Mike Finn's Reviews > We Solve Murders
We Solve Murders (We Solve Murders, #1)
by
by

3.5 stars
'We Solve Murders' turned out to be an entertaining read but, if it had been written by an author I didn't know, I'd have been thinking about setting it aside after the first hour. The start of the book put me off. The situations felt forced, the humour was brittle in a wannabe Carl Haaisen way, the people felt shallow and their world felt plastic. I was not engaged.
Because this was a Richard Osman book and the start of a new series trying something more plot-driven than 'The Thursday Murder Club' novels, I stuck with it.
Things changed, slowly. By the end of the second hour, I'd been pulled into the story by Nicola Walker's narration and I was starting to become interested in Amy, the bodyguard, and Steve, her ex-police detective father-in-law but I was still struggling with a plot that, while clever, had all the charm of a fake Doric portico stuck onto the front of an 'Executive Home'.
In the third hour, I settled into the story, which I'd now understood was a sort of fairytale with slightly subversive humour that reminded me of David Lodge. I began to enjoy the way the heist-movie-slick plot and the glitzy settings were constantly being undercut by a type of English humour that sees bling as essentially childish, and by characters whose curiosity was of the kind that would find the service tunnels in Disneyland more interesting than the rides. The plot was generating an enjoyable 'root for the underdog' vibe but the character development was still patchy.
By the halfway point, I was being swept along by the clever, original, fast-paced plot which kept me entertained until the end.
One of the things that I've enjoyed most about Richard Osman's other books is how relatable and well-observed and real his characters are. I felt this was missing for the first half of the book. Perhaps this is because I don't know any international criminals or people who choose to work in the close personal protection business and becuase many of the settings were a long way from home.
By the end of the book,, I had become engaged with most of the main characters. I thought that Steve, the widowed ex-police officer and Rosie, the top-selling thriller writer were well-drawn and easy to engage with. Amy, the bodyguard was a little different. Her character felt functional rather than engaging, like a knife or a gun or a good piece of code. Still, the three of them together had an attractive dynamic.
The humour lifts the book and often made me smile but it was the small moments of intimacy that I liked most, especially those grounded in Steve's New Forest village.
I'd like to see what Steve, Amy and Rosie do next, so I'll be back for the next 'We Solve Murders' novel.
'We Solve Murders' turned out to be an entertaining read but, if it had been written by an author I didn't know, I'd have been thinking about setting it aside after the first hour. The start of the book put me off. The situations felt forced, the humour was brittle in a wannabe Carl Haaisen way, the people felt shallow and their world felt plastic. I was not engaged.
Because this was a Richard Osman book and the start of a new series trying something more plot-driven than 'The Thursday Murder Club' novels, I stuck with it.
Things changed, slowly. By the end of the second hour, I'd been pulled into the story by Nicola Walker's narration and I was starting to become interested in Amy, the bodyguard, and Steve, her ex-police detective father-in-law but I was still struggling with a plot that, while clever, had all the charm of a fake Doric portico stuck onto the front of an 'Executive Home'.
In the third hour, I settled into the story, which I'd now understood was a sort of fairytale with slightly subversive humour that reminded me of David Lodge. I began to enjoy the way the heist-movie-slick plot and the glitzy settings were constantly being undercut by a type of English humour that sees bling as essentially childish, and by characters whose curiosity was of the kind that would find the service tunnels in Disneyland more interesting than the rides. The plot was generating an enjoyable 'root for the underdog' vibe but the character development was still patchy.
By the halfway point, I was being swept along by the clever, original, fast-paced plot which kept me entertained until the end.
One of the things that I've enjoyed most about Richard Osman's other books is how relatable and well-observed and real his characters are. I felt this was missing for the first half of the book. Perhaps this is because I don't know any international criminals or people who choose to work in the close personal protection business and becuase many of the settings were a long way from home.
By the end of the book,, I had become engaged with most of the main characters. I thought that Steve, the widowed ex-police officer and Rosie, the top-selling thriller writer were well-drawn and easy to engage with. Amy, the bodyguard was a little different. Her character felt functional rather than engaging, like a knife or a gun or a good piece of code. Still, the three of them together had an attractive dynamic.
The humour lifts the book and often made me smile but it was the small moments of intimacy that I liked most, especially those grounded in Steve's New Forest village.
I'd like to see what Steve, Amy and Rosie do next, so I'll be back for the next 'We Solve Murders' novel.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
We Solve Murders.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
September 12, 2024
– Shelved
September 12, 2024
– Shelved as:
to-read
September 12, 2024
– Shelved as:
1-in-a-series
September 12, 2024
– Shelved as:
audiobook
September 12, 2024
– Shelved as:
crime-series
September 12, 2024
– Shelved as:
crime
September 12, 2024
– Shelved as:
humour
September 15, 2024
–
Started Reading
September 16, 2024
–
18.0%
"The start put me off. The humour was brittle in a wannabe Carl Haaisen way, the people felt shallow and their world felt plastic. I was not engaged.
Things changed, slowly. By the second hour I was becoming interested in two of the people.
The plot still has all the charm of a fake Doric portico stuck onto the front of an 'Executive Home'.
I'm waiting for the people to become more important than the plot."
Things changed, slowly. By the second hour I was becoming interested in two of the people.
The plot still has all the charm of a fake Doric portico stuck onto the front of an 'Executive Home'.
I'm waiting for the people to become more important than the plot."
September 16, 2024
–
48.0%
"This is a fairytale with humour that reminds me of David Lodge.
The heist-movie slick plot and the glitzy settings are constantly undercut by English humour that sees bling as essentially childish and a curiosity that would find the service tunnels in Disneyland more interesting than the rides.
The 'root for the underdogs' thing works well but the characterisation is patchy. Steve has more depth than Amy."
The heist-movie slick plot and the glitzy settings are constantly undercut by English humour that sees bling as essentially childish and a curiosity that would find the service tunnels in Disneyland more interesting than the rides.
The 'root for the underdogs' thing works well but the characterisation is patchy. Steve has more depth than Amy."
September 17, 2024
–
100.0%
"This ended up being entertaining. The plot really is clever but I'll have forgotten the details by the time the next book comes along. It's the people that make or break the book. Steve and Rosie are well drawn and engaging. Amy is... functional... like a knife or a gun or a good piece of code. The humour lifts the book but it's the small moments of empathy that I most enjoyed."
September 17, 2024
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Cheyenne
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Sep 24, 2024 08:07AM

reply
|
flag

I hope the next one is better. I think he demonstrated that there's no such thing as a 'cozy thriller'.

