Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

David Katzman's Reviews > His Dark Materials

His Dark Materials by Philip Pullman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1444651
's review

it was ok

This review only applies to book 1: The Golden Compass

Growing up with an addiction to Dungeons & Dragons and reading through my town library's entire Science Fiction and Fantasy section before I was sixteen has left me with a life-long proclivity for the fantastic. Some of my favorite novels manage to combine the highly literary (or experimental) with the fantastical. I'm willing to take a chance on books considered straight fantasy or science fiction, but I haven't been making the best choices this year other than Kraken. I gave Golden Compass a chance having found that many GR folks including friends have given it top marks. I didn't realize it was considered YA fiction nor had I seen the movie.

Frankly, I was underwhelmed. I had expected the next Lord of the Rings and this was nowhere near the sophistication of that work.

First to the good:

I appreciated a certain feminist sensibility that surrounded the main character, Lyra. Early on in the book it was directly called out that females were "not permitted" to enter the private club area of the college where she was raised...but she snuck into it anyway, ignoring the rules. And this event led to all that followed. She was a clever street smart girl who despite her diminutive size and youth is directly responsible for saving the day. She is the heroine through determination, compassion, and wit.

I felt enough urgency in the plot to want to know "what happens next." It kept me reading.

The Gyptian tribal people demonstrate a certain level of "town hall" democracy in their decision-making process. It was nice to see the sort of communal Q&A between leader and individuals that doesn't happen in our society. Although, they still had a leader, he seemed to rule more by moral strength and fairness than by force or even by convention.

Now to the not-as-good:

I did not get the deep believability from the characters that the best writers manage to create. I never bonded with the main character nor her friends to the extent that they felt real. Neither did the villains of the piece. They seemed even more exaggerated and one dimensional than the rest.

The Gyptian tribe seemed rather like a cross between Gypsies and Native Americans, and they were a bit too "perfect." As in, the noble savage.

Occasionally weak logistics. By that I mean, when a writer needs to create an actual physical experience such as a fight or moving a character through a house, they must deal with logistics. Describing the actions in a way that allows the reader to visualize the event without bogging it down without too many words and mucking up the pace of the narrative. At times, I found Pullman's logistics awkward or vague. Distances were unclear and timing was off.

Some of the relationships felt forced. Lyra manages to convince a warrior bear to join her quest and before you know it she "loves" him (in a platonic way). The build of this love was not very convincing--it seemed more like a device contrived by the author in order to increase the drama and emotional weight of the danger experienced by the bear.

Lastly, I'll comment on the accusation of "anti-Christianity" some have leveled at this book. I was really looking forward to some bold blasphemy but found nothing of the kind. The book seems to actually endorse the premise that literal souls exist although it manifests our souls as visible spirit animals bonded to each human. There is a running theme through the book that the fictional Church is trying to hide certain revelations that might bring into question orthodox religious doctrine. And they are willing to do cruel and violent things to hide them. But this doesn't call into question religious beliefs so much as it simply accuses a religious institution of corruption. Even Roman Catholics recognize that their church has done horrible things in the past such as endorsing the burning of witches and so-on. Popes have fathered kids. Priests have molested kids, and the church covered it up. But all that doesn't necessarily invalidate Christianity so much as certain institutional behavior. So overall, nothing much to get excited about there. Although, I am modestly curious whether Pullman will go further in the subsequent books, I did not find this compelling enough to read further. End of story.
21 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read His Dark Materials.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 11, 2013 – Started Reading
October 11, 2013 – Shelved
Finished Reading
October 18, 2013 –
page 300
32.15% "Debating whether to continue on to Book 2 because Book 1 was underwhelming."

Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Caroline (new)

Caroline Good review, David. I saw the movie in theaters and thought it was nicely done but have no real desire to read these books.


David Katzman Thanks, Caroline! Someone who saw the movie and read the books told me the books were definitely better and more adult for what that's worth. But I felt there was an overall lack of sophistication that would prevent this from rising to a fantasy masterpiece.

When's the next book in the Magician King trilogy coming out?!?!? :-)


message 3: by Caroline (new)

Caroline David wrote: "When's the next book in the Magician King trilogy coming out?!?!? :-)"

In 2014! I'm so excited! It's The Magician's Land. I follow Grossman on Twitter, so I'm up on these things. :D :D


David Katzman You rock. Thanks for enlightening me! I hope he doesn't have any product placement in this third installment. :-)


message 5: by Caroline (new)

Caroline David wrote: "You rock. Thanks for enlightening me! I hope he doesn't have any product placement in this third installment. :-)"

You're welcome. I hope the third one doesn't disappoint. I must have blocked out past product placement. :/ I can't even remember there being any in the other books, but ugh. Really? Just no.


message 6: by David (last edited Nov 14, 2013 06:39AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

David Katzman Haha. Yeah, I called it on in my review... /review/show...


message 7: by Caroline (last edited Nov 14, 2013 06:53AM) (new)

Caroline Something's wrong with the link, but I'll go look it up. I'm curious about this.


David Katzman I fixed it. Try again! :-)


message 9: by Caroline (last edited Nov 14, 2013 06:58AM) (new)

Caroline I just read it and commented! Good review; I don't know why I never saw your review of that the first time. O.o It's interesting to see that the second book has an overall higher rating here on GR than the first book does. People really SLAMMED the first book. :|

ETA: This is so irritating; my "like" for THIS review keeps disappearing. WTH


David Katzman That is so weird!?!?


message 11: by Caroline (new)

Caroline David wrote: "That is so weird!?!?"

It's happened before too. GR has so many bugs it's ridiculous. >:[


David Katzman perhaps you should email the help service about that glitch.


message 13: by Caroline (new)

Caroline David wrote: "perhaps you should email the help service about that glitch."

Oh, there's probably already a thread or 3 about it in the Feedback group. :| I'm sure they're "working on it."


David Katzman lol. I guess they have their hands full with all the controversies around censorship.


message 15: by Clif (new)

Clif I'm a failure at fantasy/SF. You have to be able to let go and engage with whatever the fantastic may be yet at the same time retain a critical facility. Too often, I would early on be saying "this is ridiculous!" and toss the book aside. It's much easier for me to engage with a SF movie, maybe because it is a 2 hour waste at most and the special effects always divert from even the worst story, even allowing one to endure, say, Tom Cruise.


David Katzman Hah! I can't explain where the suspension of reality gene comes from, but it goes back to children's stories, fairytales, cartoons...I guess it either stays with you or it doesn't.

You might dip your toe into some stories that are only set marginally in the future. Perhaps Cryptonomicon by Neal Stephenson, which is half historical fiction and half...just slightly in the future. Actually, by now, it's caught up to the present. Just a thought. There are some sci fi books that are what is called hard-sci fi that don't have fantastical elements at all and that involve feasible technology. But at any rate, I lean more toward fantasy than sci fi anyway. I think I really enjoy the creative aspect of inventing worlds. They call it "world building" in writer's jargon. Some authors can create very rich and believable worlds.


message 17: by Clif (last edited Nov 14, 2013 09:13PM) (new)

Clif Going just one step beyond...I think that's why 2001, A Space Odyssey was so impressive - it all seemed so real, so plausible with the added excitement of trying to figure out along with the characters what the monoliths were, and then the wonderful element of Hal acting on its own. Both the book and movie are masterpieces that don't age.


David Katzman True. A classic.


message 19: by Olivier (new)

Olivier Delaye Dammit, I just got the audiobook.... guess I ll have to make my own opinion;-)


David Katzman Haha! Sorry, Olivier! Don't let my opinion spoil it for you. Many people have loved it, and every review is subjective. It just didn't do it for me.

Btw, could I ask how much you paid for the audiobook? I'm working on an audiobook version of my second novel, and I have no idea what a fair price is.


message 21: by Olivier (new)

Olivier Delaye David wrote: "Haha! Sorry, Olivier! Don't let my opinion spoil it for you. Many people have loved it, and every review is subjective. It just didn't do it for me.

Btw, could I ask how much you paid for the audi..."


Sure thing. I bought it in Paris, France, for EUR25, which is quite okay in my opinion especially when you know that the narrator is Philip Pullman himself!


message 22: by Jenbebookish (new)

Jenbebookish First of all, I love your reviews. Sharp and succinct!

So all the rage about the supposedly blasphemous nature of this book was in my opinion founded. Clearly Phillip Pullman intended for The Magisterium/The Authority to serve as an allegory to church/religion. (In my mind, it was the Catholic church.) But in general, like you said, it was more anti-religion than specifically anti-God or anti-spirituality. So while he seems to, like you said, propagate the concept of a soul and spirituality, there is still some clear stance against organized religion which ultimately is enough to cause a ruckus amongst people committed to any church. I'm not saying that I agree, only that it made sense to me after reading it that certain conservatives or zealots would blow things out of proportion and focus on the obvious anti-religion aspects.

Though in my opinion, despite being artfully woven into the story so as not to detract from the storyline, those concepts/theories/philosophies have no business being in a book written for children! But even so, I thought the book was great! I sort of separated myself from that aspect and didn't pay much attention to it beyond what was necessary for the story and of course I agree with you that compared to Lord of the Rings....well, it just doesn't compare! But not much can. But for something written for teens, and compared to all the other smut and mindless, unskilled writing that is out there in the YA/TF genre I think it holds up pretty well!!


David Katzman Thanks, Jen!

Appreciate your comments and thank you much for commenting. I still don't think it's really what I would call "blasphemous." There are highly respected theologians who criticize church opinions or behavior. I know a few Catholics who call themselves ala-carte Catholics--they pick and choose what to follow because they think certain things (like birth control, or what have you) are bullshit. They use their own judgement as to what "God" might really care about. I agree with you that it felt like the Catholic Church, which is only one aspect of Christianity. Well, you can go back to Martin Luther and he criticized the hell out of the Roman Catholic Church. (So to speak.) See that was little blasphemous. ;-) And I'm sure many RCs called him a blasphemer. But I don't think you could call him a blasphemer so match as a critic.

I am midly curious what happens in the later books, but to me the metaphor is highly ambiguous in this first book. And to me, didn't sound like criticism of Christianity (the whole metaphor of separating a kid from their soul animal? well, of COURSE that's bad!) so much as criticism of being cruel in the name of religion. Institutional behavior that can be leveled at many institutions, really. Government or corporations, too.

I guess I haven't read enough of that smut and mindless material to know how this stands up against other YA books! :-) Maybe I need to read more smut and then my standards would be lower.


message 24: by Alejandra (new)

Alejandra García In my opinion this trilogy is a master piece, and definitely not for children or even young adults. The way he handles the anti-religion and faith is beautiful and really gets you thinking. By the way the movie is not even half of the first book, they didn't shoot the rest or the other two books for obvious reasons. I loved this books


David Katzman Glad you enjoyed it, I just found it clunky. Everyone has their own reaction to literature. Cheers.


message 26: by [deleted user] (new)

I just read all three books. I didn't care for the series either. I liked the first book, but than my opinions changed after the second and third books.


David Katzman What went south for you, Morgan?


message 28: by [deleted user] (new)

David wrote: "What went south for you, Morgan?"

The tone and structure. Wrote a review a few days ago.


back to top