Anne's Reviews > Conspiracy: Why the Rational Believe the Irrational
Conspiracy: Why the Rational Believe the Irrational
by
by

The Audible Original for The Great Courses is a somewhat abbreviated version of this book and well worth it if you're looking for something a bit more bite-sized. <--but still delicious!

The conspiracies covered are interesting. And I loved the way he peeled apart the difference between the "evidence" we've heard via pop culture that has propagated some of these theories into large-scale societal beliefs vs the facts that we should be looking at. Sometimes we subconsciously assume things to be true or probably true without even realizing why or how we came to that conclusion. The conspiracies are just out there in the ether with believableish sounding talking points.
The first line of defense against gullibility is to take a rational look around and try to shake our ingrained reaction toward confirmation bias.
For example, the CIA has done shady and illegal things in the past does not equal JFK was killed by the CIA, but an overwhelming number of people still believe this to be at least somewhat true.

The biggest difference I noticed between this and The Great Courses version, was that at the end of this book, it discusses how to talk to people who hold both fringe and mainstream conspiracy theories without it turning into a heated argument. Or losing relationships over the disagreements.
I really like the way Shermer is open to criticizing both sides of the political fence over their pet conspiracies. Also, that we should all be not only talking to but actively listening to people with ideas we disagree with. That's really the only way we can find the underlying causes to help us untangle the reasons behind what seems like vast gulfs of belief between family, friends, and neighbors.

Some of the more prevalent and disproven conspiracy theories tell us a lot about not only ourselves but our cultural and societal worries.
We are creatures who are hardwired to need answers. Conspiracies happen, so it's not at all crazy to stop and take a look at them. But it is important to take a look at the actual evidence and make an informed, rational, neutral decision on which ones to believe.
And it is also VERY important to look in the mirror and realize that what you would like to believe is going to make you biased. I try hard to untangle myself from my emotions when I listen to new information but I usually fail and end up with some kind of biased gut-reaction takeover of my mouth.

So that's my (belated) New Year's resolution. Shut up and listen. Take a step back. Then take a deep breath and attempt some unbiased research. Go into conversations with an open mind, and the idea that what I believe may be wrong.
I'm not, of course. Pffft. <--damn, that's a hard habit to break.
At the very least, my hope is that I'll end up with a broader understanding of the people around me, and I think this book will go a long way to helping me reach that goal.
Recommended.

The conspiracies covered are interesting. And I loved the way he peeled apart the difference between the "evidence" we've heard via pop culture that has propagated some of these theories into large-scale societal beliefs vs the facts that we should be looking at. Sometimes we subconsciously assume things to be true or probably true without even realizing why or how we came to that conclusion. The conspiracies are just out there in the ether with believableish sounding talking points.
The first line of defense against gullibility is to take a rational look around and try to shake our ingrained reaction toward confirmation bias.
For example, the CIA has done shady and illegal things in the past does not equal JFK was killed by the CIA, but an overwhelming number of people still believe this to be at least somewhat true.

The biggest difference I noticed between this and The Great Courses version, was that at the end of this book, it discusses how to talk to people who hold both fringe and mainstream conspiracy theories without it turning into a heated argument. Or losing relationships over the disagreements.
I really like the way Shermer is open to criticizing both sides of the political fence over their pet conspiracies. Also, that we should all be not only talking to but actively listening to people with ideas we disagree with. That's really the only way we can find the underlying causes to help us untangle the reasons behind what seems like vast gulfs of belief between family, friends, and neighbors.

Some of the more prevalent and disproven conspiracy theories tell us a lot about not only ourselves but our cultural and societal worries.
We are creatures who are hardwired to need answers. Conspiracies happen, so it's not at all crazy to stop and take a look at them. But it is important to take a look at the actual evidence and make an informed, rational, neutral decision on which ones to believe.
And it is also VERY important to look in the mirror and realize that what you would like to believe is going to make you biased. I try hard to untangle myself from my emotions when I listen to new information but I usually fail and end up with some kind of biased gut-reaction takeover of my mouth.

So that's my (belated) New Year's resolution. Shut up and listen. Take a step back. Then take a deep breath and attempt some unbiased research. Go into conversations with an open mind, and the idea that what I believe may be wrong.
I'm not, of course. Pffft. <--damn, that's a hard habit to break.
At the very least, my hope is that I'll end up with a broader understanding of the people around me, and I think this book will go a long way to helping me reach that goal.
Recommended.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Conspiracy.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 27, 2025
–
Started Reading
February 27, 2025
– Shelved
April 5, 2025
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Ned
(new)
-
added it
Apr 05, 2025 08:40AM

reply
|
flag


I'm worried about you, Anne.
Your interest in the psychological underpinnings of conspiracy theories seems to be soaring.
Anne wrote: "Shut up and listen. Take a step back. Then take a deep breath and attempt some unbiased research. Go into conversations with an open mind..."
A good resolution and even better advice to all of us. Especially in this extremely polemic world that social media has helped us create.
Great review. I think I would enjoy (and need) the additional lecture in the book. Does the professor give any advice on how to stop your eyes from rolling?

I'm worried about you, Anne.
Your interest in the psychological underpinnings of conspiracy theories seems to be soaring.
I think I would enjoy (and need) the additional lecture in the book. Does the professor give any advice on how to stop your eyes from rolling?
It's only TWO books! <--by the same guy and basically just the same book twice - though I didn't know that when I started it.
I am kind of on a roll, aren't I? lol
And yeah, the eye-rolling is one of my downfalls, too. I caught myself doing it the other day and had to unroll them really fast.
I think you just have to be genuinely interested in letting that other person talk. I'm not sure it makes any difference, but it can't hurt.

Anne wrote: "It's only TWO books! <--by the same guy and basically just the same book twice..."
�
More a cult thing than a conspiracy thing for you then?
”And yeah, the eye-rolling is one of my downfalls, too.�
That completely subconscious physiological response to insipid banality and/or outright stupidity has kept me firmly working class. Down with the bourgeoisie! 🙂
”I think you just have to be genuinely interested in letting that other person talk. I'm not sure it makes any difference, but it can't hurt.�
�
Genuinely? 😩
I listen…but genuinely interested? That’s tough. I actually think it would hurt.
²�
You said “genuinely interested in letting them talk� not “genuinely interested in what they have to say�. 🤔 I think I can do that…if they don’t dawdle. 🙂

I sooooo hope you are on to something with this book. I am prolly not the guy who can pull it off, but I want to believe there is a way to get the tin hatters out of their bubbles. Maybe never into mine, but anything in the way of a reasonable movement away from their extreme, would be appreciated.
At the end, it might be nice to see into a promised land where these differences can be hashed out with mutual respect. At bottom, I do not think I am the one to take them across the river.

I used to give people more credit for being smart enough to sniff out the lies. Or at least, I thought they would be open to sniffing out the lies.
I was wrong. lol
Won't be the last time.

Ahhh..,
More a cult thing than a conspiracy thing for you then?
”And yeah, the eye-rolling is one of my downfalls, too.�
That completely subconscious physiolo..."
I just thought this would be a different book. Still great! But I'd basically already listened to it as a Great Course.
This was the only other audiobook of his that was available at the time. No regrets.


Someone: [SAYS SOMETHING SKETCHY!]
Lyn: That’s interesting, I’d like to discuss this with you.
Someone: ITS THE FACTS! I SAW IT ON THE INTERNET!
Lyn: Ah, yes, thank you. Please explain further.
Someone: EXPLAIN??!! EVERBODY KNOWS ITS TRUE!!!
Lyn: Sadly, I have been omitted from the Everybody database, can you please explain?
Someone: YOU DUM ER SOMETHING??!! YOU LIVE UNDER A ROCK??!!
Lyn: An erudite observation, I do live under a rock, this one right here. Let’s try this a different way, what about what you learned on the “internet� made this believable for you?
Someone: ITS FACTS!!
Lyn: Yes, but what about this set of “facts� led you to champion this position so fervently?
Someone: THE INTERNET SAID SO!! YOU DUM ER SOMETHING??!!
Lyn: Very. Can you just break it down for me, why do you choose to believe this that you learned on the internet? Do you believe everything you see on the internet?
Someone: WELL NO! THAT WOULD BE CRAZY!! THERE’S SOME MISINFORMATION ON THE INTERNET!!
Lyn: Agreed. What led you to assign this set of facts to the believable category while rejecting those other internet facts that you have labeled misinformation?
And so on, vive la difference!

That confirmation bias sends all of us off on some tangents but they can usually be untangled to some extent - as long as you keep your cool.

Anne wrote: "I just thought this would be a different book."
I live in a glass house. I refrain from throwing stones.
A very worthwhile topic and this edition added something that the Great Courses didn’t have.
I don’t think the “actual� Great Courses has this one (or anything by Professor Shermer). 😢 However, my Audible subscription unpaused (???) so I will give a listen after I finish ‘Skeptics� Guide to American History� (which is absolutely fascinating).
(view spoiler)