventure together.

--

Audiobook narrated by Torian Brackett:

In this narration, women sound like badly depicted silly creatures with inflated emotions. It does not help the existing issues with character development.

Thank you, Macmillan Audio and Tor, for a free Netgalley audio ARC of Cascade Failure.
38 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Cascade Failure.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 5, 2024 – Started Reading
March 5, 2024 – Shelved
March 5, 2024 – Shelved as: netgalley-2024
March 5, 2024 – Shelved as: science-fiction
March 5, 2024 – Shelved as: debut
March 10, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Nataliya (new)

Nataliya Ugh, I can’t stand overexplaining like in those underlined parts. It’s a sign either of an author insecure in their writing ability or in their readers� comprehension. Or maybe both?


Sasha Nataliya wrote: "Ugh, I can’t stand overexplaining like in those underlined parts. It’s a sign either of an author insecure in their writing ability or in their readers� comprehension. Or maybe both?"

This is a debut, so it likely stems from a lack of writing experience. But you're also right about the reader side of this dynamic - I felt like the narrator was talking down to me.


message 3: by H (new) - rated it 4 stars

H I think a lot of this stuff should have been caught by the editor. The over explaining and all the italics never should have made it to the final draft.


back to top