Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Jason's Reviews > The Long Walk

The Long Walk by Richard  Bachman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4426615
's review

liked it
bookshelves: for-kindle, 2013, reviewed

The Long Walk is a book by an elusive author named Richard Bachman—whom no one has ever met—about a bunch of kids being slaughtered in a near-future (or alternate reality) dystopian America. Which, been there, done that, right? Can’t unknown authors write about something that ·É´Ç³Ü±ô»å²Ô’t be covered again decades later? The lack of foresight here is really disappointing.

There are differences, though, between The Hunger Games and this book, particularly in that the kids in The Long Walk are mowed down by military officials rather than by each other, and that participation in this deadly event is strictly voluntary (whereas in The Hunger Games, there is little “choice� in the matter). And while I don’t think it is a bad thing necessarily for some of these teenagers to get their just desserts—seriously, have you met a teenager?—the voluntary aspect of this event is something that I had trouble with. Because we’re not just talking a few hundred mentally disturbed kids who cannot comprehend the meaning of a 99% mortality rate. We’re talking tens of thousands of kids across the country who seem to want to be chosen for competition, and whose family and friends seem even to encourage their participation. I am not sure how dystopian this dystopia is, other than that it appears to include a military-run government, but it certainly doesn’t leave one with the impression that laying low and avoiding the event entirely should be all that difficult to do, so what’s with all these idiots wanting to get themselves killed?

But still, the book is pretty good overall. It draws interesting conclusions about survival and what drives us to surpass that which we believe to be the limits of our physical capabilities (mind over matter) and it also addresses a point that I have always been able to relate to particularly, which is that it doesn’t take much more than a simple conversation sometimes to connect with another person, and in the case of The Long Walk, that connection can come to mean the difference between life and death for its characters. At the end of it all, though, it is a book that was hard to put down, and it makes one wonder why the author—whoever he is—has not been more prolific and has never broken free from relative obscurity.
70 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Long Walk.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 5, 2013 – Shelved as: to-read
October 5, 2013 – Shelved
October 5, 2013 – Shelved as: for-kindle
Started Reading
November 10, 2013 – Finished Reading
November 11, 2013 – Shelved as: 2013
November 11, 2013 – Shelved as: reviewed

Comments Showing 1-50 of 58 (58 new)


message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

It's really a shame that there are authors like this who just fall through the cracks and never get the slightest bit of recognition for their achievements. It can be kind of heartbreaking.


Jason I suppose it happens sometimes. Given different circumstances, I really think this guy could've been a household name.


message 3: by Traveller (last edited Nov 11, 2013 11:50AM) (new)

Traveller Yes, if only he had published under a different name. It all goes to show you what's in a name... ;)

Btw, have you guys heard of J. Rubin lately? Now there's someone else who just fell through the cracks.


Jason He did not fall through the cracks; I killed him!


message 5: by Traveller (new)

Traveller I heard a rumor that Stephen King killed Robert Bachman too.

No, seriously. These literary killings are a sad thing.
I loved J. Rubin, you bastard! *sniff*

I mean it, I did love him. Why you kill J.Rubin you bastaddd?


Jason He ran out his useful life.


message 7: by Traveller (last edited Nov 11, 2013 12:54PM) (new)

Traveller Ha. I suppose you could say the same of Robert Bachman, eh. I wonder if these books by Bachman started selling more again once SK killed Bachman. I suppose they must have?


Jason I'm not sure. This book was published the year I was born and I think he "killed" Bachman a few years later.


Trudi Three stars?? Now I know there's no hope for you Morais. Why must you always miss the point and read books wrong? This is just becoming embarrassing for all parties involved.

"so what’s with all these idiots wanting to get themselves killed?"

Even though it was published post-Vietnam, King wrote this while still in college on the eve of 1968 when all shit hit all fans. An aspect of the story that has always engaged me is the boys� compulsion to join the Walk and be complicit in their own execution. I may be way off here but I suspect this is an allegory for young boys signing up to die in Vietnam. The draft, which came later, took the choice away from many, but in the beginning a lot of those boys were volunteers. Even when the war descended into a bloody quagmire, you still had some of them volunteering.

I think naivety and ignorance got a lot of the boys to The Walk, including Garraty. There’s a sense of this isn’t real, and I can’t die, even with the odds against surviving so astronomically high. Right up until the first boy gets his “ticket� many of the boys believed “the ticket� would be a white flag with the word “bang� on it. But as they find out, there is no glory in the stink and blood of senseless death, as I’m sure many a young Vietnam soldier came to understand as well. But by then it was too late.


message 10: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Peto Jason, I thought you were on a self-improvement drive lately with your reading choices. This one seems a little too fun for that. Have you given up?


message 11: by Traveller (last edited Nov 12, 2013 12:32AM) (new)

Traveller Trudi wrote: "An aspect of the story that has always engaged me is the boys� compulsion to join the Walk and be complicit in their own execution. I may be way off here but I suspect this is an allegory for young boys signing up to die in Vietnam. The draft, which came later, took the choice away from many, but in the beginning a lot of those boys were volunteers. Even when the war descended into a bloody quagmire, you still had some of them volunteering. .."

Rather excellent observations there, Trudi. Cycle back an odd 50 years, and you have boys lining up to join WW1. Cycle back another 50 years, and you had boys lining up to fight the Civil War.

...and so it goes...


Jason Trudi wrote: "Three stars?? Now I know there's no hope for you Morais. Why must you always miss the point and read books wrong? This is just becoming embarrassing for all parties involved."

It's between three and four stars. The rating is not as important as the review. But regardless, that means I liked it. You're saying I am hopeless because I only "liked" it and not "liiiiiiiiiiiiiked" it? =)

To be honest I hadn't considered the war angle. There is definitely a lot of that "why did you sign up for The Walk?" conversation among the boys but no one ever really gets far in explaining why they signed up, so I couldn't exactly empathize with their decisions. If it had been an actual war, there might have been themes of "honor in serving" or even just "fear of being seen as less of a man" but none of that was really explored so I think it's kind of a stretch to assume that's what King—I mean Bachman—was thinking about when he wrote it. But maybe.

I will repeat, though: I did like this book. What else did I read wrong? I can't remember...


Jason Jonathan wrote: "Jason, I thought you were on a self-improvement drive lately with your reading choices. This one seems a little too fun for that. Have you given up?"

SELF-IMPROVEMENT DRIVE? Oh, man. I love you, Peto, but this does not sound like anything I would ever say (or imply).

Here are some books I read this year. You tell me if this seems indicative of some sort of self-improvement drive. =)










message 14: by Traveller (new)

Traveller Hmm, sounds like similar reasons for why I hated Bachman's Rage. His writing always has an engaging style but tends to lack depth.

Jason wrote: "What else did I read wrong? I can't remember... ."

I seem to remember that you apparently missed the point of the Bulgakov, he he.
I liked your review of that, btw, bc I appreciated your honesty. Though, wow, did Kris write a good review of TM&M.


Jason Oh, Bulgakov. Fuck that guy!


message 16: by Traveller (new)

Traveller You got pages of flak for that. A bit like Keely's review of the Bible.


Jason Yeah, but I don't mind the flak. Generally because it is from people who don't know me or who have made incorrect assumptions about me based on a 400-word block of text on a screen.

So fuck them, too. =)


Trudi Jason wrote: "Trudi wrote: "You're saying I am hopeless because I only "liked" it and not "liiiiiiiiiiiiiked" it? =)..."

Yes! Drink the Kool-Aid!

"What else did I read wrong? I can't remember..."

Pfft. Just off the top of my head:
11/22/63
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks
Crooked Letter, Crooked Letter
The Book Thief

See? Hope-less. All books I gave five stars to, so you're obviously reading them wrong asshole. =)


Jason Yeah, those are mostly threes for me. Except for Henrietta. That book was a major, major disappointment.


Jason I will not pilfer your shelves to see what books YOU didn't rate high enough!

BRB.


Jason ACK! THE GREAT GATSBY!!!


Jason Friday Night Lights, Room by Emma Donohue, Something Wicked This Way Comes are three other good examples of books I loved and you did not.


Trudi Jason wrote: "Friday Night Lights, Room by Emma Donohue, Something Wicked This Way Comes are three other good examples of books I loved and you did not."

And your point? That still makes me right and you wrong.

Hey, what did you think of the movie and/or ? Have you seen either of those? I loved both to infinity (if you loved them you may be allowed to live on the same planet as me).


Trudi Jason wrote: "ACK! THE GREAT GATSBY!!!"

Gatsby can suck it. It made me want to stick hot needles in my eyes. I much prefer Tennessee Williams to F. Scott Fitzgerald.


message 25: by Traveller (last edited Nov 12, 2013 01:00PM) (new)

Traveller Jason, I don't blame you if you bring a bottle of wine with you when you visit GR, bec. you're always wrong!

Just drown your sorrows, pal, and it won't matter any more.

PS. I wonder what people would say to someone who actually likes both Tennessee Williams and Scott Fitzgerald...


message 26: by [deleted user] (new)

Trudi wrote: "Jason wrote: "ACK! THE GREAT GATSBY!!!"

Gatsby can suck it. It made me want to stick hot needles in my eyes. I much prefer Tennessee Williams to F. Scott Fitzgerald."


You are wrong, Trudi.


Jason I saw the movie and it was fine, but I really want to see the series. I was "supposed to" start it this summer but I just don't watch as much TV as I used to, so I haven't carved out the time for it. I really am looking forward to seeing it, though.


Trudi Jason wrote: "I really am looking forward to seeing it, though..."

It was very well done Jason. I think you'll enjoy it a lot. It's worth taking the time to watch it.


Trudi Anthony wrote: "You are wrong, Trudi..."

No, you are! And I dare you to come across the border and say that to my face tough guy.


message 30: by [deleted user] (new)

Trudi wrote: "Anthony wrote: "You are wrong, Trudi..."

No, you are! And I dare you to come across the border and say that to my face tough guy."


Just because no one has written or cares about the Great Canadian Novel, doesn't mean you have to take it out on us.


Trudi Anthony wrote: "Just because no one has written or cares about the Great Canadian Novel, doesn't mean you have to take it out on us..."

Oooooh, so brave from so far away. Them's are fightin' words where I'm from. Come a little closer wouldja so I can get a good smack in and knock some sense into you.

On second thought, you better stay the hell away from the border all together. You just might disappear into a special black hole we save for Americans who annoy the shit out of us. No one knows how deep it actually goes, but there's definitely still room in it for a young whippersnapper like you! And I think if you dig right to the bottom you'll find F. Scott Fitzgerald.


message 32: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Peto Jason wrote: "Jonathan wrote: "Jason, I thought you were on a self-improvement drive lately with your reading choices. This one seems a little too fun for that. Have you given up?"

SELF-IMPROVEMENT DRIVE? Oh, m..."


Forgot those. I guess I was just thinking of that whole Magic Mountain debacle.


message 33: by Steve (new)

Steve I see I've been missing out on some good fun here: Jason writing a great review (not surprisingly), friends taking him to task (not undeservingly), and speculation about this Bachman guy (almost parenthetically). I may be wrong, but wasn't he spotted at a Red Sox game not long ago?


Jason Probably. I think he holds season's tickets.


Jason I mean, "What are you talking about? He's dead."


message 36: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Peto Jason wrote: "I mean, "What are you talking about? He's dead.""

Dead? I thought he was writing under the name Joe Hill.


Jason Haha, yeah. His spirit has been reincarnated in the form of his son.

I haven't read any Joe Hill yet, though. Have you?


message 38: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Peto Jason wrote: "Haha, yeah. His spirit has been reincarnated in the form of his son.

I haven't read any Joe Hill yet, though. Have you?"


No Joe Hill under my belt yet. I've only read one King novel. Figure the son must wait.


message 39: by s.penkevich (new)

s.penkevich Bachman, that elusive bastards. He even rewrote a King book once I hear. Funny, when I read this I had the same thought 'why was it so easy to get people to join this?'. Perhaps this dystopia had some awesome facebook social media advertising the event? Shame he had to future-copy that Hunger Games... I've missed your reviews, they are the right mix of grumpy and funny that we can all benefit from.


Jason Thank you, Steve! That was a nice comment. I'm glad to hear you felt the same way about the premise. It was still a difficult-to-put-down book, though, right?

Why you too busy for Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ, Penkevich?


message 43: by Vanda (new) - added it

Vanda Hendrychová Correct me if I am wrong but Richard Bachman is a pseudonym used by Stephen King while writing his early novels...


Jason I know, Vanda. I was only joking.


message 46: by Donna (new)

Donna It's been widely known for years that Stephen King is Richard Bachman.


Jason Thank you, Donna.


message 48: by Cassie (new)

Cassie Richard Bachman is Stephen King. I'm suprised at how many people don't know this!


message 49: by Rhick Deuel (new)

Rhick Deuel Esteves Richard Bachman is Stephen King. He used this pseudonym to test the people. Whether the people buys his book because he is the writer or because it is just a great book.


message 50: by Steve (new)

Steve Jason, when you wrote: "...it makes one wonder why the author—whoever he is—has not been more prolific and has never broken free from relative obscurity," it was almost like you knew this Bachman guy was really Stephen King and that you were playfully suggesting the opposite. But since we know how literal-minded you are, with little or no sense of irony or jest, I assume you had no idea about this false identity.


« previous 1
back to top