Robin's Reviews > In Our Time
In Our Time (Vintage Classics)
by
by

Robin's review
bookshelves: 2025, american, literary-fiction, short-stories, literature, debut
Mar 16, 2025
bookshelves: 2025, american, literary-fiction, short-stories, literature, debut
The idea of my reviewing this collection of stories, which are classic and experimental and incalculably influential, is a bit silly.
Nothing I can possibly say will be new, or illuminating, so I won't even try, on that score. What I'll say is wow - some of these stories still hold up beautifully today, still hold an immense power.
This is the author's first collection, published in 1925, and came before his novels, and before his fame, so there is no overtly masculine posturing here. What I felt was a post war wounding, and the "iceberg theory" that is used to describe his writing. So much under the surface, much unsaid, and in a style that rejects the 19th century writers that came before him.
I read 'Indian Camp' through twice, and was brought to tears both times. I dare you to get through it dry-eyed. 'A Very Short Story' sounds like something that happened countless times to young people at the end of the war, with a decidedly unromantic return to reality. 'Big Two-Hearted River' - a vision of a soldier returned home, finding healing in nature (but none of that actually stated, buried deep under the almost plot-less images).
Certain stories feel wholly relevant, while others seem dated. This is something to see, though, it's a big part of what brought literature to where it is today.
(Besides the one about the soldier who begs Christ to help him survive, and who makes desperate promises, I could have done without the little vignettes between each story, I have to admit. Particularly the ones involving bulls and matadors. As soon as bullfighting is a thing on the page, I fall asleep. Why so much bullfighting, Ernest Hemingway? WHY?)
Nothing I can possibly say will be new, or illuminating, so I won't even try, on that score. What I'll say is wow - some of these stories still hold up beautifully today, still hold an immense power.
This is the author's first collection, published in 1925, and came before his novels, and before his fame, so there is no overtly masculine posturing here. What I felt was a post war wounding, and the "iceberg theory" that is used to describe his writing. So much under the surface, much unsaid, and in a style that rejects the 19th century writers that came before him.
I read 'Indian Camp' through twice, and was brought to tears both times. I dare you to get through it dry-eyed. 'A Very Short Story' sounds like something that happened countless times to young people at the end of the war, with a decidedly unromantic return to reality. 'Big Two-Hearted River' - a vision of a soldier returned home, finding healing in nature (but none of that actually stated, buried deep under the almost plot-less images).
Certain stories feel wholly relevant, while others seem dated. This is something to see, though, it's a big part of what brought literature to where it is today.
(Besides the one about the soldier who begs Christ to help him survive, and who makes desperate promises, I could have done without the little vignettes between each story, I have to admit. Particularly the ones involving bulls and matadors. As soon as bullfighting is a thing on the page, I fall asleep. Why so much bullfighting, Ernest Hemingway? WHY?)
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
In Our Time.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Diane
(new)
-
added it
Mar 16, 2025 10:59AM

reply
|
flag



Diane, thanks so much for sharing this story with me - I don't think I'd heard it before! He's definitely the person I'd expect to win such a contest. Thinking on it, I think it's actually brave to write (or under-write) the way he did. There's this pressure a writer can feel, to make sure the reader understands everything, and I think it can be a mistake to explain it. Hemingway definitely doesn't make that mistake.
I think this might be a collection you could appreciate. My macho-radar didn't go off, not once, although, as I said, the bullfighting vignettes were tiresome -- but easily skipped over. :)

Your reading experience really speaks to the powerful nature of these stories, Dave! I love hearing that.

Thanks so much, Bonnie. It's been many years since I'd read Hemingway (I should mark The Old Man and the Sea for a re-read), so it was great to re-visit his work. It's at once of a time, and also timeless - or even modern - in style, if not subject matter.
You put it so well when you point out that he was so young and yet got so much right. I'm smitten anew by what he was able to capture. Sort of like Philip Roth, who was a baby adult when he penned the brilliant Goodbye Columbus. I am amazed by what these young authors accomplished... I was such a dimwit at the same age!




Thank you Lorna! Hope you enjoy and appreciate it as I did!

I see you weren't a big fan of this collection Laysee! Maybe the bull-fighting tipped the scales? :) Thanks so much for your comment, it's always so nice to see you here.

Sorry to hear about the Cardinals, Javier! Yes, let it out, read 'Indian Camp'. If you end up reading him, let me know what you think!