Candi's Reviews > Crush
Crush
by
by

“Adults deal in moral ambiguity. Never hurting people or getting hurt is impossible if you’re living an honest life.�
This is a challenging book to review. Not because it was difficult to read. Mainly because my enjoyment of it had more to do with how I approached it than anything else. If I look at it from the standpoint of a novel (which it is), I’d expect some excellent character development and a compelling story arc. Personally, I couldn’t claim this to excel on those merits alone. Instead, I approached this as what I like to call an “ideas� book, much like I did Rachel Cusk’s Outline. Don’t get me wrong, however. I’m not comparing Cusk with Ada Calhoun. Come to think of it, Miranda July’s book All Fours comes to mind as well. July and Calhoun are both dealing with middle-aged, married women that balance thriving careers with motherhood. The marriages are pretty successful, at least as far as these women can tell when compared to how they view other marriages. Both novels examine what happens when these women explore their needs and desires. July’s book did it better, but this one was pretty damn interesting to me as well. The narrator’s friend best encapsulates the question at the heart of this novel:
“You have to ask: If this was my last year alive, how would I want to spend it? If I had thirty years? If you’re saying ‘Things are good enough � why should I blow them up?� The answer is because ‘good enough� should not be the goal,� she said. “We didn’t work this hard� � by “we� I sensed she meant women � “to be fine.�
This is a first-person narrative and the voice of the protagonist kept me well engaged. You might find this a bit pretentious, as she throws around quotes from other writers and philosophers like your local Rotary Club throws candy at parade-goers. They just keep coming. Yet, I found myself highlighting the hell out of this. Marilynn Robinson, Michel de Montaigne, Graham Greene, Rabindranath Tagore, and Ortega y Gasset were a just a few of those I flagged in my copy (Robinson and Greene being the only ones I’ve personally read). Sometimes, while being clever, she also made me smile a bit.
“I wanted to send word to my generational cohort: Don’t we make our own cages? When we rattle the bars don’t we often find that they are made of cardboard? That we’ve cut them out for ourselves with X-ACTO knives? Look! We are free! We have nothing to lose but our PTA membership!�
What happens when you find that deep connection? What do you do about a marriage that is plodding along ‘just fine�? Our narrator tries to answer those questions. What she concludes, well, you’d have to read this to find out. In the meantime, I’m super curious about Calhoun’s non-fiction work.
“So what does a true happy ending look like? I think it’s always a surprise.�
This is a challenging book to review. Not because it was difficult to read. Mainly because my enjoyment of it had more to do with how I approached it than anything else. If I look at it from the standpoint of a novel (which it is), I’d expect some excellent character development and a compelling story arc. Personally, I couldn’t claim this to excel on those merits alone. Instead, I approached this as what I like to call an “ideas� book, much like I did Rachel Cusk’s Outline. Don’t get me wrong, however. I’m not comparing Cusk with Ada Calhoun. Come to think of it, Miranda July’s book All Fours comes to mind as well. July and Calhoun are both dealing with middle-aged, married women that balance thriving careers with motherhood. The marriages are pretty successful, at least as far as these women can tell when compared to how they view other marriages. Both novels examine what happens when these women explore their needs and desires. July’s book did it better, but this one was pretty damn interesting to me as well. The narrator’s friend best encapsulates the question at the heart of this novel:
“You have to ask: If this was my last year alive, how would I want to spend it? If I had thirty years? If you’re saying ‘Things are good enough � why should I blow them up?� The answer is because ‘good enough� should not be the goal,� she said. “We didn’t work this hard� � by “we� I sensed she meant women � “to be fine.�
This is a first-person narrative and the voice of the protagonist kept me well engaged. You might find this a bit pretentious, as she throws around quotes from other writers and philosophers like your local Rotary Club throws candy at parade-goers. They just keep coming. Yet, I found myself highlighting the hell out of this. Marilynn Robinson, Michel de Montaigne, Graham Greene, Rabindranath Tagore, and Ortega y Gasset were a just a few of those I flagged in my copy (Robinson and Greene being the only ones I’ve personally read). Sometimes, while being clever, she also made me smile a bit.
“I wanted to send word to my generational cohort: Don’t we make our own cages? When we rattle the bars don’t we often find that they are made of cardboard? That we’ve cut them out for ourselves with X-ACTO knives? Look! We are free! We have nothing to lose but our PTA membership!�
What happens when you find that deep connection? What do you do about a marriage that is plodding along ‘just fine�? Our narrator tries to answer those questions. What she concludes, well, you’d have to read this to find out. In the meantime, I’m super curious about Calhoun’s non-fiction work.
“So what does a true happy ending look like? I think it’s always a surprise.�
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Crush.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
March 6, 2025
–
Started Reading
March 6, 2025
– Shelved
March 6, 2025
– Shelved as:
contemporary-literary
March 13, 2025
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-46 of 46 (46 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Linda
(new)
Mar 23, 2025 08:07AM

reply
|
flag





I'm glad I mentioned those authors, Bonnie. It would be hard for me to guess who would like this and who would want to throw it across the room! And I do adore Marilynn Robinson a whole lot! I've read Gilead pre-GR and Lila since joining GR. I've also read Housekeeping which I loved too!

Thanks a bunch, Bianca! It's payback time for the books you've made me add! ;) :)

Oh good! She is amazing. I must have misread your review and thought you had not read Robison. Lila and Home are my favorites, but I love them all.

Laura, I took the "work" to be more along the lines of the fight for women's rights. The work that has been done to get to the point women are at now, even if there is more work to be done. But of course, there was no context with that quote here, I guess! I just liked it and highlighted it. As far as a marriage being 'fine', I assume everyone has their own definition and that was what this particular protagonist was struggling with. Her marriage wasn't all conventional though, I'd say!

I believe these women were in their forties, Pedro. I know! I'm not particularly fond of that term now :D

I really appreciate you, Fionnuala! These days, I'm struggling to review at all, actually. But I want to get something out there and highlight a bit of the good and the bad where I can :) I'm pleased you still keep coming back for more ;) :)

I appreciate this quote, since what sets us up for happiness is different for each of us, and continually changes.
I also think the endings of stories are the beginnings of new ones, so who knows where they "end."

Thanks so much, Cheryl! :)

Thank you, Diane! I don't blame you one bit! Pleased you enjoyed the quotes though :)


I appreciate this quote, since what sets us up for happiness is different for each of us, and continually changes.
I ..."
I agree with you about happiness, Lisa! And hoping you're right about endings being the start of new stories. Thanks, my friend. :)

This is another one that caught my eye on the bookshelf, K! Otherwise, I hadn't been aware of it previously. I really hope you read All Fours and report back to me! I'd be so interested to hear what you think - whether positive or negative :) Happy you liked my metaphor! Thanks so much!

Ha! I tried, Pedro! :D

Thank you, Peter! :D


It was indeed a bit of guilty pleasure, Jennifer! :D I don't think, however, that this book would have mass appeal. Calhoun is very clever and may even border on pretentious for some when she throws around so many other literary references. It's not hard to read, but definitely a notch or two above The Help. Having said that, I'd not know for sure which of my friends would actually enjoy this! :)


I was going to write more but I just found a gob of dog hair in my coffee cup. Yuck.

Now I know why I was scorned! No PTA membership here though I was room parent or team parent (or both) in school and religious school for roughly 13 years straight.

Thank you very much, Ilse! I too love when other literary quotes and references are thrown into another writer's work. It just piques my interest in some of those other authors even more :) And yes, I absolutely read to hear a variety of voices that aren't like my own at all sometimes!

It definitely had my mind in some deep thought, Laysee! Thanks for your kind support, friend. It's always appreciated :)

I don't think she was implying it was necessarily a bad thing to be a card-carrying PTA member, Justin ;) However, she probably aligns it with a more conventional life, and therefore an unconventional life might be under scrutiny from some of these PTA women (and men.)
I hope your Saturday morning coffee is more palatable! :D :D

Ha, yes—when stories hits me so personally, I also feel I've no idea who else would like them, Candi. But at least this audience has a good chance of appreciating those literary references, lol.



Thanks a bunch, Antoinette! It does make one reflect on personal situations for sure. I can always appreciate that too! :)

Thank you, Wyndy! I enjoyed many of those little snippets that Calhoun shared with us :)


Thanks a bunch, Markus! I've thought about that 12 months to live quote a whole lot. The other day, a friend mentioned that we are the authors of our own stories. I liked that in conjunction with that quote :) Lots to think about there!